Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baracat, Eduardo Milléo
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Gunther, Luiz Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2319
Resumo: The predominant concept in labor jurisprudence to define function identity – the presupposition for the acknowledgement of equal salaries as conceived in Art 461 of the Brazilian Labor Law (CLT) – is foregrounded on the fact that employees with equal salaries should develop identical tasks. The criterion is derived from the hegemonic concept of the 100-year-old Ford production system in which workers normally developed the same set of tasks throughout their labor contract, coupled to adherence to strict hierarchic stratification. However, the rise of Toyotism brought forth more flexible tasks and functions with decision-taking and immediate problem solving. The strictly Ford system states that no two employees should have the same task and functions are identified through the finality of the tasks and attributions undertaken by the workers. The employment of the Ford system within an organized firm as from the point of view of Toyotism causes deep concern and is an offense to the principle of equality in salaries.
id UNICESU-0_eb37a237f2749332fea4fa5cde02fdfb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2319
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of ViewEquidad de Sueldos: Análisis Del Criterio de La Identidad de Funcion sob Perspectivas Del Fordismo y ToyotismoIsonomia salarial: Análise do Critério da Identidade de Função sob as perspectivas do Fordismo e ToyotismoEquality principleIsonomySalaryFordismToyotism.Principio de IgualdadEquidadSueldoFordismoToyotismo.Princípio da igualdadeIsonomiaSalárioFordismoToyotismo.The predominant concept in labor jurisprudence to define function identity – the presupposition for the acknowledgement of equal salaries as conceived in Art 461 of the Brazilian Labor Law (CLT) – is foregrounded on the fact that employees with equal salaries should develop identical tasks. The criterion is derived from the hegemonic concept of the 100-year-old Ford production system in which workers normally developed the same set of tasks throughout their labor contract, coupled to adherence to strict hierarchic stratification. However, the rise of Toyotism brought forth more flexible tasks and functions with decision-taking and immediate problem solving. The strictly Ford system states that no two employees should have the same task and functions are identified through the finality of the tasks and attributions undertaken by the workers. The employment of the Ford system within an organized firm as from the point of view of Toyotism causes deep concern and is an offense to the principle of equality in salaries.El entendimiento dominante en la jurisprudencia del trabajo para conceptuar identidad de función – presupuestos bases para el reconocimiento de la equiparación de sueldos prevista en el art. 461 de la CLT – es lo de que los empleados equiparados deben desarrollar identidad absoluta de tareas. Este criterio deriva de la hegemonía del sistema fordista de producción por casi un siglo, donde el trabajador normalmente desarrolla el mismo conjunto de tareas a lo largo del contracto, teniendo en vista rígido sistema jerárquico. Sin embargo, con el surgimiento del toyotismo, se pasó a exigirse de los empleados tareas y atribuciones más flexibles, pudiendo tomar decisiones y resolver problemas inmediatos. Así que, en el sistema fordista, a principio, ningún empleado ejerce rigurosamente las mismas tareas que el otro, siendo las funciones identificadas por la finalidad del conjunto de tareas y atribuciones realizadas por los empleados. La utilización del criterio concebido teniendo en vista el sistema fordista en situación de empresa organizadas a partir del sistema toyotista genera profundas iniquidades, con agravios al principio de equidad de sueldos.O entendimento dominante na jurisprudência trabalhista para efeito de se conceituar identidade de função – pressuposto para reconhecimento da equiparação salarial prevista no art. 461 da CLT - é o de que os empregados equiparados devem desenvolver identidade absoluta de tarefas. Este critério decorre da hegemonia do sistema fordista de produção por quase um século, onde o trabalhador normalmente desenvolve o mesmo conjunto de tarefas ao longo do contrato, tendo em vista rígido sistema hierárquico. No entanto, com o surgimento do toyotismo, passou-se a se exigir dos empregados tarefas e atribuições mais flexíveis, podendo tomar decisões e resolver problemas imediatos. Assim, no sistema fordista, a rigor, nenhum empregado exerce rigorosamente as mesmas tarefas que outro, sendo as funções identificadas pela finalidade do conjunto de tarefas e atribuições realizadas pelos empregados. A utilização de critério concebido tendo em vista o sistema fordista em situação de empresa organizada a partir do sistema toyotista gera profundas iniquidades, com ofensa ao princípio da igualdade salarial.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2012-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2319Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 1 (2012): jan./jun.2176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2319/1695Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaracat, Eduardo MilléoGunther, Luiz Eduardo2022-05-24T13:25:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2319Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-05-24T13:25:50Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
Equidad de Sueldos: Análisis Del Criterio de La Identidad de Funcion sob Perspectivas Del Fordismo y Toyotismo
Isonomia salarial: Análise do Critério da Identidade de Função sob as perspectivas do Fordismo e Toyotismo
title Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
spellingShingle Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
Baracat, Eduardo Milléo
Equality principle
Isonomy
Salary
Fordism
Toyotism.
Principio de Igualdad
Equidad
Sueldo
Fordismo
Toyotismo.
Princípio da igualdade
Isonomia
Salário
Fordismo
Toyotismo.
title_short Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
title_full Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
title_fullStr Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
title_full_unstemmed Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
title_sort Equal Salaries: Analysis of the Function Identity Criterion from the Point of Fordism and Toyotism Point of View
author Baracat, Eduardo Milléo
author_facet Baracat, Eduardo Milléo
Gunther, Luiz Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Gunther, Luiz Eduardo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baracat, Eduardo Milléo
Gunther, Luiz Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Equality principle
Isonomy
Salary
Fordism
Toyotism.
Principio de Igualdad
Equidad
Sueldo
Fordismo
Toyotismo.
Princípio da igualdade
Isonomia
Salário
Fordismo
Toyotismo.
topic Equality principle
Isonomy
Salary
Fordism
Toyotism.
Principio de Igualdad
Equidad
Sueldo
Fordismo
Toyotismo.
Princípio da igualdade
Isonomia
Salário
Fordismo
Toyotismo.
description The predominant concept in labor jurisprudence to define function identity – the presupposition for the acknowledgement of equal salaries as conceived in Art 461 of the Brazilian Labor Law (CLT) – is foregrounded on the fact that employees with equal salaries should develop identical tasks. The criterion is derived from the hegemonic concept of the 100-year-old Ford production system in which workers normally developed the same set of tasks throughout their labor contract, coupled to adherence to strict hierarchic stratification. However, the rise of Toyotism brought forth more flexible tasks and functions with decision-taking and immediate problem solving. The strictly Ford system states that no two employees should have the same task and functions are identified through the finality of the tasks and attributions undertaken by the workers. The employment of the Ford system within an organized firm as from the point of view of Toyotism causes deep concern and is an offense to the principle of equality in salaries.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2319
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2319
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2319/1695
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 1 (2012): jan./jun.
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042386750767104

Registros relacionados