Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Anselmo Queiroz
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena, Góes, Alexandre José da Silva, Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima, Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de, Silva, Flávio Ferreira da, Alves, Antonio José, Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187
Resumo: Measurement of wounds to document the healing process have an important role in the management of wounds. Digital cameras in smartphones are available and easy to use and taking pictures of wounds has becoming a routine. Analyzing digital pictures with appropriate software provides a rapid, clean and easy-to-use tool for measuring of wound area. A set of 160 digital pictures of wounds in rats was the basis of this study. Digital photographs were made by placing a rule next to the wound in parallel with the healthy skin and visualized with Image Tool, ImageJ, and AutoCaD® softwares. Measurement of wound area was carried out and was performed paired Student’s t-test and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to compare manual rule-based technique and all softwares measurement of wounds. In conclusion, the manual rule-based technique overestimated wound size and Image Tools software provided a better, faster, and accurate measurement of the wound area. This software could routinely be used to document wound healing process.
id UNIFEI_3e3d7609072ba0a016c8e1a7ff3381c2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28187
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of woundsComparación de cuatro métodos para la evaluación morfométrica de heridasComparação de quatro métodos para avaliação morfométrica de feridasMedição de feridasPlanimetria digitalFotografia digitalSoftwares de Imagem.Medición de heridasPlanimetría digitalFotografía digitalSoftware de imagen.Measurement of woundsDigital planimetryDigital photographyImage Softwares.Measurement of wounds to document the healing process have an important role in the management of wounds. Digital cameras in smartphones are available and easy to use and taking pictures of wounds has becoming a routine. Analyzing digital pictures with appropriate software provides a rapid, clean and easy-to-use tool for measuring of wound area. A set of 160 digital pictures of wounds in rats was the basis of this study. Digital photographs were made by placing a rule next to the wound in parallel with the healthy skin and visualized with Image Tool, ImageJ, and AutoCaD® softwares. Measurement of wound area was carried out and was performed paired Student’s t-test and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to compare manual rule-based technique and all softwares measurement of wounds. In conclusion, the manual rule-based technique overestimated wound size and Image Tools software provided a better, faster, and accurate measurement of the wound area. This software could routinely be used to document wound healing process.La medición de heridas para documentar el proceso de curación tiene un papel importante en el tratamiento de heridas. Las cámaras digitales en los teléfonos inteligentes están disponibles y son fáciles de usar, y tomar fotografías de las heridas se ha convertido en una rutina. El análisis de imágenes digitales con el software apropiado proporciona una herramienta rápida, limpia y fácil de usar para medir el área de la herida. Un conjunto de 160 fotografías digitales de heridas en ratas fue la base de este estudio. Se tomaron fotografías digitales colocando una regla al lado de la herida en paralelo con la piel sana y se visualizaron con los softwares Image Tool, ImageJ y AutoCaD®. Se llevó a cabo la medición del área de la herida y se realizó la prueba t de Student pareada y el análisis de componentes principales (PCA) para comparar la técnica manual basada en reglas y la medición de heridas de todos los softwares. En conclusión, la técnica manual basada en reglas sobrestimó el tamaño de la herida y el software Image Tools proporcionó una medición mejor, más rápida y precisa del área de la herida. Este software podría usarse de forma rutinaria para documentar el proceso de curación de heridas.A medição de feridas para documentar o processo de cicatrização tem um papel importante no manejo de feridas. Câmeras digitais em smartphones estão disponíveis fáceis de usar e tirar fotos de feridas tem se tornado uma rotina. A análise de imagens digitais com software apropriado fornece uma ferramenta rápida, limpa e fácil de usar para medir a área da ferida. Um conjunto de 160 fotos digitais de feridas em ratos foi a base deste estudo. As fotografias digitais foram feitas colocando uma régua ao lado da ferida em paralelo com a pele saudável e visualizadas com os softwares Image Tool, ImageJ e AutoCaD®. A medição da área da ferida foi realizada e foi realizado teste t de Student pareado e Análise de Componentes Principais (PCA) para comparar a técnica manual em régua e todos os softwares de medição de feridas. Em conclusão, a técnica manual em régua superestimou o tamanho da ferida e o software Image Tools forneceu uma medição melhor, mais rápida e precisa da área da ferida. Este software pode ser usado rotineiramente para documentar o processo de cicatrização de feridas.Research, Society and Development2022-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818710.33448/rsd-v11i5.28187Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e17611528187Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e17611528187Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e176115281872525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187/24450Copyright (c) 2022 Anselmo Queiroz Alves; Rubens Pedro Lorena Silva; Alexandre José da Silva Góes; Mariza Severina de Lima Silva; Antonio Gomes de Castro Neto; Flávio Ferreira da Silva; Antonio José Alves; Valdemiro Amaro da Silva Juniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Anselmo Queiroz Silva, Rubens Pedro LorenaGóes, Alexandre José da SilvaSilva, Mariza Severina de LimaCastro Neto, Antonio Gomes deSilva, Flávio Ferreira daAlves, Antonio JoséSilva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da2022-04-17T18:18:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28187Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:40.830040Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
Comparación de cuatro métodos para la evaluación morfométrica de heridas
Comparação de quatro métodos para avaliação morfométrica de feridas
title Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
spellingShingle Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
Alves, Anselmo Queiroz
Medição de feridas
Planimetria digital
Fotografia digital
Softwares de Imagem.
Medición de heridas
Planimetría digital
Fotografía digital
Software de imagen.
Measurement of wounds
Digital planimetry
Digital photography
Image Softwares.
title_short Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
title_full Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
title_fullStr Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
title_sort Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
author Alves, Anselmo Queiroz
author_facet Alves, Anselmo Queiroz
Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena
Góes, Alexandre José da Silva
Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima
Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de
Silva, Flávio Ferreira da
Alves, Antonio José
Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena
Góes, Alexandre José da Silva
Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima
Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de
Silva, Flávio Ferreira da
Alves, Antonio José
Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Anselmo Queiroz
Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena
Góes, Alexandre José da Silva
Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima
Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de
Silva, Flávio Ferreira da
Alves, Antonio José
Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medição de feridas
Planimetria digital
Fotografia digital
Softwares de Imagem.
Medición de heridas
Planimetría digital
Fotografía digital
Software de imagen.
Measurement of wounds
Digital planimetry
Digital photography
Image Softwares.
topic Medição de feridas
Planimetria digital
Fotografia digital
Softwares de Imagem.
Medición de heridas
Planimetría digital
Fotografía digital
Software de imagen.
Measurement of wounds
Digital planimetry
Digital photography
Image Softwares.
description Measurement of wounds to document the healing process have an important role in the management of wounds. Digital cameras in smartphones are available and easy to use and taking pictures of wounds has becoming a routine. Analyzing digital pictures with appropriate software provides a rapid, clean and easy-to-use tool for measuring of wound area. A set of 160 digital pictures of wounds in rats was the basis of this study. Digital photographs were made by placing a rule next to the wound in parallel with the healthy skin and visualized with Image Tool, ImageJ, and AutoCaD® softwares. Measurement of wound area was carried out and was performed paired Student’s t-test and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to compare manual rule-based technique and all softwares measurement of wounds. In conclusion, the manual rule-based technique overestimated wound size and Image Tools software provided a better, faster, and accurate measurement of the wound area. This software could routinely be used to document wound healing process.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187
10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28187
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28187
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187/24450
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e17611528187
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e17611528187
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e17611528187
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052794123845632