The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Aurora (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/3848 |
Resumo: | The text addresses the organic relations of rupture and continuity between forms of work organization characterized as fordism, taylorism and toyotism, noting that such relations are historically determined and combined with each other dialectically. The purpose of this paper is to present an argument demonstrating the materiality of social relations in the form of capitalist sociality through management models fordist work, taylor and toyotist and its reverberation in organizational theories that comprise the so-called General Theory of Administration. Specifically, it is the prospect of rescuing processuality between these models and highlight the dialectical and historical character of the different moments of productive capital restructuring, especially during the twentieth century in order to demonstrate that there is a procedural and organic line between them. The methodology relies on the method of historical materialism research followed the method of dialectical analysis, using as instruments the literature search and document analysis. |
id |
UNESP-32_852b24ef460b7c3eadeb971331564ab3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/3848 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-32 |
network_name_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and ToyotismA dialética da reestruturação produtiva: a processualidade entre fordismo, taylorismo e toyotismoFordismoTaylorismoToyotismoReestruturação produtivaFordismTaylorismToyotismProductive restructuring The text addresses the organic relations of rupture and continuity between forms of work organization characterized as fordism, taylorism and toyotism, noting that such relations are historically determined and combined with each other dialectically. The purpose of this paper is to present an argument demonstrating the materiality of social relations in the form of capitalist sociality through management models fordist work, taylor and toyotist and its reverberation in organizational theories that comprise the so-called General Theory of Administration. Specifically, it is the prospect of rescuing processuality between these models and highlight the dialectical and historical character of the different moments of productive capital restructuring, especially during the twentieth century in order to demonstrate that there is a procedural and organic line between them. The methodology relies on the method of historical materialism research followed the method of dialectical analysis, using as instruments the literature search and document analysis. O texto aborda as relações orgânicas entre as formas de organização do trabalho dos períodos caracterizados como fordismo, taylorismo e toyotismo, ressaltando que tais relações são historicamente determinadas e dialeticamente conjugadas entre si. A mundialização do capital, entendida como expansão da forma de sociabilidade capitalista contemporânea, acarreta particularidades ao desenvolvimento e dinâmica das relações de trabalho que ultrapassam a dinâmica produtiva e assumem caráter social, indicando um modelo híbrido de gestão do trabalho em todas as suas manifestações. O objetivo geral deste artigo é apresentar uma argumentação que indica a materialidade das relações sociais estabelecidas sob esta forma de sociabilidade através dos modelos de gestão do trabalho fordista, taylorista e toyotista e sua reverberação nas teorias organizacionais que integram a chamada Teoria Geral da Administração. Especificamente, trata-se de resgatar a perspectiva de processualidade entre estes modelos e destacar o caráter dialético e histórico dos diferentes momentos de reestruturação produtiva do capital, sobretudo durante o século XX, a fim de demonstrar que existe uma dinâmica orgânica entre eles. A metodologia utilizada conta com o método de investigação materialista histórico acompanhado do método de análise dialético, utilizando como instrumentos a pesquisa bibliográfica e análise documental.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2014-07-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/384810.36311/1982-8004.2014.v7n2.3848Revista Aurora; v. 7 n. 2 (2014); 17-34Revista Aurora; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014); 17-34Revista Aurora; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2014); 17-341982-80042177-0484reponame:Revista Aurora (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/3848/2876Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Aurorahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBatista, Erika2024-04-02T23:37:39Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/3848Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/oaiaurora.revista@gmail.com||1982-80041982-8004opendoar:2024-04-02T23:37:39Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism A dialética da reestruturação produtiva: a processualidade entre fordismo, taylorismo e toyotismo |
title |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism |
spellingShingle |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism Batista, Erika Fordismo Taylorismo Toyotismo Reestruturação produtiva Fordism Taylorism Toyotism Productive restructuring |
title_short |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism |
title_full |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism |
title_fullStr |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism |
title_sort |
The dialectics of productive restructuring: the processuality between Fordism, Taylorism and Toyotism |
author |
Batista, Erika |
author_facet |
Batista, Erika |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Batista, Erika |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fordismo Taylorismo Toyotismo Reestruturação produtiva Fordism Taylorism Toyotism Productive restructuring |
topic |
Fordismo Taylorismo Toyotismo Reestruturação produtiva Fordism Taylorism Toyotism Productive restructuring |
description |
The text addresses the organic relations of rupture and continuity between forms of work organization characterized as fordism, taylorism and toyotism, noting that such relations are historically determined and combined with each other dialectically. The purpose of this paper is to present an argument demonstrating the materiality of social relations in the form of capitalist sociality through management models fordist work, taylor and toyotist and its reverberation in organizational theories that comprise the so-called General Theory of Administration. Specifically, it is the prospect of rescuing processuality between these models and highlight the dialectical and historical character of the different moments of productive capital restructuring, especially during the twentieth century in order to demonstrate that there is a procedural and organic line between them. The methodology relies on the method of historical materialism research followed the method of dialectical analysis, using as instruments the literature search and document analysis. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/3848 10.36311/1982-8004.2014.v7n2.3848 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/3848 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36311/1982-8004.2014.v7n2.3848 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/3848/2876 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora; v. 7 n. 2 (2014); 17-34 Revista Aurora; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014); 17-34 Revista Aurora; Vol. 7 Núm. 2 (2014); 17-34 1982-8004 2177-0484 reponame:Revista Aurora (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
collection |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aurora.revista@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797053557462007808 |