Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Harassim, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, Olibio Lopes Fiebig da, Pinheiro, Luiz Felipe Soares, Santos, Elber José Assaiante dos, Cerdeira, Cláudio Daniel, Barros, Gérsika Bittencourt Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13516
Resumo: Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) affecting patients at Intensive Care Units (ICU) is a preoccupant reality, further aggravated by inadequate antimicrobial use and the alarming antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms. We evaluated the level of assertiveness regarding the use of antimicrobials during the empirical antibiotic-therapy (EA), in patients with UTI, comparing the empiric pharmacological treatments (EA) and those ones performed after the antibiogram (guided therapy). Moreover, we estimated the prevalence of the causative agents and analyzed the risk factors associated. This is an observational and cross-sectional study, undertaken in 2015, in which patients (both gender and all ages) with UTI and underwent antimicrobial therapy, enrolled at an ICU in a hospital in the southern region of the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were evaluated. Among the 49 patients evaluated (28 females [F] and 21 males [M]), the mean age was 55±19 years (CI(95) 49-61) and the predominant age range was ≥70 years. Fourteen different microorganisms were identified. 28.3% (CI(95%) 16.2-40.4) of the UTI had Escherichia coli as causative agent (33.3% M and 28.6% F); 18.9% (CI(95%) 8.3-29.4) Acinetobacter baumannii (33.3% M and 10.7% F); 15.1% (CI(95%) 5.5-24.7) Klebsiella pneumoniae (19% M and 14.3% F); 11.3% Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5% M and 14.3% F); 5.7% Enterobacter aerogenes (14.3% M); 3.8% Klebsiella oxytoca; 3.8% Staphylococcus aureus (7.1% F); and 2% for each of the microorganisms as follows: Enterococcus faecalis (4.8% M); Proteus mirabilis (3.6% F); Enterobacter cloacae (3.6% F); Providencia rettgeri (4.8% M); Citrobacter koseri (3.6% F); Citrobacter freundii (3.6% F); and Yeasts (4.8% M). The prevalence of UTI caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in the ITUs were influenced by the patients’ sex (χ² with p<0.001). In the male sex, it there was “substantial” positive correlations between the most increased ages (in years) and the prevalence of UTI caused by E. coli (r = 0.69) or between the decreased ages and the prevalence of UTI caused by A. baumannii (r = -0.7). In the female sex, it there was an “extremely” positive correlation between the most increased ages and the prevalence of UTI caused by E. coli (r = 0.94; CI(95) 0.66-0.99; p<0.0014). The most used antimicrobials in an empirical fashion (EA) were: Ciprofloxacin (14.3% CI(95%) 4.7-24.1), Cefepime (14.3%), and Vancomicin (10%); and after antibiogram (guided therapy): Ceftazidime (16.3% CI(95%) 6-26.7), Ciprofloxacin (14.3% CI(95%) 4.5-24.1), Polymyxin B (10.2%), Imipenem (10.2%), and Ampicillin/sulbactam (8.2%). In 20% of cases, the EAs were considered “inappropriate/not correct”. However, we must also be aware of the clinical need and the immediacy for the treatment of UTIs in an ICU, since the disease can be fatal if a therapy is not instituted, therefore, we advise more detailed assessments, both of the rationality of use antibiotics, as well as the risk factors for the development of UTIs in ICUs.
id UNIFEI_65463057bb498511a2fbe04e3c8f7d23
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13516
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit Factores de riesgo y perfil del uso de antimicrobianos en pacientes con infección del tracto urinario en una unidad de cuidados intensivosFatores de risco e perfil do uso de antimicrobianos entre pacientes com infecção no trato urinário em uma unidade de terapia intensivaInfecção no Trato UrinárioUnidade de Terapia IntensivaAntibióticoEscherichia coliITUUTIAcinetobacter baumannii.Infección del tracto urinarioUnidad de cuidados intensivosAntibióticoEscherichia coliAcinetobacter baumannii.Urinary tract infectionsIntensive Care UnitsAntimicrobialEscherichia coliUTIICUAcinetobacter baumannii.Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) affecting patients at Intensive Care Units (ICU) is a preoccupant reality, further aggravated by inadequate antimicrobial use and the alarming antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms. We evaluated the level of assertiveness regarding the use of antimicrobials during the empirical antibiotic-therapy (EA), in patients with UTI, comparing the empiric pharmacological treatments (EA) and those ones performed after the antibiogram (guided therapy). Moreover, we estimated the prevalence of the causative agents and analyzed the risk factors associated. This is an observational and cross-sectional study, undertaken in 2015, in which patients (both gender and all ages) with UTI and underwent antimicrobial therapy, enrolled at an ICU in a hospital in the southern region of the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were evaluated. Among the 49 patients evaluated (28 females [F] and 21 males [M]), the mean age was 55±19 years (CI(95) 49-61) and the predominant age range was ≥70 years. Fourteen different microorganisms were identified. 28.3% (CI(95%) 16.2-40.4) of the UTI had Escherichia coli as causative agent (33.3% M and 28.6% F); 18.9% (CI(95%) 8.3-29.4) Acinetobacter baumannii (33.3% M and 10.7% F); 15.1% (CI(95%) 5.5-24.7) Klebsiella pneumoniae (19% M and 14.3% F); 11.3% Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5% M and 14.3% F); 5.7% Enterobacter aerogenes (14.3% M); 3.8% Klebsiella oxytoca; 3.8% Staphylococcus aureus (7.1% F); and 2% for each of the microorganisms as follows: Enterococcus faecalis (4.8% M); Proteus mirabilis (3.6% F); Enterobacter cloacae (3.6% F); Providencia rettgeri (4.8% M); Citrobacter koseri (3.6% F); Citrobacter freundii (3.6% F); and Yeasts (4.8% M). The prevalence of UTI caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in the ITUs were influenced by the patients’ sex (χ² with p<0.001). In the male sex, it there was “substantial” positive correlations between the most increased ages (in years) and the prevalence of UTI caused by E. coli (r = 0.69) or between the decreased ages and the prevalence of UTI caused by A. baumannii (r = -0.7). In the female sex, it there was an “extremely” positive correlation between the most increased ages and the prevalence of UTI caused by E. coli (r = 0.94; CI(95) 0.66-0.99; p<0.0014). The most used antimicrobials in an empirical fashion (EA) were: Ciprofloxacin (14.3% CI(95%) 4.7-24.1), Cefepime (14.3%), and Vancomicin (10%); and after antibiogram (guided therapy): Ceftazidime (16.3% CI(95%) 6-26.7), Ciprofloxacin (14.3% CI(95%) 4.5-24.1), Polymyxin B (10.2%), Imipenem (10.2%), and Ampicillin/sulbactam (8.2%). In 20% of cases, the EAs were considered “inappropriate/not correct”. However, we must also be aware of the clinical need and the immediacy for the treatment of UTIs in an ICU, since the disease can be fatal if a therapy is not instituted, therefore, we advise more detailed assessments, both of the rationality of use antibiotics, as well as the risk factors for the development of UTIs in ICUs.La Infección del Tracto Urinario (ITU) que afecta a pacientes en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) es una realidad preocupante, agravada por el uso irracional de antimicrobianos y la alarmante multirresistencia de los microorganismos. Se evaluó el nivel de asertividad respecto al uso de antimicrobianos durante la antibioticoterapia empírica (ATE), en pacientes diagnosticados de ITU, comparando este tratamiento farmacológico empírico y el realizado tras el antibiograma (antibioticoterapia dirigida), además, estimamos la prevalencia de los agentes etiológicos y analizamos los factores de riesgo asociados. Se trata de un estudio observacional y transversal, realizado en 2015, con pacientes de ambos sexos y todas las edades afectado por ITU y sometidos a antibioticoterapia, ingresados ​​en una UCI de un hospital del sur de Minas Gerais, Brasil. De los 49 pacientes evaluados (28 mujeres [M] y 21 hombres [H]), la edad media fue 55 ± 19 años (IC(95) 49-61) y el grupo de edad ≥70 años fue el predominante. Catorce microorganismos diferentes causaron ITU, con el 28,3% (IC(95) 16,2-40,4) de los aislados clínicos que tenían Escherichia coli como agente etiológico (33,3% H y 28,6% M); el 18,9% (IC(95) 8,3-29,4) Acinetobacter baumannii (33,3% H y 10,7% M); el 15,1% (IC(95) 5,5-24,7) Klebsiella pneumoniae (19% H y 14,3% M); el 11,3% Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9,5% H y 14,3% M); el 5,7% Enterobacter aerogenes (14,3% H); el 3,8% Klebsiella oxytoca; el 3,8% Staphylococcus aureus (7,1% M); y el 1,9% para cada uno de los siguientes microorganismos: Enterococcus faecalis (4,8% H); Proteus mirabilis (3,6% M); Enterobacter cloacae (3,6% M); Providencia rettgeri (4,8% H); Citrobacter koseri (3,6% M); Citrobacter freundii (3,6% M); y hongos similares a las levaduras (4,8% H). La prevalencia de ITU causada por A. baumannii y P. aeruginosa fue influenciada por el sexo (χ² con p <0.001). En los hombres, hubo correlaciones positivas "sustanciales" entre el aumento de la edad (en años) y la prevalencia de ITU causada por E. coli (r = 0,69) o entre edades menos avanzadas y la prevalencia de ITU causada por A. baumannii (r = -0,7). En las mujeres, hubo una correlación positiva “extremadamente fuerte” entre el aumento de la edad y la prevalencia de ITU causada por E. coli (r = 0,94; IC(95) 0,66-0,99; p <0,0014). Los antibióticos más utilizados empíricamente (ATE) fueron: Ciprofloxacino (14,3% IC(95) 4,7-24,1), Cefepima (14,3%) y Vancomicina (10%), y tras el antibiograma (tratamiento antibiótico dirigido): Ceftazidima (16,3%) IC(95) 6-26,7), Ciprofloxacina (14,3% IC(95) 4,5-24,1), Polimixina B (10,2%), Imipenem (10,2%) y Ampicilina + Sulbac. (8,2%). En el 20% de los casos, las terapias empíricas (ATE) se consideraron “inapropiadas/incorrectas”. Sin embargo, también debemos ser conscientes de la necesidad clínica y la inmediatez para el tratamiento de una ITU en una UCI, ya que la enfermedad puede ser fatal si no se instituye una terapia, por lo que aconsejamos valoraciones más detalladas, tanto de la racionalidad de utilizar antibióticos, así como los factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de infecciones urinarias en UCI.A Infecção no Trato Urinário (ITU) acometendo pacientes em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (UTIs) é uma realidade preocupante, agravada pelo uso irracional de antimicrobianos e a alarmante multirresistência em microrganismos. Nós avaliamos o nível de assertividade quanto ao uso de antimicrobianos durante à antibioticoterapia empírica (ATE), em pacientes diagnosticados com ITU, comparando tal tratamento farmacológico empírico e o realizado após o antibiograma (antibioticoterapia direcionada), além disto, estimamos a prevalência dos agentes etiológicos e analisamos os fatores de risco associados. Este é um estudo observacional e transversal, realizado em 2015, no qual foram avaliados pacientes de ambos os sexos e todas as idades apresentando ITU e submetidos à antibioticoterapia, internados em uma UTI de um hospital no sul de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Dos 49 pacientes avaliados (28 mulheres [M] e 21 homens [H]), a média de idade foi 55±19 anos (IC(95) 49-61) e a faixa etária ≥70 anos foi a predominante. Quatorze diferentes microrganismos foram causadores de ITUs, sendo que 28,3% (IC(95%) 16,2-40,4) dos isolados clínicos tiveram Escherichia coli como o agente etiológico (33,3% H e 28,6% M); 18,9% (IC(95%) 8,3-29,4) Acinetobacter baumannii (33,3% H e 10,7% M); 15,1% (IC(95%) 5,5-24,7) Klebsiella pneumoniae (19% H e 14,3% M); 11,3% Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9,5% H e 14,3% M); 5,7% Enterobacter aerogenes (14,3% H); 3,8% Klebsiella oxytoca; 3,8% Staphylococcus aureus (7,1% M); e 1,9% para cada um dos seguintes microrganismos: Enterococcus faecalis (4,8% H); Proteus mirabilis (3,6% M); Enterobacter cloacae (3,6% M); Providencia rettgeri (4,8% H); Citrobacter koseri (3,6% M); Citrobacter freundii (3,6% M); e Fungos leveduriformes (4,8% H). As prevalências de ITUs causadas por A. baumannii e P. aeruginosa foram influenciadas pelo sexo (χ² com p<0,001). No sexo masculino, houve correlações positivas “substanciais” entre o aumento da idade (em anos) e a prevalência de ITU causada por E. coli (r = 0,69) ou entre idades menos avançadas e a prevalência de ITU causada por A. baumannii (r = -0,7). No sexo feminino, houve uma correlação positiva “extremamente forte” entre o aumento da idade e a prevalência de ITU causada por E. coli (r = 0,94; IC(95) 0,66-0,99; p<0,0014). Os antibióticos mais utilizados de forma empírica (ATE) foram: Ciprofloxacina (14,3% IC(95%) 4,7-24,1), Cefepima (14,3%) e Vancomicina (10%), e após o antibiograma (antibioticoterapia direcionada): Ceftazidima (16,3% IC(95%) 6-26,7), Ciprofloxacina (14,3% IC(95%) 4,5-24,1), Polimixina B (10,2%), Imipenem (10,2%) e Ampicilina + Sulbac. (8,2%). Em 20% dos casos, as terapias empíricas (ATE) foram consideradas “inapropriadas/não acertadas”. Contudo, também devemos ter ciência da necessidade clínica e quanto ao imediatismo para o tratamento de uma ITU em UTI, uma vez que a doença pode ser fatal se uma terapia não for instituída, portanto, nós aconselhamos avaliações mais minuciosas, tanto da racionalidade do uso de antibióticos, quanto dos fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento de ITUs em UTIs.Research, Society and Development2021-03-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1351610.33448/rsd-v10i3.13516Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 3; e43910313516Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 3; e43910313516Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 3; e439103135162525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13516/12158Copyright (c) 2021 Lucas Harassim; Olibio Lopes Fiebig da Silva; Luiz Felipe Soares Pinheiro; Elber José Assaiante dos Santos; Cláudio Daniel Cerdeira; Gérsika Bittencourt Santos Barroshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHarassim, Lucas Silva, Olibio Lopes Fiebig da Pinheiro, Luiz Felipe Soares Santos, Elber José Assaiante dos Cerdeira, Cláudio DanielBarros, Gérsika Bittencourt Santos 2021-03-28T12:03:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13516Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:34:50.384528Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
Factores de riesgo y perfil del uso de antimicrobianos en pacientes con infección del tracto urinario en una unidad de cuidados intensivos
Fatores de risco e perfil do uso de antimicrobianos entre pacientes com infecção no trato urinário em uma unidade de terapia intensiva
title Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
spellingShingle Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
Harassim, Lucas
Infecção no Trato Urinário
Unidade de Terapia Intensiva
Antibiótico
Escherichia coli
ITU
UTI
Acinetobacter baumannii.
Infección del tracto urinario
Unidad de cuidados intensivos
Antibiótico
Escherichia coli
Acinetobacter baumannii.
Urinary tract infections
Intensive Care Units
Antimicrobial
Escherichia coli
UTI
ICU
Acinetobacter baumannii.
title_short Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
title_full Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
title_fullStr Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
title_sort Risk factors and profile of antimicrobial use among patients with urinary tract infection at an intensive care unit
author Harassim, Lucas
author_facet Harassim, Lucas
Silva, Olibio Lopes Fiebig da
Pinheiro, Luiz Felipe Soares
Santos, Elber José Assaiante dos
Cerdeira, Cláudio Daniel
Barros, Gérsika Bittencourt Santos
author_role author
author2 Silva, Olibio Lopes Fiebig da
Pinheiro, Luiz Felipe Soares
Santos, Elber José Assaiante dos
Cerdeira, Cláudio Daniel
Barros, Gérsika Bittencourt Santos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Harassim, Lucas
Silva, Olibio Lopes Fiebig da
Pinheiro, Luiz Felipe Soares
Santos, Elber José Assaiante dos
Cerdeira, Cláudio Daniel
Barros, Gérsika Bittencourt Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Infecção no Trato Urinário
Unidade de Terapia Intensiva
Antibiótico
Escherichia coli
ITU
UTI
Acinetobacter baumannii.
Infección del tracto urinario
Unidad de cuidados intensivos
Antibiótico
Escherichia coli
Acinetobacter baumannii.
Urinary tract infections
Intensive Care Units
Antimicrobial
Escherichia coli
UTI
ICU
Acinetobacter baumannii.
topic Infecção no Trato Urinário
Unidade de Terapia Intensiva
Antibiótico
Escherichia coli
ITU
UTI
Acinetobacter baumannii.
Infección del tracto urinario
Unidad de cuidados intensivos
Antibiótico
Escherichia coli
Acinetobacter baumannii.
Urinary tract infections
Intensive Care Units
Antimicrobial
Escherichia coli
UTI
ICU
Acinetobacter baumannii.
description Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) affecting patients at Intensive Care Units (ICU) is a preoccupant reality, further aggravated by inadequate antimicrobial use and the alarming antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms. We evaluated the level of assertiveness regarding the use of antimicrobials during the empirical antibiotic-therapy (EA), in patients with UTI, comparing the empiric pharmacological treatments (EA) and those ones performed after the antibiogram (guided therapy). Moreover, we estimated the prevalence of the causative agents and analyzed the risk factors associated. This is an observational and cross-sectional study, undertaken in 2015, in which patients (both gender and all ages) with UTI and underwent antimicrobial therapy, enrolled at an ICU in a hospital in the southern region of the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were evaluated. Among the 49 patients evaluated (28 females [F] and 21 males [M]), the mean age was 55±19 years (CI(95) 49-61) and the predominant age range was ≥70 years. Fourteen different microorganisms were identified. 28.3% (CI(95%) 16.2-40.4) of the UTI had Escherichia coli as causative agent (33.3% M and 28.6% F); 18.9% (CI(95%) 8.3-29.4) Acinetobacter baumannii (33.3% M and 10.7% F); 15.1% (CI(95%) 5.5-24.7) Klebsiella pneumoniae (19% M and 14.3% F); 11.3% Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5% M and 14.3% F); 5.7% Enterobacter aerogenes (14.3% M); 3.8% Klebsiella oxytoca; 3.8% Staphylococcus aureus (7.1% F); and 2% for each of the microorganisms as follows: Enterococcus faecalis (4.8% M); Proteus mirabilis (3.6% F); Enterobacter cloacae (3.6% F); Providencia rettgeri (4.8% M); Citrobacter koseri (3.6% F); Citrobacter freundii (3.6% F); and Yeasts (4.8% M). The prevalence of UTI caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in the ITUs were influenced by the patients’ sex (χ² with p<0.001). In the male sex, it there was “substantial” positive correlations between the most increased ages (in years) and the prevalence of UTI caused by E. coli (r = 0.69) or between the decreased ages and the prevalence of UTI caused by A. baumannii (r = -0.7). In the female sex, it there was an “extremely” positive correlation between the most increased ages and the prevalence of UTI caused by E. coli (r = 0.94; CI(95) 0.66-0.99; p<0.0014). The most used antimicrobials in an empirical fashion (EA) were: Ciprofloxacin (14.3% CI(95%) 4.7-24.1), Cefepime (14.3%), and Vancomicin (10%); and after antibiogram (guided therapy): Ceftazidime (16.3% CI(95%) 6-26.7), Ciprofloxacin (14.3% CI(95%) 4.5-24.1), Polymyxin B (10.2%), Imipenem (10.2%), and Ampicillin/sulbactam (8.2%). In 20% of cases, the EAs were considered “inappropriate/not correct”. However, we must also be aware of the clinical need and the immediacy for the treatment of UTIs in an ICU, since the disease can be fatal if a therapy is not instituted, therefore, we advise more detailed assessments, both of the rationality of use antibiotics, as well as the risk factors for the development of UTIs in ICUs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13516
10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13516
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13516
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13516
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13516/12158
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 3; e43910313516
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 3; e43910313516
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 3; e43910313516
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052817398038528