A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18478 |
Resumo: | Syphilis is a polymorphic, infectious and systemic disease, caused by the bacteria T. pallidum, considered a disease of compulsory notification. Early diagnosis is an important factor in its control, this is performed by combining clinical findings and laboratory tests. Molecular techniques help in the diagnosis, however, there is no consensus on which technique would is the most appropriate, because studies present divergences such as which gene should be used as target, what sequence of primer, extraction method and type of sample. This review sought to investigate, based on scientific evidence, the most effective molecular techniques in the detection of T. pallidum DNA. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Science Direct and Lilacs databases, using the descriptors "syphilis" and "PCR" and "diagnosis" and "molecular biology", selecting works published in the last ten years. The sample consisted of 10 articles. As for the study design, the clinical trial was 100% prevalent. As for the method used, variations were evidenced, 6 used Nested PCR, 5 real-time PCR and 4 conventional PCR, 5 used more than one variation. The difference between them, such as time to evaluate a reaction, chance of contamination, reproducibility, specificity, sensitivity, precision and diagnostic accuracy, showed that the two genes of greatest interest are pol A and tpp47. Molecular tests, in particular nested PCR, proved to be promising, with good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of syphilis together with serology to avoid clinical complications and disease transmission. |
id |
UNIFEI_542536d272753ef93c95db7b80b8dc7f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18478 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effectiveUna revisión de las técnicas de detección molecular de Treponema pallidum, que es la más efectivaUma revisão das técnicas de detecção molecular de Treponema pallidum, qual a mais eficazSífilisPCRDiagnósticoBiologia molecular.SífilisPCRDiagnósticoBiología Molecular.SyphilisPCRDiagnosisMolecular biology.Syphilis is a polymorphic, infectious and systemic disease, caused by the bacteria T. pallidum, considered a disease of compulsory notification. Early diagnosis is an important factor in its control, this is performed by combining clinical findings and laboratory tests. Molecular techniques help in the diagnosis, however, there is no consensus on which technique would is the most appropriate, because studies present divergences such as which gene should be used as target, what sequence of primer, extraction method and type of sample. This review sought to investigate, based on scientific evidence, the most effective molecular techniques in the detection of T. pallidum DNA. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Science Direct and Lilacs databases, using the descriptors "syphilis" and "PCR" and "diagnosis" and "molecular biology", selecting works published in the last ten years. The sample consisted of 10 articles. As for the study design, the clinical trial was 100% prevalent. As for the method used, variations were evidenced, 6 used Nested PCR, 5 real-time PCR and 4 conventional PCR, 5 used more than one variation. The difference between them, such as time to evaluate a reaction, chance of contamination, reproducibility, specificity, sensitivity, precision and diagnostic accuracy, showed that the two genes of greatest interest are pol A and tpp47. Molecular tests, in particular nested PCR, proved to be promising, with good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of syphilis together with serology to avoid clinical complications and disease transmission.La sífilis es una enfermedad polimórfica, infecciosa y sistémica, causada por la bacteria T. pallidum, considerada una enfermedad de notificación obligatoria. El diagnóstico precoz es un factor importante en su control, que se realiza combinando hallazgos clínicos y pruebas de laboratorio. Las técnicas moleculares ayudan en el diagnóstico, sin embargo, no existe consenso sobre qué técnica es la más adecuada, los estudios muestran divergencias como qué gen debe usarse como diana, qué secuencia de cebador, método de extracción y tipo de muestra. Esta revisión buscó investigar, con base en evidencia científica, las técnicas moleculares más efectivas para detectar el ADN de T. pallidum. Por ello, se realizó una revisión bibliográfica sistemática en las bases de datos PubMed, Science Direct y Lilacs, utilizando los descriptores "sífilis" y "PCR" y "diagnóstico" y "biología molecular", seleccionando trabajos publicados en los últimos diez años. La muestra estuvo formada por 10 artículos. En cuanto al diseño del estudio, el ensayo clínico tuvo una prevalencia del 100%. En cuanto al método utilizado, se evidenciaron variaciones, 6 utilizaron PCR anidada, 5 PCR en tiempo real y 4 PCR convencional, 5 utilizaron más de una variación. La diferencia entre ellos, como el tiempo para evaluar una reacción, la probabilidad de contaminación, la reproducibilidad, la especificidad, la sensibilidad, la precisión y la exactitud diagnóstica, mostró que los dos genes de mayor interés son pol A y tpp47. Las pruebas moleculares, en particular la PCR anidada, demostraron ser prometedoras, tiniendo buena sensibilidad y especificidad en el diagnóstico de la sífilis junto con la serología para evitar complicaciones clínicas y la transmisión de la enfermedad.A sífilis é uma doença polimórfica, infectocontagiosa e sistêmica, causada pela bactéria T. pallidum, considerada um agravo de notificação compulsória. O diagnóstico precoce é um fator importante no seu controle, este é realizado combinando achados clínicos e exames laboratoriais. As técnicas moleculares ajudam no diagnóstico, no entanto, não se tem um consenso sobre qual técnica é a mais adequada, estudos apresentam divergências como, qual gene deve ser usado como alvo, qual sequência dos primers, método de extração e tipo de amostra. Esta revisão procurou investigar com base nas evidências científicas, as técnicas moleculares mais eficazes na detecção de DNA de Treponema pallidum. Para tanto, realizou-se uma revisão sistemática da literatura realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, Science Direct e Lilacs, através dos descritores “sífilis” and “PCR and “diagnóstico” and “biologia molecular”, selecionando trabalhos publicados nos últimos dez anos. A amostra foi composta por 10 artigos. Quanto ao desenho de estudo, o ensaio clínico foi 100% prevalente. Quanto ao método utilizado foi evidenciado variações, 6 utilizaram PCR Nested, 5 PCR em tempo real e 4 PCR convencional, 5 utilizam mais de uma variação. A diferença entre elas, como, tempo para avaliar uma reação, chance de contaminação, reprodutibilidade, especificidade, sensibilidade, precisão e acurácia diagnóstica, mostrou que os dois genes de maior interesse são o pol A e o tpp47. Os testes moleculares em especial o PCR nested demostrou ser promissor tendo boa sensibilidade e especificidade no diagnóstico da sífilis em conjunto com a sorologia para evitar complicações clínicas e transmissão da doença.Research, Society and Development2021-08-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1847810.33448/rsd-v10i9.18478Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e59310918478Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e59310918478Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e593109184782525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18478/16500Copyright (c) 2021 Vera Mileide Trivellato Grassi; Liliane Trivellato Grassi; Maria Lucia Rosa Rossettihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrassi, Vera Mileide TrivellatoGrassi, Liliane Trivellato Rossetti, Maria Lucia Rosa2021-09-12T14:28:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18478Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:36.504783Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective Una revisión de las técnicas de detección molecular de Treponema pallidum, que es la más efectiva Uma revisão das técnicas de detecção molecular de Treponema pallidum, qual a mais eficaz |
title |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective |
spellingShingle |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective Grassi, Vera Mileide Trivellato Sífilis PCR Diagnóstico Biologia molecular. Sífilis PCR Diagnóstico Biología Molecular. Syphilis PCR Diagnosis Molecular biology. |
title_short |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective |
title_full |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective |
title_fullStr |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective |
title_sort |
A review of Treponema pallidum Molecular Detection Techniques, which is the most effective |
author |
Grassi, Vera Mileide Trivellato |
author_facet |
Grassi, Vera Mileide Trivellato Grassi, Liliane Trivellato Rossetti, Maria Lucia Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grassi, Liliane Trivellato Rossetti, Maria Lucia Rosa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grassi, Vera Mileide Trivellato Grassi, Liliane Trivellato Rossetti, Maria Lucia Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sífilis PCR Diagnóstico Biologia molecular. Sífilis PCR Diagnóstico Biología Molecular. Syphilis PCR Diagnosis Molecular biology. |
topic |
Sífilis PCR Diagnóstico Biologia molecular. Sífilis PCR Diagnóstico Biología Molecular. Syphilis PCR Diagnosis Molecular biology. |
description |
Syphilis is a polymorphic, infectious and systemic disease, caused by the bacteria T. pallidum, considered a disease of compulsory notification. Early diagnosis is an important factor in its control, this is performed by combining clinical findings and laboratory tests. Molecular techniques help in the diagnosis, however, there is no consensus on which technique would is the most appropriate, because studies present divergences such as which gene should be used as target, what sequence of primer, extraction method and type of sample. This review sought to investigate, based on scientific evidence, the most effective molecular techniques in the detection of T. pallidum DNA. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed, Science Direct and Lilacs databases, using the descriptors "syphilis" and "PCR" and "diagnosis" and "molecular biology", selecting works published in the last ten years. The sample consisted of 10 articles. As for the study design, the clinical trial was 100% prevalent. As for the method used, variations were evidenced, 6 used Nested PCR, 5 real-time PCR and 4 conventional PCR, 5 used more than one variation. The difference between them, such as time to evaluate a reaction, chance of contamination, reproducibility, specificity, sensitivity, precision and diagnostic accuracy, showed that the two genes of greatest interest are pol A and tpp47. Molecular tests, in particular nested PCR, proved to be promising, with good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of syphilis together with serology to avoid clinical complications and disease transmission. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18478 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18478 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18478 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18478 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18478/16500 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e59310918478 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e59310918478 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e59310918478 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052753047977984 |