ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leitão, Manoela Lelis de Carvalho
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Ítalo Lima e, Hiroki, Kátia Aparecida Nunes, Pelli, Afonso, de Souza, Fagner
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biota Amazônia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/3622
Resumo: The assertion that within an ecosystem may exist different environmental characteristics and the populations tend to adapt, is the rule to justify the morphological variations. Thus, Ecomorphology and functional diversity try to diagnose how and where these different environmental characteristics are reflected in the organisms morphology. In this sense, our hypothesis was that populations of different environments in the Upper Paraná River Basin have ecomorphological and functional variations. For obtain Ecomorphological data were used seventy individuals of the Phalloceros harpagos from different sub-basins. Twenty-six morphometric measurements and calculated six body areas were taken. For analysis of the functional traits were evaluated, the stomach contents and osteology of fifty individuals of the species. The data analysis allowed noted and infer parameters about populations related to different regions can express differences in ecomorphological and functional standards. These differences related to the environmental characteristics of ecosystems often affected by human activities, and interspecific competition with alien species inserted there. The human impacts diagnosed in these environments indicate that conservation actions, mitigation and/or environmental compensation are necessary to maintain the functional structure of these populations.Keywords: Adaptation; Environmental Characteristics; Cyprinodontiformes; Environmental degradation; Morphology.
id UNIFAP-3_b8574a8ab9c99cac287336b1dccfcba4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3622
network_acronym_str UNIFAP-3
network_name_str Biota Amazônia
repository_id_str
spelling ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASINDIFERENÇAS ECOMORFOLÓGICAS E FUNCIONAL EM POPULAÇÕES DE Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA, 2008, NA BACIA DO ALTO RIO PARANÁThe assertion that within an ecosystem may exist different environmental characteristics and the populations tend to adapt, is the rule to justify the morphological variations. Thus, Ecomorphology and functional diversity try to diagnose how and where these different environmental characteristics are reflected in the organisms morphology. In this sense, our hypothesis was that populations of different environments in the Upper Paraná River Basin have ecomorphological and functional variations. For obtain Ecomorphological data were used seventy individuals of the Phalloceros harpagos from different sub-basins. Twenty-six morphometric measurements and calculated six body areas were taken. For analysis of the functional traits were evaluated, the stomach contents and osteology of fifty individuals of the species. The data analysis allowed noted and infer parameters about populations related to different regions can express differences in ecomorphological and functional standards. These differences related to the environmental characteristics of ecosystems often affected by human activities, and interspecific competition with alien species inserted there. The human impacts diagnosed in these environments indicate that conservation actions, mitigation and/or environmental compensation are necessary to maintain the functional structure of these populations.Keywords: Adaptation; Environmental Characteristics; Cyprinodontiformes; Environmental degradation; Morphology. A afirmativa de que dentro de um ecossistema podem existir diferentes características ambientais e as populações tendem a se adaptar, é a regra para justificar as variações morfológicas. Assim, a ecomorfologia e a diversidade funcional tentam diagnosticar como e onde estas distintas características ambientais são refletidas na morfologia dos organismos. Neste sentido, partimos da hipótese de que populações de diferentes ambientes na bacia do alto rio Paraná apresentam variações ecomorfológicas e funcionais. Para obter os dados ecomorfológicos foram utilizados setenta indivíduos de Phalloceros harpagos oriundos de diferentes sub-bacias. Foram tomadas vinte e seis medidas morfométricas e calculadas seis áreas corporais. Para análise dos caracteres funcionais foram avaliados, o conteúdo estomacal e a osteologia de cinquenta indivíduos da espécie. Por meio das análises dos dados foi possível constatar e inferir parâmetros de que realmente as populações referentes à diferentes regiões da bacia hidrográfica analisada podem expressar diferenças nos padrões ecomorfológicos e funcionais. Diferenças essas relacionadas com as características ambientais de ecossistemas muitas vezes impactados por ações antrópicas, além de competições interespecíficas com espécies exóticas ali inseridas. Os impactos antrópicos diagnosticados nestes ambientes indicam que as ações de preservação, mitigação e/ou compensação ambiental são necessárias para manter a estrutura funcional destas populações.Palavras-chave: Adaptação, Características ambientais, Cyprinodontiformes, Degradação ambiental, Morfologia.Universidade Federal do AmapáLeitão, Manoela Lelis de CarvalhoSilva, Ítalo Lima eHiroki, Kátia Aparecida NunesPelli, Afonsode Souza, Fagner2018-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/362210.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v8n3p34-38Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 8, n. 3 (2018); 34-382179-5746reponame:Biota Amazôniainstname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)instacron:UNIFAPporhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/3622/v8n3p34-38.pdfBrasilDireitos autorais 2018 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-09-10T19:55:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3622Revistahttp://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biotaONGhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/oai||juliosa@unifap.br2179-57462179-5746opendoar:2019-09-10T19:55:31Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
DIFERENÇAS ECOMORFOLÓGICAS E FUNCIONAL EM POPULAÇÕES DE Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA, 2008, NA BACIA DO ALTO RIO PARANÁ
title ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
spellingShingle ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
Leitão, Manoela Lelis de Carvalho
title_short ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
title_full ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
title_fullStr ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
title_full_unstemmed ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
title_sort ECOMORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES IN POPULATION OF Phalloceros harpagos LUCINDA 2008 IN UPPER PARANÁ RIVER BASIN
author Leitão, Manoela Lelis de Carvalho
author_facet Leitão, Manoela Lelis de Carvalho
Silva, Ítalo Lima e
Hiroki, Kátia Aparecida Nunes
Pelli, Afonso
de Souza, Fagner
author_role author
author2 Silva, Ítalo Lima e
Hiroki, Kátia Aparecida Nunes
Pelli, Afonso
de Souza, Fagner
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leitão, Manoela Lelis de Carvalho
Silva, Ítalo Lima e
Hiroki, Kátia Aparecida Nunes
Pelli, Afonso
de Souza, Fagner
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

description The assertion that within an ecosystem may exist different environmental characteristics and the populations tend to adapt, is the rule to justify the morphological variations. Thus, Ecomorphology and functional diversity try to diagnose how and where these different environmental characteristics are reflected in the organisms morphology. In this sense, our hypothesis was that populations of different environments in the Upper Paraná River Basin have ecomorphological and functional variations. For obtain Ecomorphological data were used seventy individuals of the Phalloceros harpagos from different sub-basins. Twenty-six morphometric measurements and calculated six body areas were taken. For analysis of the functional traits were evaluated, the stomach contents and osteology of fifty individuals of the species. The data analysis allowed noted and infer parameters about populations related to different regions can express differences in ecomorphological and functional standards. These differences related to the environmental characteristics of ecosystems often affected by human activities, and interspecific competition with alien species inserted there. The human impacts diagnosed in these environments indicate that conservation actions, mitigation and/or environmental compensation are necessary to maintain the functional structure of these populations.Keywords: Adaptation; Environmental Characteristics; Cyprinodontiformes; Environmental degradation; Morphology.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/3622
10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v8n3p34-38
url https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/3622
identifier_str_mv 10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v8n3p34-38
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/3622/v8n3p34-38.pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2018 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2018 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv


Brasil


dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Amapá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Amapá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 8, n. 3 (2018); 34-38
2179-5746
reponame:Biota Amazônia
instname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)
instacron:UNIFAP
instname_str Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)
instacron_str UNIFAP
institution UNIFAP
reponame_str Biota Amazônia
collection Biota Amazônia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||juliosa@unifap.br
_version_ 1800218369012531200