The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Rodrigo Couto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Neliton Marques da, Andrade, Marcos Vinícius Barros de, Pereira, Henrique dos Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10582
Resumo: The present study aimed to strategically analyze the implementation of an intermunicipal public consortium for the integrated management of solid waste (CPIGRS) between two municipalities in Amazonas State, considering the technical, economic, environmental, social and political dimensions. The research is descriptive in terms of objectives, bibliographic, documentary and field regarding procedures and a qualitative and quantitative approach. The data were obtained through the application of online questionnaires, forms, in semi-structured interviews and preparation of technical maps. Indicators were defined for the evaluation of the implementation of CPIGRS, with the adoption of the Delphi Method, and at the end of the consultations, 30 indicators were defined. Subsequently, the areas for the possible construction of landfills were delimited and the costs that each municipality would have had to be raised if an embankment were constructed in an isolated and intercropped manner. After analyzing the dimensions related to CPIGRS and classifying them in the defined indicators, the municipalities showed a viability of 94.4%. The study revealed that there are benefits in the five dimensions if CPIGRS is implemented. However, it is emphasized that the economic and political dimensions may be responsible for the failure to implement consortia in the State, mainly for maintaining a high value for the construction of a landfill as well as for the lack of priority for municipal managers to equalize the problems of waste in their respective municipalities.
id UNIFEI_0c0dbae555fd53c9784bbcae98b972f7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10582
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, BrazilLa (in) factibilidad de los Consorcios Públicos Intermunicipales para la Gestión de Residuos Sólidos en Amazonas, BrasilA (in) viabilidade dos Consórcios Públicos Intermunicipais para Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos no Amazonas, Brasil Consorcio IntermunicipalAdministración integradaVertederoAmazónia.Intermunicipal ConsortiumIntegrated ManagementLandfillAmazon.Consórcio IntermunicipalGestão IntegradaAterro SanitárioAmazônia.The present study aimed to strategically analyze the implementation of an intermunicipal public consortium for the integrated management of solid waste (CPIGRS) between two municipalities in Amazonas State, considering the technical, economic, environmental, social and political dimensions. The research is descriptive in terms of objectives, bibliographic, documentary and field regarding procedures and a qualitative and quantitative approach. The data were obtained through the application of online questionnaires, forms, in semi-structured interviews and preparation of technical maps. Indicators were defined for the evaluation of the implementation of CPIGRS, with the adoption of the Delphi Method, and at the end of the consultations, 30 indicators were defined. Subsequently, the areas for the possible construction of landfills were delimited and the costs that each municipality would have had to be raised if an embankment were constructed in an isolated and intercropped manner. After analyzing the dimensions related to CPIGRS and classifying them in the defined indicators, the municipalities showed a viability of 94.4%. The study revealed that there are benefits in the five dimensions if CPIGRS is implemented. However, it is emphasized that the economic and political dimensions may be responsible for the failure to implement consortia in the State, mainly for maintaining a high value for the construction of a landfill as well as for the lack of priority for municipal managers to equalize the problems of waste in their respective municipalities.El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar estratégicamente la implementación de un consorcio público intermunicipal para el manejo integrado de residuos sólidos (CPIGRS) entre dos municipios de Amazonas, considerando las dimensiones técnica, económica, ambiental, social y política. La investigación es descriptiva en cuanto a objetivos, bibliográfica, documental y de campo relacionada con los procedimientos y un enfoque cualitativo y cuantitativo. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante la aplicación de cuestionarios online, formularios, en entrevistas semiestructuradas y elaboración de mapas técnicos. Se definieron indicadores para la evaluación de la implementación del CPIGRS, con la adopción del Método Delphi, y al final de las consultas se definieron 30 indicadores. Posteriormente, se delimitaron las áreas para la posible construcción de rellenos sanitarios y los costos que habría tenido que subir cada municipio si se construyera un terraplén de manera aislada e intercalada. Después de analizar las dimensiones relacionadas con CPIGRS y clasificarlas en los indicadores definidos, los municipios mostraron una viabilidad del 94,4%. El estudio reveló que existen beneficios en las cinco dimensiones si se implementa CPIGRS. Sin embargo, se enfatiza que la dimensión económica y política puede ser responsable de la falta de implementación de los consorcios en el Estado, principalmente por mantener un alto valor para la construcción de un relleno sanitario así como por la falta de prioridad de los administradores municipales para igualar los problemas de residuos en sus respectivos municipios.O presente estudo teve como objetivo analisar estrategicamente a implantação de um consórcio público intermunicipal para a gestão integrada dos resíduos sólidos (CPIGRS) entre dois municípios do Amazonas, considerando as dimensões técnica, econômica, ambiental, social e política. A pesquisa é de caráter descritivo quanto aos objetivos, bibliográfica, documental e de campo quanto aos procedimentos e de abordagem quali-quantitativa. Os dados foram obtidos com a aplicação de questionários online, formulários, em entrevistas semiestruturadas e elaboração de mapas técnicos. Foram definidos indicadores para a avaliação da implantação de CPIGRS, com adoção do Método Delphi, e ao término das consultas foram definidos 30 indicadores. Posteriormente, foram delimitadas as áreas para a possível construção dos aterros sanitários e levantados os custos que cada município teria se construísse um aterro de forma isolada e consorciada. Após análise das dimensões relativas ao CPIGRS e classificando-os nos indicadores definidos, os municípios apresentaram viabilidade de 94,4%. O estudo revelou que existem benefícios nas cinco dimensões caso seja implantado o CPIGRS. Entretanto, salienta-se que as dimensões econômica e política podem ser as responsáveis pela não implementação dos consórcios no Estado, principalmente pela manutenção de um alto valor para a construção de um aterro assim como pela ausência na prioridade dos gestores municipais em equalizar a problemática dos resíduos em seus respectivos municípios.Research, Society and Development2020-12-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1058210.33448/rsd-v9i11.10582Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e82191110582Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e82191110582Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e821911105822525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10582/9374Copyright (c) 2020 Rodrigo Couto Alves; Neliton Marques da Silva; Marcos Vinícius Barros de Andrade; Henrique dos Santos Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Rodrigo Couto Silva, Neliton Marques da Andrade, Marcos Vinícius Barros de Pereira, Henrique dos Santos 2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10582Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:37.334669Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
La (in) factibilidad de los Consorcios Públicos Intermunicipales para la Gestión de Residuos Sólidos en Amazonas, Brasil
A (in) viabilidade dos Consórcios Públicos Intermunicipais para Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos no Amazonas, Brasil
title The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
spellingShingle The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
Alves, Rodrigo Couto
Consorcio Intermunicipal
Administración integrada
Vertedero
Amazónia.
Intermunicipal Consortium
Integrated Management
Landfill
Amazon.
Consórcio Intermunicipal
Gestão Integrada
Aterro Sanitário
Amazônia.
title_short The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
title_full The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
title_fullStr The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
title_sort The (in) feasibility of Intermunicipal Public Consortia for Solid Waste Management in Amazonas, Brazil
author Alves, Rodrigo Couto
author_facet Alves, Rodrigo Couto
Silva, Neliton Marques da
Andrade, Marcos Vinícius Barros de
Pereira, Henrique dos Santos
author_role author
author2 Silva, Neliton Marques da
Andrade, Marcos Vinícius Barros de
Pereira, Henrique dos Santos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Rodrigo Couto
Silva, Neliton Marques da
Andrade, Marcos Vinícius Barros de
Pereira, Henrique dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Consorcio Intermunicipal
Administración integrada
Vertedero
Amazónia.
Intermunicipal Consortium
Integrated Management
Landfill
Amazon.
Consórcio Intermunicipal
Gestão Integrada
Aterro Sanitário
Amazônia.
topic Consorcio Intermunicipal
Administración integrada
Vertedero
Amazónia.
Intermunicipal Consortium
Integrated Management
Landfill
Amazon.
Consórcio Intermunicipal
Gestão Integrada
Aterro Sanitário
Amazônia.
description The present study aimed to strategically analyze the implementation of an intermunicipal public consortium for the integrated management of solid waste (CPIGRS) between two municipalities in Amazonas State, considering the technical, economic, environmental, social and political dimensions. The research is descriptive in terms of objectives, bibliographic, documentary and field regarding procedures and a qualitative and quantitative approach. The data were obtained through the application of online questionnaires, forms, in semi-structured interviews and preparation of technical maps. Indicators were defined for the evaluation of the implementation of CPIGRS, with the adoption of the Delphi Method, and at the end of the consultations, 30 indicators were defined. Subsequently, the areas for the possible construction of landfills were delimited and the costs that each municipality would have had to be raised if an embankment were constructed in an isolated and intercropped manner. After analyzing the dimensions related to CPIGRS and classifying them in the defined indicators, the municipalities showed a viability of 94.4%. The study revealed that there are benefits in the five dimensions if CPIGRS is implemented. However, it is emphasized that the economic and political dimensions may be responsible for the failure to implement consortia in the State, mainly for maintaining a high value for the construction of a landfill as well as for the lack of priority for municipal managers to equalize the problems of waste in their respective municipalities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10582
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10582
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10582
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10582/9374
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e82191110582
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e82191110582
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e82191110582
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052743354941440

Registros relacionados