Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marin, Douglas Popp
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/275
Resumo: O objetivo geral deste estudo foi investigar as respostas perceptivas e motivacionais ao treinamento intervalado com corda naval (TICN) e examinar a relação da resposta afetiva com os indicadores motivacionais relacionados à adesão ao exercício. Para tanto, dois estudos foram conduzidos. No estudo 1, 14 voluntários adultos jovens fisicamente ativos (24 ± 4 anos, 80,5 ± 8,27 kg, 175,4 ± 4,66 cm, IMC 26,2 ± 2,72 kg/m2 e 11,5 ± 4,41 % de gordura corporal) realizaram três protocolos de TICN em ordem aleatória contrabalanceada: P10:30 (12 x 10 segundos - 30 segundos de recuperação); P15:45 (8 x 15 segundos - 45 segundos de recuperação); e P30:90 (4 x 30 - 90 segundos de recuperação). Todas os protocolos foram realizados em intensidade “all-out”, com recuperação passiva, mantendo a densidade (razão entre trabalho/recuperação) em 1:3. Imediatamente ao final de cada série foi avaliada a resposta afetiva (FS), ativação (FAS), percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e frequência cardíaca (FC). No período de recuperação 15 minutos pós-exercício, foram acessados indicadores motivacionais como o divertimento, autoeficácia e intenção. Os resultados demonstraram que houve declínio significativo da FS e aumento progressivo da FAS, PSE, FC, porém sem diferença entre os protocolos. Da mesma maneira, não foi observada diferença para os indicadores motivacionais entre os protocolos. Nossos dados indicaram que a relação inversa entre o declínio da FS e o incremento da PSE pode ser moderada para percepção de tolerância a intensidade do exercício. A análise de regressão revelou que a resposta de FS e a autoeficácia podem predizer a intenção de repetir o TICN. O efeito da resposta de FS sobre a intenção foi mediado pela percepção de autoeficácia dos voluntários. No estudo 2, nós investigamos se o intervalo de recuperação (IR) autosselecionado poderia influenciar nas respostas perceptivas e motivacionais durante e após o TICN. Participaram desse estudo 12 homens fisicamente ativos (22 ± 6 anos, 77,2 ± 9,83 kg, 175,4 ± 5,83 cm, IMC 25,1 ± 2,70 kg/m2 e 9,35 ± 4,93% de gordura corporal). Foram realizados dois protocolos de TICN: protocolo prescrito (P15:45 - idêntico ao estudo 1) e protocolo autosselecionado (8 x 15 segundos - IR autosselecionado). Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença nas respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre os protocolos. Entretanto, o aumento da FC durante o protocolo prescrito foi significativamente maior do que no IR autosselecionado. Coletivamente, os resultados dos estudos 1 e 2 mostraram que a manipulação da duração do intervalo de trabalho e do IR no TICN não influenciaram as respostas perceptivas durante o exercício, em condições de volume total e intensidade equalizados. Além disso, a FS pode influenciar diretamente e indiretamente os fatores motivacionais envolvidos na adesão ao exercício.
id UNICSUL-1_5e569e9cb306b5339e6426627942fecd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/275
network_acronym_str UNICSUL-1
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
repository_id_str
spelling 2020-01-21T17:49:17Z20202020-01-21T17:49:17Z2019-06-26MARIN, D. P. Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado. 2019 Tese (Doutorado Interdisciplinar em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, 2019.https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/275O objetivo geral deste estudo foi investigar as respostas perceptivas e motivacionais ao treinamento intervalado com corda naval (TICN) e examinar a relação da resposta afetiva com os indicadores motivacionais relacionados à adesão ao exercício. Para tanto, dois estudos foram conduzidos. No estudo 1, 14 voluntários adultos jovens fisicamente ativos (24 ± 4 anos, 80,5 ± 8,27 kg, 175,4 ± 4,66 cm, IMC 26,2 ± 2,72 kg/m2 e 11,5 ± 4,41 % de gordura corporal) realizaram três protocolos de TICN em ordem aleatória contrabalanceada: P10:30 (12 x 10 segundos - 30 segundos de recuperação); P15:45 (8 x 15 segundos - 45 segundos de recuperação); e P30:90 (4 x 30 - 90 segundos de recuperação). Todas os protocolos foram realizados em intensidade “all-out”, com recuperação passiva, mantendo a densidade (razão entre trabalho/recuperação) em 1:3. Imediatamente ao final de cada série foi avaliada a resposta afetiva (FS), ativação (FAS), percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e frequência cardíaca (FC). No período de recuperação 15 minutos pós-exercício, foram acessados indicadores motivacionais como o divertimento, autoeficácia e intenção. Os resultados demonstraram que houve declínio significativo da FS e aumento progressivo da FAS, PSE, FC, porém sem diferença entre os protocolos. Da mesma maneira, não foi observada diferença para os indicadores motivacionais entre os protocolos. Nossos dados indicaram que a relação inversa entre o declínio da FS e o incremento da PSE pode ser moderada para percepção de tolerância a intensidade do exercício. A análise de regressão revelou que a resposta de FS e a autoeficácia podem predizer a intenção de repetir o TICN. O efeito da resposta de FS sobre a intenção foi mediado pela percepção de autoeficácia dos voluntários. No estudo 2, nós investigamos se o intervalo de recuperação (IR) autosselecionado poderia influenciar nas respostas perceptivas e motivacionais durante e após o TICN. Participaram desse estudo 12 homens fisicamente ativos (22 ± 6 anos, 77,2 ± 9,83 kg, 175,4 ± 5,83 cm, IMC 25,1 ± 2,70 kg/m2 e 9,35 ± 4,93% de gordura corporal). Foram realizados dois protocolos de TICN: protocolo prescrito (P15:45 - idêntico ao estudo 1) e protocolo autosselecionado (8 x 15 segundos - IR autosselecionado). Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença nas respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre os protocolos. Entretanto, o aumento da FC durante o protocolo prescrito foi significativamente maior do que no IR autosselecionado. Coletivamente, os resultados dos estudos 1 e 2 mostraram que a manipulação da duração do intervalo de trabalho e do IR no TICN não influenciaram as respostas perceptivas durante o exercício, em condições de volume total e intensidade equalizados. Além disso, a FS pode influenciar diretamente e indiretamente os fatores motivacionais envolvidos na adesão ao exercício.The general objective of this study was to investigate the perceptual responses to battling rope interval training (BRIT) and to examine the relationship of the affective response with motivational indicators related to exercise adherence. We conducted two studies. In the study 1, 14 young adult physically active volunteers (24 ± 4 years old, 80.5 ± 8.27 kg, 175.4 ± 4.66 cm, BMI 26.2 ± 2.72 kg /m2 and 11.5 ± 4.41% of body fat) performed three BRIT protocols in randomized counterbalance order: P10:30 (12 x 10-s efforts, 30-s recovery); P15:45 (8 x 15-s efforts, 45-s recovery); and P30:90 (4 x 30-s efforts 90-s recovery). All protocols were performed in all-out intensity, with passive recovery, maintaining the density (work to rest ratio) in 1:3. Immediately at the end of each set the affective response (FS), activation (FAS), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and heart rate (HR) were measured. During recovery period, motivational indicators such as enjoyment, self-efficacy and intention were accessed. There was a significant decline in FS and a progressive increase of FAS, RPE, HR, however, no difference between protocols was observed. Likewise, no significant difference was observed for motivational indicators between protocols. The results indicated that the inverse relationship between FS decline and RPE increment may be moderate to perceived tolerance. Regression analysis revealed that FS response and self-efficacy may predict the intention to repeat BRIT. The effect of FS response on intention was mediated by the self-efficacy perception. In study 2, we investigated wheter self-selected rest interval (RI) could influence perceptual and motivational responses during and after BRIT. Twelve physically active men (22 ± 6 years, 77.2 ± 9.83 kg, 175.4 ± 5.83 cm, BMI 25.1 ± 2.70 kg/m2 and 9.35 ± 4.93 % body fat). Two BRIT protocols were performed: prescribed protocol (P15:45 - identical to study 1) and self-selected protocol (8 x 15-s efforts, self-selected RI). The results showed that there was no difference in the perceptual and motivational responses between protocols. However, the increase in HR during the prescribed protocol was significantly higher than in self-selected RI. Taken together, the results of both study 1 and 2 showed that the manipulation of the working time and RI in BRIT did not influence the perceptual responses during the exercise, particularly when total volume and intensity are equated. In addition, FS can directly and indirectly influence the motivational factors involved in adherence to exercise.porUniversidade Cruzeiro do SulDoutorado Interdisciplinar em Ciências da SaúdeCruzeiro do SulBrasilCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDEAfetividadeAutonomiaTolerânciaTreinamento intervaladoComparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.Comparisons of perceptual and motivational responses between different interval training protocolsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisOtton, Rosemari74531611934http://lattes.cnpq.br/1164500211646058Otton, Rosemarihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1164500211646058Barela, Ana Maria Fortihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2481128022542270Pires, Adriana Cristina Levadahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5152872723454265Foschini, Denishttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7560757335531919Figueira Junior, Aylton Joséhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/110742741734865230802674860http://lattes.cnpq.br/8096301998353851Marin, Douglas PoppACSM. ACSM's Resources for the Personal Trainer. Fourth. LWW, 2013. ______. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Tenth. Philadelphia, PA: LWW, 2017. AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991. ANNESI, J. J. Sex differences in relations of cardiorespiratory and mood changes associated with self-selected amounts of cardiovascular exercise. Psychol Rep, v. 93, n. 3 Pt 2, p. 1339-46, Dec 2003. ASTORINO, T. A.; THUM, J. S. Response: Commentary: Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population. Front Psychol, v. 7, p. 746, 2016. ______. Interval training elicits higher enjoyment versus moderate exercise in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, v. 41, n. 1, p. 77-84, Jan 2018. BACKHOUSE, S. H. et al. Exercise makes people feel better but people are inactive: paradox or artifact? J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 29, n. 4, p. 498-517, Aug 2007. BANDURA, A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997. BARBOSA, C. A tríade do tempo. 1. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Sextante, 2011. BARNETT, F. The effect of exercise on affective and self-efficacy responses in older and younger women. J Phys Act Health, v. 10, n. 1, p. 97-105, Jan 2013. BARTLETT, J. D. et al. High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence. J Sports Sci, v. 29, n. 6, p. 547-53, Mar 2011. BIDDLE, S. J.; GORELY, T. Sitting psychology: towards a psychology of sedentary behaviour. In: PAPAIOANNOU, A. G. e HACKFORT, D. (Ed.). Routledge Companion to Sport and Exercise Psychology. London: Routledge, 2014. cap. 720-740, BORG, G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998. BUCHHEIT, M.; LAURSEN, P. B. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med, v. 43, n. 5, p. 313-38, May 2013. CHANG, H. H.; PHAM, M. T. Affect as a Decision-Making System of the Present. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 40, n. 1, p. 42-63, 2013. CHEN, W. H. et al. Eight-Week Battle Rope Training Improves Multiple Physical Fitness Dimensions and Shooting Accuracy in Collegiate Basketball Players. J Strength Cond Res, v. 32, n. 10, p. 2715-2724, Oct 2018. COQUART, J. B.; GARCIN, M. Knowledge of the endpoint: effect on perceptual values. Int J Sports Med, v. 29, n. 12, p. 976-9, Dec 2008. DE SALLES, B. F. et al. Effects of fixed vs. self-suggested rest between sets in upper and lower body exercises performance. Eur J Sport Sci, v. 16, n. 8, p. 927-31, Nov 2016. DECI, E. L.; RYAN, R. M. The “ What ” and “ Why ” of Goal Pursuits : Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychology Inquiry, v. 11, n. 4, p. 227-268, 2000. DECKER, E. S.; EKKEKAKIS, P. More efficient, perhaps, but at what price? Pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in low-active women with obesity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 28, p. 1-10, 2017. DIENER, E.; IRAN-NEJAD, A. The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1031-1038, 1985. DIETRICH, A. Transient hypofrontality as a mechanism for the psychological effects of exercise. Psychiatry Res, v. 145, n. 1, p. 79-83, Nov 29 2006. DING, D. et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet, v. 388, n. 10051, p. 1311-24, Sep 24 2016. DISHMAN, P. B. Assessment and care coordination teams: an innovation in caring for children. J Tenn Med Assoc, v. 86, n. 1, p. 17, 19, Jan 1993. DISHMAN, R. K.; BUCKWORTH, J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 28, n. 6, p. 706-19, Jun 1996. DISHMAN, R. K.; FARQUHAR, R. P.; CURETON, K. J. Responses to preferred intensities of exertion in men differing in activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 26, n. 6, p. 783-90, Jun 1994. EKKEKAKIS, P. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition and Emotion, v. 17, n. 2, p. 213-239, 2003a. ______. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cogn Emot, v. 17, n. 2, p. 213-239, Mar 2003b. ______. Pleasure from the exercising body:Two centuries of changing outlooks in psychological thought. In: P., E. (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Physical Activity and Mental Health. London: Routledge, 2013. p.35-56. ______. People have feelings! Exercise psychology in paradigmatic transition. Curr Opin Psychol, v. 16, p. 84-88, Aug 2017. EKKEKAKIS, P.; HALL, E. E.; PETRUZZELLO, S. J. Some like It Vigorous: Measuring Individual Differences in the Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology v. 27, n. 3, p. 350-374, 2005. EKKEKAKIS, P. et al. Can self-reported tolerance of exercise intensity play a role in exercise testing? Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 39, n. 7, p. 1193-9, Jul 2007. EKKEKAKIS, P.; PARFITT, G.; PETRUZZELLO, S. J. The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med, v. 41, n. 8, p. 641-71, Aug 1 2011. EKKEKAKIS, P.; RUSSELL, J. A. The Measurement of Affect, Mood, and Emotion: A guide for healthbehavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. EKKEKAKIS, P.; ZENKO, Z. Escape From Cognitivism: Exercise as Hedonic Experience. In: RAAB, M.;WYLLEMAN, P., et al (Ed.). Sport and Exercise Psychology Research: From Theory to Practice. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press., 2016a. p. 389-414. ______. Measurement of Affective Responses to Exercise: From “Affectless Arousal” to “The Most Well-Characterized” Relationship Between the Body and Affect. In: MEISELMAN, H. L. (Ed.). Emotion Measurement. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press., 2016b. p.293-321. EKKEKAKIS, S.; EKKEKAKIS, P. Affective Consequences of imposing the intensity of physical activity: does the loss of perceived autonomy matter? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, v. 6, p. 125-144, 2009. FAIGENBAUM, A. D. et al. Acute Cardiometabolic Responses to a Novel Training Rope Protocol in Children. J Strength Cond Res, v. 32, n. 5, p. 1197-1206, May 2018. FIUZA-LUCES, C. et al. Exercise is the real polypill. Physiology (Bethesda), v. 28, n. 5, p. 330-58, Sep 2013. FOCHT, B. C. et al. Affective and self-efficacy responses to acute aerobic exercise in sedentary older and younger adults. J Aging Phys Act, v. 15, n. 2, p. 123-38, Apr 2007. FOUNTAINE, C. J.; SCHMIDT, B. J. Metabolic cost of rope training. J Strength Cond Res, v. 29, n. 4, p. 889-93, Apr 2015. FRAZAO, D. T. et al. Feeling of Pleasure to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Is Dependent of the Number of Work Bouts and Physical Activity Status. PLoS One, v. 11, n. 3, p. e0152752, 2016. GABLE, S. L.; GONZAGA, G. C.; STRACHMAN, A. Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. J Pers Soc Psychol, v. 91, n. 5, p. 904-17, Nov 2006. GARBER, C. E. et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 43, n. 7, p. 1334-59, Jul 2011. GIBALA, M. J.; GILLEN, J. B.; PERCIVAL, M. E. Physiological and health-related adaptations to low-volume interval training: influences of nutrition and sex. Sports Med, v. 44 Suppl 2, p. S127-37, Nov 2014. GIBALA, M. J.; MCGEE, S. L. Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain? Exerc Sport Sci Rev, v. 36, n. 2, p. 58- 63, Apr 2008. GILLEN, J. B.; GIBALA, M. J. Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, v. 39, n. 3, p. 409- 12, Mar 2014. GOESSLER, K. F.; POLITO, M. D. Effect of fixed and self-suggested rest intervals between sets of resistance exercise on post-exercise cardiovascular behavior. Brazilian journal of kinanthropometry and human performance, v. 15, n. 4, p. 467- 475, 2013. GROSLAMBERT, A.; MAHON, A. D. Perceived exertion : influence of age and cognitive development. Sports Med, v. 36, n. 11, p. 911-28, 2006. HAMLYN-WILLIAMS, C. C.; FREEMAN, P.; PARFITT, G. Acute affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise sessions in adolescent girls: an observational study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, v. 6, p. 35, 2014. HANIN, J.; EKKEKAKIS, P. Emotions in sport and exercise settings. In: PAPAIOANNOU, A. G. e HACKFORT, D. (Ed.). Routledge Companion to Sport and Exercise Psychology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014. p.83-104. HARDY, C. J.; REJESKI, W. J. Not What, but How One Feels: The Measurement of Affect during Exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 11, n. 3, p. 304-3017, 1989. HOEKSTRA, S. P.; BISHOP, N. C.; LEICHT, C. A. Can intervals enhance the inflammatory response and enjoyment in upper-body exercise? Eur J Appl Physiol, v. 117, n. 6, p. 1155-1163, Jun 2017. ISLAM, H.; TOWNSEND, L. K.; HAZELL, T. J. Modified sprint interval training protocols. Part I. Physiological responses. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, v. 42, n. 4, p. 339-346, Apr 2017. JACKSON, A. S.; POLLOCK, M. L. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr, v. 40, n. 3, p. 497-504, Nov 1978. JOHNSTON, V. S. The origin and function of pleasure. Cognition and Emotion, v. 17, n. 2, p. 167-179, 2003. JUNG, M. E.; BOURNE, J. E.; LITTLE, J. P. Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate- and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum. PLoS One, v. 9, n. 12, p. e114541, 2014. KAUR, J. et al. Muscle metaboreflex activation during dynamic exercise vasoconstricts ischemic active skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, v. 309, n. 12, p. H2145-51, Dec 15 2015. KENDZIERSKI, D.; DECARLO, K. J. Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two Validation Studies. Journaal of Sports & Exercise Psychology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 50-64, 1991. KILPATRICK, M. et al. Affective responses to exercise are dependent on intensity rather than total work. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 39, n. 8, p. 1417-22, Aug 2007. KILPATRICK, M. W.; GREELEY, S. J.; COLLINS, L. H. The Impact of Continuous and Interval Cycle Exercise on Affect and Enjoyment. Res Q Exerc Sport, v. 86, n. 3, p. 244-51, 2015. KIMIECIK, J. C.; HARRIS, A. T. What Is Enjoyment? A Conceptual/Definitional Analysis with Implications for Sport and Exercise Psychology. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 20, n. 3, p. 247-263, 1998. KIVINIEMI, M. T.; VOSS-HUMKE, A. M.; SEIFERT, A. L. How do I feel about the behavior? The interplay of affective associations with behaviors and cognitive beliefs as influences on physical activity behavior. Health Psychol, v. 26, n. 2, p. 152-8, Mar 2007. KOHL, H. W., 3RD et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet, v. 380, n. 9838, p. 294-305, Jul 21 2012. KWAN, B. M.; BRYAN, A. D. Affective response to exercise as a component of exercise motivation: Attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and temporal stability of intentions. Psychol Sport Exerc, v. 11, n. 1, p. 71-79, Jan 1 2010a. KWAN, B. M.; BRYAN, A. D. In-task and post-task affective response to exercise: translating exercise intentions into behaviour. Br J Health Psychol, v. 15, n. Pt 1, p. 115-31, Feb 2010b. LAWTON, R.; CONNER, M.; MCEACHAN, R. Desire or reason: predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychol, v. 28, n. 1, p. 56-65, Jan 2009. LEE, I. M. et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, v. 380, n. 9838, p. 219-29, Jul 21 2012. LEOTTI, L. A.; IYENGAR, S. S.; OCHSNER, K. N. Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control. Trends Cogn Sci, v. 14, n. 10, p. 457-63, Oct 2010. LERNER, J. S. et al. Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 66, p. 799-823, 2015. LEWIS, B. A. et al. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity behavior among adults and children. Am J Prev Med, v. 23, n. 2 Suppl, p. 26-35, Aug 2002. LIM, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, v. 380, n. 9859, p. 2224-60, Dec 15 2012. LIND, E.; EKKEKAKIS, P.; VAZOU, S. The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: 'pain' for no additional 'gain'. J Health Psychol, v. 13, n. 4, p. 464-8, May 2008. LOWE, R.; EVES, F.; CARROL, D. The Influence of Affective and Instrumental Beliefs on Exercise Intentions and Behavior: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology v. 32, n. 6, p. 1241-1252, 2006. MACHADO-VIDOTTI, H. G. et al. Cardiac autonomic responses during upper versus lower limb resistance exercise in healthy elderly men. Braz J Phys Ther, v. 18, n. 1, p. 9-18, Jan-Feb 2014. MAGNAN, R. E.; KWAN, B. M.; BRYAN, A. D. Effects of current physical activity on affective response to exercise: physical and social-cognitive mechanisms. Psychol Health, v. 28, n. 4, p. 418-33, 2013. MALIK, A. A. et al. Perceptual Responses to High- and Moderate-Intensity Interval Exercise in Adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1021-1030, May 2018. MARIN, D. P. et al. Motives, Motivation and Exercise Behavioral Regulations in CrossFit and Resistance Training Participants. PSYCH, v. 9, n. 14, p. 2869-2884, 2018. MARTIN, S. B. et al. Variables related to meeting the CDC/ACSM physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 32, n. 12, p. 2087-92, Dec 2000. MARTINEZ, N. et al. Affective and Enjoyment Responses to High-Intensity Interval Training in Overweight-to-Obese and Insufficiently Active Adults. J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 37, n. 2, p. 138-49, Apr 2015. MATSUO, E. et al. Relationships between Psychophysiological Responses to Cycling Exercise and Post-Exercise Self-Efficacy. Front Psychol, v. 6, p. 1775, 2015. MCAULEY, E.; COURNEYA, K. The subjective exercise experiences scale (SEES): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 16, n. 2, p. 163, 1994. MCAULEY, E. et al. Predicting long-term maintenance of physical activity in older adults. Prev Med, v. 37, n. 2, p. 110-8, Aug 2003. MCAULEY, E. et al. Long-term follow-up of physical activity behavior in older adults. Health Psychol, v. 26, n. 3, p. 375-80, May 2007. MCAULEY, E. et al. Self-efficacy: Implications for Physical Activity, Function, and Functional Limitations in Older Adults. Am J Lifestyle Med, v. 5, n. 4, Jul 2011. MOUSTAKA, F. C. et al. Effects of an autonomy-supportive exercise instructing style on exercise motivation, psychological well-being, and exercise attendance in middleage women. J Phys Act Health, v. 9, n. 1, p. 138-50, Jan 2012. NIVEN, A. et al. Comparison of affective responses during and after low volume highintensity interval exercise, continuous moderate- and continuous high-intensity exercise in active, untrained, healthy males. J Sports Sci, v. 36, n. 17, p. 1993-2001, Sep 2018. NOAKES, T. D. Fatigue is a Brain-Derived Emotion that Regulates the Exercise Behavior to Ensure the Protection of Whole Body Homeostasis. Front Physiol, v. 3, p. 82, 2012. O'DONOVAN, G.; SHAVE, R. British adults' views on the health benefits of moderate and vigorous activity. Prev Med, v. 45, n. 6, p. 432-5, Dec 2007. OLIVEIRA, B. R.; DESLANDES, A. C.; SANTOS, T. M. Differences in exercise intensity seems to influence the affective responses in self-selected and imposed exercise: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol, v. 6, p. 1105, 2015. OLIVEIRA, B. R. et al. Continuous and high-intensity interval training: which promotes higher pleasure? PLoS One, v. 8, n. 11, p. e79965, 2013. OLIVEIRA, J. S. et al. What is the effect of health coaching on physical activity participation in people aged 60 years and over? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med, Mar 20 2017. OLNEY, N. et al. Comparison of Acute Physiological and Psychological Responses Between Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise and Three Regimes of High- Intensity Interval Training. J Strength Cond Res, v. 32, n. 8, p. 2130-2138, Aug 2018. PERRI, M. G. et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol, v. 21, n. 5, p. 452-8, Sep 2002. POON, E. T. et al. Age-specific affective responses and self-efficacy to acute highintensity interval training and continuous exercise in insufficiently active young and middle-aged men. Journal of Exercise Science Fitness, v. 16, n. 3, p. 106-111, 2018. PRICE, M.; MOSS, P. The effects of work:rest duration on physiological and perceptual responses during intermittent exercise and performance. J Sports Sci, v. 25, n. 14, p. 1613-21, Dec 2007. RATAMESS, N. A. et al. The effect of rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol, v. 100, n. 1, p. 1-17, May 2007. RATAMESS, N. A. et al. Acute oxygen uptake and resistance exercise performance using different rest interval lengths: the influence of maximal aerobic capacity and exercise sequence. J Strength Cond Res, v. 28, n. 7, p. 1875-88, Jul 2014. RATAMESS, N. A. et al. Effects of Rest Interval Length on Acute Battling Rope Exercise Metabolism. J Strength Cond Res, v. 29, n. 9, p. 2375-87, Sep 2015. REEDA, J.; ONESB, D. S. The effect of acute aerobic exercise on positive activated affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 7, n. 5, p. 477–514, 2006. REISENZEIN, R. Pleasure-arousal theory and the intensity of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 67, n. 3, p. 525-539, 1994. REJESKI, W. J. The perception of exertion: A social psychophysiological integration. Journal of Sport Psychology, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-320, 1981. REYNOLDS, J. P. et al. Feeling bad about progress does not lead people want to change their health behaviour . Psychology & Health v. 33, n. 2, p. 275-291, 2018. RHODES, R. E.; FIALA, B.; CONNER, M. A review and meta-analysis of affective judgments and physical activity in adult populations. Ann Behav Med, v. 38, n. 3, p. 180-204, Dec 2009. RHODES, R. E.; KATES, A. Can the Affective Response to Exercise Predict Future Motives and Physical Activity Behavior? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence. Ann Behav Med, v. 49, n. 5, p. 715-31, Oct 2015. RHODES, R. E.; KAWALSKI, K. Building skills to promote physical activity. In: NIGG, C. R. (Ed.). ACSM's Behavioral Aspects of Physical Activity and Exercise. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014. p.72-101. RHODES, R. E. et al. Factors associated with participation in resistance training: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med, v. 51, n. 20, p. 1466-1472, Oct 2017. ROSE, E. A.; PARFITT, G. A quantitative analysis and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 29, n. 3, p. 281-309, Jun 2007. ______. Can the feeling scale be used to regulate exercise intensity? Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 40, n. 10, p. 1852-60, Oct 2008. ______. Pleasant for some and unpleasant for others: a protocol analysis of the cognitive factors that influence affective responses to exercise. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, v. 7, p. 15, Feb 7 2010a. ______. Pleasant for some and unpleasant for others: a protocol analysis of the cognitive factors that influence affective responses to exercise. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, v. 7, n. 15, p. 1-15, 2010b. ______. Exercise experience influences affective and motivational outcomes of prescribed and self-selected intensity exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports, v. 22, n. 2, p. 265-77, Apr 2012. ROSENTHAL, J. A. Qualitative Descriptors of Strength of Association and Effect Size. Journal of Social Service Research, v. 21, n. 4, p. 37-59, 1996/10/11 1996. RUSSEL, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1161-1178, 1980. RUSSELL, J. A.; BARRETT, L. F. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. J Pers Soc Psychol, v. 76, n. 5, p. 805-19, May 1999. RYAN, R. et al. Intrinsic Motivation and Exercise Adherence. International Journal of Psychology, v. 28, p. 335-354, 1997. RYAN, R. M.; DECI, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol, v. 55, n. 1, p. 68-78, Jan 2000. SAANIJOKI, T. et al. Affective Responses to Repeated Sessions of High-Intensity Interval Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 47, n. 12, p. 2604-11, Dec 2015. SAWKA, M. N. Physiology of upper body exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, v. 14, p. 175- 211, 1986. SCHNEIDER, M.; DUNN, A.; COOPER, D. Affect, exercise, and physical activity among healthy adolescents. J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 31, n. 6, p. 706-23, Dec 2009. SCHNEIDER, M. L.; KWAN, B. M. Psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and affective response to exercise in adolescents. Psychol Sport Exerc, v. 14, n. 5, p. 776-785, Sep 2013. SIBLEY, B. A.; BERGMAN, S. M. What keeps athletes in the gym? Goals, psychological needs, and motivation of CrossFit™ participants. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology p. 1-20, 2017. SIRI, W. E. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: BROZECK, J. e HENSCHEL, A. (Ed.). Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 1961. p.233-244. SMIRMAUL, B. P. C. et al. Questionário de Preferência e Tolerância da Intensidade de Exercício: versão em português do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, v. 17, n. 5, p. 550-564, 2015. SPERANDEI, S.; VIEIRA, M. C.; REIS, A. C. Adherence to physical activity in an unsupervised setting: Explanatory variables for high attrition rates among fitness center members. J Sci Med Sport, Jan 28 2016. STANFORTH, D. et al. Training toys ... bells, ropes, and balls - oh my! ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 5-11, 2015. STORK, M. J. et al. A scoping review of the psychological responses to interval exercise: is interval exercise a viable alternative to traditional exercise? Health Psychol Rev, v. 11, n. 4, p. 324-344, Dec 2017. SUDECK, G.; SCHMID, J.; CONZELMANN, A. Exercise Experiences and Changes in Affective Attitude: Direct and Indirect Effects of In Situ Measurements of Experiences. Front Psychol, v. 7, p. 900, 2016. SVEBAK, S.; MURGATROYD, S. Metamotivational dominance: A multimethod validation of reversal theory constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 107-116, 1985. TANAKA, H.; MONAHAN, K. D.; SEALS, D. R. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol, v. 37, n. 1, p. 153-6, Jan 2001. TEIXEIRA, P. J. et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, v. 9, p. 78, 2012. TEMPEST, G.; PARFITT, G. Self-reported tolerance influences prefrontal cortex hemodynamics and affective responses. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, v. 16, n. 1, p. 63-71, Feb 2016. THOGERSEN-NTOUMANI, C.; NTOUMANIS, N. The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. J Sports Sci, v. 24, n. 4, p. 393-404, Apr 2006. THUM, J. S. et al. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One, v. 12, n. 1, p. e0166299, 2017. TOWNSEND, L. K. et al. Modified sprint interval training protocols. Part II. Psychological responses. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, v. 42, n. 4, p. 347-353, Apr 2017. TRITTER, A. et al. Self-efficacy and affect responses to sprint interval training. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 14, n. 6, p. 886-890, 2013. TUCKER, J. M.; WELK, G. J.; BEYLER, N. K. Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med, v. 40, n. 4, p. 454-61, Apr 2011. TUCKER, W. J. et al. Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Differing in Interval Duration. J Strength Cond Res, v. 29, n. 12, p. 3326-35, Dec 2015. TUDOR-LOCKE, C. et al. Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese U.S. men and women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, v. 7, p. 60, Aug 3 2010. ULMER, H. V. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia, v. 52, n. 5, p. 416-20, May 15 1996. VAZOU-EKKEKAKIS, S.; EKKEKAKIS, P. Affective consequences of imposing the intensity of physical activity: Does the loss of perceived autonomy matter? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, v. 6, n. 2, p. 125-144, 2009. WATSON, D.; CLARK, L. A.; TELLEGEN, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1063-70, Jun 1988. WESTON, K. S.; WISLOFF, U.; COOMBES, J. S. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Br J Sports Med, v. 48, n. 16, p. 1227-34, Aug 2014. WILLIAMS, D. M. et al. Acute Affective Response to a Moderate-intensity Exercise Stimulus Predicts Physical Activity Participation 6 and 12 Months Later. Psychol Sport Exerc, v. 9, n. 3, p. 231-245, May 2008. WILLIAMS, D. M. et al. Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10- min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity? Ann Behav Med, v. 44, n. 1, p. 43-51, Aug 2012. WOOD, K. M. et al. Dissimilar Physiological and Perceptual Responses Between Sprint Interval Training and High-Intensity Interval Training. J Strength Cond Res, v. 30, n. 1, p. 244-50, Jan 2016.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sulinstname:Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)instacron:UNICSULORIGINALDOUGLAS POPP MARIN.pdfDOUGLAS POPP MARIN.pdfapplication/pdf4150678http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/275/1/DOUGLAS%20POPP%20MARIN.pdfa3a97b7d0bf43e0910f88a1b5db78fcbMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/275/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/2752020-03-27 17:06:41.282oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/oai/requestmary.pela@unicid.edu.bropendoar:2020-03-27T20:06:41Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparisons of perceptual and motivational responses between different interval training protocols
title Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
spellingShingle Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
Marin, Douglas Popp
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
Afetividade
Autonomia
Tolerância
Treinamento intervalado
title_short Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
title_full Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
title_fullStr Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
title_full_unstemmed Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
title_sort Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado.
author Marin, Douglas Popp
author_facet Marin, Douglas Popp
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Otton, Rosemari
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 74531611934
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1164500211646058
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Otton, Rosemari
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1164500211646058
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Barela, Ana Maria Forti
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2481128022542270
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Pires, Adriana Cristina Levada
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5152872723454265
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Foschini, Denis
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7560757335531919
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv Figueira Junior, Aylton José
dc.contributor.referee5Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1107427417348652
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 30802674860
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8096301998353851
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marin, Douglas Popp
contributor_str_mv Otton, Rosemari
Otton, Rosemari
Barela, Ana Maria Forti
Pires, Adriana Cristina Levada
Foschini, Denis
Figueira Junior, Aylton José
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
topic CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
Afetividade
Autonomia
Tolerância
Treinamento intervalado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Afetividade
Autonomia
Tolerância
Treinamento intervalado
description O objetivo geral deste estudo foi investigar as respostas perceptivas e motivacionais ao treinamento intervalado com corda naval (TICN) e examinar a relação da resposta afetiva com os indicadores motivacionais relacionados à adesão ao exercício. Para tanto, dois estudos foram conduzidos. No estudo 1, 14 voluntários adultos jovens fisicamente ativos (24 ± 4 anos, 80,5 ± 8,27 kg, 175,4 ± 4,66 cm, IMC 26,2 ± 2,72 kg/m2 e 11,5 ± 4,41 % de gordura corporal) realizaram três protocolos de TICN em ordem aleatória contrabalanceada: P10:30 (12 x 10 segundos - 30 segundos de recuperação); P15:45 (8 x 15 segundos - 45 segundos de recuperação); e P30:90 (4 x 30 - 90 segundos de recuperação). Todas os protocolos foram realizados em intensidade “all-out”, com recuperação passiva, mantendo a densidade (razão entre trabalho/recuperação) em 1:3. Imediatamente ao final de cada série foi avaliada a resposta afetiva (FS), ativação (FAS), percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e frequência cardíaca (FC). No período de recuperação 15 minutos pós-exercício, foram acessados indicadores motivacionais como o divertimento, autoeficácia e intenção. Os resultados demonstraram que houve declínio significativo da FS e aumento progressivo da FAS, PSE, FC, porém sem diferença entre os protocolos. Da mesma maneira, não foi observada diferença para os indicadores motivacionais entre os protocolos. Nossos dados indicaram que a relação inversa entre o declínio da FS e o incremento da PSE pode ser moderada para percepção de tolerância a intensidade do exercício. A análise de regressão revelou que a resposta de FS e a autoeficácia podem predizer a intenção de repetir o TICN. O efeito da resposta de FS sobre a intenção foi mediado pela percepção de autoeficácia dos voluntários. No estudo 2, nós investigamos se o intervalo de recuperação (IR) autosselecionado poderia influenciar nas respostas perceptivas e motivacionais durante e após o TICN. Participaram desse estudo 12 homens fisicamente ativos (22 ± 6 anos, 77,2 ± 9,83 kg, 175,4 ± 5,83 cm, IMC 25,1 ± 2,70 kg/m2 e 9,35 ± 4,93% de gordura corporal). Foram realizados dois protocolos de TICN: protocolo prescrito (P15:45 - idêntico ao estudo 1) e protocolo autosselecionado (8 x 15 segundos - IR autosselecionado). Os resultados mostraram que não houve diferença nas respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre os protocolos. Entretanto, o aumento da FC durante o protocolo prescrito foi significativamente maior do que no IR autosselecionado. Coletivamente, os resultados dos estudos 1 e 2 mostraram que a manipulação da duração do intervalo de trabalho e do IR no TICN não influenciaram as respostas perceptivas durante o exercício, em condições de volume total e intensidade equalizados. Além disso, a FS pode influenciar diretamente e indiretamente os fatores motivacionais envolvidos na adesão ao exercício.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-06-26
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-01-21T17:49:17Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-21T17:49:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MARIN, D. P. Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado. 2019 Tese (Doutorado Interdisciplinar em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/275
identifier_str_mv MARIN, D. P. Comparação das respostas perceptivas e motivacionais entre diferentes protocolos de treinamento intervalado. 2019 Tese (Doutorado Interdisciplinar em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, 2019.
url https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/275
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.references.pt_BR.fl_str_mv ACSM. ACSM's Resources for the Personal Trainer. Fourth. LWW, 2013. ______. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Tenth. Philadelphia, PA: LWW, 2017. AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211, 1991. ANNESI, J. J. Sex differences in relations of cardiorespiratory and mood changes associated with self-selected amounts of cardiovascular exercise. Psychol Rep, v. 93, n. 3 Pt 2, p. 1339-46, Dec 2003. ASTORINO, T. A.; THUM, J. S. Response: Commentary: Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population. Front Psychol, v. 7, p. 746, 2016. ______. Interval training elicits higher enjoyment versus moderate exercise in persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, v. 41, n. 1, p. 77-84, Jan 2018. BACKHOUSE, S. H. et al. Exercise makes people feel better but people are inactive: paradox or artifact? J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 29, n. 4, p. 498-517, Aug 2007. BANDURA, A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997. BARBOSA, C. A tríade do tempo. 1. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Sextante, 2011. BARNETT, F. The effect of exercise on affective and self-efficacy responses in older and younger women. J Phys Act Health, v. 10, n. 1, p. 97-105, Jan 2013. BARTLETT, J. D. et al. High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence. J Sports Sci, v. 29, n. 6, p. 547-53, Mar 2011. BIDDLE, S. J.; GORELY, T. Sitting psychology: towards a psychology of sedentary behaviour. In: PAPAIOANNOU, A. G. e HACKFORT, D. (Ed.). Routledge Companion to Sport and Exercise Psychology. London: Routledge, 2014. cap. 720-740, BORG, G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998. BUCHHEIT, M.; LAURSEN, P. B. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med, v. 43, n. 5, p. 313-38, May 2013. CHANG, H. H.; PHAM, M. T. Affect as a Decision-Making System of the Present. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 40, n. 1, p. 42-63, 2013. CHEN, W. H. et al. Eight-Week Battle Rope Training Improves Multiple Physical Fitness Dimensions and Shooting Accuracy in Collegiate Basketball Players. J Strength Cond Res, v. 32, n. 10, p. 2715-2724, Oct 2018. COQUART, J. B.; GARCIN, M. Knowledge of the endpoint: effect on perceptual values. Int J Sports Med, v. 29, n. 12, p. 976-9, Dec 2008. DE SALLES, B. F. et al. Effects of fixed vs. self-suggested rest between sets in upper and lower body exercises performance. Eur J Sport Sci, v. 16, n. 8, p. 927-31, Nov 2016. DECI, E. L.; RYAN, R. M. The “ What ” and “ Why ” of Goal Pursuits : Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychology Inquiry, v. 11, n. 4, p. 227-268, 2000. DECKER, E. S.; EKKEKAKIS, P. More efficient, perhaps, but at what price? Pleasure and enjoyment responses to high-intensity interval exercise in low-active women with obesity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 28, p. 1-10, 2017. DIENER, E.; IRAN-NEJAD, A. The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1031-1038, 1985. DIETRICH, A. Transient hypofrontality as a mechanism for the psychological effects of exercise. Psychiatry Res, v. 145, n. 1, p. 79-83, Nov 29 2006. DING, D. et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet, v. 388, n. 10051, p. 1311-24, Sep 24 2016. DISHMAN, P. B. Assessment and care coordination teams: an innovation in caring for children. J Tenn Med Assoc, v. 86, n. 1, p. 17, 19, Jan 1993. DISHMAN, R. K.; BUCKWORTH, J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 28, n. 6, p. 706-19, Jun 1996. DISHMAN, R. K.; FARQUHAR, R. P.; CURETON, K. J. Responses to preferred intensities of exertion in men differing in activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 26, n. 6, p. 783-90, Jun 1994. EKKEKAKIS, P. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cognition and Emotion, v. 17, n. 2, p. 213-239, 2003a. ______. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cogn Emot, v. 17, n. 2, p. 213-239, Mar 2003b. ______. Pleasure from the exercising body:Two centuries of changing outlooks in psychological thought. In: P., E. (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Physical Activity and Mental Health. London: Routledge, 2013. p.35-56. ______. People have feelings! Exercise psychology in paradigmatic transition. Curr Opin Psychol, v. 16, p. 84-88, Aug 2017. EKKEKAKIS, P.; HALL, E. E.; PETRUZZELLO, S. J. Some like It Vigorous: Measuring Individual Differences in the Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology v. 27, n. 3, p. 350-374, 2005. EKKEKAKIS, P. et al. Can self-reported tolerance of exercise intensity play a role in exercise testing? Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 39, n. 7, p. 1193-9, Jul 2007. EKKEKAKIS, P.; PARFITT, G.; PETRUZZELLO, S. J. The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med, v. 41, n. 8, p. 641-71, Aug 1 2011. EKKEKAKIS, P.; RUSSELL, J. A. The Measurement of Affect, Mood, and Emotion: A guide for healthbehavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. EKKEKAKIS, P.; ZENKO, Z. Escape From Cognitivism: Exercise as Hedonic Experience. In: RAAB, M.;WYLLEMAN, P., et al (Ed.). Sport and Exercise Psychology Research: From Theory to Practice. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press., 2016a. p. 389-414. ______. Measurement of Affective Responses to Exercise: From “Affectless Arousal” to “The Most Well-Characterized” Relationship Between the Body and Affect. In: MEISELMAN, H. L. (Ed.). Emotion Measurement. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press., 2016b. p.293-321. EKKEKAKIS, S.; EKKEKAKIS, P. Affective Consequences of imposing the intensity of physical activity: does the loss of perceived autonomy matter? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, v. 6, p. 125-144, 2009. FAIGENBAUM, A. D. et al. Acute Cardiometabolic Responses to a Novel Training Rope Protocol in Children. J Strength Cond Res, v. 32, n. 5, p. 1197-1206, May 2018. FIUZA-LUCES, C. et al. Exercise is the real polypill. Physiology (Bethesda), v. 28, n. 5, p. 330-58, Sep 2013. FOCHT, B. C. et al. Affective and self-efficacy responses to acute aerobic exercise in sedentary older and younger adults. J Aging Phys Act, v. 15, n. 2, p. 123-38, Apr 2007. FOUNTAINE, C. J.; SCHMIDT, B. J. Metabolic cost of rope training. J Strength Cond Res, v. 29, n. 4, p. 889-93, Apr 2015. FRAZAO, D. T. et al. Feeling of Pleasure to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Is Dependent of the Number of Work Bouts and Physical Activity Status. PLoS One, v. 11, n. 3, p. e0152752, 2016. GABLE, S. L.; GONZAGA, G. C.; STRACHMAN, A. Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. J Pers Soc Psychol, v. 91, n. 5, p. 904-17, Nov 2006. GARBER, C. E. et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 43, n. 7, p. 1334-59, Jul 2011. GIBALA, M. J.; GILLEN, J. B.; PERCIVAL, M. E. Physiological and health-related adaptations to low-volume interval training: influences of nutrition and sex. Sports Med, v. 44 Suppl 2, p. S127-37, Nov 2014. GIBALA, M. J.; MCGEE, S. L. Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain? Exerc Sport Sci Rev, v. 36, n. 2, p. 58- 63, Apr 2008. GILLEN, J. B.; GIBALA, M. J. Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, v. 39, n. 3, p. 409- 12, Mar 2014. GOESSLER, K. F.; POLITO, M. D. Effect of fixed and self-suggested rest intervals between sets of resistance exercise on post-exercise cardiovascular behavior. Brazilian journal of kinanthropometry and human performance, v. 15, n. 4, p. 467- 475, 2013. GROSLAMBERT, A.; MAHON, A. D. Perceived exertion : influence of age and cognitive development. Sports Med, v. 36, n. 11, p. 911-28, 2006. HAMLYN-WILLIAMS, C. C.; FREEMAN, P.; PARFITT, G. Acute affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise sessions in adolescent girls: an observational study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil, v. 6, p. 35, 2014. HANIN, J.; EKKEKAKIS, P. Emotions in sport and exercise settings. In: PAPAIOANNOU, A. G. e HACKFORT, D. (Ed.). Routledge Companion to Sport and Exercise Psychology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014. p.83-104. HARDY, C. J.; REJESKI, W. J. Not What, but How One Feels: The Measurement of Affect during Exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 11, n. 3, p. 304-3017, 1989. HOEKSTRA, S. P.; BISHOP, N. C.; LEICHT, C. A. Can intervals enhance the inflammatory response and enjoyment in upper-body exercise? Eur J Appl Physiol, v. 117, n. 6, p. 1155-1163, Jun 2017. ISLAM, H.; TOWNSEND, L. K.; HAZELL, T. J. Modified sprint interval training protocols. Part I. Physiological responses. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, v. 42, n. 4, p. 339-346, Apr 2017. JACKSON, A. S.; POLLOCK, M. L. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr, v. 40, n. 3, p. 497-504, Nov 1978. JOHNSTON, V. S. The origin and function of pleasure. Cognition and Emotion, v. 17, n. 2, p. 167-179, 2003. JUNG, M. E.; BOURNE, J. E.; LITTLE, J. P. Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate- and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum. PLoS One, v. 9, n. 12, p. e114541, 2014. KAUR, J. et al. Muscle metaboreflex activation during dynamic exercise vasoconstricts ischemic active skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, v. 309, n. 12, p. H2145-51, Dec 15 2015. KENDZIERSKI, D.; DECARLO, K. J. Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two Validation Studies. Journaal of Sports & Exercise Psychology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 50-64, 1991. KILPATRICK, M. et al. Affective responses to exercise are dependent on intensity rather than total work. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 39, n. 8, p. 1417-22, Aug 2007. KILPATRICK, M. W.; GREELEY, S. J.; COLLINS, L. H. The Impact of Continuous and Interval Cycle Exercise on Affect and Enjoyment. Res Q Exerc Sport, v. 86, n. 3, p. 244-51, 2015. KIMIECIK, J. C.; HARRIS, A. T. What Is Enjoyment? A Conceptual/Definitional Analysis with Implications for Sport and Exercise Psychology. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 20, n. 3, p. 247-263, 1998. KIVINIEMI, M. T.; VOSS-HUMKE, A. M.; SEIFERT, A. L. How do I feel about the behavior? The interplay of affective associations with behaviors and cognitive beliefs as influences on physical activity behavior. Health Psychol, v. 26, n. 2, p. 152-8, Mar 2007. KOHL, H. W., 3RD et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet, v. 380, n. 9838, p. 294-305, Jul 21 2012. KWAN, B. M.; BRYAN, A. D. Affective response to exercise as a component of exercise motivation: Attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and temporal stability of intentions. Psychol Sport Exerc, v. 11, n. 1, p. 71-79, Jan 1 2010a. KWAN, B. M.; BRYAN, A. D. In-task and post-task affective response to exercise: translating exercise intentions into behaviour. Br J Health Psychol, v. 15, n. Pt 1, p. 115-31, Feb 2010b. LAWTON, R.; CONNER, M.; MCEACHAN, R. Desire or reason: predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychol, v. 28, n. 1, p. 56-65, Jan 2009. LEE, I. M. et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, v. 380, n. 9838, p. 219-29, Jul 21 2012. LEOTTI, L. A.; IYENGAR, S. S.; OCHSNER, K. N. Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control. Trends Cogn Sci, v. 14, n. 10, p. 457-63, Oct 2010. LERNER, J. S. et al. Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 66, p. 799-823, 2015. LEWIS, B. A. et al. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity behavior among adults and children. Am J Prev Med, v. 23, n. 2 Suppl, p. 26-35, Aug 2002. LIM, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, v. 380, n. 9859, p. 2224-60, Dec 15 2012. LIND, E.; EKKEKAKIS, P.; VAZOU, S. The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: 'pain' for no additional 'gain'. J Health Psychol, v. 13, n. 4, p. 464-8, May 2008. LOWE, R.; EVES, F.; CARROL, D. The Influence of Affective and Instrumental Beliefs on Exercise Intentions and Behavior: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology v. 32, n. 6, p. 1241-1252, 2006. MACHADO-VIDOTTI, H. G. et al. Cardiac autonomic responses during upper versus lower limb resistance exercise in healthy elderly men. Braz J Phys Ther, v. 18, n. 1, p. 9-18, Jan-Feb 2014. MAGNAN, R. E.; KWAN, B. M.; BRYAN, A. D. Effects of current physical activity on affective response to exercise: physical and social-cognitive mechanisms. Psychol Health, v. 28, n. 4, p. 418-33, 2013. MALIK, A. A. et al. Perceptual Responses to High- and Moderate-Intensity Interval Exercise in Adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1021-1030, May 2018. MARIN, D. P. et al. Motives, Motivation and Exercise Behavioral Regulations in CrossFit and Resistance Training Participants. PSYCH, v. 9, n. 14, p. 2869-2884, 2018. MARTIN, S. B. et al. Variables related to meeting the CDC/ACSM physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 32, n. 12, p. 2087-92, Dec 2000. MARTINEZ, N. et al. Affective and Enjoyment Responses to High-Intensity Interval Training in Overweight-to-Obese and Insufficiently Active Adults. J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 37, n. 2, p. 138-49, Apr 2015. MATSUO, E. et al. Relationships between Psychophysiological Responses to Cycling Exercise and Post-Exercise Self-Efficacy. Front Psychol, v. 6, p. 1775, 2015. MCAULEY, E.; COURNEYA, K. The subjective exercise experiences scale (SEES): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, v. 16, n. 2, p. 163, 1994. MCAULEY, E. et al. Predicting long-term maintenance of physical activity in older adults. Prev Med, v. 37, n. 2, p. 110-8, Aug 2003. MCAULEY, E. et al. Long-term follow-up of physical activity behavior in older adults. Health Psychol, v. 26, n. 3, p. 375-80, May 2007. MCAULEY, E. et al. Self-efficacy: Implications for Physical Activity, Function, and Functional Limitations in Older Adults. Am J Lifestyle Med, v. 5, n. 4, Jul 2011. MOUSTAKA, F. C. et al. Effects of an autonomy-supportive exercise instructing style on exercise motivation, psychological well-being, and exercise attendance in middleage women. J Phys Act Health, v. 9, n. 1, p. 138-50, Jan 2012. NIVEN, A. et al. Comparison of affective responses during and after low volume highintensity interval exercise, continuous moderate- and continuous high-intensity exercise in active, untrained, healthy males. J Sports Sci, v. 36, n. 17, p. 1993-2001, Sep 2018. NOAKES, T. D. Fatigue is a Brain-Derived Emotion that Regulates the Exercise Behavior to Ensure the Protection of Whole Body Homeostasis. Front Physiol, v. 3, p. 82, 2012. O'DONOVAN, G.; SHAVE, R. British adults' views on the health benefits of moderate and vigorous activity. Prev Med, v. 45, n. 6, p. 432-5, Dec 2007. OLIVEIRA, B. R.; DESLANDES, A. C.; SANTOS, T. M. Differences in exercise intensity seems to influence the affective responses in self-selected and imposed exercise: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol, v. 6, p. 1105, 2015. OLIVEIRA, B. R. et al. Continuous and high-intensity interval training: which promotes higher pleasure? PLoS One, v. 8, n. 11, p. e79965, 2013. OLIVEIRA, J. S. et al. What is the effect of health coaching on physical activity participation in people aged 60 years and over? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med, Mar 20 2017. OLNEY, N. et al. Comparison of Acute Physiological and Psychological Responses Between Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise and Three Regimes of High- Intensity Interval Training. J Strength Cond Res, v. 32, n. 8, p. 2130-2138, Aug 2018. PERRI, M. G. et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderate versus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol, v. 21, n. 5, p. 452-8, Sep 2002. POON, E. T. et al. Age-specific affective responses and self-efficacy to acute highintensity interval training and continuous exercise in insufficiently active young and middle-aged men. Journal of Exercise Science Fitness, v. 16, n. 3, p. 106-111, 2018. PRICE, M.; MOSS, P. The effects of work:rest duration on physiological and perceptual responses during intermittent exercise and performance. J Sports Sci, v. 25, n. 14, p. 1613-21, Dec 2007. RATAMESS, N. A. et al. The effect of rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol, v. 100, n. 1, p. 1-17, May 2007. RATAMESS, N. A. et al. Acute oxygen uptake and resistance exercise performance using different rest interval lengths: the influence of maximal aerobic capacity and exercise sequence. J Strength Cond Res, v. 28, n. 7, p. 1875-88, Jul 2014. RATAMESS, N. A. et al. Effects of Rest Interval Length on Acute Battling Rope Exercise Metabolism. J Strength Cond Res, v. 29, n. 9, p. 2375-87, Sep 2015. REEDA, J.; ONESB, D. S. The effect of acute aerobic exercise on positive activated affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 7, n. 5, p. 477–514, 2006. REISENZEIN, R. Pleasure-arousal theory and the intensity of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 67, n. 3, p. 525-539, 1994. REJESKI, W. J. The perception of exertion: A social psychophysiological integration. Journal of Sport Psychology, v. 3, n. 4, p. 305-320, 1981. REYNOLDS, J. P. et al. Feeling bad about progress does not lead people want to change their health behaviour . Psychology & Health v. 33, n. 2, p. 275-291, 2018. RHODES, R. E.; FIALA, B.; CONNER, M. A review and meta-analysis of affective judgments and physical activity in adult populations. Ann Behav Med, v. 38, n. 3, p. 180-204, Dec 2009. RHODES, R. E.; KATES, A. Can the Affective Response to Exercise Predict Future Motives and Physical Activity Behavior? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence. Ann Behav Med, v. 49, n. 5, p. 715-31, Oct 2015. RHODES, R. E.; KAWALSKI, K. Building skills to promote physical activity. In: NIGG, C. R. (Ed.). ACSM's Behavioral Aspects of Physical Activity and Exercise. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014. p.72-101. RHODES, R. E. et al. Factors associated with participation in resistance training: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med, v. 51, n. 20, p. 1466-1472, Oct 2017. ROSE, E. A.; PARFITT, G. A quantitative analysis and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 29, n. 3, p. 281-309, Jun 2007. ______. Can the feeling scale be used to regulate exercise intensity? Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 40, n. 10, p. 1852-60, Oct 2008. ______. Pleasant for some and unpleasant for others: a protocol analysis of the cognitive factors that influence affective responses to exercise. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, v. 7, p. 15, Feb 7 2010a. ______. Pleasant for some and unpleasant for others: a protocol analysis of the cognitive factors that influence affective responses to exercise. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, v. 7, n. 15, p. 1-15, 2010b. ______. Exercise experience influences affective and motivational outcomes of prescribed and self-selected intensity exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports, v. 22, n. 2, p. 265-77, Apr 2012. ROSENTHAL, J. A. Qualitative Descriptors of Strength of Association and Effect Size. Journal of Social Service Research, v. 21, n. 4, p. 37-59, 1996/10/11 1996. RUSSEL, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1161-1178, 1980. RUSSELL, J. A.; BARRETT, L. F. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. J Pers Soc Psychol, v. 76, n. 5, p. 805-19, May 1999. RYAN, R. et al. Intrinsic Motivation and Exercise Adherence. International Journal of Psychology, v. 28, p. 335-354, 1997. RYAN, R. M.; DECI, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol, v. 55, n. 1, p. 68-78, Jan 2000. SAANIJOKI, T. et al. Affective Responses to Repeated Sessions of High-Intensity Interval Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, v. 47, n. 12, p. 2604-11, Dec 2015. SAWKA, M. N. Physiology of upper body exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, v. 14, p. 175- 211, 1986. SCHNEIDER, M.; DUNN, A.; COOPER, D. Affect, exercise, and physical activity among healthy adolescents. J Sport Exerc Psychol, v. 31, n. 6, p. 706-23, Dec 2009. SCHNEIDER, M. L.; KWAN, B. M. Psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and affective response to exercise in adolescents. Psychol Sport Exerc, v. 14, n. 5, p. 776-785, Sep 2013. SIBLEY, B. A.; BERGMAN, S. M. What keeps athletes in the gym? Goals, psychological needs, and motivation of CrossFit™ participants. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology p. 1-20, 2017. SIRI, W. E. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. In: BROZECK, J. e HENSCHEL, A. (Ed.). Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 1961. p.233-244. SMIRMAUL, B. P. C. et al. Questionário de Preferência e Tolerância da Intensidade de Exercício: versão em português do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, v. 17, n. 5, p. 550-564, 2015. SPERANDEI, S.; VIEIRA, M. C.; REIS, A. C. Adherence to physical activity in an unsupervised setting: Explanatory variables for high attrition rates among fitness center members. J Sci Med Sport, Jan 28 2016. STANFORTH, D. et al. Training toys ... bells, ropes, and balls - oh my! ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, v. 19, n. 4, p. 5-11, 2015. STORK, M. J. et al. A scoping review of the psychological responses to interval exercise: is interval exercise a viable alternative to traditional exercise? Health Psychol Rev, v. 11, n. 4, p. 324-344, Dec 2017. SUDECK, G.; SCHMID, J.; CONZELMANN, A. Exercise Experiences and Changes in Affective Attitude: Direct and Indirect Effects of In Situ Measurements of Experiences. Front Psychol, v. 7, p. 900, 2016. SVEBAK, S.; MURGATROYD, S. Metamotivational dominance: A multimethod validation of reversal theory constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 107-116, 1985. TANAKA, H.; MONAHAN, K. D.; SEALS, D. R. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol, v. 37, n. 1, p. 153-6, Jan 2001. TEIXEIRA, P. J. et al. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, v. 9, p. 78, 2012. TEMPEST, G.; PARFITT, G. Self-reported tolerance influences prefrontal cortex hemodynamics and affective responses. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, v. 16, n. 1, p. 63-71, Feb 2016. THOGERSEN-NTOUMANI, C.; NTOUMANIS, N. The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise-related behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. J Sports Sci, v. 24, n. 4, p. 393-404, Apr 2006. THUM, J. S. et al. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One, v. 12, n. 1, p. e0166299, 2017. TOWNSEND, L. K. et al. Modified sprint interval training protocols. Part II. Psychological responses. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, v. 42, n. 4, p. 347-353, Apr 2017. TRITTER, A. et al. Self-efficacy and affect responses to sprint interval training. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, v. 14, n. 6, p. 886-890, 2013. TUCKER, J. M.; WELK, G. J.; BEYLER, N. K. Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med, v. 40, n. 4, p. 454-61, Apr 2011. TUCKER, W. J. et al. Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Exercise Differing in Interval Duration. J Strength Cond Res, v. 29, n. 12, p. 3326-35, Dec 2015. TUDOR-LOCKE, C. et al. Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese U.S. men and women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, v. 7, p. 60, Aug 3 2010. ULMER, H. V. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia, v. 52, n. 5, p. 416-20, May 15 1996. VAZOU-EKKEKAKIS, S.; EKKEKAKIS, P. Affective consequences of imposing the intensity of physical activity: Does the loss of perceived autonomy matter? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, v. 6, n. 2, p. 125-144, 2009. WATSON, D.; CLARK, L. A.; TELLEGEN, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1063-70, Jun 1988. WESTON, K. S.; WISLOFF, U.; COOMBES, J. S. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Br J Sports Med, v. 48, n. 16, p. 1227-34, Aug 2014. WILLIAMS, D. M. et al. Acute Affective Response to a Moderate-intensity Exercise Stimulus Predicts Physical Activity Participation 6 and 12 Months Later. Psychol Sport Exerc, v. 9, n. 3, p. 231-245, May 2008. WILLIAMS, D. M. et al. Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10- min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity? Ann Behav Med, v. 44, n. 1, p. 43-51, Aug 2012. WOOD, K. M. et al. Dissimilar Physiological and Perceptual Responses Between Sprint Interval Training and High-Intensity Interval Training. J Strength Cond Res, v. 30, n. 1, p. 244-50, Jan 2016.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Doutorado Interdisciplinar em Ciências da Saúde
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv Cruzeiro do Sul
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
instname:Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)
instacron:UNICSUL
instname_str Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)
instacron_str UNICSUL
institution UNICSUL
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/275/1/DOUGLAS%20POPP%20MARIN.pdf
http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/275/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a3a97b7d0bf43e0910f88a1b5db78fcb
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mary.pela@unicid.edu.br
_version_ 1801771153873698816

Registros relacionados