The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Ana Luisa Tarter
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Coutinho, Nilton Carlos, Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3119
Resumo: The current activist stance of the judiciary has generated repercussions in social relations, and specifically in relation to how to see the judicial function within the legal framework. Therefore, the present work perform a bibliographical and documentary research of the subject theme in order to analyze how the judicial activism has been seen by the doctrine and the existing dilemmas regarding the effectiveness of public policies and the limitations of judges facing the constitutional separation of powers and the economic and financial restrictions inherent in the theme. It is a relevant theme, owing to conflicts and debates that arise in society considering the guarantees provided by the Magna Carta and, in particular, the realization of social rights. In this respect, specific questions relating to the protection of social rights decided by the Judiciary and its implications for political arrangement-Brazilian institutional will be analyzed seeking to make notes on the limits of judicial activism in the protection of fundamental rights.
id UNICEUB-3_0ace9bca53e6b96fbb429f5812f1bdeb
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/3119
network_acronym_str UNICEUB-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. ItPolíticas públicas e ativismo judicial: o dilema entre efetividade e limites de atuaçãoDireito; Políticas públicas; ativismo judicial; separação dos poderesativismo judicial; separação de poderes; princípios constitucionais; limitações práticas; JudicializaçãoThe current activist stance of the judiciary has generated repercussions in social relations, and specifically in relation to how to see the judicial function within the legal framework. Therefore, the present work perform a bibliographical and documentary research of the subject theme in order to analyze how the judicial activism has been seen by the doctrine and the existing dilemmas regarding the effectiveness of public policies and the limitations of judges facing the constitutional separation of powers and the economic and financial restrictions inherent in the theme. It is a relevant theme, owing to conflicts and debates that arise in society considering the guarantees provided by the Magna Carta and, in particular, the realization of social rights. In this respect, specific questions relating to the protection of social rights decided by the Judiciary and its implications for political arrangement-Brazilian institutional will be analyzed seeking to make notes on the limits of judicial activism in the protection of fundamental rights.A atual postura ativista do Poder Judiciário tem gerado repercussões nas relações sociais e, especificamente, em relação ao modo de se ver a função judicial dentro do ordenamento jurídico. Deste modo, o presente trabalho realiza uma pesquisa bibliográfica e documental em relação ao tema, de modo a analisar a forma como o ativismo judicial tem sido visto pela doutrina, bem como os dilemas existentes em relação à efetividade das políticas públicas e o limite de atuação do juiz frente à separação constitucional dos poderes e aos limites econômico-financeiros inerentes ao tema. Trata-se de um tema relevante em razão dos conflitos e debates que surgem na sociedade tendo em vista as garantias asseguradas pela Carta Magna e, em especial, a efetivação dos direitos sociais. Neste aspecto, serão analisadas questões concretas relacionadas à proteção dos direitos sociais decididas pelo Poder Judiciário e suas implicações no arranjo político-institucional brasileiro realizando ponderações sobre os limites do ativismo judicial na proteção dos direitos fundamentais.UniCEUBNunes, Ana Luisa TarterCoutinho, Nilton CarlosLazari, Rafael José Nadim de2015-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/311910.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3119Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 208-222Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 208-222Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 208-2222236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3119/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-11T21:14:04Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/3119Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2018-12-11T21:14:04Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
Políticas públicas e ativismo judicial: o dilema entre efetividade e limites de atuação
title The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
spellingShingle The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
Nunes, Ana Luisa Tarter
Direito; Políticas públicas; ativismo judicial; separação dos poderes
ativismo judicial; separação de poderes; princípios constitucionais; limitações práticas; Judicialização
title_short The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
title_full The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
title_fullStr The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
title_full_unstemmed The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
title_sort The aim of this work is to demonstrate the overcoming of the model of the Liberal State, especially evidenced in Brazil by the consecration of the principles of the welfare state in our Constitution, legitimizes the possibilities of judicial activism. It
author Nunes, Ana Luisa Tarter
author_facet Nunes, Ana Luisa Tarter
Coutinho, Nilton Carlos
Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
author_role author
author2 Coutinho, Nilton Carlos
Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Ana Luisa Tarter
Coutinho, Nilton Carlos
Lazari, Rafael José Nadim de
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito; Políticas públicas; ativismo judicial; separação dos poderes
ativismo judicial; separação de poderes; princípios constitucionais; limitações práticas; Judicialização
topic Direito; Políticas públicas; ativismo judicial; separação dos poderes
ativismo judicial; separação de poderes; princípios constitucionais; limitações práticas; Judicialização
description The current activist stance of the judiciary has generated repercussions in social relations, and specifically in relation to how to see the judicial function within the legal framework. Therefore, the present work perform a bibliographical and documentary research of the subject theme in order to analyze how the judicial activism has been seen by the doctrine and the existing dilemmas regarding the effectiveness of public policies and the limitations of judges facing the constitutional separation of powers and the economic and financial restrictions inherent in the theme. It is a relevant theme, owing to conflicts and debates that arise in society considering the guarantees provided by the Magna Carta and, in particular, the realization of social rights. In this respect, specific questions relating to the protection of social rights decided by the Judiciary and its implications for political arrangement-Brazilian institutional will be analyzed seeking to make notes on the limits of judicial activism in the protection of fundamental rights.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3119
10.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3119
url https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3119
identifier_str_mv 10.5102/rbpp.v5i2.3119
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3119/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 208-222
Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 208-222
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 5, n. 2 (2015): Ativismo Judicial; 208-222
2236-1677
2179-8338
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron:UNICEUB
instname_str Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron_str UNICEUB
institution UNICEUB
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com
_version_ 1798328491760943104

Registros relacionados