The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosales Zamora, Pablo César
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204
Resumo: International law offers to the international community several types of international instruments, and not all of them have been fully explored by doctrine. In this context, the present article aims to reexamine the analysis proposed by Jan Klabbers in his book “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” on administrative agreements, which in our legislation are called “interinstitutional agreements” (IA). In this sense, four criticisms that Klabbers raises about such types of agreements will be reviewed: i) the open texture of the definition of the State in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT); ii) the rejection of the hypothesis about the international subjectivity of public entities and the existence of a third legal order different from domestic law and international law; iii) the difficulties of reconciling IAs with the theory of international responsibility and; iv) the ease of repudiation of administrative agreements. Following this purpose, the article explores solutions to the main problems identified by the Dutch jurist, reviewing these dilemmas through the case of the Peruvian AI, using an analytical methodology.
id UNICESU-0_d6debfc4b261752b799d6a9c27244240
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11204
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of KlabbersEl Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de KlabbersEl Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de KlabbersInterinstitutional agreementSubject of international lawPublic entityInternational lawInternational responsibilityAcuerdo interinstitucionalSujeto de derecho internacionalEntidad públicaDerecho internacionalResponsabilidad internacionalAcuerdo interinstitucionalSujeto de derecho internacionalEntidad públicaDerecho internacionalResponsabilidad internacionalInternational law offers to the international community several types of international instruments, and not all of them have been fully explored by doctrine. In this context, the present article aims to reexamine the analysis proposed by Jan Klabbers in his book “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” on administrative agreements, which in our legislation are called “interinstitutional agreements” (IA). In this sense, four criticisms that Klabbers raises about such types of agreements will be reviewed: i) the open texture of the definition of the State in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT); ii) the rejection of the hypothesis about the international subjectivity of public entities and the existence of a third legal order different from domestic law and international law; iii) the difficulties of reconciling IAs with the theory of international responsibility and; iv) the ease of repudiation of administrative agreements. Following this purpose, the article explores solutions to the main problems identified by the Dutch jurist, reviewing these dilemmas through the case of the Peruvian AI, using an analytical methodology. El derecho internacional ofrece a la comunidad internacional varios tipos de instrumentos internacionales, y no todos han sido explorados completamente por la doctrina. En ese contexto, el presente artículo tiene como objetivo reexaminar el análisis planteado por Jan Klabbers en su libro “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” sobre los administrative agreements, que en la legislación peruana reciben el nombre de “acuerdos interinstitucionales” (AI). En ese sentido, se revisarán cuatro críticas que Klabbers plantea sobre tales tipos de acuerdos: i) la textura abierta de la definición de Estado en la Convención de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados (CVDT); ii) el rechazo hacia la hipótesis sobre la subjetividad internacional de las entidades públicas y la existencia de un tercer orden jurídico distinto al derecho interno y al derecho internacional; iii) las dificultades de reconciliar los AI con la teoría de la responsabilidad internacional; y iv) la facilidad de repudio de los administrative agreements. Siguiendo este propósito, el artículo explora soluciones a los principales problemas identificados por el jurista holandés, revisando esos dilemas a través del caso del AI peruano, mediante una metodología analítica.El derecho internacional ofrece a la comunidad internacional varios tipos de instrumentos internacionales, y no todos han sido explorados completamente por la doctrina. En ese contexto, el presente artículo tiene como objetivo reexaminar el análisis planteado por Jan Klabbers en su libro “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” sobre los administrative agreements, que en la legislación peruana reciben el nombre de “acuerdos interinstitucionales” (AI). En ese sentido, se revisarán cuatro críticas que Klabbers plantea sobre tales tipos de acuerdos: i) la textura abierta de la definición de Estado en la Convención de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados (CVDT); ii) el rechazo hacia la hipótesis sobre la subjetividad internacional de las entidades públicas y la existencia de un tercer orden jurídico distinto al derecho interno y al derecho internacional; iii) las dificultades de reconciliar los AI con la teoría de la responsabilidad internacional; y iv) la facilidad de repudio de los administrative agreements. Siguiendo este propósito, el artículo explora soluciones a los principales problemas identificados por el jurista holandés, revisando esos dilemas a través del caso del AI peruano, mediante una metodología analítica. Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2022-10-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1120410.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11204Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; 461-4762176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204/7192Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosales Zamora, Pablo César2022-10-05T20:51:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11204Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-10-05T20:51:26Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
El Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de Klabbers
El Acuerdo Interinstitucional en la Práctica Peruana de Derecho Internacional: Reexamen de “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” de Klabbers
title The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
spellingShingle The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
Rosales Zamora, Pablo César
Interinstitutional agreement
Subject of international law
Public entity
International law
International responsibility
Acuerdo interinstitucional
Sujeto de derecho internacional
Entidad pública
Derecho internacional
Responsabilidad internacional
Acuerdo interinstitucional
Sujeto de derecho internacional
Entidad pública
Derecho internacional
Responsabilidad internacional
title_short The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
title_full The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
title_fullStr The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
title_full_unstemmed The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
title_sort The Interinstitutional Agreement in the Peruvian Practice of International Law: Reexamination of “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” of Klabbers
author Rosales Zamora, Pablo César
author_facet Rosales Zamora, Pablo César
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosales Zamora, Pablo César
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Interinstitutional agreement
Subject of international law
Public entity
International law
International responsibility
Acuerdo interinstitucional
Sujeto de derecho internacional
Entidad pública
Derecho internacional
Responsabilidad internacional
Acuerdo interinstitucional
Sujeto de derecho internacional
Entidad pública
Derecho internacional
Responsabilidad internacional
topic Interinstitutional agreement
Subject of international law
Public entity
International law
International responsibility
Acuerdo interinstitucional
Sujeto de derecho internacional
Entidad pública
Derecho internacional
Responsabilidad internacional
Acuerdo interinstitucional
Sujeto de derecho internacional
Entidad pública
Derecho internacional
Responsabilidad internacional
description International law offers to the international community several types of international instruments, and not all of them have been fully explored by doctrine. In this context, the present article aims to reexamine the analysis proposed by Jan Klabbers in his book “The Concept of Treaty in International Law” on administrative agreements, which in our legislation are called “interinstitutional agreements” (IA). In this sense, four criticisms that Klabbers raises about such types of agreements will be reviewed: i) the open texture of the definition of the State in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT); ii) the rejection of the hypothesis about the international subjectivity of public entities and the existence of a third legal order different from domestic law and international law; iii) the difficulties of reconciling IAs with the theory of international responsibility and; iv) the ease of repudiation of administrative agreements. Following this purpose, the article explores solutions to the main problems identified by the Dutch jurist, reviewing these dilemmas through the case of the Peruvian AI, using an analytical methodology.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204
10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11204
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11204
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11204/7192
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; 461-476
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042388822753280