Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Marques, José Jailton, Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794
Resumo: Considering the importance of the search for sustainability and the growing emphasis given to biofuels, promoted as a promising alternative energy, this study highlights the relevance of research that evaluates sustainability in the bioenergy sector, specifically bioethanol. The present work aims to analyze methodologies aimed at assessing the sustainability of bioethanol using a literature review and, based on this analysis, indicate the most suitable methodology. The most popular methodologies used to assess the sustainability of bioethanol were identified from the bibliographic survey and screened according to pre-established criteria of exclusion, based on keywords, and inclusion, regarding the pillars and biofuel addressed. First, it was found that the studies were conducted in different regional contexts and used different methodologies, which could provide both quantitative and qualitative results. After screening and selection, the evaluation methodologies adopted by each author were analyzed. This analysis made it possible to recognize the factors influencing the choice of methodology, where the suitability of a methodology to the particularities of each case was of great importance. Finally, considering the pre-defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of bioethanol, this paper recommends the GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) methodology as the most appropriate, especially since it was created specifically for the bioenergetic sector and has an accessible application protocol. Lastly, it was also noted that few publications evaluate the sustainability of bioethanol considering its entire three dimensions (social, environmental, and economic), emphasizing the importance of developing more studies with this approach.
id UNIFEI_2c4f14a2be5d5059a7f3d10adffaa8fe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9794
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainabilityAnálisis de las metodologías utilizadas para evaluar la sostenibilidad del bioetanolAnálise das metodologias utilizadas para avaliar a sustentabilidade do bioetanolBioethanolMethodologySustainabilityIndicators.BioetanolMetodologíaSostenibilidadIndicadores.BioetanolMetodologiaSustentabilidadeIndicadores.Considering the importance of the search for sustainability and the growing emphasis given to biofuels, promoted as a promising alternative energy, this study highlights the relevance of research that evaluates sustainability in the bioenergy sector, specifically bioethanol. The present work aims to analyze methodologies aimed at assessing the sustainability of bioethanol using a literature review and, based on this analysis, indicate the most suitable methodology. The most popular methodologies used to assess the sustainability of bioethanol were identified from the bibliographic survey and screened according to pre-established criteria of exclusion, based on keywords, and inclusion, regarding the pillars and biofuel addressed. First, it was found that the studies were conducted in different regional contexts and used different methodologies, which could provide both quantitative and qualitative results. After screening and selection, the evaluation methodologies adopted by each author were analyzed. This analysis made it possible to recognize the factors influencing the choice of methodology, where the suitability of a methodology to the particularities of each case was of great importance. Finally, considering the pre-defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of bioethanol, this paper recommends the GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) methodology as the most appropriate, especially since it was created specifically for the bioenergetic sector and has an accessible application protocol. Lastly, it was also noted that few publications evaluate the sustainability of bioethanol considering its entire three dimensions (social, environmental, and economic), emphasizing the importance of developing more studies with this approach.Considerando la importancia de la búsqueda de la sustentabilidad y el creciente énfasis dado a los biocombustibles, promocionados como una auspiciosa alternativa energética, este estudio resalta la relevancia de las investigaciones que evalúan la sustentabilidad en el sector bioenergético, específicamente del bioetanol. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar metodologías que evaluen la sustentabilidad de éste a través de una revisión de literatura y, con base en ello, indicar la más adecuada. Las más utilizadas fueron identificadas a partir de un resumen bibliográfico y se proyectaron acorde a criterios preestabelecidos de exclusión, basados en palabras clave, e inclusión, en cuanto a pilares y biocombustibles abordados. Así, se encontró que los estudios fueron desarrollados en distintos contextos regionales y que utilizaban diferentes metodologías, las cuáles proporcionaron resultados tanto cuantitativos como cualitativos. Después de la proyección y selección, se analizaron las metodologías de evaluación adoptadas por cada autor. Esto permitió reconocer los factores que influyen en la elección, donde resultó de gran importancia aplicar la más idónea a las particularidades de cada caso. Finalmente, considerando los criterios predefinidos para evaluar la sustentabilidad del bioetanol, este artículo recomienda la GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) como la más apropiada, ya que fue creada específicamente para el sector bioenergético y tiene un protocolo de aplicación accesible. Sin embargo, también se señala que pocas publicaciones evalúan la sustentabilidad del bioetanol considerando sus tres dimensiones (social, ambiental y económica), destacando la importancia de desarrollar más estudios con este enfoque.Considerando a importância da busca pela sustentabilidade e a crescente ênfase dada aos biocombustíveis, promovidos como uma alternativa energética promissora, este estudo destaca a relevância de pesquisas que avaliem a sustentabilidade no setor de bioenergia, especificamente o bioetanol. O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar metodologias voltadas para a avaliação da sustentabilidade do bioetanol por meio de uma revisão da literatura e, com base nessa análise, indicar a metodologia mais adequada. As metodologias mais utilizadas para avaliar a sustentabilidade do bioetanol foram identificadas a partir do levantamento bibliográfico e triadas de acordo com critérios pré-estabelecidos de exclusão, a partir de palavras-chaves, e inclusão, quanto aos pilares e biocombustível abordados. A princípio, se verificou que os trabalhos foram desenvolvidos em diferentes contextos regionais e utilizando metodologias distintas, que podem fornecer tanto resultados quantitativos quanto qualitativos. Após triagem e seleção, foram analisadas as metodologias de avaliação adotadas por cada autor. Esta análise permitiu reconhecer os fatores que influenciam a escolha da metodologia, onde a adequação de uma metodologia às particularidades de cada caso foi de grande importância. Por fim, considerando os critérios pré-definidos para avaliação da sustentabilidade do bioetanol, este trabalho recomenda a metodologia GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) como a mais adequada, principalmente por ter sido criada especificamente para o setor bioenergético e ter um protocolo de aplicação acessível. Posto isto, se percebeu que poucas publicações avaliam a sustentabilidade do bioetanol considerando todas as suas três dimensões (social, ambiental e econômica), enfatizando a importância do desenvolvimento de mais estudos com esta abordagem.Research, Society and Development2020-11-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/979410.33448/rsd-v9i11.9794Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2099119794Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2099119794Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e20991197942525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794/8700Copyright (c) 2020 Larissa Pedrosa de Melo; José Jailton Marques; Inaura Carolina Carneiro da Rochahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Larissa Pedrosa deMarques, José JailtonRocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da 2020-12-10T23:37:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9794Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:59.570472Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
Análisis de las metodologías utilizadas para evaluar la sostenibilidad del bioetanol
Análise das metodologias utilizadas para avaliar a sustentabilidade do bioetanol
title Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
spellingShingle Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de
Bioethanol
Methodology
Sustainability
Indicators.
Bioetanol
Metodología
Sostenibilidad
Indicadores.
Bioetanol
Metodologia
Sustentabilidade
Indicadores.
title_short Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
title_full Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
title_fullStr Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
title_sort Analysis of methodologies used to assess bioethanol sustainability
author Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de
author_facet Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de
Marques, José Jailton
Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da
author_role author
author2 Marques, José Jailton
Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Larissa Pedrosa de
Marques, José Jailton
Rocha, Inaura Carolina Carneiro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioethanol
Methodology
Sustainability
Indicators.
Bioetanol
Metodología
Sostenibilidad
Indicadores.
Bioetanol
Metodologia
Sustentabilidade
Indicadores.
topic Bioethanol
Methodology
Sustainability
Indicators.
Bioetanol
Metodología
Sostenibilidad
Indicadores.
Bioetanol
Metodologia
Sustentabilidade
Indicadores.
description Considering the importance of the search for sustainability and the growing emphasis given to biofuels, promoted as a promising alternative energy, this study highlights the relevance of research that evaluates sustainability in the bioenergy sector, specifically bioethanol. The present work aims to analyze methodologies aimed at assessing the sustainability of bioethanol using a literature review and, based on this analysis, indicate the most suitable methodology. The most popular methodologies used to assess the sustainability of bioethanol were identified from the bibliographic survey and screened according to pre-established criteria of exclusion, based on keywords, and inclusion, regarding the pillars and biofuel addressed. First, it was found that the studies were conducted in different regional contexts and used different methodologies, which could provide both quantitative and qualitative results. After screening and selection, the evaluation methodologies adopted by each author were analyzed. This analysis made it possible to recognize the factors influencing the choice of methodology, where the suitability of a methodology to the particularities of each case was of great importance. Finally, considering the pre-defined criteria for assessing the sustainability of bioethanol, this paper recommends the GBEP (Global Bioenergy Partnership) methodology as the most appropriate, especially since it was created specifically for the bioenergetic sector and has an accessible application protocol. Lastly, it was also noted that few publications evaluate the sustainability of bioethanol considering its entire three dimensions (social, environmental, and economic), emphasizing the importance of developing more studies with this approach.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794
10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9794
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9794
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9794/8700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 11; e2099119794
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 11; e2099119794
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 11; e2099119794
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052662920773632