Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5102/rbpp.v6i1.3597 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3597 |
Resumo: | The environmental agenda presents challenges to old assumptions concerning Penal Law. The modern age brought indefinition and unstableness through broadened concepts of liability, damage and offensiveness. This fresh scenario required nations to provide proper response to causes never addressed before. Therefore, Environmental Criminal Law became visible, since continual transgressions and non-compliance were jeopardizing its major legal asset. The United States of America and Japan, nations with distinct social evolvement and history, employ Penal Law as the key to envi-ronmental violations, although peculiar outcomes have emerged in each country. Nevertheless, the demand for criminalization depicts frames of civic education and the essentiality of effective resources to strengthen collective ties among individuals. Laying the groundwork on deductive reasoning and comparative analysis of both legal systems and public data – American and Japanese –, the juridical dogmatic alignment of this paper was chosen in order to offer inputs regarding the encouragement of Administrative and Civil Law by Criminal liability. |
id |
UNICEUB-3_162020213a4f0ad158111806f43ac8e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/3597 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICEUB-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
spelling |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and JapanDireito penal ambiental: cotejo legislativo entre nações dissímiles como reflexão para a elaboração de políticas criminais que melhor tutelem o ambientePolíticas públicas; direito penal; direito ambientalMeio ambiente; política criminal; Estados Unidos da América; Japão; cotejo social e jurídico.The environmental agenda presents challenges to old assumptions concerning Penal Law. The modern age brought indefinition and unstableness through broadened concepts of liability, damage and offensiveness. This fresh scenario required nations to provide proper response to causes never addressed before. Therefore, Environmental Criminal Law became visible, since continual transgressions and non-compliance were jeopardizing its major legal asset. The United States of America and Japan, nations with distinct social evolvement and history, employ Penal Law as the key to envi-ronmental violations, although peculiar outcomes have emerged in each country. Nevertheless, the demand for criminalization depicts frames of civic education and the essentiality of effective resources to strengthen collective ties among individuals. Laying the groundwork on deductive reasoning and comparative analysis of both legal systems and public data – American and Japanese –, the juridical dogmatic alignment of this paper was chosen in order to offer inputs regarding the encouragement of Administrative and Civil Law by Criminal liability.A agenda ambiental possui peculiaridades que o Direito Penal clássico não aventou enfrentar. A modernidade trouxe indefinições e inseguranças que romperam as fronteiras da subjetividade determinada, da lesividade conhecida e do dano tangível, o que constrangeu as nações a reagir e suprir lacunas dantes inexploradas. Nesse desiderato reacional estatal, eclode o Direito Penal Ambiental, esfera impetuosa que intervém ao sinal prodrômico de transgressão iterativa ao seu bem mais caro: o meio ambiente. Os Estados Unidos da América e o Japão, nações divergentes na história e desenvolvimento de suas sociedades, alargaram o influxo penal, impulsionados por fatores congêneres, mas com resultado díspar. Todavia, a precisão do Direito Penal extravasa um discernimento de educação cívica e da imperatividade de recursos hábeis a enternecer o elo coletivo entre os cidadãos. Neste trabalho, a vertente metodológica jurídico-dogmática foi escolhida para que, a partir do raciocínio lógico-dedutivo e da investigação jurídico-comparativa entre os sistemas americano e japonês, possa o texto servir de norte para a elaboração de políticas criminais que melhor acolham a tutela do bem jurídico meio ambiente a partir da pressuposição de uma cultura impermeável aos valores precípuos dos bens difusos. Conclui-se que a alteridade, nos moldes americanos e japonês, presta-se a servir de modelo para políticas públicas brasileiras.UniCEUBGonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz GustavoRogedo Bastianetto, Lorena Machado2016-08-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/359710.5102/rbpp.v6i1.3597Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 6, n. 1 (2016); 204-218Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 6, n. 1 (2016); 204-218Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 6, n. 1 (2016); 204-2182236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3597/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-16T19:51:53Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/3597Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2018-12-16T19:51:53Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan Direito penal ambiental: cotejo legislativo entre nações dissímiles como reflexão para a elaboração de políticas criminais que melhor tutelem o ambiente |
title |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan |
spellingShingle |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan Gonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz Gustavo Políticas públicas; direito penal; direito ambiental Meio ambiente; política criminal; Estados Unidos da América; Japão; cotejo social e jurídico. Gonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz Gustavo Políticas públicas; direito penal; direito ambiental Meio ambiente; política criminal; Estados Unidos da América; Japão; cotejo social e jurídico. |
title_short |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan |
title_full |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan |
title_fullStr |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan |
title_sort |
Environmental criminal law as the keystone to administrative and civil authority in the United States and Japan |
author |
Gonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz Gustavo |
author_facet |
Gonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz Gustavo Gonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz Gustavo Rogedo Bastianetto, Lorena Machado Rogedo Bastianetto, Lorena Machado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rogedo Bastianetto, Lorena Machado |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves Ribeiro, Luiz Gustavo Rogedo Bastianetto, Lorena Machado |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Políticas públicas; direito penal; direito ambiental Meio ambiente; política criminal; Estados Unidos da América; Japão; cotejo social e jurídico. |
topic |
Políticas públicas; direito penal; direito ambiental Meio ambiente; política criminal; Estados Unidos da América; Japão; cotejo social e jurídico. |
description |
The environmental agenda presents challenges to old assumptions concerning Penal Law. The modern age brought indefinition and unstableness through broadened concepts of liability, damage and offensiveness. This fresh scenario required nations to provide proper response to causes never addressed before. Therefore, Environmental Criminal Law became visible, since continual transgressions and non-compliance were jeopardizing its major legal asset. The United States of America and Japan, nations with distinct social evolvement and history, employ Penal Law as the key to envi-ronmental violations, although peculiar outcomes have emerged in each country. Nevertheless, the demand for criminalization depicts frames of civic education and the essentiality of effective resources to strengthen collective ties among individuals. Laying the groundwork on deductive reasoning and comparative analysis of both legal systems and public data – American and Japanese –, the juridical dogmatic alignment of this paper was chosen in order to offer inputs regarding the encouragement of Administrative and Civil Law by Criminal liability. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-13 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3597 10.5102/rbpp.v6i1.3597 |
url |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3597 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5102/rbpp.v6i1.3597 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/3597/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 6, n. 1 (2016); 204-218 Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 6, n. 1 (2016); 204-218 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 6, n. 1 (2016); 204-218 2236-1677 2179-8338 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) instacron:UNICEUB |
instname_str |
Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
instacron_str |
UNICEUB |
institution |
UNICEUB |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822180567222845440 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5102/rbpp.v6i1.3597 |