Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625 |
Resumo: | Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost. |
id |
UNIFEI_3a79751654bf3be139a672be1263a2f5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25625 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic reviewTecnología digital versus tecnología convencional para hacer dentaduras postizas totales: una revisión sistemáticaTecnologia digital versus convencional para confecção de próteses totais: uma revisão sistemáticaCAD-CAMDentadura totalVentaja.CAD-CAMComplete dentureAdvantage.CAD-CAMPrótese totalVantagem.Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost.Objetivo: Evaluar si la tecnología CAD / CAM es superior a la técnica convencional para hacer dentaduras postizas totales con soporte de moco. Metodología: Esta revisión siguió las recomendaciones de PRISMA. Dos revisores calibrados realizaron una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science y Cochrane Library, utilizando los descriptores: “Dentadura completa”, “Dentadura completa”, “Dentadura total”, “Prótesis total”, “Prótesis completa”, “Prótesis completa”, “Prótesis total”, “Prótesis total”, “Diseño asistido por computadora”, “Fabricación asistida por computadora”, “CAD / CAM”, “Beneficios” y “Ventaja”. Solo se incluyeron los estudios in vitro que comparaban la tecnología CAD / CAM (impresión o fresado) con la fabricación convencional, y se excluyeron los estudios sin grupo control y prótesis sobre implantes. Resultados: La estrategia utilizada resultó en 410 artículos. De estos, 11 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Después de la lectura completa, solo se incluyeron 6 en la revisión sistemática. A pesar de requerir una alta inversión y formación profesional, los estudios seleccionados demostraron las siguientes ventajas del sistema CAD / CAM sobre el convencional: menor liberación de monómero y mejor adaptación de las prótesis Conclusión: El proceso de fabricación de prótesis totales mediante el sistema CAD / La CAM demostró ser ventajosa en comparación con el método convencional, siendo la principal la menor liberación de monómero, acompañada de mejores cualidades biomecánicas y adaptación marginal, a pesar de su elevado coste.Objetivo: Avaliar se a tecnologia CAD/CAM é superior a técnica convencional para confecção de próteses totais mucosuportadas. Metodologia: Esta revisão seguiu as recomendações do PRISMA. Foi realizada, por dois revisores calibrados, uma revisão sistemática nas bases de dados Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science e Cochrane Library, usando os descritores: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prostheses”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prostheses”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ‘’Benefits” e “Advantage”. Foram incluídos apenas estudos in vitro que comparavam a tecnologia CAD/CAM (impressão ou fresagem) com a confecção convenvional e excluídos trabalhos sem grupo controle e de próteses sobre implantes. Resultados: A estratégia utilizada resultou em 410 artigos. Destes, 11 se encaixavam nos critérios de inclusão. Após leitura na íntegra, apenas 6 foram incluídos na revisão sistemática. Apesar de exigir um alto investimento e capacitação profissional, os estudos selecionados demonstraram as próteses Conclusão: O processo de fabricação de prótese total por meio do sistema CAD/CAM apresentou-se vantajoso, comparado ao método convencional, sendo a principal delas a menor liberação de monômero, acompanhado de melhores qualidades biomecânicas e adaptação marginal, apesar do seu alto custo.Research, Society and Development2022-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2562510.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e24911225625Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e24911225625Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e249112256252525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625/22512Copyright (c) 2022 Larissa Costa Freitas; Flávia Braga de Oliveira; Camila Moreira Lima; Jean Soares Miranda ; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leitehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Larissa Costa Oliveira, Flávia Braga de Lima, Camila MoreiraMiranda , Jean SoaresLeite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25625Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:52.033684Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review Tecnología digital versus tecnología convencional para hacer dentaduras postizas totales: una revisión sistemática Tecnologia digital versus convencional para confecção de próteses totais: uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review Freitas, Larissa Costa CAD-CAM Dentadura total Ventaja. CAD-CAM Complete denture Advantage. CAD-CAM Prótese total Vantagem. |
title_short |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review |
title_full |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review |
author |
Freitas, Larissa Costa |
author_facet |
Freitas, Larissa Costa Oliveira, Flávia Braga de Lima, Camila Moreira Miranda , Jean Soares Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Flávia Braga de Lima, Camila Moreira Miranda , Jean Soares Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Freitas, Larissa Costa Oliveira, Flávia Braga de Lima, Camila Moreira Miranda , Jean Soares Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CAD-CAM Dentadura total Ventaja. CAD-CAM Complete denture Advantage. CAD-CAM Prótese total Vantagem. |
topic |
CAD-CAM Dentadura total Ventaja. CAD-CAM Complete denture Advantage. CAD-CAM Prótese total Vantagem. |
description |
Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625/22512 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e24911225625 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e24911225625 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e24911225625 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052703101157376 |