Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/article/view/1388 |
Resumo: | After the fall of Berlin wall, Brazil has centered efforts to develop a policy of prestige to interpose the neoliberal from the North. Notwithstanding, the country has sought established itself as a leader in its region, and also has placed in its external agenda an approximation to Arabian countries, as well as with Latin-American and African ones, underpinned on dialogue and cooperation. Moreover, has pleaded incisively for the reform on the ONU Security Council, arguing that this space should correspond to a new order which implies a more active participation of developing countries, not exempting itself to eliminate the imbalances between the industrialized and the developing countries. This way, Brazil projects itself as a moderator on the north-south relations, seeking to affirm the sovereignty of the nations. In April 2004, accepted the mission to lead the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), an opportunity that allowed the country to apply its pacific and mediation policy. On this sense, adopting the MINUSTAH as a study case, the present article has as its objective to analyze if the Brazilian performance, face this peace operation, correspond with its non-interfering speech, and then, bring questions that might course through this performance. |
id |
UNICEUB-4_8e947a24933e40af5ff836e3e675fb3b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1388 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICEUB-4 |
network_name_str |
Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? O Brasil e a não-indiferença à crise haitiana: solidariedade ou retórica do discurso? 10.5102/uri.v9i1.1388Brasil. Haiti. Minustah. Conselho de Segurança da ONU.After the fall of Berlin wall, Brazil has centered efforts to develop a policy of prestige to interpose the neoliberal from the North. Notwithstanding, the country has sought established itself as a leader in its region, and also has placed in its external agenda an approximation to Arabian countries, as well as with Latin-American and African ones, underpinned on dialogue and cooperation. Moreover, has pleaded incisively for the reform on the ONU Security Council, arguing that this space should correspond to a new order which implies a more active participation of developing countries, not exempting itself to eliminate the imbalances between the industrialized and the developing countries. This way, Brazil projects itself as a moderator on the north-south relations, seeking to affirm the sovereignty of the nations. In April 2004, accepted the mission to lead the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), an opportunity that allowed the country to apply its pacific and mediation policy. On this sense, adopting the MINUSTAH as a study case, the present article has as its objective to analyze if the Brazilian performance, face this peace operation, correspond with its non-interfering speech, and then, bring questions that might course through this performance.O Brasil, após a queda do muro de Berlim, tem centrado esforços para desenvolver uma política de prestígio que se contraponha à política neoliberal do Norte. Não obstante, o país tem buscado firmar liderança na sua região, além de ter definido em sua agenda externa a aproximação com os países árabes, latino-americanos e africanos, sustentada no diálogo e na cooperação. Ademais, tem pleiteado incisivamente a reforma do Conselho de Segurança da ONU, argumentando que esse espaço deve corresponder a uma nova ordem que implica na participação mais ativa dos países em desenvolvimento, não se eximindo também de eliminar as desigualdades entre estes e os países industrializados. Dessa forma, o Brasil projeta-se como um mediador nas relações Norte-Sul, buscando sempre afirmar a soberania das nações. Em abril de 2004, aceitou liderar a Missão das Nações Unidas para a Estabilização do Haiti (MINUSTAH), oportunidade que tem permitido ao país aplicar a sua política pacifista e de mediação. Nesse sentido, adotando a MINUSTAH como estudo de caso, o presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar se a atuação brasileira, frente a essa operação de paz, condiz com seu discurso de não-ingerência e não-indiferença e, por fim, levantar questões que podem decorrer dessa atuação.UniCEUB2011-06-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/article/view/138810.5102/uri.v9i1.1388Universitas: Relações Internacionais; v. 9, n. 1 (2011)1982-07201807-2135reponame:Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/article/view/1388/1352Rosa, Renata de MeloCarvalho, Amanda Sanches Daltro deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2011-06-16T13:47:58Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1388Revistahttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/indexPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/oaiuniversitas.rel@uniceub.br1982-07201807-2135opendoar:2011-06-16T13:47:58Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? O Brasil e a não-indiferença à crise haitiana: solidariedade ou retórica do discurso? 10.5102/uri.v9i1.1388 |
title |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? |
spellingShingle |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? Rosa, Renata de Melo Brasil. Haiti. Minustah. Conselho de Segurança da ONU. |
title_short |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? |
title_full |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? |
title_fullStr |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? |
title_sort |
Brazil and the non-indifference to Haitian crisis: solidarity or the rhetoric of discourse? |
author |
Rosa, Renata de Melo |
author_facet |
Rosa, Renata de Melo Carvalho, Amanda Sanches Daltro de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho, Amanda Sanches Daltro de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosa, Renata de Melo Carvalho, Amanda Sanches Daltro de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brasil. Haiti. Minustah. Conselho de Segurança da ONU. |
topic |
Brasil. Haiti. Minustah. Conselho de Segurança da ONU. |
description |
After the fall of Berlin wall, Brazil has centered efforts to develop a policy of prestige to interpose the neoliberal from the North. Notwithstanding, the country has sought established itself as a leader in its region, and also has placed in its external agenda an approximation to Arabian countries, as well as with Latin-American and African ones, underpinned on dialogue and cooperation. Moreover, has pleaded incisively for the reform on the ONU Security Council, arguing that this space should correspond to a new order which implies a more active participation of developing countries, not exempting itself to eliminate the imbalances between the industrialized and the developing countries. This way, Brazil projects itself as a moderator on the north-south relations, seeking to affirm the sovereignty of the nations. In April 2004, accepted the mission to lead the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), an opportunity that allowed the country to apply its pacific and mediation policy. On this sense, adopting the MINUSTAH as a study case, the present article has as its objective to analyze if the Brazilian performance, face this peace operation, correspond with its non-interfering speech, and then, bring questions that might course through this performance. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-16 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/article/view/1388 10.5102/uri.v9i1.1388 |
url |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/article/view/1388 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5102/uri.v9i1.1388 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/relacoesinternacionais/article/view/1388/1352 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Universitas: Relações Internacionais; v. 9, n. 1 (2011) 1982-0720 1807-2135 reponame:Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) instacron:UNICEUB |
instname_str |
Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
instacron_str |
UNICEUB |
institution |
UNICEUB |
reponame_str |
Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) |
collection |
Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Universitas. Relações Internacionais (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
universitas.rel@uniceub.br |
_version_ |
1796797599779389440 |