Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction. |
id |
UNIFEI_1b0ddcf8e6b2e5d7defd813f621a34f5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14290 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feedingRiesgos y beneficios de los diferentes métodos de introducción de alimentosRiscos e benefícios dos diferentes métodos de introdução alimentarAlimentación complementariaBLWNutrición infantilLactancia maternaAtragantamiento.Alimentação complementarBLWNutrição infantilAleitamento maternoEngasgo. Complementary feedingBLWChild nutritionBreast feedingGagging.Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction.Introducción: Los primeros años de vida de un niño se caracterizan por un rápido crecimiento y desarrollo digestivo y neuropsicomotor, incluyendo habilidades como: recibir, masticar y digerir alimentos distintos a la leche materna. Objetivo: conocer si existe alguno de los diferentes métodos de alimentación complementaria que ofrezcan mayor riesgo o beneficios para la salud, el desarrollo y la seguridad del bebé. Metodología: Se utilizaron alimentación complementaria Y destete dirigido por bebés Y Nutrición infantil. De acuerdo con el mecanismo de Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) y descriptores en ciencias de la salud (DeCS), de las tres termologías solo una, Nutrición infantil, aparece en el vocabulario controlado. Entre los 105 artículos encontrados, 71 de la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de EE. UU. (PubMed) y 34 de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS), 23 estaban presentes en ambas bases de datos, 21 artículos fueron leídos en su totalidad y 8 fueron elegibles para el presente trabajo Resultados y discusión: se analizaron 8 artículos para esta revisión, de los cuales 6 son ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, 1 estudio piloto realizado a través de un cuestionario y 1 estudio realizado a través de un cuestionario en línea. Además de los valores basados en el pesaje de la dieta, a los 12 meses los bebés se sometieron a una evaluación de laboratorio mediante la recogida de sangre. Los valores de hemoglobina (g / dl) en el grupo de control fueron 11,7 y en el grupo BLISS 11,6. Conclusión: esta revisión no identificó diferencias significativas entre los diferentes métodos de introducción de alimentos.Introdução: Os primeiros anos de vida de uma criança são caracterizados por rápida velocidade de crescimento e desenvolvimento digestório e neuropsicomotor, incluindo habilidades tais como: receber, mastigar e digerir outros alimentos além do leite materno. Objetivo: compreender se há dentre os diferentes métodos de alimentação complementar algum que ofereça maior risco ou benefícios para saúde, desenvolvimento e segurança do bebê. Metodologia: foram utilizados os descritores Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition. Segundo o mecanismo Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) e Descritores em Ciências em Saúde (DeCS), das três termologias apenas uma, Infant Nutrition, consta no vocabulário controlado. Dentre os 105 artigos encontrados, 71 da US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e 34 da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), 23 estavam presentes em ambas as bases de dados, 21 artigos foram lidos de forma integral e 8 foram elegíveis para o presente trabalho Resultados e discussão: Foram analisados 8 trabalhos para presente revisão, dos quais 6 são ensaios clínicos randomizados, 1 estudo piloto realizado através de questionário e 1 estudo realizado através de questionário online. Além dos valores baseados na pesagem da dieta, aos 12 meses os bebes passaram por uma avaliação laboratorial através da coleta de sangue. Os valores para hemoglobina (g/dl) no grupo controle foi de 11,7 e no grupo BLISS 11,6. Conclusão: Está revisão não identificou diferenças significativas entres os diferentes métodos de introdução alimentar.Research, Society and Development2021-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1429010.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e44110414290Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e44110414290Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e441104142902525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290/12868Copyright (c) 2021 Camila Conceição Santos Temóteo; Débora Cristina Leite Fontes; Alessandro Santos Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTemóteo, Camila Conceição Santos Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite Ferreira, Alessandro Santos 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14290Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:26.931810Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding Riesgos y beneficios de los diferentes métodos de introducción de alimentos Riscos e benefícios dos diferentes métodos de introdução alimentar |
title |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding |
spellingShingle |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos Alimentación complementaria BLW Nutrición infantil Lactancia materna Atragantamiento. Alimentação complementar BLW Nutrição infantil Aleitamento materno Engasgo. Complementary feeding BLW Child nutrition Breast feeding Gagging. |
title_short |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding |
title_full |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding |
title_fullStr |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding |
title_sort |
Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding |
author |
Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos |
author_facet |
Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite Ferreira, Alessandro Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite Ferreira, Alessandro Santos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite Ferreira, Alessandro Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Alimentación complementaria BLW Nutrición infantil Lactancia materna Atragantamiento. Alimentação complementar BLW Nutrição infantil Aleitamento materno Engasgo. Complementary feeding BLW Child nutrition Breast feeding Gagging. |
topic |
Alimentación complementaria BLW Nutrición infantil Lactancia materna Atragantamiento. Alimentação complementar BLW Nutrição infantil Aleitamento materno Engasgo. Complementary feeding BLW Child nutrition Breast feeding Gagging. |
description |
Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290/12868 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e44110414290 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e44110414290 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e44110414290 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052806068174848 |