Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, Marcely Reis da, Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida, Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de, Souza, Caio Cesar, Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini, Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes, Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900
Resumo: Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter.
id UNIFEI_3827adcb0bddafda7d488c847c7538bb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21900
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)Evaluación de la capacidad de corte de dos instrumentos alternativos después del tercer uso (Wa-veOne Gold y W-file)Avaliação da capacidade de corte de dois instrumentos reciprocantes após terceiro uso (WaveOne Gold e W-file)EndodonticsSimulated canalsWaveOne GoldW-File.Canais simuladosEndodontiaWaveOne GoldW-File.Canales simuladosEndodonciaWaveOne GoldW-file.Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter.La instrumentación es un paso fundamental en el tratamiento de endodoncia para promover la limpieza y el modelado adecuados del conducto. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la capacidad de corte de dos sistemas alternativos de níquel-titanio en bloques de canales simulados. Se utilizaron sesenta bloques acrílicos, que se separaron en dos grupos de limas recíprocas (WaveOne Gold - WOG y W-File - WF) con 30 bloques cada uno, y subdivididos en 3 grupos (n = 10), representando el primero, segundo y tercero. uso: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2 y WF3. Se inyectó tinta tinta en los canales simulados, que se cubrieron con papel laminado, para no influir en la instrumentación. Para la irrigación, se utilizaron 5 ml de solución salina en cada cambio de instrumento. Una vez finalizada la instrumentación, los bloques se fotografiaron y analizaron en un programa informático para comparar el pre y posinstrumentación. En el análisis estadístico se realizaron las pruebas S Shapiro-Wilk, T para muestras independientes y Mann Whitney. En las condiciones experimentales en las que se realizó esta investigación, se concluye que luego del tercer uso no hubo diferencias significativas en relación con el transporte apical, sin embargo, los instrumentos del grupo W-File tuvieron preparaciones más conservadoras, con una mejor capacidad de centralización. en comparación con los instrumentos del grupo WaveOne Gold, lo que provocó preparaciones de mayor diámetro.A instrumentação é um passo fundamental no tratamento endodôntico para promover uma adequada limpeza e modelagem do conduto. O objetivo desse estudo foi comparar a capacidade de corte de dois sistemas reciprocante de níquel-titânio em blocos de canais simulados. Foram utilizados 60 blocos de acrílico, que foram separados em dois grupos de limas reciprocantes (WaveOne Gold - WOG e W-File - WF) com 30 blocos cada, e subdivididos em 3 grupos (n=10), representando o primeiro, segundo e terceiro uso: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2 e WF3. Foi injetada tinta nanquim nos canais simulados, os quais foram cobertos com papel laminado, para não haver influência na instrumentação. Para irrigação foram utilizados 5mL de solução salina a cada troca de instrumento. Após o término das instrumentações, os blocos foram fotografados e analisados em um programa de computador para comparar o pré e pós-instrumentação. Na análise estatística foram realizados os testes S Shapiro-Wilk, T para amostras independentes e Mann Whitney. Nas condições experimentais que essa pesquisa foi conduzida, conclui-se que após o terceiro uso não houve diferenças significativa em relação ao transporte apical, porém, os instrumentos do grupo W-File obtiveram preparos mais conservadores, com uma melhor capacidade de centralização em comparação com os instrumentos do grupo WaveOne Gold, que ocasionaram preparos com um maior diâmetro.Research, Society and Development2021-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2190010.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e207101421900Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e207101421900Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e2071014219002525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900/19510Copyright (c) 2021 Adolfo de Matos de Carvalho; Marcely Reis da Silva; Matheus Almeida Rodrigues; Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Junior; Caio Cesar Souza; Cesar Augusto Perini Rosas; Ryhan Menezes Cardoso; Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Adolfo de Matos deSilva, Marcely Reis daRodrigues, Matheus AlmeidaOliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana deSouza, Caio CesarRosas, Cesar Augusto PeriniCardoso, Ryhan MenezesLimoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva 2021-12-04T11:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21900Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:41:13.042353Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
Evaluación de la capacidad de corte de dos instrumentos alternativos después del tercer uso (Wa-veOne Gold y W-file)
Avaliação da capacidade de corte de dois instrumentos reciprocantes após terceiro uso (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
title Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
spellingShingle Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de
Endodontics
Simulated canals
WaveOne Gold
W-File.
Canais simulados
Endodontia
WaveOne Gold
W-File.
Canales simulados
Endodoncia
WaveOne Gold
W-file.
title_short Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
title_full Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
title_fullStr Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
title_sort Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
author Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de
author_facet Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de
Silva, Marcely Reis da
Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida
Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de
Souza, Caio Cesar
Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini
Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marcely Reis da
Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida
Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de
Souza, Caio Cesar
Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini
Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de
Silva, Marcely Reis da
Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida
Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de
Souza, Caio Cesar
Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini
Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontics
Simulated canals
WaveOne Gold
W-File.
Canais simulados
Endodontia
WaveOne Gold
W-File.
Canales simulados
Endodoncia
WaveOne Gold
W-file.
topic Endodontics
Simulated canals
WaveOne Gold
W-File.
Canais simulados
Endodontia
WaveOne Gold
W-File.
Canales simulados
Endodoncia
WaveOne Gold
W-file.
description Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900
10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900/19510
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e207101421900
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e207101421900
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e207101421900
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052694136881152