Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938 |
Resumo: | Seeds pathogens compromise the production of beans. Seed treatment is used to mitigate the pathogens' incidence and damage; however, the forms of control must be efficient and safe. Our main hypothesis is that synthetic chemicals are the most efficient treatment against bean seed pathogens. Thus, we discuss the controls of pathogens in bean seeds using different treatments and identify the technologies studied for these purposes. This review assessed papers that used different strategies to control the bean seed pathogen. There are treatment classifications in which synthetic chemicals are the most efficient to control these pathogens, but as a burden, they pose a risk to human health, animals, and the environment. However, alternative, and complementary solutions to control these microorganisms have been sought in physical, natural, and biological control. Of the studies evaluated, 35.29% used biological control, 17.65% used control with natural agents, 11.76% used physical control, and the others corresponded to 5.88% each. 72.22% are related to the control of fungal pathogens, 16.67% to the control of bacteria, and only 11.11% to the virus. 94.12% were effective, and only 5.88% were not successful in controlling. Overall, our findings expand our knowledge about the alternative treatments that are efficient against pathogens associated with bean seeds which could serve as an alternative tool for plant disease management and seed treatment. |
id |
UNIFEI_5528d782ed05b06017bf3b292b302102 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36938 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review Alternativas y estrategias de bajo costo para el control de patógenos en semillas de frijol: una revisiónAlternativas e estratégias de baixo custo para o controle de patógenos em sementes de feijão: uma revisão Seed diseaseManagement practicesPhaseolus vulgaris L.Sanity.Phaseolus vulgaris L.Doença de sementesPráticas de manejoSanidade.Phaseolus vulgaris L.Enfermedad de la semillaPrácticas de manejoSanidad.Seeds pathogens compromise the production of beans. Seed treatment is used to mitigate the pathogens' incidence and damage; however, the forms of control must be efficient and safe. Our main hypothesis is that synthetic chemicals are the most efficient treatment against bean seed pathogens. Thus, we discuss the controls of pathogens in bean seeds using different treatments and identify the technologies studied for these purposes. This review assessed papers that used different strategies to control the bean seed pathogen. There are treatment classifications in which synthetic chemicals are the most efficient to control these pathogens, but as a burden, they pose a risk to human health, animals, and the environment. However, alternative, and complementary solutions to control these microorganisms have been sought in physical, natural, and biological control. Of the studies evaluated, 35.29% used biological control, 17.65% used control with natural agents, 11.76% used physical control, and the others corresponded to 5.88% each. 72.22% are related to the control of fungal pathogens, 16.67% to the control of bacteria, and only 11.11% to the virus. 94.12% were effective, and only 5.88% were not successful in controlling. Overall, our findings expand our knowledge about the alternative treatments that are efficient against pathogens associated with bean seeds which could serve as an alternative tool for plant disease management and seed treatment.Patógenos en semillas que comprometen la producción de frijol. El tratamiento de semillas se usa para mitigar la falla y el daño por patógenos; Sin embargo, las formas de control deben ser eficientes y seguras. De esta forma, el objetivo de este trabajo es luchar contra el control de patógenos en semillas de frijol utilizando diferentes tratamientos e identificamos cómo se utilizan las tecnologías para estos fines. Esta revisión evaluó artículos que utilizan diferentes estrategias para controlar el patógeno de la semilla de frijol. Existen clasificaciones de tratamientos, en los que los químicos sintéticos son los más eficientes, pero representan un riesgo para la salud, los animales y el medio ambiente. Sin embargo, se han utilizado soluciones alternativas y complementarias para el control de estos microorganismos en el control físico, natural y biológico. De los estudios de evaluación, el 35,29% utiliza control biológico, el 17,65% utiliza control natural, el 11,76% utiliza control físico y los demás corresponden al 5,88% cada uno. El 72,22% está relacionado con el control de patógenos fúngicos, el 16,67% con el control de bacterias y solo el 11,11% con el virus. El 94,12% fueron efectivos y solo el 5,88% no tuvieron éxito en el control. Tratamientos alternativos que son eficientes contra los patógenos asociados a la semilla de frijol que pueden servir como una herramienta alternativa para el manejo de enfermedades de las plantas y el tratamiento de semillas.Patógenos de sementes comprometem a produção de feijão. O tratamento de sementes é usado para mitigar a incidência e os danos dos patógenos; entretanto, as formas de controle devem ser eficientes e seguras. Dessa forma, o objetivo deste trabalho é discutir os controles de patógenos em sementes de feijão utilizando diferentes tratamentos e identificamos as tecnologias estudadas para esses fins. Esta revisão avaliou artigos que utilizaram diferentes estratégias para controlar o patógeno de sementes de feijão. Existem classificações de tratamento, em que os produtos químicos sintéticos são os mais eficientes, mas, representam risco à saúde humana, aos animais e ao meio ambiente. No entanto, soluções alternativas e complementares para o controle desses microrganismos têm sido buscadas no controle físico, natural e biológico. Dos estudos avaliados, 35,29% utilizaram controle biológico, 17,65% utilizaram controle com agentes naturais, 11,76% utilizaram controle físico e os demais corresponderam a 5,88% cada. 72,22% estão relacionados ao controle de patógenos fúngicos, 16,67% ao controle de bactérias e apenas 11,11% ao vírus. 94,12% foram eficazes e apenas 5,88% não tiveram sucesso no controle. Os tratamentos alternativos que são eficientes contra patógenos associados a sementes de feijão que podem servir como uma ferramenta alternativa para o manejo de doenças de plantas e tratamento de sementes.Research, Society and Development2022-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3693810.33448/rsd-v11i15.36938Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 15; e153111536938Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 15; e153111536938Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 15; e1531115369382525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938/30868Copyright (c) 2022 Abraão Rodrigues de Almeida; Erika Valente de Medeiros ; Edilma Pereira Gonçalves ; Luciana Maia Mosser ; Janaina Marques Mondego; José George Ferreira Medeiros; João Paulo Goes da Silva Borges ; Edcleyton José de Lima; Kedma Maria Silva Pintohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Abraão Rodrigues de Medeiros , Erika Valente deGonçalves , Edilma PereiraMosser , Luciana MaiaMondego, Janaina MarquesMedeiros, José George FerreiraBorges , João Paulo Goes da SilvaLima, Edcleyton José dePinto, Kedma Maria Silva2022-11-27T19:56:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36938Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:51:18.775289Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review Alternativas y estrategias de bajo costo para el control de patógenos en semillas de frijol: una revisión Alternativas e estratégias de baixo custo para o controle de patógenos em sementes de feijão: uma revisão |
title |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review |
spellingShingle |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de Seed disease Management practices Phaseolus vulgaris L. Sanity. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Doença de sementes Práticas de manejo Sanidade. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Enfermedad de la semilla Prácticas de manejo Sanidad. |
title_short |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review |
title_full |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review |
title_fullStr |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review |
title_sort |
Alternatives and low-cost strategies to control of pathogens in bean seeds: a review |
author |
Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de |
author_facet |
Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de Medeiros , Erika Valente de Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira Mosser , Luciana Maia Mondego, Janaina Marques Medeiros, José George Ferreira Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva Lima, Edcleyton José de Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medeiros , Erika Valente de Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira Mosser , Luciana Maia Mondego, Janaina Marques Medeiros, José George Ferreira Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva Lima, Edcleyton José de Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, Abraão Rodrigues de Medeiros , Erika Valente de Gonçalves , Edilma Pereira Mosser , Luciana Maia Mondego, Janaina Marques Medeiros, José George Ferreira Borges , João Paulo Goes da Silva Lima, Edcleyton José de Pinto, Kedma Maria Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Seed disease Management practices Phaseolus vulgaris L. Sanity. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Doença de sementes Práticas de manejo Sanidade. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Enfermedad de la semilla Prácticas de manejo Sanidad. |
topic |
Seed disease Management practices Phaseolus vulgaris L. Sanity. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Doença de sementes Práticas de manejo Sanidade. Phaseolus vulgaris L. Enfermedad de la semilla Prácticas de manejo Sanidad. |
description |
Seeds pathogens compromise the production of beans. Seed treatment is used to mitigate the pathogens' incidence and damage; however, the forms of control must be efficient and safe. Our main hypothesis is that synthetic chemicals are the most efficient treatment against bean seed pathogens. Thus, we discuss the controls of pathogens in bean seeds using different treatments and identify the technologies studied for these purposes. This review assessed papers that used different strategies to control the bean seed pathogen. There are treatment classifications in which synthetic chemicals are the most efficient to control these pathogens, but as a burden, they pose a risk to human health, animals, and the environment. However, alternative, and complementary solutions to control these microorganisms have been sought in physical, natural, and biological control. Of the studies evaluated, 35.29% used biological control, 17.65% used control with natural agents, 11.76% used physical control, and the others corresponded to 5.88% each. 72.22% are related to the control of fungal pathogens, 16.67% to the control of bacteria, and only 11.11% to the virus. 94.12% were effective, and only 5.88% were not successful in controlling. Overall, our findings expand our knowledge about the alternative treatments that are efficient against pathogens associated with bean seeds which could serve as an alternative tool for plant disease management and seed treatment. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938 10.33448/rsd-v11i15.36938 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i15.36938 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/36938/30868 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 15; e153111536938 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 15; e153111536938 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 15; e153111536938 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052799601606656 |