Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794 |
Resumo: | Considering the importance of the search for sustainability and the growing emphasis given to biofuels, promoted as a promising alternative energy, this study highlights the relevance of research that evaluates sustainability in the bioenergy sector, specifically bioethanol. The present work aims to analyze methodologies aimed at assessing the sustainability of bioethanol using a literature review and, based on this analysis, indicate the most suitable methodology. The most popular methodologies used to assess the sustainability of bioethanol were identified from the bibliographic survey and screened according to pre-established criteria of exclusion, based on keywords, and inclusion, regarding the pillars and biofuel addressed. First, it was found that the studies were conducted in different regional contexts and used different methodologies, which could provide both quantitative and qualitative results. After screening and selection, the evaluation methodologies adopted by each author were analyzed. This analysis made it possible to recognize the factors influencing the choice of methodology, where the suitability of a methodology to the particularities of each case was of great importance. Finally, considering the pre-defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of bioethanol, this paper recommends the GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) methodology as the most appropriate, especially since it was created specifically for the bioenergetic sector and has an accessible application protocol. Lastly, it was also noted that few publications evaluate the sustainability of bioethanol considering its entire three dimensions (social, environmental, and economic), emphasizing the importance of developing more studies with this approach. |
id |
UNIFEI_2c4f14a2be5d5059a7f3d10adffaa8fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9794 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainabilityAnálisis de las metodologías utilizadas para evaluar la sostenibilidad del bioetanolAnálise das metodologias utilizadas para avaliar a sustentabilidade do bioetanolBioethanolMethodologySustainabilityIndicators.BioetanolMetodologíaSostenibilidadIndicadores.BioetanolMetodologiaSustentabilidadeIndicadores.Considering the importance of the search for sustainability and the growing emphasis given to biofuels, promoted as a promising alternative energy, this study highlights the relevance of research that evaluates sustainability in the bioenergy sector, specifically bioethanol. The present work aims to analyze methodologies aimed at assessing the sustainability of bioethanol using a literature review and, based on this analysis, indicate the most suitable methodology. The most popular methodologies used to assess the sustainability of bioethanol were identified from the bibliographic survey and screened according to pre-established criteria of exclusion, based on keywords, and inclusion, regarding the pillars and biofuel addressed. First, it was found that the studies were conducted in different regional contexts and used different methodologies, which could provide both quantitative and qualitative results. After screening and selection, the evaluation methodologies adopted by each author were analyzed. This analysis made it possible to recognize the factors influencing the choice of methodology, where the suitability of a methodology to the particularities of each case was of great importance. Finally, considering the pre-defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of bioethanol, this paper recommends the GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) methodology as the most appropriate, especially since it was created specifically for the bioenergetic sector and has an accessible application protocol. Lastly, it was also noted that few publications evaluate the sustainability of bioethanol considering its entire three dimensions (social, environmental, and economic), emphasizing the importance of developing more studies with this approach.Considerando la importancia de la búsqueda de la sustentabilidad y el creciente énfasis dado a los biocombustibles, promocionados como una auspiciosa alternativa energética, este estudio resalta la relevancia de las investigaciones que evalúan la sustentabilidad en el sector bioenergético, específicamente del bioetanol. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar metodologías que evaluen la sustentabilidad de éste a través de una revisión de literatura y, con base en ello, indicar la más adecuada. Las más utilizadas fueron identificadas a partir de un resumen bibliográfico y se proyectaron acorde a criterios preestabelecidos de exclusión, basados en palabras clave, e inclusión, en cuanto a pilares y biocombustibles abordados. Así, se encontró que los estudios fueron desarrollados en distintos contextos regionales y que utilizaban diferentes metodologías, las cuáles proporcionaron resultados tanto cuantitativos como cualitativos. Después de la proyección y selección, se analizaron las metodologías de evaluación adoptadas por cada autor. Esto permitió reconocer los factores que influyen en la elección, donde resultó de gran importancia aplicar la más idónea a las particularidades de cada caso. Finalmente, considerando los criterios predefinidos para evaluar la sustentabilidad del bioetanol, este artículo recomienda la GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) como la más apropiada, ya que fue creada específicamente para el sector bioenergético y tiene un protocolo de aplicación accesible. Sin embargo, también se señala que pocas publicaciones evalúan la sustentabilidad del bioetanol considerando sus tres dimensiones (social, ambiental y económica), destacando la importancia de desarrollar más estudios con este enfoque.Considerando a importância da busca pela sustentabilidade e a crescente ênfase dada aos biocombustíveis, promovidos como uma alternativa energética promissora, este estudo destaca a relevância de pesquisas que avaliem a sustentabilidade no setor de bioenergia, especificamente o bioetanol. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar metodologias voltadas para a avaliação da sustentabilidade do bioetanol por meio de uma revisão da literatura e, com base nessa análise, indicar a metodologia mais adequada. As metodologias mais utilizadas para avaliar a sustentabilidade do bioetanol foram identificadas a partir do levantamento bibliográfico e triadas de acordo com critérios pré-estabelecidos de exclusão, a partir de palavras-chaves, e inclusão, quanto aos pilares e biocombustível abordados. A princípio, se verificou que os trabalhos foram desenvolvidos em diferentes contextos regionais e utilizando metodologias distintas, que podem fornecer tanto resultados quantitativos quanto qualitativos. Após triagem e seleção, foram analisadas as metodologias de avaliação adotadas por cada autor. Esta análise permitiu reconhecer os fatores que influenciam a escolha da metodologia, onde a adequação de uma metodologia às particularidades de cada caso foi de grande importância. Por fim, considerando os critérios pré-definidos para avaliação da sustentabilidade do bioetanol, este trabalho recomenda a metodologia GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) como a mais adequada, principalmente por ter sido criada especificamente para o setor bioenergético e ter um protocolo de aplicação acessível. Posto isto, se percebeu que poucas publicações avaliam a sustentabilidade do bioetanol considerando todas as suas três dimensões (social, ambiental e econômica), enfatizando a importância do desenvolvimento de mais estudos com esta abordagem.Research, Society and Development2020-11-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/979410.33448/rsd-v9i11.9794Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2099119794Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2099119794Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e20991197942525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794/8700Copyright (c) 2020 Larissa Pedrosa de Melo; José Jailton Marques; Inaura Carolina Carneiro da Rochahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Larissa Pedrosa deMarques, José JailtonRocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da 2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9794Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:59.570472Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability Análisis de las metodologías utilizadas para evaluar la sostenibilidad del bioetanol Análise das metodologias utilizadas para avaliar a sustentabilidade do bioetanol |
title |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de Bioethanol Methodology Sustainability Indicators. Bioetanol Metodología Sostenibilidad Indicadores. Bioetanol Metodologia Sustentabilidade Indicadores. |
title_short |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability |
title_full |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability |
title_sort |
Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability |
author |
Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de |
author_facet |
Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de Marques, José Jailton Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, José Jailton Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de Marques, José Jailton Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioethanol Methodology Sustainability Indicators. Bioetanol Metodología Sostenibilidad Indicadores. Bioetanol Metodologia Sustentabilidade Indicadores. |
topic |
Bioethanol Methodology Sustainability Indicators. Bioetanol Metodología Sostenibilidad Indicadores. Bioetanol Metodologia Sustentabilidade Indicadores. |
description |
Considering the importance of the search for sustainability and the growing emphasis given to biofuels, promoted as a promising alternative energy, this study highlights the relevance of research that evaluates sustainability in the bioenergy sector, specifically bioethanol. The present work aims to analyze methodologies aimed at assessing the sustainability of bioethanol using a literature review and, based on this analysis, indicate the most suitable methodology. The most popular methodologies used to assess the sustainability of bioethanol were identified from the bibliographic survey and screened according to pre-established criteria of exclusion, based on keywords, and inclusion, regarding the pillars and biofuel addressed. First, it was found that the studies were conducted in different regional contexts and used different methodologies, which could provide both quantitative and qualitative results. After screening and selection, the evaluation methodologies adopted by each author were analyzed. This analysis made it possible to recognize the factors influencing the choice of methodology, where the suitability of a methodology to the particularities of each case was of great importance. Finally, considering the pre-defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of bioethanol, this paper recommends the GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) methodology as the most appropriate, especially since it was created specifically for the bioenergetic sector and has an accessible application protocol. Lastly, it was also noted that few publications evaluate the sustainability of bioethanol considering its entire three dimensions (social, environmental, and economic), emphasizing the importance of developing more studies with this approach. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9794 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9794 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794/8700 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2099119794 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2099119794 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e2099119794 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052662920773632 |