Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lago, Rafael Vinicius Pansera
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Vitt, Maksuel Gatto de, Brunetto, Andrei L. R., Bissacotti, Bianca F., Copetti, Priscila M., Carvalho, Raissa A., Pereira, Wanderson A. B., Solivo, Gabriela, Zotti, Claiton A., Vedovatto, Marcelo, Silva, Aleksandro Schafer Da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31415
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a combination of probiotics (PROB) and prebiotics (PREB) or both alone in the diet of Holstein calves after lactation has a positive effect on the immune and antioxidant response capable of favoring the animal's growth. Eighteen Holstein animals (79.2 kg and 70 days old), housed in individual pens for 92 days were used here, and divided into three treatments: PROB (n=6), PREB (n=6) and PROB+ PREB (n=6). The consumption of PREB and the association PREB+PROB generated a gain in body weight about 10% more than PROB. In the blood count, the only change was the treatment x day interaction for monocyte counts, being higher on days 63 and 92 in the blood of the PREB and PROB animals, respectively, compared to the other groups. The PREB + PROB association from day 63 increased the activity of the glutathione S-transferase enzyme by 14% when compared to the consumption of only PREB, in addition to reducing the levels of TBARS in the blood by 35%. Furthermore, the association of PREB+PROB reduced by 12.5% and 16.2% the concentration of serum urea in relation to PREB and PROB, respectively. Animals in the PREB+PROB group had higher serum IgA levels compared to the PROB, contrary to what happened with the heavy chain IGG levels, that is, it was higher in the PROB compared to the PREB+ PROB association. On day 63, lower levels of haptoglobin were observed in PREB compared to the other groups. On day 92, lower levels of transferrin and acid glycoprotein were observed in the blood of animals that consumed PREB+PROB. Also on day 92, serum ceruplasmin levels in PROB were higher than in PREB animals. A higher of apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of organic matter (OM) was observed when the animal’s consumed prebiotic compared to probiotic, and the association of both did not differ from the two treatments for ADC of OM. The results allow us to conclude that the PREB+PROB association was important to minimize the physiological oxidative stress, as well as to raise the serum levels of IgA, an important mucosal immunoglobulin at the level of the digestive system; in addition, the combination of physiological results of prebiotic consumption alone or in combination reflected in greater weight gain in calves.
id UNIFEI_6856341be15fe152bb84694a18011f14
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31415
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaningLos prebióticos solos o combinados con probióticos tienen un efecto positivo en la digestibilidad de la materia orgánica, el rendimiento y la respuesta inmunológica y antioxidante de los terneros después del destetePrébiotico isolado ou combinado com probiótico tem efeito positivo sobre digestibilidade de matéria orgânica, desempenho, resposta imune e antioxidante de bezerros após o desaleitamentoPrébióticoProbióticoSimbióticoBezerros leiteiros.PrebioticProbioticSymbioticDairy calves.PrebióticoProbióticoSimbióticoTerneros lecheros.The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a combination of probiotics (PROB) and prebiotics (PREB) or both alone in the diet of Holstein calves after lactation has a positive effect on the immune and antioxidant response capable of favoring the animal's growth. Eighteen Holstein animals (79.2 kg and 70 days old), housed in individual pens for 92 days were used here, and divided into three treatments: PROB (n=6), PREB (n=6) and PROB+ PREB (n=6). The consumption of PREB and the association PREB+PROB generated a gain in body weight about 10% more than PROB. In the blood count, the only change was the treatment x day interaction for monocyte counts, being higher on days 63 and 92 in the blood of the PREB and PROB animals, respectively, compared to the other groups. The PREB + PROB association from day 63 increased the activity of the glutathione S-transferase enzyme by 14% when compared to the consumption of only PREB, in addition to reducing the levels of TBARS in the blood by 35%. Furthermore, the association of PREB+PROB reduced by 12.5% and 16.2% the concentration of serum urea in relation to PREB and PROB, respectively. Animals in the PREB+PROB group had higher serum IgA levels compared to the PROB, contrary to what happened with the heavy chain IGG levels, that is, it was higher in the PROB compared to the PREB+ PROB association. On day 63, lower levels of haptoglobin were observed in PREB compared to the other groups. On day 92, lower levels of transferrin and acid glycoprotein were observed in the blood of animals that consumed PREB+PROB. Also on day 92, serum ceruplasmin levels in PROB were higher than in PREB animals. A higher of apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of organic matter (OM) was observed when the animal’s consumed prebiotic compared to probiotic, and the association of both did not differ from the two treatments for ADC of OM. The results allow us to conclude that the PREB+PROB association was important to minimize the physiological oxidative stress, as well as to raise the serum levels of IgA, an important mucosal immunoglobulin at the level of the digestive system; in addition, the combination of physiological results of prebiotic consumption alone or in combination reflected in greater weight gain in calves.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar si la adición de una combinación de probióticos (PROB) y prebióticos (PREB) o ambos solos en la dieta de terneros Holstein después de la lactancia tiene un efecto positivo sobre la respuesta inmunológica y antioxidante capaz de favorecer la salud del animal. crecimiento. Se utilizaron dieciocho animales Holstein (79,2 kg y 70 días de edad), alojados en corrales individuales durante 92 días, divididos en tres tratamientos: PROB (n=6), PREB (n=6) y PROB+ PREB (n=6) . El consumo de PREB y la asociación PREB+PROB generó una ganancia de peso corporal de alrededor de un 10% más que PROB. En el hemograma, el único cambio fue la interacción tratamiento x día para el conteo de monocitos, siendo mayor en los días 63 y 92 en la sangre de los animales PREB y PROB, respectivamente, en comparación con los otros grupos. La asociación PREB + PROB a partir del día 63 aumentó la actividad de la enzima glutatión S-transferasa en un 14 % en comparación con el consumo de solo PREB, además de reducir los niveles de TBARS en sangre en un 35 %. Además, la asociación de PREB+PROB redujo en un 12,5% y 16,2% la concentración de urea sérica en relación a PREB y PROB, respectivamente. Los animales del grupo PREB+PROB tenían niveles séricos de IgA más altos en comparación con el PROB, al contrario de lo que ocurría con los niveles de IGG de cadena pesada, es decir, era más alto en el PROB en comparación con la asociación PREB+PROB. En el día 63, se observaron niveles más bajos de haptoglobina en PREB en comparación con los otros grupos. El día 92 se observaron niveles más bajos de transferrina y glicoproteína ácida en la sangre de los animales que consumieron PREB+PROB. También en el día 92, los niveles de ceruplasmina en suero en los animales PROB fueron más altos que en los animales PREB. Se observó un mayor coeficiente de digestibilidad aparente (ADC) de materia orgánica (MO) cuando los animales consumieron prebiótico en comparación con probiótico, y la asociación de ambos no difirió de los dos tratamientos para CDA de MO. Los resultados permiten concluir que la asociación PREB+PROB fue importante para minimizar el estrés oxidativo fisiológico, así como para elevar los niveles séricos de IgA, importante inmunoglobulina mucosal a nivel del sistema digestivo; además, la combinación de resultados fisiológicos del consumo de prebióticos solos o combinados se reflejó en una mayor ganancia de peso en los terneros.O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar se a adição de combinação de probiótico (PROB) e prébioticos (PREB) ou ambos sozinhos na dieta de bezerros holandeses após o aleitamento tem efeito positivo na resposta imune e antioxidante capaz de favorecer o crescimento do animal. Dezoito animais da raça holandesa (79,2 kg e 70 dias de idade), alojados em baias individuais por 92 dias foram usados aqui, e divididos em três tratamentos: PROB (n=6), PREB (n=6) e PROB+PREB (n=6). O consumo de PREB e da associação PREB+PROB gerou um ganho de peso corporal cerca de 10% a mais que o PROB. No hemograma, a única alteração foi a interação tratamento x dia para contagem de monócitos, sendo maior no dia 63 e 92 no sangue dos animais do PREB e PROB, respectivamente, comparado aos demais grupos. A associação PREB + PROB a partir do dia 63 elevou a atividade da enzima glutationa S-transferase em 14% quando comprado ao consumo de apenas PREB, além de reduzir em 35% os níveis de TBARS no sangue. Além disso, a associação de PREB+PROB reduziu em 12,5% e 16,2% a concentração de ureia sérica em relação ao PREB e PROB, respectivamente. Animais do grupo PREB+PROB tiveram maiores níveis de IgA no soro em relação ao PROB, ao contrário do que ocorreu referentes aos níveis de IGG de cadeia pesada, isto é, foi maior no PROB comparado a associação PREB+ PROB. No dia 63 foi observado menores níveis haptoglobina no PREB comparado aos demais grupos. No dia 92 foi observado menores níveis de transferrina e glicoproteína acida para a no sangue dos animais que consumiram PREB+PROB. Também no dia 92, níveis de ceruplasmina no soro do PROB foi maior que nos animais do PREB. Foi observado coeficiente de digestibilidade aparente (CDA) de matéria orgânica (MO) maior quando os animais consumiram prébiotico comparado ao probiótico, sendo que a associação de ambos não diferiu dos dois tratamentos para CDA de MO. Os resultados permitem concluir a associação PREB+PROB foi importante para minimizar o estresse oxidativo fisiológico, assim como elevar os níveis séricos de IgA, imunoglobulina de mucosa importante a nível de sistema digestivo; além disso a combinação de resultados fisiológicos do consumo de prébiotico isolado ou combinado refletiu em maior ganho de peso dos bezerros.Research, Society and Development2022-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3141510.33448/rsd-v11i10.31415Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e188111032415Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e188111032415Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e1881110324152525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31415/27687Copyright (c) 2022 Rafael Vinicius Pansera Lago; Maksuel Gatto de Vitt; Andrei L. R. Brunetto; Bianca F. Bissacotti; Priscila M. Copetti; Raissa A. Carvalho; Wanderson A. B. Pereira; Gabriela Solivo; Claiton A. Zotti; Marcelo Vedovatto; Aleksandro Schafer da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLago, Rafael Vinicius Pansera Vitt, Maksuel Gatto de Brunetto, Andrei L. R. Bissacotti, Bianca F. Copetti, Priscila M. Carvalho, Raissa A.Pereira, Wanderson A. B. Solivo, GabrielaZotti, Claiton A.Vedovatto, MarceloSilva, Aleksandro Schafer Da 2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31415Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:47:46.122795Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
Los prebióticos solos o combinados con probióticos tienen un efecto positivo en la digestibilidad de la materia orgánica, el rendimiento y la respuesta inmunológica y antioxidante de los terneros después del destete
Prébiotico isolado ou combinado com probiótico tem efeito positivo sobre digestibilidade de matéria orgânica, desempenho, resposta imune e antioxidante de bezerros após o desaleitamento
title Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
spellingShingle Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
Lago, Rafael Vinicius Pansera
Prébiótico
Probiótico
Simbiótico
Bezerros leiteiros.
Prebiotic
Probiotic
Symbiotic
Dairy calves.
Prebiótico
Probiótico
Simbiótico
Terneros lecheros.
title_short Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
title_full Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
title_fullStr Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
title_full_unstemmed Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
title_sort Prebiotic alone or combined with probiotic has a positive effect on organic matter digestibility, performance, immune and antioxidant response of calves after weaning
author Lago, Rafael Vinicius Pansera
author_facet Lago, Rafael Vinicius Pansera
Vitt, Maksuel Gatto de
Brunetto, Andrei L. R.
Bissacotti, Bianca F.
Copetti, Priscila M.
Carvalho, Raissa A.
Pereira, Wanderson A. B.
Solivo, Gabriela
Zotti, Claiton A.
Vedovatto, Marcelo
Silva, Aleksandro Schafer Da
author_role author
author2 Vitt, Maksuel Gatto de
Brunetto, Andrei L. R.
Bissacotti, Bianca F.
Copetti, Priscila M.
Carvalho, Raissa A.
Pereira, Wanderson A. B.
Solivo, Gabriela
Zotti, Claiton A.
Vedovatto, Marcelo
Silva, Aleksandro Schafer Da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lago, Rafael Vinicius Pansera
Vitt, Maksuel Gatto de
Brunetto, Andrei L. R.
Bissacotti, Bianca F.
Copetti, Priscila M.
Carvalho, Raissa A.
Pereira, Wanderson A. B.
Solivo, Gabriela
Zotti, Claiton A.
Vedovatto, Marcelo
Silva, Aleksandro Schafer Da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prébiótico
Probiótico
Simbiótico
Bezerros leiteiros.
Prebiotic
Probiotic
Symbiotic
Dairy calves.
Prebiótico
Probiótico
Simbiótico
Terneros lecheros.
topic Prébiótico
Probiótico
Simbiótico
Bezerros leiteiros.
Prebiotic
Probiotic
Symbiotic
Dairy calves.
Prebiótico
Probiótico
Simbiótico
Terneros lecheros.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a combination of probiotics (PROB) and prebiotics (PREB) or both alone in the diet of Holstein calves after lactation has a positive effect on the immune and antioxidant response capable of favoring the animal's growth. Eighteen Holstein animals (79.2 kg and 70 days old), housed in individual pens for 92 days were used here, and divided into three treatments: PROB (n=6), PREB (n=6) and PROB+ PREB (n=6). The consumption of PREB and the association PREB+PROB generated a gain in body weight about 10% more than PROB. In the blood count, the only change was the treatment x day interaction for monocyte counts, being higher on days 63 and 92 in the blood of the PREB and PROB animals, respectively, compared to the other groups. The PREB + PROB association from day 63 increased the activity of the glutathione S-transferase enzyme by 14% when compared to the consumption of only PREB, in addition to reducing the levels of TBARS in the blood by 35%. Furthermore, the association of PREB+PROB reduced by 12.5% and 16.2% the concentration of serum urea in relation to PREB and PROB, respectively. Animals in the PREB+PROB group had higher serum IgA levels compared to the PROB, contrary to what happened with the heavy chain IGG levels, that is, it was higher in the PROB compared to the PREB+ PROB association. On day 63, lower levels of haptoglobin were observed in PREB compared to the other groups. On day 92, lower levels of transferrin and acid glycoprotein were observed in the blood of animals that consumed PREB+PROB. Also on day 92, serum ceruplasmin levels in PROB were higher than in PREB animals. A higher of apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of organic matter (OM) was observed when the animal’s consumed prebiotic compared to probiotic, and the association of both did not differ from the two treatments for ADC of OM. The results allow us to conclude that the PREB+PROB association was important to minimize the physiological oxidative stress, as well as to raise the serum levels of IgA, an important mucosal immunoglobulin at the level of the digestive system; in addition, the combination of physiological results of prebiotic consumption alone or in combination reflected in greater weight gain in calves.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31415
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31415
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31415
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.31415
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31415/27687
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e188111032415
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e188111032415
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e188111032415
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052768019546112