The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204 |
Resumo: | International law offers to the international community several types of international instruments, and not all of them have been fully explored by doctrine. In this context, the present article aims to reexamine the analysis proposed by Jan Klabbers in his book “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” on administrative agreements, which in our legislation are called “interinstitutional agreements” (IA). In this sense, four criticisms that Klabbers raises about such types of agreements will be reviewed: i) the open texture of the definition of the State in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT); ii) the rejection of the hypothesis about the international subjectivity of public entities and the existence of a third legal order different from domestic law and international law; iii) the difficulties of reconciling IAs with the theory of international responsibility and; iv) the ease of repudiation of administrative agreements. Following this purpose, the article explores solutions to the main problems identified by the Dutch jurist, reviewing these dilemmas through the case of the Peruvian AI, using an analytical methodology. |
id |
UNICESU-0_d6debfc4b261752b799d6a9c27244240 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11204 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of KlabbersEl Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de KlabbersEl Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de KlabbersInterinstitutional agreementSubject of international lawPublic entityInternational lawInternational responsibilityAcuerdo interinstitucionalSujeto de derecho internacionalEntidad públicaDerecho internacionalResponsabilidad internacionalAcuerdo interinstitucionalSujeto de derecho internacionalEntidad públicaDerecho internacionalResponsabilidad internacionalInternational law offers to the international community several types of international instruments, and not all of them have been fully explored by doctrine. In this context, the present article aims to reexamine the analysis proposed by Jan Klabbers in his book “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” on administrative agreements, which in our legislation are called “interinstitutional agreements” (IA). In this sense, four criticisms that Klabbers raises about such types of agreements will be reviewed: i) the open texture of the definition of the State in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT); ii) the rejection of the hypothesis about the international subjectivity of public entities and the existence of a third legal order different from domestic law and international law; iii) the difficulties of reconciling IAs with the theory of international responsibility and; iv) the ease of repudiation of administrative agreements. Following this purpose, the article explores solutions to the main problems identified by the Dutch jurist, reviewing these dilemmas through the case of the Peruvian AI, using an analytical methodology. El derecho internacional ofrece a la comunidad internacional varios tipos de instrumentos internacionales, y no todos han sido explorados completamente por la doctrina. En ese contexto, el presente artículo tiene como objetivo reexaminar el análisis planteado por Jan Klabbers en su libro “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” sobre los administrative agreements, que en la legislación peruana reciben el nombre de “acuerdos interinstitucionales” (AI). En ese sentido, se revisarán cuatro críticas que Klabbers plantea sobre tales tipos de acuerdos: i) la textura abierta de la definición de Estado en la Convención de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados (CVDT); ii) el rechazo hacia la hipótesis sobre la subjetividad internacional de las entidades públicas y la existencia de un tercer orden jurídico distinto al derecho interno y al derecho internacional; iii) las dificultades de reconciliar los AI con la teoría de la responsabilidad internacional; y iv) la facilidad de repudio de los administrative agreements. Siguiendo este propósito, el artículo explora soluciones a los principales problemas identificados por el jurista holandés, revisando esos dilemas a través del caso del AI peruano, mediante una metodología analítica.El derecho internacional ofrece a la comunidad internacional varios tipos de instrumentos internacionales, y no todos han sido explorados completamente por la doctrina. En ese contexto, el presente artículo tiene como objetivo reexaminar el análisis planteado por Jan Klabbers en su libro “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” sobre los administrative agreements, que en la legislación peruana reciben el nombre de “acuerdos interinstitucionales” (AI). En ese sentido, se revisarán cuatro críticas que Klabbers plantea sobre tales tipos de acuerdos: i) la textura abierta de la definición de Estado en la Convención de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados (CVDT); ii) el rechazo hacia la hipótesis sobre la subjetividad internacional de las entidades públicas y la existencia de un tercer orden jurídico distinto al derecho interno y al derecho internacional; iii) las dificultades de reconciliar los AI con la teoría de la responsabilidad internacional; y iv) la facilidad de repudio de los administrative agreements. Siguiendo este propósito, el artículo explora soluciones a los principales problemas identificados por el jurista holandés, revisando esos dilemas a través del caso del AI peruano, mediante una metodología analítica. Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2022-10-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1120410.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11204Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; 461-4762176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204/7192Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosales Zamora, Pablo César2022-10-05T20:51:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11204Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-10-05T20:51:26Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers El Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de Klabbers El Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de Klabbers |
title |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers |
spellingShingle |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers Rosales Zamora, Pablo César Interinstitutional agreement Subject of international law Public entity International law International responsibility Acuerdo interinstitucional Sujeto de derecho internacional Entidad pública Derecho internacional Responsabilidad internacional Acuerdo interinstitucional Sujeto de derecho internacional Entidad pública Derecho internacional Responsabilidad internacional |
title_short |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers |
title_full |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers |
title_fullStr |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers |
title_sort |
The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers |
author |
Rosales Zamora, Pablo César |
author_facet |
Rosales Zamora, Pablo César |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosales Zamora, Pablo César |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interinstitutional agreement Subject of international law Public entity International law International responsibility Acuerdo interinstitucional Sujeto de derecho internacional Entidad pública Derecho internacional Responsabilidad internacional Acuerdo interinstitucional Sujeto de derecho internacional Entidad pública Derecho internacional Responsabilidad internacional |
topic |
Interinstitutional agreement Subject of international law Public entity International law International responsibility Acuerdo interinstitucional Sujeto de derecho internacional Entidad pública Derecho internacional Responsabilidad internacional Acuerdo interinstitucional Sujeto de derecho internacional Entidad pública Derecho internacional Responsabilidad internacional |
description |
International law offers to the international community several types of international instruments, and not all of them have been fully explored by doctrine. In this context, the present article aims to reexamine the analysis proposed by Jan Klabbers in his book “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” on administrative agreements, which in our legislation are called “interinstitutional agreements” (IA). In this sense, four criticisms that Klabbers raises about such types of agreements will be reviewed: i) the open texture of the definition of the State in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT); ii) the rejection of the hypothesis about the international subjectivity of public entities and the existence of a third legal order different from domestic law and international law; iii) the difficulties of reconciling IAs with the theory of international responsibility and; iv) the ease of repudiation of administrative agreements. Following this purpose, the article explores solutions to the main problems identified by the Dutch jurist, reviewing these dilemmas through the case of the Peruvian AI, using an analytical methodology. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204 10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11204 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204/7192 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; 461-476 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042388822753280 |