Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants?
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
| Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37766 |
Resumo: | The determined growth tomato plant has advantages such as reduction of labor and inputs, enabling the production of fruits for consumption " in natura" efficiently. The objective of this work was to evaluate the conduction and spacing systems between plants with determined tomatoes and their influence on the production attributes and quality of the fruit. The experiment was carried out in the open field with three conduction systems (“half stake”, open V and “mulch”) and four spacings between plants (0.2; 0.3; 0.4; and 0.5 m). It was found that the highest yield and commercial production and number of large fruits were obtained in the half stake and mulch system. The spacing at 0.5 m provided the highest fruit production (6.4 kg in 56 fruits), and at 0.2 m, the highest productivity was obtained (145.63 t ha -1). In the 0.2 m and open V 0.5 m stake system, the fruits had a high lycopene content. spacing 0.2 m in half stake, and mulch systems were favorable for the production of quality fruit. |
| id |
UNIFEI_5eca6589ca4f164cb6fe6cb997081c6d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37766 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
| network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants?¿El sistema de conducción y espaciamiento afectan la productividad y calidad de las plantas de tomate?O sistema de condução e o espaçamento afetam a produtividade e a qualidade do tomateiro?Solanum lycopersicumTomate saladeteTutoramentoMulching.Solanum lycopersicumSaladete tomatoTutoramentoMulch.Solanum lycopersicumSaladete de tomateTutoríaMantilla. The determined growth tomato plant has advantages such as reduction of labor and inputs, enabling the production of fruits for consumption " in natura" efficiently. The objective of this work was to evaluate the conduction and spacing systems between plants with determined tomatoes and their influence on the production attributes and quality of the fruit. The experiment was carried out in the open field with three conduction systems (“half stake”, open V and “mulch”) and four spacings between plants (0.2; 0.3; 0.4; and 0.5 m). It was found that the highest yield and commercial production and number of large fruits were obtained in the half stake and mulch system. The spacing at 0.5 m provided the highest fruit production (6.4 kg in 56 fruits), and at 0.2 m, the highest productivity was obtained (145.63 t ha -1). In the 0.2 m and open V 0.5 m stake system, the fruits had a high lycopene content. spacing 0.2 m in half stake, and mulch systems were favorable for the production of quality fruit.El tomate de crescimento determinado presenta ventajas como reducción de mão de obra e insumos, lo que posibilita una producción de frutos para consumo “in natura” de forma eficiente. O objetivo de este trabajo para evaluar los sistemas de conducción y espaçamento entre plantas con tomate determinado y su influencia en los atributos de producción y calidad del fruto. O experimento para realizar un campo aberto com três sistemas de condução (“meia estaca”, aberto V e “mulching”) y quatro espaçamentos entre plantas (0,2; 0,3; 0,4; e 0,5 m). Verificou-se que a maior produtividade e produção comercial e número de frutos grandes foram obtidos no system meia estaca e cobertura morta. El espacio de até 0,5 m proporciona una mayor producción de frutos (6,4 kg en 56 frutos), e até 0,2 m, una mayor productividad (145,63 t ha -1). No sistema de estacas de 0,2 me aberto V 0,5 m, os frutos apresentaram alto teor de licopeno. espaçamento de 0,2 m em meia estaca, e os sistemas de cobertura foram favoraveis para a produção de frutos de qualidade.O tomateiro de crescimento determinado apresenta vantagens como redução de mão de obra e insumos, possibilitando a produção de frutos para consumo “in natura” de forma eficiente. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os sistemas de condução e espaçamento entre plantas com determinado tomateiro e sua influência nos atributos de produção e qualidade do fruto. O experimento foi realizado a campo aberto com três sistemas de condução (“meia estaca”, aberto V e “mulching”) e quatro espaçamentos entre plantas (0,2; 0,3; 0,4; e 0,5 m). Verificou-se que a maior produtividade e produção comercial e número de frutos grandes foram obtidos no sistema meia estaca e cobertura morta. O espaçamento de até 0,5 m proporcionou a maior produção de frutos (6,4 kg em 56 frutos), e até 0,2 m, a maior produtividade (145,63 t ha -1). No sistema de estacas de 0,2 me aberto V 0,5 m, os frutos apresentaram alto teor de licopeno. espaçamento de 0,2 m em meia estaca, e os sistemas de cobertura foram favoráveis para a produção de frutos de qualidade.Research, Society and Development2022-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3776610.33448/rsd-v11i16.37766Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e210111637766Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e210111637766Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e2101116377662525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37766/31577Copyright (c) 2022 Fernanda Lourenço Dipple; Franciely da Silva Ponce; Claudia Aparecida de Lima Toledo ; Rejeane Maria da Silva; Rafael Rosa Rocha ; Bruno Alexis Zachrisson Salamina; Márcio Roggia Zanuzo ; Rivanildo Dallacort; Santino Seabra Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDipple, Fernanda Lourenço Ponce, Franciely da Silva Toledo , Claudia Aparecida de Lima Silva, Rejeane Maria da Rocha , Rafael Rosa Salamina, Bruno Alexis Zachrisson Zanuzo , Márcio Roggia Dallacort, Rivanildo Seabra Júnior, Santino2022-12-18T18:26:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37766Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:51:48.604191Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? ¿El sistema de conducción y espaciamiento afectan la productividad y calidad de las plantas de tomate? O sistema de condução e o espaçamento afetam a produtividade e a qualidade do tomateiro? |
| title |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? |
| spellingShingle |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? Dipple, Fernanda Lourenço Solanum lycopersicum Tomate saladete Tutoramento Mulching. Solanum lycopersicum Saladete tomato Tutoramento Mulch. Solanum lycopersicum Saladete de tomate Tutoría Mantilla. |
| title_short |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? |
| title_full |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? |
| title_fullStr |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? |
| title_sort |
Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants? |
| author |
Dipple, Fernanda Lourenço |
| author_facet |
Dipple, Fernanda Lourenço Ponce, Franciely da Silva Toledo , Claudia Aparecida de Lima Silva, Rejeane Maria da Rocha , Rafael Rosa Salamina, Bruno Alexis Zachrisson Zanuzo , Márcio Roggia Dallacort, Rivanildo Seabra Júnior, Santino |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Ponce, Franciely da Silva Toledo , Claudia Aparecida de Lima Silva, Rejeane Maria da Rocha , Rafael Rosa Salamina, Bruno Alexis Zachrisson Zanuzo , Márcio Roggia Dallacort, Rivanildo Seabra Júnior, Santino |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dipple, Fernanda Lourenço Ponce, Franciely da Silva Toledo , Claudia Aparecida de Lima Silva, Rejeane Maria da Rocha , Rafael Rosa Salamina, Bruno Alexis Zachrisson Zanuzo , Márcio Roggia Dallacort, Rivanildo Seabra Júnior, Santino |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Solanum lycopersicum Tomate saladete Tutoramento Mulching. Solanum lycopersicum Saladete tomato Tutoramento Mulch. Solanum lycopersicum Saladete de tomate Tutoría Mantilla. |
| topic |
Solanum lycopersicum Tomate saladete Tutoramento Mulching. Solanum lycopersicum Saladete tomato Tutoramento Mulch. Solanum lycopersicum Saladete de tomate Tutoría Mantilla. |
| description |
The determined growth tomato plant has advantages such as reduction of labor and inputs, enabling the production of fruits for consumption " in natura" efficiently. The objective of this work was to evaluate the conduction and spacing systems between plants with determined tomatoes and their influence on the production attributes and quality of the fruit. The experiment was carried out in the open field with three conduction systems (“half stake”, open V and “mulch”) and four spacings between plants (0.2; 0.3; 0.4; and 0.5 m). It was found that the highest yield and commercial production and number of large fruits were obtained in the half stake and mulch system. The spacing at 0.5 m provided the highest fruit production (6.4 kg in 56 fruits), and at 0.2 m, the highest productivity was obtained (145.63 t ha -1). In the 0.2 m and open V 0.5 m stake system, the fruits had a high lycopene content. spacing 0.2 m in half stake, and mulch systems were favorable for the production of quality fruit. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-05 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37766 10.33448/rsd-v11i16.37766 |
| url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37766 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i16.37766 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37766/31577 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 16; e210111637766 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 16; e210111637766 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 16; e210111637766 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
| institution |
UNIFEI |
| reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
| collection |
Research, Society and Development |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
| _version_ |
1797052730076823552 |