Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite, Ferreira, Alessandro Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290
Resumo: Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values ​​based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values ​​for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction.
id UNIFEI_1b0ddcf8e6b2e5d7defd813f621a34f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14290
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feedingRiesgos y beneficios de los diferentes métodos de introducción de alimentosRiscos e benefícios dos diferentes métodos de introdução alimentarAlimentación complementariaBLWNutrición infantilLactancia maternaAtragantamiento.Alimentação complementarBLWNutrição infantilAleitamento maternoEngasgo. Complementary feedingBLWChild nutritionBreast feedingGagging.Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values ​​based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values ​​for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction.Introducción: Los primeros años de vida de un niño se caracterizan por un rápido crecimiento y desarrollo digestivo y neuropsicomotor, incluyendo habilidades como: recibir, masticar y digerir alimentos distintos a la leche materna. Objetivo: conocer si existe alguno de los diferentes métodos de alimentación complementaria que ofrezcan mayor riesgo o beneficios para la salud, el desarrollo y la seguridad del bebé. Metodología: Se utilizaron alimentación complementaria Y destete dirigido por bebés Y Nutrición infantil. De acuerdo con el mecanismo de Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) y descriptores en ciencias de la salud (DeCS), de las tres termologías solo una, Nutrición infantil, aparece en el vocabulario controlado. Entre los 105 artículos encontrados, 71 de la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de EE. UU. (PubMed) y 34 de la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS), 23 estaban presentes en ambas bases de datos, 21 artículos fueron leídos en su totalidad y 8 fueron elegibles para el presente trabajo Resultados y discusión: se analizaron 8 artículos para esta revisión, de los cuales 6 son ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, 1 estudio piloto realizado a través de un cuestionario y 1 estudio realizado a través de un cuestionario en línea. Además de los valores basados en el pesaje de la dieta, a los 12 meses los bebés se sometieron a una evaluación de laboratorio mediante la recogida de sangre. Los valores de hemoglobina (g / dl) en el grupo de control fueron 11,7 y en el grupo BLISS 11,6. Conclusión: esta revisión no identificó diferencias significativas entre los diferentes métodos de introducción de alimentos.Introdução: Os primeiros anos de vida de uma criança são caracterizados por rápida velocidade de crescimento e desenvolvimento digestório e neuropsicomotor, incluindo habilidades tais como: receber, mastigar e digerir outros alimentos além do leite materno. Objetivo: compreender se há dentre os diferentes métodos de alimentação complementar algum que ofereça maior risco ou benefícios para saúde, desenvolvimento e segurança do bebê. Metodologia: foram utilizados os descritores Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition. Segundo o mecanismo Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) e Descritores em Ciências em Saúde (DeCS), das três termologias apenas uma, Infant Nutrition, consta no vocabulário controlado. Dentre os 105 artigos encontrados, 71 da US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e 34 da Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), 23 estavam presentes em ambas as bases de dados, 21 artigos foram lidos de forma integral e 8 foram elegíveis para o presente trabalho Resultados e discussão: Foram analisados 8 trabalhos para presente revisão, dos quais 6 são ensaios clínicos randomizados, 1 estudo piloto realizado através de questionário e 1 estudo realizado através de questionário online. Além dos valores baseados na pesagem da dieta, aos 12 meses os bebes passaram por uma avaliação laboratorial através da coleta de sangue. Os valores para hemoglobina (g/dl) no grupo controle foi de 11,7 e no grupo BLISS 11,6. Conclusão: Está revisão não identificou diferenças significativas entres os diferentes métodos de introdução alimentar.Research, Society and Development2021-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1429010.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e44110414290Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e44110414290Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e441104142902525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290/12868Copyright (c) 2021 Camila Conceição Santos Temóteo; Débora Cristina Leite Fontes; Alessandro Santos Ferreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTemóteo, Camila Conceição Santos Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite Ferreira, Alessandro Santos 2021-04-25T11:21:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14290Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:26.931810Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
Riesgos y beneficios de los diferentes métodos de introducción de alimentos
Riscos e benefícios dos diferentes métodos de introdução alimentar
title Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
spellingShingle Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos
Alimentación complementaria
BLW
Nutrición infantil
Lactancia materna
Atragantamiento.
Alimentação complementar
BLW
Nutrição infantil
Aleitamento materno
Engasgo.
Complementary feeding
BLW
Child nutrition
Breast feeding
Gagging.
title_short Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
title_full Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
title_fullStr Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
title_full_unstemmed Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
title_sort Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
author Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos
author_facet Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos
Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite
Ferreira, Alessandro Santos
author_role author
author2 Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite
Ferreira, Alessandro Santos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Temóteo, Camila Conceição Santos
Fontes, Débora Cristina Leite
Ferreira, Alessandro Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alimentación complementaria
BLW
Nutrición infantil
Lactancia materna
Atragantamiento.
Alimentação complementar
BLW
Nutrição infantil
Aleitamento materno
Engasgo.
Complementary feeding
BLW
Child nutrition
Breast feeding
Gagging.
topic Alimentación complementaria
BLW
Nutrición infantil
Lactancia materna
Atragantamiento.
Alimentação complementar
BLW
Nutrição infantil
Aleitamento materno
Engasgo.
Complementary feeding
BLW
Child nutrition
Breast feeding
Gagging.
description Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values ​​based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values ​​for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290
10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14290/12868
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 4; e44110414290
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 4; e44110414290
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 4; e44110414290
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052806068174848