Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brito, Francisco Daniel Queiroz
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva, Vitor Hugo Santos da, Gemaque, Henrique Eron da Silva, Kosmiscky, Isis de Oliveira, Moura, Letícia Azevedo, Duarte, Carolina Alves, Medeiros, Ana Beatriz dos Santos, Jesus, Karen Letícia Gonçalves de, Reis, Priscila Pessoa Diamantino, Arruda, José Eduardo Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34141
Resumo: Since its emergence in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has proved to be very versatile and lethal. The numbers of deaths and hospitalizations have become a problem, therefore, it is necessary to find a measure against the infection. Therefore, new studies have emerged from existing drugs, such as Hydroxychloroquine, Nitazoxanide, Azithromycin and Ivermectin. However, amidst the uncertainties, the use of these drugs was widespread, even after carrying out studies that did not find the real benefit of this therapy, becoming a problem, especially in Brazil. Therefore, the present study sought to understand the perspective of health professionals, from an electronic form, in relation to early treatment as well as preventive measures for COVID-19. Regarding early treatment, most individuals (69/88) do not believe in the use of drugs as a prophylactic or cure, and those over 39 years of age had higher confidence levels (40% and 28%) in this pharmacological management in relation to professionals aged between 18 and 39 years (14.3% and 1.6%). When asked about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, professionals with a technical level had a lower confidence index (82.4%) when compared to those with a higher level (97.2%). The data indicate that health professionals tend to seek updates on COVID-19, but that specific groups should receive attention, aiming to combat misinformation and fully implement the concept of evidence-based health.
id UNIFEI_32a321b03e4b72540fd157f144f22978
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34141
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19Evaluación del conocimiento de los profesionales de la salud sobre la farmacoterapia preventiva para la COVID-19Avaliação do conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde sobre a farmacoterapia preventiva para COVID-19COVID-19Health Care ProfessionalsSARS-CoV-2.COVID-19Profesionales de la SaludSARS-CoV-2.COVID-19Profissionais da SaúdeSARS-CoV-2.Since its emergence in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has proved to be very versatile and lethal. The numbers of deaths and hospitalizations have become a problem, therefore, it is necessary to find a measure against the infection. Therefore, new studies have emerged from existing drugs, such as Hydroxychloroquine, Nitazoxanide, Azithromycin and Ivermectin. However, amidst the uncertainties, the use of these drugs was widespread, even after carrying out studies that did not find the real benefit of this therapy, becoming a problem, especially in Brazil. Therefore, the present study sought to understand the perspective of health professionals, from an electronic form, in relation to early treatment as well as preventive measures for COVID-19. Regarding early treatment, most individuals (69/88) do not believe in the use of drugs as a prophylactic or cure, and those over 39 years of age had higher confidence levels (40% and 28%) in this pharmacological management in relation to professionals aged between 18 and 39 years (14.3% and 1.6%). When asked about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, professionals with a technical level had a lower confidence index (82.4%) when compared to those with a higher level (97.2%). The data indicate that health professionals tend to seek updates on COVID-19, but that specific groups should receive attention, aiming to combat misinformation and fully implement the concept of evidence-based health.Desde su aparición en 2019, el SARS-CoV-2 ha demostrado ser muy versátil y letal. Las cifras de muertes y hospitalizaciones se han convertido en un problema, por lo que es necesario encontrar una medida contra la infección. Por ello, han surgido nuevos estudios a partir de fármacos ya existentes, como la Hidroxicloroquina, la Nitazoxanida, la Azitromicina y la Ivermectina. Sin embargo, en medio de las incertidumbres, el uso de esos medicamentos se generalizó, incluso después de la realización de estudios que no encontraron el beneficio real de esta terapia, convirtiéndose en un problema, especialmente en Brasil. Por lo tanto, el presente estudio buscó comprender la perspectiva de los profesionales de la salud, a partir de un formulario electrónico, en relación con el tratamiento temprano y las medidas preventivas para el COVID-19. En cuanto al tratamiento temprano, la mayoría de los individuos (69/88) no cree en el uso de medicamentos como profiláctico o curativo, y los mayores de 39 años tienen mayores niveles de confianza (40% y 28%) en este manejo farmacológico en relación a profesionales de 18 a 39 años (14,3% y 1,6%). Al ser cuestionados sobre la seguridad y eficacia de las vacunas, los profesionales con nivel técnico presentaron menor índice de confianza (82,4%) en comparación con aquellos con mayor nivel (97,2%). Los datos indican que los profesionales de la salud tienden a buscar actualizaciones sobre COVID-19, pero que grupos específicos deben recibir atención, con el objetivo de combatir la desinformación e implementar completamente el concepto de salud basada en evidencia.Desde o seu surgimento em 2019, o SARS-CoV-2 se mostrou muito versátil e letal. Os números de óbitos e internações se tornaram um problema, sendo, portanto, necessário encontrar uma medida contra a infecção. Diante disso, novos estudos foram surgindo a partir de fármacos já existentes, como a Hidroxicloroquina, Nitazoxanida, Azitromicina e Ivermectina. Entretanto, diante de incertezas, o uso desses fármacos foi amplamente difundido, mesmo após a realização de estudos que não constataram o real benefício dessa terapia, se tornando um problema, principalmente no Brasil. Portanto, o presente estudo buscou compreender a perspectiva dos profissionais da saúde, a partir de um formulário eletrônico, em relação ao tratamento precoce assim como as medidas preventivas para COVID-19. Em relação ao tratamento precoce, a maioria dos indivíduos (69/88) não acredita no uso de medicamentos como forma profilática ou com objetivo de cura, sendo que aqueles com idade superior a 39 anos apresentaram maiores índices de confiança (40% e 28%) nesse manejo farmacológico, em relação aos profissionais com idade entre 18 e 39 anos (14,3% e 1,6%). Quando questionados sobre a segurança e eficácia das vacinas, profissionais de nível técnico apresentaram um índice de confiança inferior (82,4%) quando comparado aos de nível superior (97,2%). Os dados indicam que os profissionais da saúde tendem a buscar atualização sobre a COVID-19, mas que grupos específicos devem receber atenção, objetivando combater a desinformação e implementar, por completo, o conceito de saúde baseada em evidências.Research, Society and Development2022-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3414110.33448/rsd-v11i12.34141Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e360111234141Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e360111234141Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e3601112341412525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34141/29170Copyright (c) 2022 Francisco Daniel Queiroz Brito; Vitor Hugo Santos da Silva; Henrique Eron da Silva Gemaque; Isis de Oliveira Kosmiscky; Letícia Azevedo Moura; Carolina Alves Duarte; Ana Beatriz dos Santos Medeiros; Karen Letícia Gonçalves de Jesus; Priscila Pessoa Diamantino Reis; José Eduardo Gomes Arrudahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrito, Francisco Daniel QueirozSilva, Vitor Hugo Santos daGemaque, Henrique Eron da SilvaKosmiscky, Isis de OliveiraMoura, Letícia AzevedoDuarte, Carolina AlvesMedeiros, Ana Beatriz dos SantosJesus, Karen Letícia Gonçalves de Reis, Priscila Pessoa DiamantinoArruda, José Eduardo Gomes 2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34141Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:49:33.698992Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
Evaluación del conocimiento de los profesionales de la salud sobre la farmacoterapia preventiva para la COVID-19
Avaliação do conhecimento dos profissionais de saúde sobre a farmacoterapia preventiva para COVID-19
title Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
spellingShingle Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
Brito, Francisco Daniel Queiroz
COVID-19
Health Care Professionals
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Profesionales de la Salud
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Profissionais da Saúde
SARS-CoV-2.
title_short Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
title_full Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
title_fullStr Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
title_sort Assessment of the knowledge of health professionals about preventive pharmacotherapy for COVID-19
author Brito, Francisco Daniel Queiroz
author_facet Brito, Francisco Daniel Queiroz
Silva, Vitor Hugo Santos da
Gemaque, Henrique Eron da Silva
Kosmiscky, Isis de Oliveira
Moura, Letícia Azevedo
Duarte, Carolina Alves
Medeiros, Ana Beatriz dos Santos
Jesus, Karen Letícia Gonçalves de
Reis, Priscila Pessoa Diamantino
Arruda, José Eduardo Gomes
author_role author
author2 Silva, Vitor Hugo Santos da
Gemaque, Henrique Eron da Silva
Kosmiscky, Isis de Oliveira
Moura, Letícia Azevedo
Duarte, Carolina Alves
Medeiros, Ana Beatriz dos Santos
Jesus, Karen Letícia Gonçalves de
Reis, Priscila Pessoa Diamantino
Arruda, José Eduardo Gomes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brito, Francisco Daniel Queiroz
Silva, Vitor Hugo Santos da
Gemaque, Henrique Eron da Silva
Kosmiscky, Isis de Oliveira
Moura, Letícia Azevedo
Duarte, Carolina Alves
Medeiros, Ana Beatriz dos Santos
Jesus, Karen Letícia Gonçalves de
Reis, Priscila Pessoa Diamantino
Arruda, José Eduardo Gomes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Health Care Professionals
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Profesionales de la Salud
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Profissionais da Saúde
SARS-CoV-2.
topic COVID-19
Health Care Professionals
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Profesionales de la Salud
SARS-CoV-2.
COVID-19
Profissionais da Saúde
SARS-CoV-2.
description Since its emergence in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has proved to be very versatile and lethal. The numbers of deaths and hospitalizations have become a problem, therefore, it is necessary to find a measure against the infection. Therefore, new studies have emerged from existing drugs, such as Hydroxychloroquine, Nitazoxanide, Azithromycin and Ivermectin. However, amidst the uncertainties, the use of these drugs was widespread, even after carrying out studies that did not find the real benefit of this therapy, becoming a problem, especially in Brazil. Therefore, the present study sought to understand the perspective of health professionals, from an electronic form, in relation to early treatment as well as preventive measures for COVID-19. Regarding early treatment, most individuals (69/88) do not believe in the use of drugs as a prophylactic or cure, and those over 39 years of age had higher confidence levels (40% and 28%) in this pharmacological management in relation to professionals aged between 18 and 39 years (14.3% and 1.6%). When asked about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, professionals with a technical level had a lower confidence index (82.4%) when compared to those with a higher level (97.2%). The data indicate that health professionals tend to seek updates on COVID-19, but that specific groups should receive attention, aiming to combat misinformation and fully implement the concept of evidence-based health.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34141
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34141
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34141
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34141
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34141/29170
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e360111234141
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e360111234141
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e360111234141
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052797677469696