The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jhullyana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alencar, Larissa Mayara de Sousa, Sá, Lucas Costa, Santos, Marcos Vinícios Ferreira dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35476
Resumo: Introduction: The Manchester Risk Classification System (MCHR) was developed in the United Kingdom by physicians and nurses with the purpose of prioritizing emergency care according to higher-risk clinical criteria in order to minimize harm to the patient's health. Objectives: To identify the main difficulties and clinical outcomes during the use of SMCR. Methodology: Integrative literature review by searching the PUBMED and SciELO databases, using the descriptors "Manchester triage" and "emergency" and their variations in English. Articles published between 2017 to 2022, which answered the research question and free full texts were included. In the end, a sample of 16 articles was obtained. Results And Discussion: Three thematic categories were listed. The first one corresponded to the clinical profile of patients screened by the RRMS, which indicated the prevalence of male patients in the white and red categories, and the most prevalent comorbidities in the red category were associated with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Another category highlighted the main difficulties associated, which were the lack of standardization, nursing staff with no previous training, and lower performance of the triage as the patient's level of complexity increased. The last category pointed out that the RMCMS is a good predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: There are several factors that hinder the screening process, and it is necessary that institutions promote training of healthcare professionals to improve screening standardization protocols, in order to generate a lower error rate and reduce morbidity and mortality.
id UNIFEI_16ec74d5d2635fba6816576dbb49d6ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35476
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency servicesLas consecuencias de no utilizar correctamente el protocolo Manchester en los servicios de Urgencias y EmergenciasAs consequências da não utilização correta do protocolo de Manchester nos serviços de Urgência e EmergênciaEmergencyUrgencyTriage.EmergenciaUrgenciaTriaje.EmergênciaUrgênciaTriagem.Introduction: The Manchester Risk Classification System (MCHR) was developed in the United Kingdom by physicians and nurses with the purpose of prioritizing emergency care according to higher-risk clinical criteria in order to minimize harm to the patient's health. Objectives: To identify the main difficulties and clinical outcomes during the use of SMCR. Methodology: Integrative literature review by searching the PUBMED and SciELO databases, using the descriptors "Manchester triage" and "emergency" and their variations in English. Articles published between 2017 to 2022, which answered the research question and free full texts were included. In the end, a sample of 16 articles was obtained. Results And Discussion: Three thematic categories were listed. The first one corresponded to the clinical profile of patients screened by the RRMS, which indicated the prevalence of male patients in the white and red categories, and the most prevalent comorbidities in the red category were associated with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Another category highlighted the main difficulties associated, which were the lack of standardization, nursing staff with no previous training, and lower performance of the triage as the patient's level of complexity increased. The last category pointed out that the RMCMS is a good predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: There are several factors that hinder the screening process, and it is necessary that institutions promote training of healthcare professionals to improve screening standardization protocols, in order to generate a lower error rate and reduce morbidity and mortality.Introducción: El Sistema de Clasificación de Riesgo de Manchester (SMCR) fue desarrollado en el Reino Unido por médicos y enfermeras con el objetivo de priorizar la atención de emergencia de acuerdo con los criterios clínicos de mayor riesgo para minimizar los problemas de salud de los pacientes. Objetivos: Identificar las principales dificultades y resultados clínicos durante el uso de SMCR. METODOLOGÍA: Revisión integrativa de la literatura a través de una búsqueda en las bases de datos PUBMED y SciELO, Utilizando los descriptores “Manchester screening” y “emergency” y sus variantes en inglés. Se incluyeron artículos publicados entre 2017 y 2022 que respondieron a la pregunta de investigación y textos completos libres. Al final se obtuvo una muestra de 16 artículos. Resultados Y Discusión: Se listaron tres categorías temáticas. El primero correspondió al perfil clínico de los pacientes tamizados por el SMCR, que indicó el predominio de pacientes del sexo masculino en las categorías blanca y roja y las comorbilidades más prevalentes en la categoría roja estaban asociadas a diabetes mellitus e hipertensión arterial. Otra categoría mostró las principales dificultades asociadas, que fueron la falta de estandarización, personal de enfermería sin capacitación previa y menor desempeño del tamizaje cuanto mayor era el nivel de complejidad del paciente. La última categoría señaló que el SMCR es un buen predictor de mortalidad. Conclusión: Existen varios factores que dificultan el proceso de tamizaje, siendo necesario que las instituciones promuevan la capacitación de los profesionales de la salud para mejorar los protocolos de estandarización del tamizaje, con el fin de generar una menor tasa de error y reducir la morbimortalidad.Introdução: O Sistema Manchester de Classificação de Risco (SMCR) foi desenvolvido no Reino Unido por médicos e enfermeiros com a finalidade de priorizar o atendimento na emergência de acordo com critérios clínicos de maior risco com intuito de minimizar agravos à saúde do paciente. Objetivos: Identificar as principais dificuldades e desfechos clínicos durante o uso SMCR. Metodologia: Revisão integrativa da literatura através da pesquisa nas bases de dados PUBMED e SciELO, utilizando os descritores “triagem de Manchester” e “emergência” e suas variações em inglês. Foram incluídos os artigos publicados entre 2017 à 2022, que respondessem à pergunta de pesquisa e textos completos gratuitos. Ao final, obteve-se uma amostra de 16 artigos. Resultados E Discussão: Foram elencadas três categorias temáticas. A primeira correspondeu ao perfil clínico dos pacientes triados pelo SMCR, que apontou a prevalência de pacientes do sexo masculino nas categorias branca e vermelha e as comorbidades mais prevalentes na categoria vermelha estavam associadas ao diabetes mellitus e a hipertensão. Outra categoria evidenciou as principais dificuldades associadas, sendo estas a ausência de padronização, equipe de enfermagem sem treinamento prévio e menor desempenho da triagem quanto maior o nível de complexidade do paciente. A última categoria apontou que o SMCR é um bom preditor de mortalidade. Conclusão: Há diversos fatores que dificultam o processo de triagem, sendo necessário que as instituições promovam a capacitação dos profissionais da área da saúde para melhorar os protocolos de padronização de triagem, a fim de gerar uma menor taxa de erros e redução da morbimortalidade.Research, Society and Development2022-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3547610.33448/rsd-v11i13.35476Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 13; e324111335476Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 13; e324111335476Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 13; e3241113354762525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35476/29748Copyright (c) 2022 Jhullyana Rocha Silva; Larissa Mayara de Sousa Alencar; Lucas Costa Sá; Marcos Vinícios Ferreira dos Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJhullyanaAlencar, Larissa Mayara de SousaSá, Lucas CostaSantos, Marcos Vinícios Ferreira dos2022-10-17T13:43:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35476Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:50:23.145430Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
Las consecuencias de no utilizar correctamente el protocolo Manchester en los servicios de Urgencias y Emergencias
As consequências da não utilização correta do protocolo de Manchester nos serviços de Urgência e Emergência
title The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
spellingShingle The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
Jhullyana
Emergency
Urgency
Triage.
Emergencia
Urgencia
Triaje.
Emergência
Urgência
Triagem.
title_short The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
title_full The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
title_fullStr The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
title_full_unstemmed The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
title_sort The consequences of not using the Manchester protocol correctly in Urgent and Emergency services
author Jhullyana
author_facet Jhullyana
Alencar, Larissa Mayara de Sousa
Sá, Lucas Costa
Santos, Marcos Vinícios Ferreira dos
author_role author
author2 Alencar, Larissa Mayara de Sousa
Sá, Lucas Costa
Santos, Marcos Vinícios Ferreira dos
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jhullyana
Alencar, Larissa Mayara de Sousa
Sá, Lucas Costa
Santos, Marcos Vinícios Ferreira dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Emergency
Urgency
Triage.
Emergencia
Urgencia
Triaje.
Emergência
Urgência
Triagem.
topic Emergency
Urgency
Triage.
Emergencia
Urgencia
Triaje.
Emergência
Urgência
Triagem.
description Introduction: The Manchester Risk Classification System (MCHR) was developed in the United Kingdom by physicians and nurses with the purpose of prioritizing emergency care according to higher-risk clinical criteria in order to minimize harm to the patient's health. Objectives: To identify the main difficulties and clinical outcomes during the use of SMCR. Methodology: Integrative literature review by searching the PUBMED and SciELO databases, using the descriptors "Manchester triage" and "emergency" and their variations in English. Articles published between 2017 to 2022, which answered the research question and free full texts were included. In the end, a sample of 16 articles was obtained. Results And Discussion: Three thematic categories were listed. The first one corresponded to the clinical profile of patients screened by the RRMS, which indicated the prevalence of male patients in the white and red categories, and the most prevalent comorbidities in the red category were associated with diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Another category highlighted the main difficulties associated, which were the lack of standardization, nursing staff with no previous training, and lower performance of the triage as the patient's level of complexity increased. The last category pointed out that the RMCMS is a good predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: There are several factors that hinder the screening process, and it is necessary that institutions promote training of healthcare professionals to improve screening standardization protocols, in order to generate a lower error rate and reduce morbidity and mortality.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35476
10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35476
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35476
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35476
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35476/29748
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 13; e324111335476
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 13; e324111335476
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 13; e324111335476
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052725044707328