Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Maria Nathália Prado Simões
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Menezes, Marina de Pádua Nogueira, Lima, Marina Santos Costa, Gomes, Marcel Vieira, Matos, Mariana Moscoso Rêgo de, Lima, Felipe Cerqueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11375
Resumo: Objective: To analyze whether the indications for cesarean section performed in a low risk reference maternity in Sergipe are in accordance with the Ministry of Health guideline published in 2016. Methods: Documentary, prospective, qualitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study, with data collection through analysis of 318 post-cesarean section medical records from 2018 to 2019. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the aid of the Graph Pad Prism and SPSS 20 software. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: The main indication found was a previous cesarean section, followed by others such as: cephalopelvic disproportion, breech presentation, iterativity, fetal distress, macrosomia, induction failure and post-datism. Conclusion: According to the main indication found, the indications are not fully in accordance with the guideline. However, other indications found are correct, but are outside the guideline because they are situations of intra-delivery care and urgency, not discussed in the document.
id UNIFEI_419b2046a6585f7f076ad9f5e57441d9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11375
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospitalEstudio de las indicaciones de cesárea en una maternidad de referencia de bajo riesgoEstudo das indicações de cesariana em uma maternidade de referência em baixo riscoCesarean sectionObstetricsWomen's health.CesáreaObstetriciaSalud de la mujer.CesáreaObstetríciaSaúde da mulher.Objective: To analyze whether the indications for cesarean section performed in a low risk reference maternity in Sergipe are in accordance with the Ministry of Health guideline published in 2016. Methods: Documentary, prospective, qualitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study, with data collection through analysis of 318 post-cesarean section medical records from 2018 to 2019. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the aid of the Graph Pad Prism and SPSS 20 software. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: The main indication found was a previous cesarean section, followed by others such as: cephalopelvic disproportion, breech presentation, iterativity, fetal distress, macrosomia, induction failure and post-datism. Conclusion: According to the main indication found, the indications are not fully in accordance with the guideline. However, other indications found are correct, but are outside the guideline because they are situations of intra-delivery care and urgency, not discussed in the document.Objetivo: Analizar si las indicaciones de cesárea realizadas en una maternidad de referencia de bajo riesgo en Sergipe se ajustan a la directriz del Ministerio de Sanidad publicada en 2016. Métodos: Estudio documental, prospectivo, cualitativo, descriptivo y transversal con recogida de datos mediante análisis de 318 historias clínicas poscesáreas de 2018 a 2019. Los datos obtenidos se analizaron mediante estadística descriptiva con la ayuda del software Graph Pad Prism y SPSS 20. El estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética en Investigación. Resultados: La principal indicación encontrada fue una cesárea previa, seguida de otras como: desproporción cefalopélvica, presentación de nalgas, iteratividad, sufrimiento fetal, macrosomía, falla de inducción y posdatismo. Conclusión: De acuerdo con la indicación principal encontrada, las indicaciones no están completamente de acuerdo con la guía. Sin embargo, otras indicaciones encontradas son correctas, pero están fuera de la guía por tratarse de situaciones de atención y urgencia intraparto, no discutidas en el documento.Objetivo: Analisar se as indicações de operação cesariana realizadas em maternidade de referência em baixo risco de Sergipe estão de acordo com a diretriz do Ministério da Saúde publicada em 2016. Métodos: Estudo documental, prospectivo, qualitativo, descritivo e de corte transversal, com coleta de dados através da análise de 318 prontuários médicos de puérperas pós cesárea no período de 2018 a 2019. Os dados obtidos foram analisados por estatística descritiva com auxílio do software Graph Pad Prism e SPSS 20. O estudo foi aprovado por Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa. Resultados: A principal indicação encontrada foi uma operação cesariana anterior, seguidas de outras como: desproporção céfalo-pélvica, apresentação pélvica, iteratividade, sofrimento fetal, macrossomia, falha de indução e pós-datismo. Conclusão: Conforme a principal indicação encontrada, as indicações não estão totalmente de acordo com a diretriz. Entretanto, outras indicações encontradas estão corretas, porém fogem da diretriz por serem situações de cuidado intra-parto e de urgência, não discutidas no documento.Research, Society and Development2021-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1137510.33448/rsd-v10i1.11375Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e7510111375Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e7510111375Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e75101113752525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11375/10270Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Nathália Prado Simões Mendonça; Marina de Pádua Nogueira Menezes; Marina Santos Costa Lima; Marcel Vieira Gomes; Mariana Moscoso Rêgo de Matos; Felipe Cerqueira Limahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça, Maria Nathália Prado SimõesMenezes, Marina de Pádua NogueiraLima, Marina Santos CostaGomes, Marcel VieiraMatos, Mariana Moscoso Rêgo deLima, Felipe Cerqueira2021-02-20T21:19:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11375Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:33:13.185734Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
Estudio de las indicaciones de cesárea en una maternidad de referencia de bajo riesgo
Estudo das indicações de cesariana em uma maternidade de referência em baixo risco
title Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
spellingShingle Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
Mendonça, Maria Nathália Prado Simões
Cesarean section
Obstetrics
Women's health.
Cesárea
Obstetricia
Salud de la mujer.
Cesárea
Obstetrícia
Saúde da mulher.
title_short Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
title_full Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
title_fullStr Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
title_full_unstemmed Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
title_sort Study of cesarean section indications in a low-risk referral maternity hospital
author Mendonça, Maria Nathália Prado Simões
author_facet Mendonça, Maria Nathália Prado Simões
Menezes, Marina de Pádua Nogueira
Lima, Marina Santos Costa
Gomes, Marcel Vieira
Matos, Mariana Moscoso Rêgo de
Lima, Felipe Cerqueira
author_role author
author2 Menezes, Marina de Pádua Nogueira
Lima, Marina Santos Costa
Gomes, Marcel Vieira
Matos, Mariana Moscoso Rêgo de
Lima, Felipe Cerqueira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Maria Nathália Prado Simões
Menezes, Marina de Pádua Nogueira
Lima, Marina Santos Costa
Gomes, Marcel Vieira
Matos, Mariana Moscoso Rêgo de
Lima, Felipe Cerqueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cesarean section
Obstetrics
Women's health.
Cesárea
Obstetricia
Salud de la mujer.
Cesárea
Obstetrícia
Saúde da mulher.
topic Cesarean section
Obstetrics
Women's health.
Cesárea
Obstetricia
Salud de la mujer.
Cesárea
Obstetrícia
Saúde da mulher.
description Objective: To analyze whether the indications for cesarean section performed in a low risk reference maternity in Sergipe are in accordance with the Ministry of Health guideline published in 2016. Methods: Documentary, prospective, qualitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study, with data collection through analysis of 318 post-cesarean section medical records from 2018 to 2019. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the aid of the Graph Pad Prism and SPSS 20 software. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Results: The main indication found was a previous cesarean section, followed by others such as: cephalopelvic disproportion, breech presentation, iterativity, fetal distress, macrosomia, induction failure and post-datism. Conclusion: According to the main indication found, the indications are not fully in accordance with the guideline. However, other indications found are correct, but are outside the guideline because they are situations of intra-delivery care and urgency, not discussed in the document.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11375
10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11375
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11375
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11375
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11375/10270
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 1; e7510111375
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 1; e7510111375
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 1; e7510111375
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052744217919488