Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8563 |
Resumo: | Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is an especially important variable since it is used in the planning and management of irrigation systems and other areas. Therefore, its determination must be made carefully and rigorously in the face of the various existing estimation methods. In this sense, given that the standard Penman-Monteith FAO/56 method requires many meteorological input elements, the study of alternative methods is quite necessary for a view of the numerous delimitations existing in automatic stations in several different regions. The present study aimed to identify, among the methods of Pennan Original, Modified Penman, Blaney-Criddle, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor, and Kimberly Penman, the most alternative methods to the standard model, through statistical analysis of the data, considering the climatic seasons (Summer, Autumn, Winter, and Spring), from three automatic stations located in Cruzeiro do Sul, Porto Walter and Marechal Thaumaturgo in Acre state, Brazil with data belonging to INMET and Xavier, King and Scanlon. It was concluded that the methods of Pennan Original and Kimberly Penman were the ones that best estimated ETo concerning the standard model for the three automatic stations, while the methods of Blaney-Criddle and Hargreaves-Samani presented the worst performance. The Priestley-Taylor method were chosen as alternative to the methods of Pennan Original. |
id |
UNIFEI_4d1780a433afc646b3a79ce645817c37 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8563 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate Métodos empíricos de estimación de la evapotranspiración en el clima tropical ecuatorialMétodos empíricos de estimativa da evapotranspiração em clima tropical equatorialPenman-MonteithTaylor diagramAcre.Penman-MonteithDiagrama de TaylorAcre.Penman-MonteithDiagrama de TaylorAcre.Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is an especially important variable since it is used in the planning and management of irrigation systems and other areas. Therefore, its determination must be made carefully and rigorously in the face of the various existing estimation methods. In this sense, given that the standard Penman-Monteith FAO/56 method requires many meteorological input elements, the study of alternative methods is quite necessary for a view of the numerous delimitations existing in automatic stations in several different regions. The present study aimed to identify, among the methods of Pennan Original, Modified Penman, Blaney-Criddle, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor, and Kimberly Penman, the most alternative methods to the standard model, through statistical analysis of the data, considering the climatic seasons (Summer, Autumn, Winter, and Spring), from three automatic stations located in Cruzeiro do Sul, Porto Walter and Marechal Thaumaturgo in Acre state, Brazil with data belonging to INMET and Xavier, King and Scanlon. It was concluded that the methods of Pennan Original and Kimberly Penman were the ones that best estimated ETo concerning the standard model for the three automatic stations, while the methods of Blaney-Criddle and Hargreaves-Samani presented the worst performance. The Priestley-Taylor method were chosen as alternative to the methods of Pennan Original.La evapotranspiración de referencia (ETo) es una variable especialmente importante ya que se utiliza en la planificación y gestión de sistemas de riego y otras áreas. Por tanto, su determinación debe realizarse con cuidado y rigor ante los distintos métodos de estimación existentes. En este sentido, dado que el método estándar Penman-Monteith FAO / 56 requiere muchos elementos de entrada meteorológicos, el estudio de métodos alternativos es bastante necesario para ver las numerosas delimitaciones que existen en las estaciones automáticas en varias regiones diferentes. El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar, entre los métodos de Pennan Original, Modified Penman, Blaney-Criddle, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor y Kimberly Penman, los métodos más alternativos al modelo estándar, mediante el análisis estadístico de los datos, considerando las estaciones climáticas (Verano, Otoño, Invierno y Primavera), de tres estaciones automáticas ubicadas en Cruzeiro do Sul, Porto Walter y Marechal Thaumaturgo en el estado de Acre, Brasil con datos de INMET y Xavier, King y Scanlon. Se concluyó que los métodos de Pennan Original y Kimberly Penman fueron los que mejor estimaron la ETo con respecto al modelo estándar para las tres estaciones automáticas, mientras que los métodos de Blaney-Criddle y Hargreaves-Samani presentaron el peor desempeño. Se eligió el método de Priestley-Taylor como alternativa a los métodos de Pennan Original.A evapotranspiração de referência (ETo) é uma variável muito importante, uma vez que é usada no planejamento e manejo dos sistemas de irrigação e demais áreas. Sendo assim, sua determinação deve ser feita cuidadosa e rigorosamente em face aos vários métodos de estimativa existentes. Neste sentido, dado que o método padrão de Penman-Monteith FAO/56 exige muitos elementos meteorológicos de entrada, o estudo de métodos alternativos se mostra necessário pelas inúmeras delimitações existentes nas estações automáticas de diversas regiões. O presente estudo objetivou comparar a evapotranspiração obtida a partir do método padrão Penman-Monteith FAO/56 com as determinadas por equações empíricas, buscando, identificar métodos mais simples e, portanto, alternativos ao método de referência na Bacia Hidrográfica do Alto Juruá. Para o estudo foram utilizadas três estações automáticas localizadas em Cruzeiro do Sul, Porto Walter e Marechal Thaumaturgo no Acre, com dados pertencentes ao INMET e Xavier, King e Scanlon. Os resultados mostraram que os métodos de Pennan Original e Kimberly Penman foram os que melhor estimaram a ETo em relação ao modelo padrão para as três estações automáticas, enquanto que os métodos de Blaney-Criddle e Hargreaves-Samani apresentaram desempenho inferior. Os métodos de Priestley-Taylor e Kimberly Penman foram escolhidos como alternativos aos métodos de Pennan Original e Kimberly Penman.Research, Society and Development2020-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/856310.33448/rsd-v9i10.8563Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e4099108563Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e4099108563Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e40991085632525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8563/7745Copyright (c) 2020 Jefferson Vieira José; Livia Braz Pereira; Hugo Motta Ferreira Leite; Lucas da Costa Santos; Timóteo Herculino da Silva Barros; Kelly Nascimento Leitehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJosé, Jefferson Vieira Pereira, Livia Braz Leite, Hugo Motta Ferreira Santos, Lucas da Costa Barros, Timóteo Herculino da Silva Leite, Kelly Nascimento2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8563Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:00.471208Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate Métodos empíricos de estimación de la evapotranspiración en el clima tropical ecuatorial Métodos empíricos de estimativa da evapotranspiração em clima tropical equatorial |
title |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate |
spellingShingle |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate José, Jefferson Vieira Penman-Monteith Taylor diagram Acre. Penman-Monteith Diagrama de Taylor Acre. Penman-Monteith Diagrama de Taylor Acre. |
title_short |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate |
title_full |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate |
title_fullStr |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate |
title_sort |
Empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation in equatorial tropical climate |
author |
José, Jefferson Vieira |
author_facet |
José, Jefferson Vieira Pereira, Livia Braz Leite, Hugo Motta Ferreira Santos, Lucas da Costa Barros, Timóteo Herculino da Silva Leite, Kelly Nascimento |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Livia Braz Leite, Hugo Motta Ferreira Santos, Lucas da Costa Barros, Timóteo Herculino da Silva Leite, Kelly Nascimento |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
José, Jefferson Vieira Pereira, Livia Braz Leite, Hugo Motta Ferreira Santos, Lucas da Costa Barros, Timóteo Herculino da Silva Leite, Kelly Nascimento |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Penman-Monteith Taylor diagram Acre. Penman-Monteith Diagrama de Taylor Acre. Penman-Monteith Diagrama de Taylor Acre. |
topic |
Penman-Monteith Taylor diagram Acre. Penman-Monteith Diagrama de Taylor Acre. Penman-Monteith Diagrama de Taylor Acre. |
description |
Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is an especially important variable since it is used in the planning and management of irrigation systems and other areas. Therefore, its determination must be made carefully and rigorously in the face of the various existing estimation methods. In this sense, given that the standard Penman-Monteith FAO/56 method requires many meteorological input elements, the study of alternative methods is quite necessary for a view of the numerous delimitations existing in automatic stations in several different regions. The present study aimed to identify, among the methods of Pennan Original, Modified Penman, Blaney-Criddle, Hargreaves-Samani, Priestley-Taylor, and Kimberly Penman, the most alternative methods to the standard model, through statistical analysis of the data, considering the climatic seasons (Summer, Autumn, Winter, and Spring), from three automatic stations located in Cruzeiro do Sul, Porto Walter and Marechal Thaumaturgo in Acre state, Brazil with data belonging to INMET and Xavier, King and Scanlon. It was concluded that the methods of Pennan Original and Kimberly Penman were the ones that best estimated ETo concerning the standard model for the three automatic stations, while the methods of Blaney-Criddle and Hargreaves-Samani presented the worst performance. The Priestley-Taylor method were chosen as alternative to the methods of Pennan Original. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8563 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8563 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8563 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8563 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/8563/7745 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e4099108563 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e4099108563 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e4099108563 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052659943866368 |