The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023 |
Resumo: | The integrity of natural systems is already at risk because of climate change caused by the intense emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The goal of geological carbon sequestration is to capture, transport and store CO2 in appropriate geological formations. In this review, we address the geological environments conducive to the application of CCS projects (Carbon Capture and Storage), the phases that make up these projects, and their associated investment and operating costs. Furthermore it is presented the calculations of the estimated financial profitability of different types of projects in Brazil. Using mathematical models, it can be concluded that the Roncador field presents higher gross revenue when the amount of extra oil that can be retrieved is 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billions approximately in 2018). Additional calculations show that the Paraná saline aquifer has the highest gross revenue (US$ 6.90 trillions in 2018) when compared to the Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillions approximately in 2018) and Santos saline aquifers (US$ 2.21 trillions approximately in 2018) if a CCS project were to be employed. Therefore, the proposed Carbon Capture and Storage method in this study is an important scientific contribution for reliable large-scale CO2 storage in Brazil. |
id |
UNIFEI_3cb541b626a3e0381be45ae2c5e3d050 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1023 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case studyLa aplicación, las inversiones requeridas y los costos operativos del secuestro geológico de CO2: un estudio de casoAplicação, investimentos necessários e custos operacionais do sequestro geológico de CO2: um estudo de casoEnvironmentCarbonGeological StorageAquifersSustainability.Medio AmbienteCarbónAlmacenamiento GeológicoAcuíferosSostenibilidad.Meio AmbienteCarbonoArmazenamento GeológicoAquíferosSustentabilidade.The integrity of natural systems is already at risk because of climate change caused by the intense emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The goal of geological carbon sequestration is to capture, transport and store CO2 in appropriate geological formations. In this review, we address the geological environments conducive to the application of CCS projects (Carbon Capture and Storage), the phases that make up these projects, and their associated investment and operating costs. Furthermore it is presented the calculations of the estimated financial profitability of different types of projects in Brazil. Using mathematical models, it can be concluded that the Roncador field presents higher gross revenue when the amount of extra oil that can be retrieved is 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billions approximately in 2018). Additional calculations show that the Paraná saline aquifer has the highest gross revenue (US$ 6.90 trillions in 2018) when compared to the Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillions approximately in 2018) and Santos saline aquifers (US$ 2.21 trillions approximately in 2018) if a CCS project were to be employed. Therefore, the proposed Carbon Capture and Storage method in this study is an important scientific contribution for reliable large-scale CO2 storage in Brazil.La integridad de los sistemas naturales ya está en riesgo debido al cambio climático causado por las intensas emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en la atmósfera. El objetivo del secuestro de carbono geológico es capturar, transportar y almacenar CO2 en formaciones geológicas apropiadas. En esta revisión, abordamos los entornos geológicos propicios para la aplicación de proyectos CCS (Captura y almacenamiento de carbono), las fases que conforman estos proyectos y sus costos asociados de inversión y operación. Además, se presentan los cálculos de la rentabilidad financiera estimada de diferentes tipos de proyectos en Brasil. Usando modelos matemáticos, se puede concluir que el campo Roncador presenta mayores ingresos brutos cuando la cantidad de petróleo extra que se puede recuperar es de 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billones aproximadamente en 2018). Cálculos adicionales muestran que el acuífero salino de Paraná tiene el ingreso bruto más alto (US$ 6.90 trillones en 2018) en comparación con los Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillones aproximadamente en 2018) y los acuíferos salinos de Santos (US$ 2.21 trillones aproximadamente en 2018) si El proyecto CCS debía ser empleado. Por lo tanto, el método de captura y almacenamiento de carbono propuesto en este estudio es una contribución científica importante para el almacenamiento confiable de CO2 a gran escala en Brasil.A integridade dos sistemas naturais já está em risco por causa das mudanças climáticas causadas pelas intensas emissões de gases de efeito estufa na atmosfera. O objetivo do sequestro geológico de carbono é capturar, transportar e armazenar CO2 em formações geológicas apropriadas. Nesta revisão, foi abordado os ambientes geológicos conducentes à aplicação de projetos de CCS (do inglês, Carbon Capture and Storage), as fases que compõem esses projetos e seus custos associados aos investimentos e operações. Além disso, são apresentados os cálculos da rentabilidade financeira estimada para diferentes tipos de projetos no Brasil. Utilizando modelos matemáticos referents à tecnologia de Carbon Capture and Storage, pode-se concluir que o campo de Roncador apresenta a maior receita bruta quando a quantidade de óleo extra que pode ser recuperada é de 9,3% (US$ 48,55 bilhões aproximadamente em 2018). Cálculos adicionais mostram que o aquífero salino do Paraná apresenta a maior receita bruta (US$ 6,90 trilhões em 2018) quando comparado aos aquíferos salinos de Solimões (US$ 3,76 trilhões aproximadamente em 2018) e Santos (US$ 2,21 trilhões aproximadamente em 2018), isso se um projeto de CCS fosse empregado nestes locais. Portanto, o método de captura e armazenamento de carbono proposto neste estudo é uma importante contribuição científica para o armazenamento confiável de CO2 em grande escala no Brasil.Research, Society and Development2019-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/102310.33448/rsd-v8i6.1023Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 6; e12861023Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 6; e12861023Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 6; e128610232525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023/871Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Junior Zucatelli, Ana Paula Meneguelo, Gisele de Lorena Diniz Chaves, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro Tostainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZucatelli, Pedro JuniorMeneguelo, Ana PaulaDiniz Chaves, Gisele de LorenaChaves, Gisele de Lorena DinizTosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro2020-03-25T16:06:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1023Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:13.588993Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study La aplicación, las inversiones requeridas y los costos operativos del secuestro geológico de CO2: un estudio de caso Aplicação, investimentos necessários e custos operacionais do sequestro geológico de CO2: um estudo de caso |
title |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study |
spellingShingle |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study Zucatelli, Pedro Junior Environment Carbon Geological Storage Aquifers Sustainability. Medio Ambiente Carbón Almacenamiento Geológico Acuíferos Sostenibilidad. Meio Ambiente Carbono Armazenamento Geológico Aquíferos Sustentabilidade. |
title_short |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study |
title_full |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study |
title_fullStr |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study |
title_sort |
The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study |
author |
Zucatelli, Pedro Junior |
author_facet |
Zucatelli, Pedro Junior Meneguelo, Ana Paula Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meneguelo, Ana Paula Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zucatelli, Pedro Junior Meneguelo, Ana Paula Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Environment Carbon Geological Storage Aquifers Sustainability. Medio Ambiente Carbón Almacenamiento Geológico Acuíferos Sostenibilidad. Meio Ambiente Carbono Armazenamento Geológico Aquíferos Sustentabilidade. |
topic |
Environment Carbon Geological Storage Aquifers Sustainability. Medio Ambiente Carbón Almacenamiento Geológico Acuíferos Sostenibilidad. Meio Ambiente Carbono Armazenamento Geológico Aquíferos Sustentabilidade. |
description |
The integrity of natural systems is already at risk because of climate change caused by the intense emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The goal of geological carbon sequestration is to capture, transport and store CO2 in appropriate geological formations. In this review, we address the geological environments conducive to the application of CCS projects (Carbon Capture and Storage), the phases that make up these projects, and their associated investment and operating costs. Furthermore it is presented the calculations of the estimated financial profitability of different types of projects in Brazil. Using mathematical models, it can be concluded that the Roncador field presents higher gross revenue when the amount of extra oil that can be retrieved is 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billions approximately in 2018). Additional calculations show that the Paraná saline aquifer has the highest gross revenue (US$ 6.90 trillions in 2018) when compared to the Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillions approximately in 2018) and Santos saline aquifers (US$ 2.21 trillions approximately in 2018) if a CCS project were to be employed. Therefore, the proposed Carbon Capture and Storage method in this study is an important scientific contribution for reliable large-scale CO2 storage in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023 10.33448/rsd-v8i6.1023 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v8i6.1023 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023/871 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 6; e12861023 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 6; e12861023 Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 6; e12861023 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052643308208128 |