Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zambam, Neuro José
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Baldissera, Wellington Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878
Resumo: Society has perceived with great interest the reactions of the Brazilian Higher Election Court (HEC) with regard to the phenomenon of fake news in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election in 2018. The following question may be made: Is such positioning the most adequate for the strengthening of democracy in Brazil? Current analysis of the 2018 resolutions is based on Sen´s freedom concept. It has been stated that careful positions are adequate and society should verify facts permanently. The right to the exercise of freedom of expression is fundamental to prevent and fight against fake news. Juridical intervention is justified when the activity wrecks the credibility of the electoral process and the people fall into serious mistakes.
id UNICESU-0_87ee4a364e9f9db2f7d23d774dd3fefa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7878
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya SenFake News y Democracia: un análisis a partir de los juzgados del Tribunal Superior Electoral en 2018 y de la percepción de Amartya SenFake News e Democracia: uma análise a partir dos julgados do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral em 2018 e da visão de Amartya SenDemocracyFake NewsFreedom of speech;Amartya SenDemocraciaFake NewsLibertad de expresiónAmartya SenDemocraciaFake NewsAmartya SenLiberdade de expressãoDireitoSociety has perceived with great interest the reactions of the Brazilian Higher Election Court (HEC) with regard to the phenomenon of fake news in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election in 2018. The following question may be made: Is such positioning the most adequate for the strengthening of democracy in Brazil? Current analysis of the 2018 resolutions is based on Sen´s freedom concept. It has been stated that careful positions are adequate and society should verify facts permanently. The right to the exercise of freedom of expression is fundamental to prevent and fight against fake news. Juridical intervention is justified when the activity wrecks the credibility of the electoral process and the people fall into serious mistakes. Distintas instancias de la sociedad observaron con atención la actuación del TSE en relación al fenómeno de las fake news en las elecciones presidenciales brasileñas de 2018. Surge la siguiente interrogación: ¿Tales posicionamientos son los más adecuados al fortalecimiento de la democracia brasileña? Esta investigación es un análisis de las resoluciones de 2018 anclada en la concepción de libertad en Sen. Se afirma que posiciones cautelosas son adecuadas y la sociedad necesita buscar el esclarecimiento permanente de los hechos. El derecho al ejercicio de la libertad de expresión es esencial para prevenir y combatir las fake news. La intervención judicial se justifica cuando tal acción afecta la credibilidad del proceso electoral y la populación incurre en graves errores.Diversas instâncias da sociedade observaram atentas a atuação do TSE em relação ao fenômeno das fake news nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras de 2018. Surge a seguinte interrogação: Tais posicionamentos são os mais adequados para o fortalecimento da democracia brasileira? Esta investigação é uma análise das resoluções de 2018 amparada na concepção de liberdade em Sen. Afirma-se que posições cautelosas são adequadas e a sociedade precisa buscar o esclarecimento permanente dos fatos. O direito ao exercício da liberdade de expressão é essencial para prevenir e combater as fake news. A intervenção judicial justifica-se quando tal ação abala a credibilidade do processo eleitoral e a população incorre em graves enganos.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2020-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexto application/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/787810.17765/2176-9184.2019v19n3p853-873Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 19 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 853-8732176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878/6190Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZambam, Neuro JoséBaldissera, Wellington Antonio2022-04-14T13:10:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7878Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-04-14T13:10:06Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
Fake News y Democracia: un análisis a partir de los juzgados del Tribunal Superior Electoral en 2018 y de la percepción de Amartya Sen
Fake News e Democracia: uma análise a partir dos julgados do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral em 2018 e da visão de Amartya Sen
title Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
spellingShingle Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
Zambam, Neuro José
Democracy
Fake News
Freedom of speech;
Amartya Sen
Democracia
Fake News
Libertad de expresión
Amartya Sen
Democracia
Fake News
Amartya Sen
Liberdade de expressão
Direito
title_short Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
title_full Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
title_fullStr Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
title_full_unstemmed Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
title_sort Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
author Zambam, Neuro José
author_facet Zambam, Neuro José
Baldissera, Wellington Antonio
author_role author
author2 Baldissera, Wellington Antonio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zambam, Neuro José
Baldissera, Wellington Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy
Fake News
Freedom of speech;
Amartya Sen
Democracia
Fake News
Libertad de expresión
Amartya Sen
Democracia
Fake News
Amartya Sen
Liberdade de expressão
Direito
topic Democracy
Fake News
Freedom of speech;
Amartya Sen
Democracia
Fake News
Libertad de expresión
Amartya Sen
Democracia
Fake News
Amartya Sen
Liberdade de expressão
Direito
description Society has perceived with great interest the reactions of the Brazilian Higher Election Court (HEC) with regard to the phenomenon of fake news in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election in 2018. The following question may be made: Is such positioning the most adequate for the strengthening of democracy in Brazil? Current analysis of the 2018 resolutions is based on Sen´s freedom concept. It has been stated that careful positions are adequate and society should verify facts permanently. The right to the exercise of freedom of expression is fundamental to prevent and fight against fake news. Juridical intervention is justified when the activity wrecks the credibility of the electoral process and the people fall into serious mistakes.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878
10.17765/2176-9184.2019v19n3p853-873
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2019v19n3p853-873
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878/6190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 19 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 853-873
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042388104478720

Registros relacionados