Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santana, Natan Galves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9266
Resumo: The problematization of the article refers to the analysis of the possibility of relativizing the principle of impartiality by the Judiciary. Therefore, it is necessary to approach the evidence system, with a brief concept and definitions, as well as to discuss the inversion of the burden of proof and the magistrate's instructive power. Due to the problematization, observance of procedural principles is also required, emphasizing the principle of impartiality and the principle of cooperation. Finally, it is intended to conceptualize the real truth by the judge. Therefore, a deductive research based on doctrine and legislation makes up the appropriate argumentative framework.
id UNIFEI_4417f46f17e4bf0b55aadaaac84798af
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9266
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciarySistema probatorio en el código procesal civil vigente: relativización del principio de imparcialidad del poder judicialSistema de provas no vigente código de processo civil: relativização do princípio da imparcialidade do poder judiciárioPrinciple of impartialityEvidenceBurden of proof.Principio de imparcialidadPruebaCarga de la prueba.Princípio da imparcialidadeProvasÔnus probatório.The problematization of the article refers to the analysis of the possibility of relativizing the principle of impartiality by the Judiciary. Therefore, it is necessary to approach the evidence system, with a brief concept and definitions, as well as to discuss the inversion of the burden of proof and the magistrate's instructive power. Due to the problematization, observance of procedural principles is also required, emphasizing the principle of impartiality and the principle of cooperation. Finally, it is intended to conceptualize the real truth by the judge. Therefore, a deductive research based on doctrine and legislation makes up the appropriate argumentative framework.La problematización del artículo se refiere al análisis de la posibilidad de relativizar el principio de imparcialidad por parte del Poder Judicial. Por tanto, es necesario abordar el sistema probatorio, con un breve concepto y definiciones, así como discutir la inversión de la carga de la prueba y el poder instructivo del magistrado. Debido a la problematización, también se requiere la observancia de los principios procesales, enfatizando el principio de imparcialidad y el principio de cooperación. Finalmente, se pretende conceptualizar la verdad real por parte del juez. Por tanto, una investigación deductiva basada en la doctrina y la legislación constituye el marco argumentativo adecuado.A problematização do artigo refere-se à análise da possibilidade da relativização do princípio da imparcialidade pelo Poder Judiciário. Para tanto, necessária abordagem do sistema de provas, com conceito e definições breves, bem como discorrer sobre a inversão o ônus da prova e o poder instrutório do magistrado. Em razão da problematização, também requer-se a observância dos princípios processuais, dando ênfase no princípio da imparcialidade e o princípio da cooperação. Por fim, pretende-se conceituar a verdade real pelo juiz. Para tanto, uma pesquisa dedutiva baseada na doutrina e legislação compõe o arcabouço argumentativo adequado.Research, Society and Development2020-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/926610.33448/rsd-v9i10.9266Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e9849109266Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e9849109266Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e98491092662525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9266/8438Copyright (c) 2020 Miriam Fecchio Chueiri; Natan Galves Santanahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChueiri, Miriam Fecchio Santana, Natan Galves 2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9266Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:35.707825Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
Sistema probatorio en el código procesal civil vigente: relativización del principio de imparcialidad del poder judicial
Sistema de provas no vigente código de processo civil: relativização do princípio da imparcialidade do poder judiciário
title Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
spellingShingle Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio
Principle of impartiality
Evidence
Burden of proof.
Principio de imparcialidad
Prueba
Carga de la prueba.
Princípio da imparcialidade
Provas
Ônus probatório.
title_short Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
title_full Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
title_fullStr Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
title_full_unstemmed Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
title_sort Evidence system in the current code of civil procedure: relativization of the principle of impartiality of the judiciary
author Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio
author_facet Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio
Santana, Natan Galves
author_role author
author2 Santana, Natan Galves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio
Santana, Natan Galves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Principle of impartiality
Evidence
Burden of proof.
Principio de imparcialidad
Prueba
Carga de la prueba.
Princípio da imparcialidade
Provas
Ônus probatório.
topic Principle of impartiality
Evidence
Burden of proof.
Principio de imparcialidad
Prueba
Carga de la prueba.
Princípio da imparcialidade
Provas
Ônus probatório.
description The problematization of the article refers to the analysis of the possibility of relativizing the principle of impartiality by the Judiciary. Therefore, it is necessary to approach the evidence system, with a brief concept and definitions, as well as to discuss the inversion of the burden of proof and the magistrate's instructive power. Due to the problematization, observance of procedural principles is also required, emphasizing the principle of impartiality and the principle of cooperation. Finally, it is intended to conceptualize the real truth by the judge. Therefore, a deductive research based on doctrine and legislation makes up the appropriate argumentative framework.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9266
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9266
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9266
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9266
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9266/8438
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Miriam Fecchio Chueiri; Natan Galves Santana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Miriam Fecchio Chueiri; Natan Galves Santana
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e9849109266
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e9849109266
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e9849109266
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052661548187648

Registros relacionados