Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caixeta, Lucas Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Assis, Gleice Aparecida, Nascimento, Letícia Gonçalves, Fernandes, Marco Iony dos Santos, Cota, Bruno Marcio Alves, Silva, Gustavo Dantas, Silva Neto, Rubens da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35993
Resumo: In coffee farming, there is interest in reducing the incidence and costs in the management of weeds, with polyethylene mulching being a promising alternative, providing increased production and profitability of agricultural activity. In this context, this work was carried out with the objective of evaluating the effect of polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources on chlorophyll levels, productivity and beverage quality. The experiment was installed at the Federal University of Uberlândia, Campus Monte Carmelo. The planting of the crop, cultivar IPR 100, was carried out in February 2019, using spacing of 3.5 m between rows and 0.7 m between plants and drip irrigation. The design used was in randomized blocks with four blocks in a 3 x 2 factorial scheme (mulching colors x fertilization types). The experiment consisted of six treatments: (1) white/black mulching with conventional fertilization; (2) white/black mulching with controlled release fertilization; (3) silver/black mulching with conventional fertilization; (4) silver/black mulching with controlled release fertilization; (5) absence of mulching and conventional fertilization and (6) absence of mulching and controlled release fertilization. In 2021, referring to the first crop of the crop, yield, percentage of unripe, cane green, cherry, raisin and dry fruits, sensory analysis and classification of grains in terms of size and shape were determined. Regarding the use of mulching, there was no increase in the productivity of processed coffee in relation to the control treatment, with an average of 47 bags per hectare. The use of mulching showed a decrease of 14% in the chlorophyll content compared to the control, however, mulching accelerates the maturation of the fruits with an increase of 17.33% of dried fruits. There was no significant difference in the sensory analysis of beverage quality, with an average of 81.5 points. The mulching showed a reduction of 19.74% for the big boring and an increase of 17.82% for the medium boring. Fertilizer sources and mulching do not have a significant effect on the phytotechnical parameters of irrigated coffee.
id UNIFEI_14d23d732c74b63fb439f495c34a5efb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35993
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage qualityAcolchado de polietileno y fuentes de fertilizantes en cafetos: efectos sobre el contenido de clorofila, la productividad y la calidad de la bebidaMulching de polietileno e fontes de adubo em cafeeiros: efeitos no teor de clorofila, produtividade e qualidade de bebidaSoil coverCoffea arabica LProductive parameters.Cobertura del sueloCoffea arabica LParámetros productivos.Cobertura do soloCoffea arabica LParâmetros produtivos.In coffee farming, there is interest in reducing the incidence and costs in the management of weeds, with polyethylene mulching being a promising alternative, providing increased production and profitability of agricultural activity. In this context, this work was carried out with the objective of evaluating the effect of polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources on chlorophyll levels, productivity and beverage quality. The experiment was installed at the Federal University of Uberlândia, Campus Monte Carmelo. The planting of the crop, cultivar IPR 100, was carried out in February 2019, using spacing of 3.5 m between rows and 0.7 m between plants and drip irrigation. The design used was in randomized blocks with four blocks in a 3 x 2 factorial scheme (mulching colors x fertilization types). The experiment consisted of six treatments: (1) white/black mulching with conventional fertilization; (2) white/black mulching with controlled release fertilization; (3) silver/black mulching with conventional fertilization; (4) silver/black mulching with controlled release fertilization; (5) absence of mulching and conventional fertilization and (6) absence of mulching and controlled release fertilization. In 2021, referring to the first crop of the crop, yield, percentage of unripe, cane green, cherry, raisin and dry fruits, sensory analysis and classification of grains in terms of size and shape were determined. Regarding the use of mulching, there was no increase in the productivity of processed coffee in relation to the control treatment, with an average of 47 bags per hectare. The use of mulching showed a decrease of 14% in the chlorophyll content compared to the control, however, mulching accelerates the maturation of the fruits with an increase of 17.33% of dried fruits. There was no significant difference in the sensory analysis of beverage quality, with an average of 81.5 points. The mulching showed a reduction of 19.74% for the big boring and an increase of 17.82% for the medium boring. Fertilizer sources and mulching do not have a significant effect on the phytotechnical parameters of irrigated coffee.En la caficultura, existe interés en reducir la incidencia y los costos en el manejo de malezas, siendo el acolchado de polietileno una alternativa promisoria, proporcionando mayor producción y rentabilidad de la actividad agrícola. En este contexto, este trabajo se realizó con el objetivo de evaluar el efecto del acolchado de polietileno y las fuentes de fertilizantes sobre los niveles de clorofila, la productividad y la calidad de la bebida. El experimento fue instalado en la Universidad Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Monte Carmelo. La siembra del cultivo, cultivar IPR 100, se realizó en febrero de 2019, utilizando distancias de 3,5 m entre hileras y 0,7 m entre plantas y riego por goteo. El diseño utilizado fue en bloques al azar con cuatro bloques en un esquema factorial 3 x 2 (colores de cobertura x tipos de fertilización). El experimento consistió en seis tratamientos: (1) acolchado blanco/negro con fertilización convencional; (2) mantillo blanco/negro con fertilización de liberación controlada; (3) acolchado plateado/negro con fertilización convencional; (4) mantillo plateado/negro con fertilización de liberación controlada; (5) ausencia de mulching y fertilización convencional y (6) ausencia de mulching y fertilización de liberación controlada. En el año 2021, referente a la primera cosecha de la cosecha, se determinó rendimiento, porcentaje de inmaduro, caña verde, cereza, pasa y frutos secos, análisis sensorial y clasificación de granos en cuanto a tamaño y forma. En cuanto al uso de mulching, no hubo incremento en la productividad de café beneficiado en relación al tratamiento testigo, con un promedio de 47 sacos por hectárea. El uso de mulching mostró una disminución del 14% en el contenido de clorofila con respecto al testigo, sin embargo, el mulching acelera la maduración de los frutos con un aumento del 17,33% de frutos secos. No hubo diferencia significativa en el análisis sensorial de la calidad de la bebida, con un promedio de 81,5 puntos. El mulching mostró una reducción del 19,74% para la perforación grande y un aumento del 17,82% para la perforación mediana. Las fuentes de fertilizantes y el mulching no tienen un efecto significativo sobre los parámetros fitotécnicos del café de riego.Na cafeicultura há interesse em reduzir a incidência e custos no manejo de plantas daninhas, sendo o mulching de polietileno uma alternativa promissora, proporcionando aumento da produção e da lucratividade da atividade agrícola. Nesse contexto, este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de avaliar o efeito do mulching de polietileno e fontes de adubo nos teores de clorofila, produtividade e qualidade de bebida. O experimento foi instalado na Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Monte Carmelo. O plantio da lavoura, cultivar IPR 100, foi realizado em fevereiro de 2019, utilizando-se espaçamento de 3,5 m entre linhas e 0,7 m entre plantas e irrigação por gotejamento. O delineamento utilizado foi em blocos casualizados com quatro blocos no esquema fatorial 3 x 2 (cores de mulching x tipos de adubação). O experimento foi constituído de seis tratamentos: (1) mulching branco/preto com adubação convencional; (2) mulching branco/preto com adubação de liberação controlada; (3) mulching prata/preto com adubação convencional; (4) mulching prata/preto com adubação de liberação controlada; (5) ausência de mulching e adubação convencional e (6) ausência de mulching e adubação de liberação controlada. Em 2021, referente à primeira safra da lavoura, foram determinadas a produtividade, o percentual de frutos verdes, verde-cana, cereja, passas e secos, a análise sensorial e a classificação dos grãos quanto ao tamanho e formato.  Quanto à utilização do mulching, não houve acréscimo em produtividade de café beneficiado em relação ao tratamento controle, com média  de 47 sacas por hectare. O uso do mulching apresentou decréscimo de 14% no teor de clorofila comparado com a testemunha, porém, o mulching acelera a  maturação dos frutos com incremento de  17,33% de frutos secos.  Não houve diferença significativa na análise sensorial de qualidade de bebida, com média de 81,5 pontos. O mulching  apresentou redução de 19,74% para chato graúdo e aumento de 17,82% de chato médio. As fontes de adubo e o mulching não promovem efeito significativo nos parâmetros fitotécnicos do cafeeiro irrigado.Research, Society and Development2022-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3599310.33448/rsd-v11i14.35993Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 14; e290111435993Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 14; e290111435993Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 14; e2901114359932525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35993/30351Copyright (c) 2022 Lucas Gomes Caixeta; Gleice Aparecida Assis; Letícia Gonçalves Nascimento; Marco Iony dos Santos Fernandes; Bruno Marcio Alves Cota; Gustavo Dantas Silva; Rubens da Silva Netohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaixeta, Lucas Gomes Assis, Gleice Aparecida Nascimento, Letícia GonçalvesFernandes, Marco Iony dos Santos Cota, Bruno Marcio Alves Silva, Gustavo DantasSilva Neto, Rubens da 2022-11-08T13:36:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35993Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:50:42.149401Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
Acolchado de polietileno y fuentes de fertilizantes en cafetos: efectos sobre el contenido de clorofila, la productividad y la calidad de la bebida
Mulching de polietileno e fontes de adubo em cafeeiros: efeitos no teor de clorofila, produtividade e qualidade de bebida
title Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
spellingShingle Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
Caixeta, Lucas Gomes
Soil cover
Coffea arabica L
Productive parameters.
Cobertura del suelo
Coffea arabica L
Parámetros productivos.
Cobertura do solo
Coffea arabica L
Parâmetros produtivos.
title_short Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
title_full Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
title_fullStr Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
title_full_unstemmed Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
title_sort Polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources in coffee trees: effects on chlorophyll content, productivity and beverage quality
author Caixeta, Lucas Gomes
author_facet Caixeta, Lucas Gomes
Assis, Gleice Aparecida
Nascimento, Letícia Gonçalves
Fernandes, Marco Iony dos Santos
Cota, Bruno Marcio Alves
Silva, Gustavo Dantas
Silva Neto, Rubens da
author_role author
author2 Assis, Gleice Aparecida
Nascimento, Letícia Gonçalves
Fernandes, Marco Iony dos Santos
Cota, Bruno Marcio Alves
Silva, Gustavo Dantas
Silva Neto, Rubens da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caixeta, Lucas Gomes
Assis, Gleice Aparecida
Nascimento, Letícia Gonçalves
Fernandes, Marco Iony dos Santos
Cota, Bruno Marcio Alves
Silva, Gustavo Dantas
Silva Neto, Rubens da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Soil cover
Coffea arabica L
Productive parameters.
Cobertura del suelo
Coffea arabica L
Parámetros productivos.
Cobertura do solo
Coffea arabica L
Parâmetros produtivos.
topic Soil cover
Coffea arabica L
Productive parameters.
Cobertura del suelo
Coffea arabica L
Parámetros productivos.
Cobertura do solo
Coffea arabica L
Parâmetros produtivos.
description In coffee farming, there is interest in reducing the incidence and costs in the management of weeds, with polyethylene mulching being a promising alternative, providing increased production and profitability of agricultural activity. In this context, this work was carried out with the objective of evaluating the effect of polyethylene mulching and fertilizer sources on chlorophyll levels, productivity and beverage quality. The experiment was installed at the Federal University of Uberlândia, Campus Monte Carmelo. The planting of the crop, cultivar IPR 100, was carried out in February 2019, using spacing of 3.5 m between rows and 0.7 m between plants and drip irrigation. The design used was in randomized blocks with four blocks in a 3 x 2 factorial scheme (mulching colors x fertilization types). The experiment consisted of six treatments: (1) white/black mulching with conventional fertilization; (2) white/black mulching with controlled release fertilization; (3) silver/black mulching with conventional fertilization; (4) silver/black mulching with controlled release fertilization; (5) absence of mulching and conventional fertilization and (6) absence of mulching and controlled release fertilization. In 2021, referring to the first crop of the crop, yield, percentage of unripe, cane green, cherry, raisin and dry fruits, sensory analysis and classification of grains in terms of size and shape were determined. Regarding the use of mulching, there was no increase in the productivity of processed coffee in relation to the control treatment, with an average of 47 bags per hectare. The use of mulching showed a decrease of 14% in the chlorophyll content compared to the control, however, mulching accelerates the maturation of the fruits with an increase of 17.33% of dried fruits. There was no significant difference in the sensory analysis of beverage quality, with an average of 81.5 points. The mulching showed a reduction of 19.74% for the big boring and an increase of 17.82% for the medium boring. Fertilizer sources and mulching do not have a significant effect on the phytotechnical parameters of irrigated coffee.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35993
10.33448/rsd-v11i14.35993
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35993
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i14.35993
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35993/30351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 14; e290111435993
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 14; e290111435993
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 14; e290111435993
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052725927608320