Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187 |
Resumo: | Measurement of wounds to document the healing process have an important role in the management of wounds. Digital cameras in smartphones are available and easy to use and taking pictures of wounds has becoming a routine. Analyzing digital pictures with appropriate software provides a rapid, clean and easy-to-use tool for measuring of wound area. A set of 160 digital pictures of wounds in rats was the basis of this study. Digital photographs were made by placing a rule next to the wound in parallel with the healthy skin and visualized with Image Tool, ImageJ, and AutoCaD® softwares. Measurement of wound area was carried out and was performed paired Student’s t-test and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to compare manual rule-based technique and all softwares measurement of wounds. In conclusion, the manual rule-based technique overestimated wound size and Image Tools software provided a better, faster, and accurate measurement of the wound area. This software could routinely be used to document wound healing process. |
id |
UNIFEI_3e3d7609072ba0a016c8e1a7ff3381c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28187 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of woundsComparación de cuatro métodos para la evaluación morfométrica de heridasComparação de quatro métodos para avaliação morfométrica de feridasMedição de feridasPlanimetria digitalFotografia digitalSoftwares de Imagem.Medición de heridasPlanimetría digitalFotografía digitalSoftware de imagen.Measurement of woundsDigital planimetryDigital photographyImage Softwares.Measurement of wounds to document the healing process have an important role in the management of wounds. Digital cameras in smartphones are available and easy to use and taking pictures of wounds has becoming a routine. Analyzing digital pictures with appropriate software provides a rapid, clean and easy-to-use tool for measuring of wound area. A set of 160 digital pictures of wounds in rats was the basis of this study. Digital photographs were made by placing a rule next to the wound in parallel with the healthy skin and visualized with Image Tool, ImageJ, and AutoCaD® softwares. Measurement of wound area was carried out and was performed paired Student’s t-test and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to compare manual rule-based technique and all softwares measurement of wounds. In conclusion, the manual rule-based technique overestimated wound size and Image Tools software provided a better, faster, and accurate measurement of the wound area. This software could routinely be used to document wound healing process.La medición de heridas para documentar el proceso de curación tiene un papel importante en el tratamiento de heridas. Las cámaras digitales en los teléfonos inteligentes están disponibles y son fáciles de usar, y tomar fotografías de las heridas se ha convertido en una rutina. El análisis de imágenes digitales con el software apropiado proporciona una herramienta rápida, limpia y fácil de usar para medir el área de la herida. Un conjunto de 160 fotografías digitales de heridas en ratas fue la base de este estudio. Se tomaron fotografías digitales colocando una regla al lado de la herida en paralelo con la piel sana y se visualizaron con los softwares Image Tool, ImageJ y AutoCaD®. Se llevó a cabo la medición del área de la herida y se realizó la prueba t de Student pareada y el análisis de componentes principales (PCA) para comparar la técnica manual basada en reglas y la medición de heridas de todos los softwares. En conclusión, la técnica manual basada en reglas sobrestimó el tamaño de la herida y el software Image Tools proporcionó una medición mejor, más rápida y precisa del área de la herida. Este software podría usarse de forma rutinaria para documentar el proceso de curación de heridas.A medição de feridas para documentar o processo de cicatrização tem um papel importante no manejo de feridas. Câmeras digitais em smartphones estão disponíveis fáceis de usar e tirar fotos de feridas tem se tornado uma rotina. A análise de imagens digitais com software apropriado fornece uma ferramenta rápida, limpa e fácil de usar para medir a área da ferida. Um conjunto de 160 fotos digitais de feridas em ratos foi a base deste estudo. As fotografias digitais foram feitas colocando uma régua ao lado da ferida em paralelo com a pele saudável e visualizadas com os softwares Image Tool, ImageJ e AutoCaD®. A medição da área da ferida foi realizada e foi realizado teste t de Student pareado e Análise de Componentes Principais (PCA) para comparar a técnica manual em régua e todos os softwares de medição de feridas. Em conclusão, a técnica manual em régua superestimou o tamanho da ferida e o software Image Tools forneceu uma medição melhor, mais rápida e precisa da área da ferida. Este software pode ser usado rotineiramente para documentar o processo de cicatrização de feridas.Research, Society and Development2022-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2818710.33448/rsd-v11i5.28187Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e17611528187Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e17611528187Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e176115281872525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187/24450Copyright (c) 2022 Anselmo Queiroz Alves; Rubens Pedro Lorena Silva; Alexandre José da Silva Góes; Mariza Severina de Lima Silva; Antonio Gomes de Castro Neto; Flávio Ferreira da Silva; Antonio José Alves; Valdemiro Amaro da Silva Juniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Anselmo Queiroz Silva, Rubens Pedro LorenaGóes, Alexandre José da SilvaSilva, Mariza Severina de LimaCastro Neto, Antonio Gomes deSilva, Flávio Ferreira daAlves, Antonio JoséSilva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da2022-04-17T18:18:56Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28187Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:40.830040Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds Comparación de cuatro métodos para la evaluación morfométrica de heridas Comparação de quatro métodos para avaliação morfométrica de feridas |
title |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds Alves, Anselmo Queiroz Medição de feridas Planimetria digital Fotografia digital Softwares de Imagem. Medición de heridas Planimetría digital Fotografía digital Software de imagen. Measurement of wounds Digital planimetry Digital photography Image Softwares. |
title_short |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds |
title_full |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds |
title_sort |
Comparison of four methods for morphometric evaluation of wounds |
author |
Alves, Anselmo Queiroz |
author_facet |
Alves, Anselmo Queiroz Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena Góes, Alexandre José da Silva Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de Silva, Flávio Ferreira da Alves, Antonio José Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena Góes, Alexandre José da Silva Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de Silva, Flávio Ferreira da Alves, Antonio José Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Anselmo Queiroz Silva, Rubens Pedro Lorena Góes, Alexandre José da Silva Silva, Mariza Severina de Lima Castro Neto, Antonio Gomes de Silva, Flávio Ferreira da Alves, Antonio José Silva Junior, Valdemiro Amaro da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Medição de feridas Planimetria digital Fotografia digital Softwares de Imagem. Medición de heridas Planimetría digital Fotografía digital Software de imagen. Measurement of wounds Digital planimetry Digital photography Image Softwares. |
topic |
Medição de feridas Planimetria digital Fotografia digital Softwares de Imagem. Medición de heridas Planimetría digital Fotografía digital Software de imagen. Measurement of wounds Digital planimetry Digital photography Image Softwares. |
description |
Measurement of wounds to document the healing process have an important role in the management of wounds. Digital cameras in smartphones are available and easy to use and taking pictures of wounds has becoming a routine. Analyzing digital pictures with appropriate software provides a rapid, clean and easy-to-use tool for measuring of wound area. A set of 160 digital pictures of wounds in rats was the basis of this study. Digital photographs were made by placing a rule next to the wound in parallel with the healthy skin and visualized with Image Tool, ImageJ, and AutoCaD® softwares. Measurement of wound area was carried out and was performed paired Student’s t-test and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to compare manual rule-based technique and all softwares measurement of wounds. In conclusion, the manual rule-based technique overestimated wound size and Image Tools software provided a better, faster, and accurate measurement of the wound area. This software could routinely be used to document wound healing process. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187 10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28187 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28187 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/28187/24450 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 5; e17611528187 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 5; e17611528187 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 5; e17611528187 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052794123845632 |