Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878 |
Resumo: | Society has perceived with great interest the reactions of the Brazilian Higher Election Court (HEC) with regard to the phenomenon of fake news in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election in 2018. The following question may be made: Is such positioning the most adequate for the strengthening of democracy in Brazil? Current analysis of the 2018 resolutions is based on Sen´s freedom concept. It has been stated that careful positions are adequate and society should verify facts permanently. The right to the exercise of freedom of expression is fundamental to prevent and fight against fake news. Juridical intervention is justified when the activity wrecks the credibility of the electoral process and the people fall into serious mistakes. |
id |
UNICESU-0_87ee4a364e9f9db2f7d23d774dd3fefa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7878 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya SenFake News y Democracia: un análisis a partir de los juzgados del Tribunal Superior Electoral en 2018 y de la percepción de Amartya SenFake News e Democracia: uma análise a partir dos julgados do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral em 2018 e da visão de Amartya SenDemocracyFake NewsFreedom of speech;Amartya SenDemocraciaFake NewsLibertad de expresiónAmartya SenDemocraciaFake NewsAmartya SenLiberdade de expressãoDireitoSociety has perceived with great interest the reactions of the Brazilian Higher Election Court (HEC) with regard to the phenomenon of fake news in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election in 2018. The following question may be made: Is such positioning the most adequate for the strengthening of democracy in Brazil? Current analysis of the 2018 resolutions is based on Sen´s freedom concept. It has been stated that careful positions are adequate and society should verify facts permanently. The right to the exercise of freedom of expression is fundamental to prevent and fight against fake news. Juridical intervention is justified when the activity wrecks the credibility of the electoral process and the people fall into serious mistakes. Distintas instancias de la sociedad observaron con atención la actuación del TSE en relación al fenómeno de las fake news en las elecciones presidenciales brasileñas de 2018. Surge la siguiente interrogación: ¿Tales posicionamientos son los más adecuados al fortalecimiento de la democracia brasileña? Esta investigación es un análisis de las resoluciones de 2018 anclada en la concepción de libertad en Sen. Se afirma que posiciones cautelosas son adecuadas y la sociedad necesita buscar el esclarecimiento permanente de los hechos. El derecho al ejercicio de la libertad de expresión es esencial para prevenir y combatir las fake news. La intervención judicial se justifica cuando tal acción afecta la credibilidad del proceso electoral y la populación incurre en graves errores.Diversas instâncias da sociedade observaram atentas a atuação do TSE em relação ao fenômeno das fake news nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras de 2018. Surge a seguinte interrogação: Tais posicionamentos são os mais adequados para o fortalecimento da democracia brasileira? Esta investigação é uma análise das resoluções de 2018 amparada na concepção de liberdade em Sen. Afirma-se que posições cautelosas são adequadas e a sociedade precisa buscar o esclarecimento permanente dos fatos. O direito ao exercício da liberdade de expressão é essencial para prevenir e combater as fake news. A intervenção judicial justifica-se quando tal ação abala a credibilidade do processo eleitoral e a população incorre em graves enganos.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2020-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexto application/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/787810.17765/2176-9184.2019v19n3p853-873Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 19 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 853-8732176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878/6190Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZambam, Neuro JoséBaldissera, Wellington Antonio2022-04-14T13:10:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7878Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-04-14T13:10:06Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen Fake News y Democracia: un análisis a partir de los juzgados del Tribunal Superior Electoral en 2018 y de la percepción de Amartya Sen Fake News e Democracia: uma análise a partir dos julgados do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral em 2018 e da visão de Amartya Sen |
title |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen |
spellingShingle |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen Zambam, Neuro José Democracy Fake News Freedom of speech; Amartya Sen Democracia Fake News Libertad de expresión Amartya Sen Democracia Fake News Amartya Sen Liberdade de expressão Direito |
title_short |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen |
title_full |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen |
title_fullStr |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen |
title_sort |
Fake News and Democracy: analysis of cases from the Higher Election Court in 2018 and from the point of view of Amartya Sen |
author |
Zambam, Neuro José |
author_facet |
Zambam, Neuro José Baldissera, Wellington Antonio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Baldissera, Wellington Antonio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zambam, Neuro José Baldissera, Wellington Antonio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democracy Fake News Freedom of speech; Amartya Sen Democracia Fake News Libertad de expresión Amartya Sen Democracia Fake News Amartya Sen Liberdade de expressão Direito |
topic |
Democracy Fake News Freedom of speech; Amartya Sen Democracia Fake News Libertad de expresión Amartya Sen Democracia Fake News Amartya Sen Liberdade de expressão Direito |
description |
Society has perceived with great interest the reactions of the Brazilian Higher Election Court (HEC) with regard to the phenomenon of fake news in the 2018 Brazilian presidential election in 2018. The following question may be made: Is such positioning the most adequate for the strengthening of democracy in Brazil? Current analysis of the 2018 resolutions is based on Sen´s freedom concept. It has been stated that careful positions are adequate and society should verify facts permanently. The right to the exercise of freedom of expression is fundamental to prevent and fight against fake news. Juridical intervention is justified when the activity wrecks the credibility of the electoral process and the people fall into serious mistakes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878 10.17765/2176-9184.2019v19n3p853-873 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2019v19n3p853-873 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/7878/6190 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 19 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 853-873 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042388104478720 |