The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9118 |
Resumo: | The monitoring activities were created with the purpose of acting as facilitators of the knowledge from the aid to the didactic functions of the teachers. In this context, it is urgent to understand if, in the current higher education scenario, the execution of monitoring activities favor the teaching-learning process? This study aims to elucidate the use of monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge expansion, as well as to point out the positive points that the practice of monitoring brings the academic community in general (students, teachers and monitors) and demonstrate possible failures that monitoring programs can present. This is an integrative review of the literature in seven stages. Twenty articles were analyzed, five of them being chosen for the discussion. The monitoring represents a strong tool in the construction of knowledge, since it allows not only the revision of contents, but also to solve doubts, the theoretical deepening in topics of interest, the practical experience, the scientific initiation and the encouragement to teaching. However, negligence was observed in the supervisor-monitor relationship, a fact that can de-structure the teaching-learning process targeted in the monitoring programs. |
id |
UNIFEI_25879eaca838a89090b9ed2e801b88f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9118 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledgeEl uso de las Monitoreas en la enseñanza como proponente ampliador del conocimientoO uso das monitorias no ensino como proponente ampliador do conhecimentoMonitoringEducationTeaching.MonitoreoEducaciónEducación.MonitoriaEducaçãoEnsino.The monitoring activities were created with the purpose of acting as facilitators of the knowledge from the aid to the didactic functions of the teachers. In this context, it is urgent to understand if, in the current higher education scenario, the execution of monitoring activities favor the teaching-learning process? This study aims to elucidate the use of monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge expansion, as well as to point out the positive points that the practice of monitoring brings the academic community in general (students, teachers and monitors) and demonstrate possible failures that monitoring programs can present. This is an integrative review of the literature in seven stages. Twenty articles were analyzed, five of them being chosen for the discussion. The monitoring represents a strong tool in the construction of knowledge, since it allows not only the revision of contents, but also to solve doubts, the theoretical deepening in topics of interest, the practical experience, the scientific initiation and the encouragement to teaching. However, negligence was observed in the supervisor-monitor relationship, a fact that can de-structure the teaching-learning process targeted in the monitoring programs.Las actividades de monitoreo surgieron con el propósito de actuar como facilitadores del conocimiento a partir del auxilio a las funciones didácticas de los docentes. En este contexto, urge la necesidad de entender si, en el escenario de la educación superior actual, la ejecución de actividades de monitoreo favorecen el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje? Este estudio tiene como objetivo elucidar en cuanto al uso de los monitores en la enseñanza como proponente ampliador del conocimiento, además de señalar los puntos positivos que la práctica de la monitoría trae a la comunidad académica en general (alumnos, docentes y monitores) y demostrar posibles fallas que los los programas de monitoreo pueden presentar. Se trata de una revisión integrativa de la literatura realizada en siete etapas. Se analizaron 20 artículos, siendo cinco de ellos elegidos para el levantamiento de la discusión. Los monitoreos representan una fuerte herramienta en la construcción de conocimientos, ya que posibilita no sólo la revisión de contenidos, sino también sanar dudas, la profundización teórica en temas de interés, la vivencia práctica, la iniciación científica y el estímulo a la docencia. Sin embargo, se observó negligencia en la relación orientador-monitor, hecho que puede desestructurar el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje visado en los programas de monitoreo.As atividades de monitoria surgiram com o intuito de atuarem como facilitadores do conhecimento a partir do auxílio às funções didáticas dos docentes. Este estudo tem como objetivo elucidar o uso das monitorias no ensino como proponente ampliador do conhecimento, além de, apontar os pontos positivos que a prática da monitoria traz a comunidade acadêmica em geral (alunos, docentes e monitores) e demonstrar possíveis falhas que os programas de monitoria possam apresentar. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura realizada em sete etapas. Foram analisados 20 artigos, sendo cinco deles escolhidos para o levantamento da discussão. As monitorias representam uma forte ferramenta na construção de conhecimentos, uma vez que possibilita não apenas a revisão de conteúdo, mas também sana dúvidas, traz aprofundamento teórico em temas de interesse, vivência prática, iniciação científica e o estímulo à docência. Todavia, observou-se negligências na relação orientador-monitor, fato este que pode desestruturar o processo ensino-aprendizagem visado nos programas de monitoria.Research, Society and Development2020-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/911810.33448/rsd-v9i10.9118Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e6079109118Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e6079109118Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e60791091182525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9118/7984Copyright (c) 2020 Sarah Lima Campos; Hanayla Sousa Santos; Thiago de Moura Arruda; Ana Kleiber Pessoa Borges; Tainá de Abreu; Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto Quaresmahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampos, Sarah Lima Santos, Hanayla Sousa Arruda, Thiago de Moura Borges, Ana Kleiber Pessoa Abreu, Tainá de Quaresma, Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto 2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9118Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:26.902603Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge El uso de las Monitoreas en la enseñanza como proponente ampliador del conocimiento O uso das monitorias no ensino como proponente ampliador do conhecimento |
title |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge |
spellingShingle |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge Campos, Sarah Lima Monitoring Education Teaching. Monitoreo Educación Educación. Monitoria Educação Ensino. |
title_short |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge |
title_full |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge |
title_fullStr |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge |
title_sort |
The use of Monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge |
author |
Campos, Sarah Lima |
author_facet |
Campos, Sarah Lima Santos, Hanayla Sousa Arruda, Thiago de Moura Borges, Ana Kleiber Pessoa Abreu, Tainá de Quaresma, Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Hanayla Sousa Arruda, Thiago de Moura Borges, Ana Kleiber Pessoa Abreu, Tainá de Quaresma, Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Sarah Lima Santos, Hanayla Sousa Arruda, Thiago de Moura Borges, Ana Kleiber Pessoa Abreu, Tainá de Quaresma, Fernando Rodrigues Peixoto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Monitoring Education Teaching. Monitoreo Educación Educación. Monitoria Educação Ensino. |
topic |
Monitoring Education Teaching. Monitoreo Educación Educación. Monitoria Educação Ensino. |
description |
The monitoring activities were created with the purpose of acting as facilitators of the knowledge from the aid to the didactic functions of the teachers. In this context, it is urgent to understand if, in the current higher education scenario, the execution of monitoring activities favor the teaching-learning process? This study aims to elucidate the use of monitoring in teaching as a proponent of knowledge expansion, as well as to point out the positive points that the practice of monitoring brings the academic community in general (students, teachers and monitors) and demonstrate possible failures that monitoring programs can present. This is an integrative review of the literature in seven stages. Twenty articles were analyzed, five of them being chosen for the discussion. The monitoring represents a strong tool in the construction of knowledge, since it allows not only the revision of contents, but also to solve doubts, the theoretical deepening in topics of interest, the practical experience, the scientific initiation and the encouragement to teaching. However, negligence was observed in the supervisor-monitor relationship, a fact that can de-structure the teaching-learning process targeted in the monitoring programs. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9118 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9118 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9118 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9118 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9118/7984 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e6079109118 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e6079109118 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e6079109118 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052741462261760 |