Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26263 |
Resumo: | This article proposes to reflect on human action as a uniqueness that promotes sustainable development in the perspective of participatory and shared progress. In this sense, the question that guides the reflection is: why ethics and economics have distanced themselves in such a way that there is an economy without ethics and an ethics without economics? The research aims to describe human action as the necessary praxis for sustainability. As for the methodology, the research is exploratory and analytical, with a qualitative approach and was carried out through a literature review using the deductive method. It is concluded that it is necessary that the praxis be guided in the perspective of an ethical economy, which gives sustainability to human dignity, for this to occur, it is necessary to overcome the dichotomy and the Manichaeism that relativizes the unit of sustainable, participatory, shared and integral development. Income distribution helps to mitigate hunger and abandonment scenarios, however, it is necessary to adopt subsidiarity and solidarity processes, oriented to the formation of the common good, in order to mitigate vulnerability scenarios. |
id |
UNIFEI_6dd863f2ba0d867c73ccec693f0b03c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26263 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilitiesÉtica y economía a la luz de la riqueza y las vulnerabilidadesÉtica e economia à luz de riquezas e vulnerabilidadesSustentabilidadeEconomiaEconomicidadeÉticaSociabilidade.SustainabilityEconomyEthicEconomicsSociability.SustentabilidadEconomíaPrincipio moralCiencias económicasSociabilidad.This article proposes to reflect on human action as a uniqueness that promotes sustainable development in the perspective of participatory and shared progress. In this sense, the question that guides the reflection is: why ethics and economics have distanced themselves in such a way that there is an economy without ethics and an ethics without economics? The research aims to describe human action as the necessary praxis for sustainability. As for the methodology, the research is exploratory and analytical, with a qualitative approach and was carried out through a literature review using the deductive method. It is concluded that it is necessary that the praxis be guided in the perspective of an ethical economy, which gives sustainability to human dignity, for this to occur, it is necessary to overcome the dichotomy and the Manichaeism that relativizes the unit of sustainable, participatory, shared and integral development. Income distribution helps to mitigate hunger and abandonment scenarios, however, it is necessary to adopt subsidiarity and solidarity processes, oriented to the formation of the common good, in order to mitigate vulnerability scenarios.Este artículo propone reflexionar sobre la acción humana como singularidad que promueve el desarrollo sostenible en la perspectiva del progreso participativo y compartido. En ese sentido, la pregunta que guía la reflexión es: ¿por qué la ética y la economía se han distanciado de tal manera que hay una economía sin ética y una ética sin economía? La investigación tiene como objetivo describir la acción humana como la praxis necesaria para la sostenibilidad. En cuanto a la metodología, la investigación es exploratoria y analítica, con un enfoque cualitativo y se llevó a cabo a través de una revisión de literatura utilizando el método deductivo. Se concluye que es necesario que la praxis se guíe en la perspectiva de una economía ética, que dé sustentabilidad a la dignidad humana, para que esto ocurra, es necesario superar la dicotomía y el maniqueísmo que relativiza la unidad de la sustentabilidad, la participación, desarrollo compartido e integral. La distribución del ingreso ayuda a mitigar escenarios de hambre y abandono, sin embargo, es necesario adoptar procesos de subsidiariedad y solidaridad, orientados a la formación del bien común, para mitigar escenarios de vulnerabilidad.O presente artigo propõe-se a refletir sobre o agir humano enquanto unicidade que promove desenvolvimento sustentável em perspectiva do progresso participativo e compartilhado. Neste sentido, a indagação que norteia a reflexão é: porque a ética e a economia se distanciaram de tal forma que há uma economia sem ética e uma ética sem economia? A pesquisa tem como objetivo descrever o agir humano enquanto a práxis necessária para a sustentabilidade. Quanto à metodologia, a pesquisa é exploratória e analítica, com abordagem qualitativa e foi realizada realizada por meio de revisão de literatura a partir do método dedutivo. Conclui-se que é preciso que a práxis seja pautada em perspectiva à uma economia ética, que dê sustentabilidade à dignidade humana, para que isso ocorra é necessário superar a dicotomia e o maniqueísmo que relativiza a unidade de desenvolvimento sustentável, participativo, compartilhado e integral. A distribuição de renda contribui para atenuar cenários de fome e abandono, todavia, é preciso adotar processos de subsidiariedade e de solidariedade, orientados à formação do bem comum, de forma a mitigar cenários de vulnerabilização.Research, Society and Development2022-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2626310.33448/rsd-v11i2.26263Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e53811226263Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e53811226263Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e538112262632525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26263/22845Copyright (c) 2022 Odirlei Arcangelo Lovo; Eleonice de Fátima Dal Magro; Gustavo de Souza Costa; Robinson Francino da Costa; Cleberson Eller Loose; Liliane Maria Nery Andradehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLovo, Odirlei ArcangeloMagro, Eleonice de Fátima Dal Costa, Gustavo de Souza Costa, Robinson Francino da Loose, Cleberson Eller Andrade, Liliane Maria Nery 2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26263Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:20.941050Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities Ética y economía a la luz de la riqueza y las vulnerabilidades Ética e economia à luz de riquezas e vulnerabilidades |
title |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities |
spellingShingle |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities Lovo, Odirlei Arcangelo Sustentabilidade Economia Economicidade Ética Sociabilidade. Sustainability Economy Ethic Economics Sociability. Sustentabilidad Economía Principio moral Ciencias económicas Sociabilidad. |
title_short |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities |
title_full |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities |
title_fullStr |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities |
title_sort |
Ethics and economics in light of wealth and vulnerabilities |
author |
Lovo, Odirlei Arcangelo |
author_facet |
Lovo, Odirlei Arcangelo Magro, Eleonice de Fátima Dal Costa, Gustavo de Souza Costa, Robinson Francino da Loose, Cleberson Eller Andrade, Liliane Maria Nery |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magro, Eleonice de Fátima Dal Costa, Gustavo de Souza Costa, Robinson Francino da Loose, Cleberson Eller Andrade, Liliane Maria Nery |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lovo, Odirlei Arcangelo Magro, Eleonice de Fátima Dal Costa, Gustavo de Souza Costa, Robinson Francino da Loose, Cleberson Eller Andrade, Liliane Maria Nery |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sustentabilidade Economia Economicidade Ética Sociabilidade. Sustainability Economy Ethic Economics Sociability. Sustentabilidad Economía Principio moral Ciencias económicas Sociabilidad. |
topic |
Sustentabilidade Economia Economicidade Ética Sociabilidade. Sustainability Economy Ethic Economics Sociability. Sustentabilidad Economía Principio moral Ciencias económicas Sociabilidad. |
description |
This article proposes to reflect on human action as a uniqueness that promotes sustainable development in the perspective of participatory and shared progress. In this sense, the question that guides the reflection is: why ethics and economics have distanced themselves in such a way that there is an economy without ethics and an ethics without economics? The research aims to describe human action as the necessary praxis for sustainability. As for the methodology, the research is exploratory and analytical, with a qualitative approach and was carried out through a literature review using the deductive method. It is concluded that it is necessary that the praxis be guided in the perspective of an ethical economy, which gives sustainability to human dignity, for this to occur, it is necessary to overcome the dichotomy and the Manichaeism that relativizes the unit of sustainable, participatory, shared and integral development. Income distribution helps to mitigate hunger and abandonment scenarios, however, it is necessary to adopt subsidiarity and solidarity processes, oriented to the formation of the common good, in order to mitigate vulnerability scenarios. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26263 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.26263 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26263 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.26263 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26263/22845 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e53811226263 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e53811226263 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e53811226263 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052704704430080 |