Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18769 |
Resumo: | Protected areas are essential for the maintenance of biodiversity. In Brazil, national parks encompass one of the most important portions of this area (26.864.003,74ha) that needs to be adequately managed to achieve conservation. Aiming to understand how the ichthyofauna data is included in management plans of Brazilian National Parks, we review 55 Brazilian national parks management plans to compare how data of freshwater fish fauna are included in these documents. The data evaluated from management plans were Hydrography, ichthyofauna list, participation of professionals trained in rapid ecological assessment and species richness, endangered and invasive species. This information was used to categorize the management plans through two sets of assessing: quality of rapid ecological assessment and coverage of species diversity. The categorization results were assumed as an indicator of the potential for biodiversity conservation of the management plans. We compare obtained results between biomes. We were able to understand that many of the Brazilian National Parks do not have management plans, and among the plans that are prepared, the lack of essential information compromises their potential for the conservation of biodiversity. We highlight the need to improve management plans for the Caatinga parks and expand the analysis of invasive species for all biomes. |
id |
UNIFEI_090e032366b0ebd2f10ca07993640abb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18769 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National ParksImportancia de la biodiversidad de peces en la planificación de la conservación de los Parques Nacionales Brasileños Importância da biodiversidade de peixes no planejamento da conservação dos Parques Nacionais BrasileirosConservaçãoGestãoÁreas protegidasPeixes de água doce.ConservaciónGestiónÁreas protegidasPeces de agua dulce.ConservationManagementProtected areasFreshwater fishes.Protected areas are essential for the maintenance of biodiversity. In Brazil, national parks encompass one of the most important portions of this area (26.864.003,74ha) that needs to be adequately managed to achieve conservation. Aiming to understand how the ichthyofauna data is included in management plans of Brazilian National Parks, we review 55 Brazilian national parks management plans to compare how data of freshwater fish fauna are included in these documents. The data evaluated from management plans were Hydrography, ichthyofauna list, participation of professionals trained in rapid ecological assessment and species richness, endangered and invasive species. This information was used to categorize the management plans through two sets of assessing: quality of rapid ecological assessment and coverage of species diversity. The categorization results were assumed as an indicator of the potential for biodiversity conservation of the management plans. We compare obtained results between biomes. We were able to understand that many of the Brazilian National Parks do not have management plans, and among the plans that are prepared, the lack of essential information compromises their potential for the conservation of biodiversity. We highlight the need to improve management plans for the Caatinga parks and expand the analysis of invasive species for all biomes.Las áreas protegidas son esenciales para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad. En Brasil, los parques nacionales abarcan una de las porciones más importantes de esta área (26.864.003,74ha) que necesita ser manejada adecuadamente para lograr la conservación. Para comprender cómo se abordan los datos sobre la ictiofauna en los planes de manejo de los Parques Nacionales de Brasil y el potencial de esta información para la conservación. revisamos 55 planes de gestión de parques nacionales brasileños para comparar cómo se incluyen en estos documentos los datos de la fauna de peces de agua dulce. Los datos evaluados de los planes de manejo fueron Hidrografía, listado de ictiofauna, participación de profesionales capacitados en valoración ecológica rápida y riqueza de especies, especies amenazadas e invasoras. Esta información se utilizó para categorizar los planes de manejo a través de dos conjuntos de evaluaciones: la calidad de la evaluación ecológica rápida y la cobertura de la diversidad de especies. Los resultados de la categorización se asumieron como un indicador del potencial de conservación de la biodiversidad de los planes de manejo. Comparamos los resultados obtenidos entre biomas. Pudimos aprehender que muchos de los Parques Nacionales brasileños aún no cuentan con planes de manejo, y entre los planes ya preparados, la falta de información esencial compromete su potencial para la conservación de la biodiversidad. Destacamos la necesidad de mejorar los planes de manejo de los parques de Caatinga y ampliar el análisis de especies invasoras para todos los biomas.As áreas protegidas são essenciais para a manutenção da biodiversidade. No Brasil, os parques nacionais abrangem uma das partes mais importantes dessas áreas (26.864.003,74 ha) que precisam ser manejadas de forma adequada para se alcançar a conservação. Para compreender como os dados a respeito da ictiofauna são abordados nos planos de manejo de parques nacionais brasileiros e o potencial dessas informações para a conservação, revisamos 55 planos de manejo. As variáveis utilizadas foram: plano de manejo disponível, hidrografia, dados da ictiofauna de água doce, profissionais treinados em avaliação ecológica rápida e riqueza de espécies. Além disso, dados sobre espécies ameaçadas e invasoras, usando uma matriz binária (ausência / presença). Comparamos nossas classificações com dados disponíveis na literatura especializada para cada bioma brasileiro. Pudemos apreender que muitos dos Parques Nacionais brasileiros ainda não possuem planos de manejo, e entre os planos já elaborados a falta de informações essenciais compromete seu potencial para a conservação da biodiversidade. Destacamos a necessidade de melhoria dos planos de manejo para os parques da Caatinga e a ampliação da análise de espécies invasoras para todos os biomas.Research, Society and Development2021-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1876910.33448/rsd-v10i10.18769Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e106101018769Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e106101018769Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e1061010187692525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18769/16635Copyright (c) 2021 Thercia Gonçalves Ribeiro Monroe; Selma Patricia Diniz Cantanhêde; Natanael Bezerra Monroe; Fabrício Silva Garcez; Ligia Tchaickahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonroe, Thercia Gonçalves Ribeiro Cantanhêde, Selma Patricia Diniz Monroe, Natanael Bezerra Garcez, Fabrício Silva Tchaicka, Ligia2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18769Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:49.526006Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks Importancia de la biodiversidad de peces en la planificación de la conservación de los Parques Nacionales Brasileños Importância da biodiversidade de peixes no planejamento da conservação dos Parques Nacionais Brasileiros |
title |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks |
spellingShingle |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks Monroe, Thercia Gonçalves Ribeiro Conservação Gestão Áreas protegidas Peixes de água doce. Conservación Gestión Áreas protegidas Peces de agua dulce. Conservation Management Protected areas Freshwater fishes. |
title_short |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks |
title_full |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks |
title_fullStr |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks |
title_sort |
Importance of fish biodiversity in conservation planning of Brazilian National Parks |
author |
Monroe, Thercia Gonçalves Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Monroe, Thercia Gonçalves Ribeiro Cantanhêde, Selma Patricia Diniz Monroe, Natanael Bezerra Garcez, Fabrício Silva Tchaicka, Ligia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cantanhêde, Selma Patricia Diniz Monroe, Natanael Bezerra Garcez, Fabrício Silva Tchaicka, Ligia |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monroe, Thercia Gonçalves Ribeiro Cantanhêde, Selma Patricia Diniz Monroe, Natanael Bezerra Garcez, Fabrício Silva Tchaicka, Ligia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Conservação Gestão Áreas protegidas Peixes de água doce. Conservación Gestión Áreas protegidas Peces de agua dulce. Conservation Management Protected areas Freshwater fishes. |
topic |
Conservação Gestão Áreas protegidas Peixes de água doce. Conservación Gestión Áreas protegidas Peces de agua dulce. Conservation Management Protected areas Freshwater fishes. |
description |
Protected areas are essential for the maintenance of biodiversity. In Brazil, national parks encompass one of the most important portions of this area (26.864.003,74ha) that needs to be adequately managed to achieve conservation. Aiming to understand how the ichthyofauna data is included in management plans of Brazilian National Parks, we review 55 Brazilian national parks management plans to compare how data of freshwater fish fauna are included in these documents. The data evaluated from management plans were Hydrography, ichthyofauna list, participation of professionals trained in rapid ecological assessment and species richness, endangered and invasive species. This information was used to categorize the management plans through two sets of assessing: quality of rapid ecological assessment and coverage of species diversity. The categorization results were assumed as an indicator of the potential for biodiversity conservation of the management plans. We compare obtained results between biomes. We were able to understand that many of the Brazilian National Parks do not have management plans, and among the plans that are prepared, the lack of essential information compromises their potential for the conservation of biodiversity. We highlight the need to improve management plans for the Caatinga parks and expand the analysis of invasive species for all biomes. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18769 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18769 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18769 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18769/16635 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e106101018769 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e106101018769 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e106101018769 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052753623646208 |