Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Medeiros , Erika Valente de, Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira, Mosser , Luciana Maia, Mondego, Janaina Marques, Medeiros, José George Ferreira, Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva, Lima, Edcleyton José de, Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938
Resumo: Seeds pathogens compromise the production of beans. Seed treatment is used to mitigate the pathogens' incidence and damage; however, the forms of control must be efficient and safe. Our main hypothesis is that synthetic chemicals are the most efficient treatment against bean seed pathogens. Thus, we discuss the controls of pathogens in bean seeds using different treatments and identify the technologies studied for these purposes. This review assessed papers that used different strategies to control the bean seed pathogen. There are treatment classifications in which synthetic chemicals are the most efficient to control these pathogens, but as a burden, they pose a risk to human health, animals, and the environment. However, alternative, and complementary solutions to control these microorganisms have been sought in physical, natural, and biological control. Of the studies evaluated, 35.29% used biological control, 17.65% used control with natural agents, 11.76% used physical control, and the others corresponded to 5.88% each. 72.22% are related to the control of fungal pathogens, 16.67% to the control of bacteria, and only 11.11% to the virus. 94.12% were effective, and only 5.88% were not successful in controlling. Overall, our findings expand our knowledge about the alternative treatments that are efficient against pathogens associated with bean seeds which could serve as an alternative tool for plant disease management and seed treatment.
id UNIFEI_5528d782ed05b06017bf3b292b302102
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36938
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review Alternativas y estrategias de bajo costo para el control de patógenos en semillas de frijol: una revisiónAlternativas e estratégias de baixo custo para o controle de patógenos em sementes de feijão: uma revisão Seed diseaseManagement practicesPhaseolus vulgaris L.Sanity.Phaseolus vulgaris L.Doença de sementesPráticas de manejoSanidade.Phaseolus vulgaris L.Enfermedad de la semillaPrácticas de manejoSanidad.Seeds pathogens compromise the production of beans. Seed treatment is used to mitigate the pathogens' incidence and damage; however, the forms of control must be efficient and safe. Our main hypothesis is that synthetic chemicals are the most efficient treatment against bean seed pathogens. Thus, we discuss the controls of pathogens in bean seeds using different treatments and identify the technologies studied for these purposes. This review assessed papers that used different strategies to control the bean seed pathogen. There are treatment classifications in which synthetic chemicals are the most efficient to control these pathogens, but as a burden, they pose a risk to human health, animals, and the environment. However, alternative, and complementary solutions to control these microorganisms have been sought in physical, natural, and biological control. Of the studies evaluated, 35.29% used biological control, 17.65% used control with natural agents, 11.76% used physical control, and the others corresponded to 5.88% each. 72.22% are related to the control of fungal pathogens, 16.67% to the control of bacteria, and only 11.11% to the virus. 94.12% were effective, and only 5.88% were not successful in controlling. Overall, our findings expand our knowledge about the alternative treatments that are efficient against pathogens associated with bean seeds which could serve as an alternative tool for plant disease management and seed treatment.Patógenos en semillas que comprometen la producción de frijol. El tratamiento de semillas se usa para mitigar la falla y el daño por patógenos; Sin embargo, las formas de control deben ser eficientes y seguras. De esta forma, el objetivo de este trabajo es luchar contra el control de patógenos en semillas de frijol utilizando diferentes tratamientos e identificamos cómo se utilizan las tecnologías para estos fines. Esta revisión evaluó artículos que utilizan diferentes estrategias para controlar el patógeno de la semilla de frijol. Existen clasificaciones de tratamientos, en los que los químicos sintéticos son los más eficientes, pero representan un riesgo para la salud, los animales y el medio ambiente. Sin embargo, se han utilizado soluciones alternativas y complementarias para el control de estos microorganismos en el control físico, natural y biológico. De los estudios de evaluación, el 35,29% utiliza control biológico, el 17,65% utiliza control natural, el 11,76% utiliza control físico y los demás corresponden al 5,88% cada uno. El 72,22% está relacionado con el control de patógenos fúngicos, el 16,67% con el control de bacterias y solo el 11,11% con el virus. El 94,12% fueron efectivos y solo el 5,88% no tuvieron éxito en el control. Tratamientos alternativos que son eficientes contra los patógenos asociados a la semilla de frijol que pueden servir como una herramienta alternativa para el manejo de enfermedades de las plantas y el tratamiento de semillas.Patógenos de sementes comprometem a produção de feijão. O tratamento de sementes é usado para mitigar a incidência e os danos dos patógenos; entretanto, as formas de controle devem ser eficientes e seguras. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste trabalho é discutir os controles de patógenos em sementes de feijão utilizando diferentes tratamentos e identificamos as tecnologias estudadas para esses fins. Esta revisão avaliou artigos que utilizaram diferentes estratégias para controlar o patógeno de sementes de feijão. Existem classificações de tratamento, em que os produtos químicos sintéticos são os mais eficientes, mas, representam risco à saúde humana, aos animais e ao meio ambiente. No entanto, soluções alternativas e complementares para o controle desses microrganismos têm sido buscadas no controle físico, natural e biológico. Dos estudos avaliados, 35,29% utilizaram controle biológico, 17,65% utilizaram controle com agentes naturais, 11,76% utilizaram controle físico e os demais corresponderam a 5,88% cada. 72,22% estão relacionados ao controle de patógenos fúngicos, 16,67% ao controle de bactérias e apenas 11,11% ao vírus. 94,12% foram eficazes e apenas 5,88% não tiveram sucesso no controle. Os tratamentos alternativos que são eficientes contra patógenos associados a sementes de feijão que podem servir como uma ferramenta alternativa para o manejo de doenças de plantas e tratamento de sementes.Research, Society and Development2022-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3693810.33448/rsd-v11i15.36938Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 15; e153111536938Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 15; e153111536938Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 15; e1531115369382525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938/30868Copyright (c) 2022 Abraão Rodrigues de Almeida; Erika Valente de Medeiros ; Edilma Pereira Gonçalves ; Luciana Maia Mosser ; Janaina Marques Mondego; José George Ferreira Medeiros; João Paulo Goes da Silva Borges ; Edcleyton José de Lima; Kedma Maria Silva Pintohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Abraão Rodrigues de Medeiros , Erika Valente deGonçalves , Edilma PereiraMosser , Luciana MaiaMondego, Janaina MarquesMedeiros, José George FerreiraBorges , João Paulo Goes da SilvaLima, Edcleyton José dePinto, Kedma Maria Silva2022-11-27T19:56:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36938Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:51:18.775289Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
Alternativas y estrategias de bajo costo para el control de patógenos en semillas de frijol: una revisión
Alternativas e estratégias de baixo custo para o controle de patógenos em sementes de feijão: uma revisão
title Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
spellingShingle Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de
Seed disease
Management practices
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Sanity.
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Doença de sementes
Práticas de manejo
Sanidade.
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Enfermedad de la semilla
Prácticas de manejo
Sanidad.
title_short Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
title_full Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
title_fullStr Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
title_full_unstemmed Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
title_sort Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
author Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de
author_facet Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de
Medeiros , Erika Valente de
Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira
Mosser , Luciana Maia
Mondego, Janaina Marques
Medeiros, José George Ferreira
Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva
Lima, Edcleyton José de
Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva
author_role author
author2 Medeiros , Erika Valente de
Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira
Mosser , Luciana Maia
Mondego, Janaina Marques
Medeiros, José George Ferreira
Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva
Lima, Edcleyton José de
Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de
Medeiros , Erika Valente de
Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira
Mosser , Luciana Maia
Mondego, Janaina Marques
Medeiros, José George Ferreira
Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva
Lima, Edcleyton José de
Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Seed disease
Management practices
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Sanity.
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Doença de sementes
Práticas de manejo
Sanidade.
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Enfermedad de la semilla
Prácticas de manejo
Sanidad.
topic Seed disease
Management practices
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Sanity.
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Doença de sementes
Práticas de manejo
Sanidade.
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Enfermedad de la semilla
Prácticas de manejo
Sanidad.
description Seeds pathogens compromise the production of beans. Seed treatment is used to mitigate the pathogens' incidence and damage; however, the forms of control must be efficient and safe. Our main hypothesis is that synthetic chemicals are the most efficient treatment against bean seed pathogens. Thus, we discuss the controls of pathogens in bean seeds using different treatments and identify the technologies studied for these purposes. This review assessed papers that used different strategies to control the bean seed pathogen. There are treatment classifications in which synthetic chemicals are the most efficient to control these pathogens, but as a burden, they pose a risk to human health, animals, and the environment. However, alternative, and complementary solutions to control these microorganisms have been sought in physical, natural, and biological control. Of the studies evaluated, 35.29% used biological control, 17.65% used control with natural agents, 11.76% used physical control, and the others corresponded to 5.88% each. 72.22% are related to the control of fungal pathogens, 16.67% to the control of bacteria, and only 11.11% to the virus. 94.12% were effective, and only 5.88% were not successful in controlling. Overall, our findings expand our knowledge about the alternative treatments that are efficient against pathogens associated with bean seeds which could serve as an alternative tool for plant disease management and seed treatment.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938
10.33448/rsd-v11i15.36938
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i15.36938
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938/30868
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 15; e153111536938
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 15; e153111536938
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 15; e153111536938
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052799601606656