The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zucatelli, Pedro Junior
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Meneguelo, Ana Paula, Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena, Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz, Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023
Resumo: The integrity of natural systems is already at risk because of climate change caused by the intense emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The goal of geological carbon sequestration is to capture, transport and store CO2 in appropriate geological formations. In this review, we address the geological environments conducive to the application of CCS projects (Carbon Capture and Storage), the phases that make up these projects, and their associated investment and operating costs. Furthermore it is presented the calculations of the estimated financial profitability of different types of projects in Brazil. Using mathematical models, it can be concluded that the Roncador field presents higher gross revenue when the amount of extra oil that can be retrieved is 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billions approximately in 2018). Additional calculations show that the Paraná saline aquifer has the highest gross revenue (US$ 6.90 trillions in 2018) when compared to the Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillions approximately in 2018) and Santos saline aquifers (US$ 2.21 trillions approximately in 2018) if a CCS project were to be employed. Therefore, the proposed Carbon Capture and Storage method in this study is an important scientific contribution for reliable large-scale CO2 storage in Brazil.
id UNIFEI_3cb541b626a3e0381be45ae2c5e3d050
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1023
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case studyLa aplicación, las inversiones requeridas y los costos operativos del secuestro geológico de CO2: un estudio de casoAplicação, investimentos necessários e custos operacionais do sequestro geológico de CO2: um estudo de casoEnvironmentCarbonGeological StorageAquifersSustainability.Medio AmbienteCarbónAlmacenamiento GeológicoAcuíferosSostenibilidad.Meio AmbienteCarbonoArmazenamento GeológicoAquíferosSustentabilidade.The integrity of natural systems is already at risk because of climate change caused by the intense emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The goal of geological carbon sequestration is to capture, transport and store CO2 in appropriate geological formations. In this review, we address the geological environments conducive to the application of CCS projects (Carbon Capture and Storage), the phases that make up these projects, and their associated investment and operating costs. Furthermore it is presented the calculations of the estimated financial profitability of different types of projects in Brazil. Using mathematical models, it can be concluded that the Roncador field presents higher gross revenue when the amount of extra oil that can be retrieved is 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billions approximately in 2018). Additional calculations show that the Paraná saline aquifer has the highest gross revenue (US$ 6.90 trillions in 2018) when compared to the Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillions approximately in 2018) and Santos saline aquifers (US$ 2.21 trillions approximately in 2018) if a CCS project were to be employed. Therefore, the proposed Carbon Capture and Storage method in this study is an important scientific contribution for reliable large-scale CO2 storage in Brazil.La integridad de los sistemas naturales ya está en riesgo debido al cambio climático causado por las intensas emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en la atmósfera. El objetivo del secuestro de carbono geológico es capturar, transportar y almacenar CO2 en formaciones geológicas apropiadas. En esta revisión, abordamos los entornos geológicos propicios para la aplicación de proyectos CCS (Captura y almacenamiento de carbono), las fases que conforman estos proyectos y sus costos asociados de inversión y operación. Además, se presentan los cálculos de la rentabilidad financiera estimada de diferentes tipos de proyectos en Brasil. Usando modelos matemáticos, se puede concluir que el campo Roncador presenta mayores ingresos brutos cuando la cantidad de petróleo extra que se puede recuperar es de 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billones aproximadamente en 2018). Cálculos adicionales muestran que el acuífero salino de Paraná tiene el ingreso bruto más alto (US$ 6.90 trillones en 2018) en comparación con los Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillones aproximadamente en 2018) y los acuíferos salinos de Santos (US$ 2.21 trillones aproximadamente en 2018) si El proyecto CCS debía ser empleado. Por lo tanto, el método de captura y almacenamiento de carbono propuesto en este estudio es una contribución científica importante para el almacenamiento confiable de CO2 a gran escala en Brasil.A integridade dos sistemas naturais já está em risco por causa das mudanças climáticas causadas pelas intensas emissões de gases de efeito estufa na atmosfera. O objetivo do sequestro geológico de carbono é capturar, transportar e armazenar CO2 em formações geológicas apropriadas. Nesta revisão, foi abordado os ambientes geológicos conducentes à aplicação de projetos de CCS (do inglês, Carbon Capture and Storage), as fases que compõem esses projetos e seus custos associados aos investimentos e operações. Além disso, são apresentados os cálculos da rentabilidade financeira estimada para diferentes tipos de projetos no Brasil. Utilizando modelos matemáticos referents à tecnologia de Carbon Capture and Storage, pode-se concluir que o campo de Roncador apresenta a maior receita bruta quando a quantidade de óleo extra que pode ser recuperada é de 9,3% (US$ 48,55 bilhões aproximadamente em 2018). Cálculos adicionais mostram que o aquífero salino do Paraná apresenta a maior receita bruta (US$ 6,90 trilhões em 2018) quando comparado aos aquíferos salinos de Solimões (US$ 3,76 trilhões aproximadamente em 2018) e Santos (US$ 2,21 trilhões aproximadamente em 2018), isso se um projeto de CCS fosse empregado nestes locais. Portanto, o método de captura e armazenamento de carbono proposto neste estudo é uma importante contribuição científica para o armazenamento confiável de CO2 em grande escala no Brasil.Research, Society and Development2019-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/102310.33448/rsd-v8i6.1023Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 6; e12861023Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 6; e12861023Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 6; e128610232525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023/871Copyright (c) 2019 Pedro Junior Zucatelli, Ana Paula Meneguelo, Gisele de Lorena Diniz Chaves, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro Tostainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZucatelli, Pedro JuniorMeneguelo, Ana PaulaDiniz Chaves, Gisele de LorenaChaves, Gisele de Lorena DinizTosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro2020-03-25T16:06:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1023Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:13.588993Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
La aplicación, las inversiones requeridas y los costos operativos del secuestro geológico de CO2: un estudio de caso
Aplicação, investimentos necessários e custos operacionais do sequestro geológico de CO2: um estudo de caso
title The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
spellingShingle The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
Zucatelli, Pedro Junior
Environment
Carbon
Geological Storage
Aquifers
Sustainability.
Medio Ambiente
Carbón
Almacenamiento Geológico
Acuíferos
Sostenibilidad.
Meio Ambiente
Carbono
Armazenamento Geológico
Aquíferos
Sustentabilidade.
title_short The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
title_full The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
title_fullStr The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
title_full_unstemmed The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
title_sort The application, required investments and operational costs of geological CO2 sequestration: a case study
author Zucatelli, Pedro Junior
author_facet Zucatelli, Pedro Junior
Meneguelo, Ana Paula
Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena
Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz
Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Meneguelo, Ana Paula
Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena
Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz
Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zucatelli, Pedro Junior
Meneguelo, Ana Paula
Diniz Chaves, Gisele de Lorena
Chaves, Gisele de Lorena Diniz
Tosta, Marielce de Cassia Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environment
Carbon
Geological Storage
Aquifers
Sustainability.
Medio Ambiente
Carbón
Almacenamiento Geológico
Acuíferos
Sostenibilidad.
Meio Ambiente
Carbono
Armazenamento Geológico
Aquíferos
Sustentabilidade.
topic Environment
Carbon
Geological Storage
Aquifers
Sustainability.
Medio Ambiente
Carbón
Almacenamiento Geológico
Acuíferos
Sostenibilidad.
Meio Ambiente
Carbono
Armazenamento Geológico
Aquíferos
Sustentabilidade.
description The integrity of natural systems is already at risk because of climate change caused by the intense emissions of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The goal of geological carbon sequestration is to capture, transport and store CO2 in appropriate geological formations. In this review, we address the geological environments conducive to the application of CCS projects (Carbon Capture and Storage), the phases that make up these projects, and their associated investment and operating costs. Furthermore it is presented the calculations of the estimated financial profitability of different types of projects in Brazil. Using mathematical models, it can be concluded that the Roncador field presents higher gross revenue when the amount of extra oil that can be retrieved is 9.3% (US$ 48.55 billions approximately in 2018). Additional calculations show that the Paraná saline aquifer has the highest gross revenue (US$ 6.90 trillions in 2018) when compared to the Solimões (US$ 3.76 trillions approximately in 2018) and Santos saline aquifers (US$ 2.21 trillions approximately in 2018) if a CCS project were to be employed. Therefore, the proposed Carbon Capture and Storage method in this study is an important scientific contribution for reliable large-scale CO2 storage in Brazil.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023
10.33448/rsd-v8i6.1023
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v8i6.1023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1023/871
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 No. 6; e12861023
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 8 Núm. 6; e12861023
Research, Society and Development; v. 8 n. 6; e12861023
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052643308208128