Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prevital , Everaldo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Gastaldi, Ana Carolina Rumão, Novakoski, Adeline dos Santos, Francisco, João Paulo, Silva , Rubens Adriano da, Lopes, Ana Daniela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24841
Resumo: In order to evaluate the potential of cucumber production for canning, an entirely randomized design experiment was conducted with three cultivars and two managements, adopting four repetitions. The plots were distributed in four planting lines, via direct sowing, with 1.50 m x 0.45 m spacing between plants. Two managements were adopted: management 1) without sprouting and apical pruning; management 2) with sprouting and apical pruning. After 70 days of planting, total fresh mass of fruits per plant, average number of fruits per plant and productivity were evaluated. Among the cultivars, Marinda and Amour F1 stood out for handling 1, with total fresh mass yields of 1762.75 g and 1026.71 g respectively, and 135.69 and 79.62 average number of fruits per plant. In handling 2, the cultivars Marinda and Eureka obtained better yields, with a total fresh mass of 1966,94 g and 1605,31 g respectively, and 146,17 and 90,09 average number of fruits per plant. The cultivar Marinda both for handling 1 and handling 2 obtained the best yield.  Among the tested cultivars, the cultivation of Marinda and Eureka cultivars associated to apical pruning and capation is suggested.
id UNIFEI_18d6036c3bce92f21dbc37f118d3a836
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24841
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different drivingPotencial productivo de los frutos del pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) para el envasado bajo diferentes sistemas de manipulaciónPotencial produtivo de frutos de pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) para conserva sob diferentes sistemas de conduçãoPodaCapação apicalHorticultura.PodaCaptación apicalHorticultura.PruningApical uptakeHorticulture.In order to evaluate the potential of cucumber production for canning, an entirely randomized design experiment was conducted with three cultivars and two managements, adopting four repetitions. The plots were distributed in four planting lines, via direct sowing, with 1.50 m x 0.45 m spacing between plants. Two managements were adopted: management 1) without sprouting and apical pruning; management 2) with sprouting and apical pruning. After 70 days of planting, total fresh mass of fruits per plant, average number of fruits per plant and productivity were evaluated. Among the cultivars, Marinda and Amour F1 stood out for handling 1, with total fresh mass yields of 1762.75 g and 1026.71 g respectively, and 135.69 and 79.62 average number of fruits per plant. In handling 2, the cultivars Marinda and Eureka obtained better yields, with a total fresh mass of 1966,94 g and 1605,31 g respectively, and 146,17 and 90,09 average number of fruits per plant. The cultivar Marinda both for handling 1 and handling 2 obtained the best yield.  Among the tested cultivars, the cultivation of Marinda and Eureka cultivars associated to apical pruning and capation is suggested.Con el objetivo de evaluar el potencial de producción de pepinos en conserva, se realizó un experimento en un diseño completamente al azar con tres cultivares y dos manejos, adoptando cuatro repeticiones. Las parcelas se distribuyeron en cuatro líneas de siembra, mediante siembra directa, con un espaciamiento de 1,50 m x 0,45 m entre plantas. Se adoptaron dos manejos: manejo 1) sin brotar y sin poda apical; manejo 2) con trilla y poda apical. Después de 70 días de la siembra, se evaluó la masa fresca total de frutos por planta, el número promedio de frutos por planta y el rendimiento. Entre los cultivares, Marinda y Amour F1 se destacaron por el manejo 1, con rendimientos totales de masa fresca de 1762,75 g y 1026,71 g respectivamente, y 135,69 y 79,62 número medio de frutos por planta. En el manejo 2, los cultivares Marinda y Eureka tuvieron el mejor rendimiento, con una masa fresca total de 1966.94 g y 1605.31 g respectivamente, y un número medio de frutos por planta de 146.17 y 90.09. Cultivar Marinda tanto para el manejo 1 como para el manejo 2 tuvo la mejor productividad. Entre los cultivares probados, se sugiere el cultivo de los cultivares Marinda y Eureka asociados con la poda y el taponado apical.Com o objetivo de avaliar o potencial de produção de pepino para conserva, foi conduzido um experimento em delineamento inteiramente casualizado com três cultivares e dois manejos, adotando-se quatro repetições. As parcelas foram distribuídas em quatro linhas de plantio, via semeadura direta, com espaçamento de 1,50 m × 0,45 m entre plantas. Adotou-se dois manejos: manejo 1) sem desbrota e sem poda apical; manejo 2) com desbrota e com poda apical. Após 70 dias de plantio, avaliou-se massa fresca total de frutos por planta, número médio de frutos por planta e produtividade. Entre as cultivares, destacaram-se Marinda e Amour F1 para o manejo 1, com rendimentos de massa fresca total de 1762,75 g e 1026,71 g respectivamente, e 135,69 e 79,62 número médio de frutos por planta. No manejo 2, as cultivares Marinda e Eureka obtiveram melhor rendimento, sendo a massa fresca total 1966,94 g e 1605,31 g respectivamente, e 146,17 e 90,09 número médio de frutos por planta. A cultivar Marinda tanto para o manejo 1 quanto para o manejo 2 foi a que obteve a melhor produtividade. Entre as cultivares testadas, sugere-se o cultivo das cultivares Marinda e Eureka associada à poda e capação apical.Research, Society and Development2022-01-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2484110.33448/rsd-v11i1.24841Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e8011124841Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e8011124841Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e80111248412525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24841/21719Copyright (c) 2022 Everaldo Prevital ; Ana Carolina Rumão Gastaldi; Adeline dos Santos Novakoski; João Paulo Francisco; Rubens Adriano da Silva ; Ana Daniela Lopeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrevital , Everaldo Gastaldi, Ana Carolina Rumão Novakoski, Adeline dos Santos Francisco, João PauloSilva , Rubens Adriano da Lopes, Ana Daniela2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24841Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:16.298013Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
Potencial productivo de los frutos del pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) para el envasado bajo diferentes sistemas de manipulación
Potencial produtivo de frutos de pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) para conserva sob diferentes sistemas de condução
title Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
spellingShingle Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
Prevital , Everaldo
Poda
Capação apical
Horticultura.
Poda
Captación apical
Horticultura.
Pruning
Apical uptake
Horticulture.
title_short Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
title_full Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
title_fullStr Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
title_full_unstemmed Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
title_sort Productive potential of cucumber fruits (Cucumis sativus L.) for preservation under different driving
author Prevital , Everaldo
author_facet Prevital , Everaldo
Gastaldi, Ana Carolina Rumão
Novakoski, Adeline dos Santos
Francisco, João Paulo
Silva , Rubens Adriano da
Lopes, Ana Daniela
author_role author
author2 Gastaldi, Ana Carolina Rumão
Novakoski, Adeline dos Santos
Francisco, João Paulo
Silva , Rubens Adriano da
Lopes, Ana Daniela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prevital , Everaldo
Gastaldi, Ana Carolina Rumão
Novakoski, Adeline dos Santos
Francisco, João Paulo
Silva , Rubens Adriano da
Lopes, Ana Daniela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Poda
Capação apical
Horticultura.
Poda
Captación apical
Horticultura.
Pruning
Apical uptake
Horticulture.
topic Poda
Capação apical
Horticultura.
Poda
Captación apical
Horticultura.
Pruning
Apical uptake
Horticulture.
description In order to evaluate the potential of cucumber production for canning, an entirely randomized design experiment was conducted with three cultivars and two managements, adopting four repetitions. The plots were distributed in four planting lines, via direct sowing, with 1.50 m x 0.45 m spacing between plants. Two managements were adopted: management 1) without sprouting and apical pruning; management 2) with sprouting and apical pruning. After 70 days of planting, total fresh mass of fruits per plant, average number of fruits per plant and productivity were evaluated. Among the cultivars, Marinda and Amour F1 stood out for handling 1, with total fresh mass yields of 1762.75 g and 1026.71 g respectively, and 135.69 and 79.62 average number of fruits per plant. In handling 2, the cultivars Marinda and Eureka obtained better yields, with a total fresh mass of 1966,94 g and 1605,31 g respectively, and 146,17 and 90,09 average number of fruits per plant. The cultivar Marinda both for handling 1 and handling 2 obtained the best yield.  Among the tested cultivars, the cultivation of Marinda and Eureka cultivars associated to apical pruning and capation is suggested.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24841
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24841
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24841
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24841/21719
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e8011124841
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e8011124841
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e8011124841
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052791850532864

Registros relacionados