Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13833 |
Resumo: | The production of eggs in Brazil has grown, which has led to an increase in the density of animals in the facilities, generating a decrease in ambience and well-being. Thus, this study aimed to carry out an analysis in laying systems, laying cage free without enrichment and cage free with enrichment, at the peak and end of production and its relationship with environmental enrichment and egg quality. For the treatment with enrichment were used: nest, perch, rattle, bales of native grass and branches of Cambuci. While the treatment without enrichment had only one nest, both treatments had feeders of the tubular type, drinkers of the pendular type and bed of rice straw. Animal behavior and egg quality were evaluated. In the behavior analysis, we obtained a difference between nesting, perching, scratching, chasing and scratching head behaviors, possibly due to the fact that birds use the means that were provided and can express their natural behavior. Within egg quality, we observed a difference in the parameters of yolk color, weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell thickness and yolk index (YCF), where yolk weight and color were higher in the treatment without enrichment, which may be due to the greater consumption of food, since the birds in this treatment did not have other means of distraction. It is concluded that enrichment promotes positive changes both in the expression of natural laying behaviors and improves the main requirements in relation to egg quality. |
id |
UNIFEI_1aca0301b94d347adf16d3ccf267d342 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13833 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg qualityComportamiento de gallinas ponedoras em un sistema sin jaulas a diferentes edades y calidad del huevoComportamento de galinhas poedeiras em sistema cage free em diferentes idades e a qualidade de ovosAnimal welfare indicatorAnimal densityProduction phaseProductivity.Indicador de bem-estar animalDensidade animalFase de produçãoProdutividade.Animal welfare indicatorAnimal densityProduction phaseProductivity.The production of eggs in Brazil has grown, which has led to an increase in the density of animals in the facilities, generating a decrease in ambience and well-being. Thus, this study aimed to carry out an analysis in laying systems, laying cage free without enrichment and cage free with enrichment, at the peak and end of production and its relationship with environmental enrichment and egg quality. For the treatment with enrichment were used: nest, perch, rattle, bales of native grass and branches of Cambuci. While the treatment without enrichment had only one nest, both treatments had feeders of the tubular type, drinkers of the pendular type and bed of rice straw. Animal behavior and egg quality were evaluated. In the behavior analysis, we obtained a difference between nesting, perching, scratching, chasing and scratching head behaviors, possibly due to the fact that birds use the means that were provided and can express their natural behavior. Within egg quality, we observed a difference in the parameters of yolk color, weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell thickness and yolk index (YCF), where yolk weight and color were higher in the treatment without enrichment, which may be due to the greater consumption of food, since the birds in this treatment did not have other means of distraction. It is concluded that enrichment promotes positive changes both in the expression of natural laying behaviors and improves the main requirements in relation to egg quality.La producción de huevos en Brasil ha crecido, lo que ha provocado un aumento de la densidad de animales en las instalaciones, generando una disminución del ambiente y el bienestar. Por lo tanto, este estudio tuvo como objetivo realizar un análisis sobre los sistemas de puesta, tipo jaula libre sin enriquecimiento y jaula libre con enriquecimiento, en pico y final de producción y su relación con el enriquecimiento ambiental y la calidad del huevo. Para el tratamiento de enriquecimiento se utilizaron: nido, percha, sonajero, fardos de pasto nativo y ramas de Cambuci. Mientras que el tratamiento sin enriquecimiento tuvo un solo nido, ambos tratamientos contaron con comederos de tipo tubular, bebederos de tipo pendular y lecho de paja de arroz. Se evaluó el comportamiento animal y la calidad del huevo. En el análisis de comportamiento, obtuvimos una diferencia entre los comportamientos de anidar, posarse, rascarse, perseguir y rascarse la cabeza, posiblemente debido al hecho de que las aves utilizan los medios que se les proporcionaron y pueden expresar su comportamiento natural. Dentro de la calidad del huevo, observamos una diferencia en los parámetros de color de la yema, peso, altura de la albúmina, unidad de Haugh, grosor de la cáscara e índice de la yema (YCF), donde el peso y el color de la yema fueron mayores en el tratamiento sin enriquecimiento, lo que puede deberse al mayor consumo de alimento, ya que las aves en este tratamiento no contaban con otros medios de distracción. Se concluye que el enriquecimiento promueve cambios positivos tanto en la expresión de los comportamientos naturales de puesta como mejora los principales requisitos en relación a la calidad del huevo.A produção de ovos no Brasil tem crescido fator que acarretou um aumento na densidade de animais nas instalações, gerando diminuição da ambiência e do bem-estar. Desta forma este estudo teve como objetivo realizar uma análise em sistemas de criação de poedeiras, tipo cage free sem enriquecimento e cage free com enriquecimento, no pico e final de produção e sua relação com o enriquecimento ambiental e qualidade de ovos. Para o tratamento com enriquecimento foram utilizados: ninho, poleiro, chocalho, fardos de capim nativo e galhos de Cambuci. Enquanto o tratamento sem enriquecimento possuía apenas um ninho, ambos os tratamentos possuíam comedouros do tipo tubular, bebedouros do tipo pendular e cama de palha de arroz. Foram avaliados o comportamento animal e qualidade dos ovos. Na análise de comportamento obtivemos diferença entre os comportamentos de ninho, empoleirar, ciscar, perseguir e coçar cabeça, possivelmente pelo fato das aves utilizarem dos meios que eram fornecidos e poderem expressar seu comportamento natural. Dentro da qualidade de ovos, observamos uma diferença nos parâmetros de coloração da gema, peso, altura de albúmen, unidade Haugh, espessura da casca e índice de gema (YCF), onde o peso e a coloração da gema foram maiores no tratamento sem enriquecimento, podendo ser devido ao maior consumo de alimento, já que as aves nesse tratamento não possuíam outros meios de distração. Conclui-se que o enriquecimento promove alterações positivas tanto na expressão de comportamentos naturais das poedeiras como melhora os principais requisitos em relação à qualidade dos ovos.Research, Society and Development2021-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1383310.33448/rsd-v10i4.13833Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e6010413833Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e6010413833Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e60104138332525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13833/12420Copyright (c) 2021 Renata Gimenes Leite; Érik dos Santos Harada; Douglas D’Alessandro Salgado; Mario Mollo Neto; Leda Gobbo de Freitas Buenohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeite, Renata Gimenes Harada, Érik dos Santos Salgado, Douglas D’Alessandro Mollo Neto, MarioBueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13833Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:05.559441Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality Comportamiento de gallinas ponedoras em un sistema sin jaulas a diferentes edades y calidad del huevo Comportamento de galinhas poedeiras em sistema cage free em diferentes idades e a qualidade de ovos |
title |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality |
spellingShingle |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality Leite, Renata Gimenes Animal welfare indicator Animal density Production phase Productivity. Indicador de bem-estar animal Densidade animal Fase de produção Produtividade. Animal welfare indicator Animal density Production phase Productivity. |
title_short |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality |
title_full |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality |
title_fullStr |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality |
title_sort |
Behavior of laying hens in a cage free system at different ages and egg quality |
author |
Leite, Renata Gimenes |
author_facet |
Leite, Renata Gimenes Harada, Érik dos Santos Salgado, Douglas D’Alessandro Mollo Neto, Mario Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Harada, Érik dos Santos Salgado, Douglas D’Alessandro Mollo Neto, Mario Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leite, Renata Gimenes Harada, Érik dos Santos Salgado, Douglas D’Alessandro Mollo Neto, Mario Bueno, Leda Gobbo de Freitas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal welfare indicator Animal density Production phase Productivity. Indicador de bem-estar animal Densidade animal Fase de produção Produtividade. Animal welfare indicator Animal density Production phase Productivity. |
topic |
Animal welfare indicator Animal density Production phase Productivity. Indicador de bem-estar animal Densidade animal Fase de produção Produtividade. Animal welfare indicator Animal density Production phase Productivity. |
description |
The production of eggs in Brazil has grown, which has led to an increase in the density of animals in the facilities, generating a decrease in ambience and well-being. Thus, this study aimed to carry out an analysis in laying systems, laying cage free without enrichment and cage free with enrichment, at the peak and end of production and its relationship with environmental enrichment and egg quality. For the treatment with enrichment were used: nest, perch, rattle, bales of native grass and branches of Cambuci. While the treatment without enrichment had only one nest, both treatments had feeders of the tubular type, drinkers of the pendular type and bed of rice straw. Animal behavior and egg quality were evaluated. In the behavior analysis, we obtained a difference between nesting, perching, scratching, chasing and scratching head behaviors, possibly due to the fact that birds use the means that were provided and can express their natural behavior. Within egg quality, we observed a difference in the parameters of yolk color, weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell thickness and yolk index (YCF), where yolk weight and color were higher in the treatment without enrichment, which may be due to the greater consumption of food, since the birds in this treatment did not have other means of distraction. It is concluded that enrichment promotes positive changes both in the expression of natural laying behaviors and improves the main requirements in relation to egg quality. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13833 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13833 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13833 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13833 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13833/12420 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e6010413833 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e6010413833 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e6010413833 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052784666738688 |