Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2315 |
Resumo: | Markup is a percentage composed of indirect costs, profit estimates, and tax charges, applied to all services that make up the direct cost of a budget. However, this concept is the subject of debate due to differences in the determination of its components and calculation formulas. This article aims to identify the positions that differ from the composition of the markup, as well as the proposed calculation methods and the frequency of occurrence of the theme in the world scientific content. Through a bibliometric analysis, 42 relevant articles were identified that after the interpolation of the selected metadata resulted in 10 articles in which the difficulty in determining the markup is perceived, as well as alternatives for improving the conventional calculation process. |
id |
UNIFEI_7209353933fdd3b340de68265f7c008e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2315 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysisDescripción general de la investigación internacional sobre métodos de cálculo de beneficios y gastos indirectos: un análisis bibliometríaPanorama da pesquisa internacional sobre os métodos de cálculo do benefício e despesas indiretas: uma análise bibliométricaBibliometríaBeneficios y gastos indirectosAnálisis de costos.BibliometriaBenefício e despesas indiretasAnálise de custo.Bibliometrics MarkupCost analysis.Markup is a percentage composed of indirect costs, profit estimates, and tax charges, applied to all services that make up the direct cost of a budget. However, this concept is the subject of debate due to differences in the determination of its components and calculation formulas. This article aims to identify the positions that differ from the composition of the markup, as well as the proposed calculation methods and the frequency of occurrence of the theme in the world scientific content. Through a bibliometric analysis, 42 relevant articles were identified that after the interpolation of the selected metadata resulted in 10 articles in which the difficulty in determining the markup is perceived, as well as alternatives for improving the conventional calculation process.El beneficio y gasto indirecto es un porcentaje de los costos indirectos, las estimaciones de ganancias y los cargos impositivos aplicados a todos los servicios que conforman el costo directo de un presupuesto. Sin embargo, este concepto es objeto de debate debido a las diferencias en la determinación de sus componentes y fórmulas de cálculo. Este artículo tiene como objetivo identificar las posiciones que difieren de la composición del beneficio y gasto indirecto, así como los métodos de cálculo propuestos y la frecuencia de aparición del tema en el contenido científico mundial. A través de un análisis bibliometría, se identificaron 42 artículos relevantes que luego de la interpolación de los metadatos seleccionados resultaron en 10 artículos en los que se percibe la dificultad para determinar el beneficio y gasto indirecto, así como alternativas para mejorar el proceso de cálculo convencional.Benefício e Despesas Indiretas (BDI) é uma porcentagem composta pelos custos indiretos, estimativa de lucro e encargos tributários, aplicada sobre todos os serviços que compõem o custo direto de um orçamento. Contudo, esse conceito é objeto de debate devido às divergências quanto a determinação dos seus componentes e fórmulas de cálculo. Este artigo tem como objetivo identificar as posições divergentes à composição do BDI, bem como as propostas de métodos de cálculo e a frequência de ocorrência do tema no conteúdo científico mundial. Por meio de uma análise bibliométrica, identificou-se 42 artigos relevantes que após a interpolação dos metadados selecionados resultou em 10 artigos nos quais se percebe a dificuldade na determinação do BDI, assim como apresentam-se alternativas de melhoria do processo convencional de cálculo.Research, Society and Development2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/231510.33448/rsd-v9i3.2315Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 3; e26932315Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 3; e26932315Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 3; e269323152525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2315/1876Copyright (c) 2019 Daniele Moreira Moreira Santos, Fabrício José Piacente, Vanessa de Cillos Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira Santos, Daniele MoreiraPiacente, Fabrício JoséSilva, Vanessa de Cillos2020-08-20T18:07:57Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2315Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:59.281320Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis Descripción general de la investigación internacional sobre métodos de cálculo de beneficios y gastos indirectos: un análisis bibliometría Panorama da pesquisa internacional sobre os métodos de cálculo do benefício e despesas indiretas: uma análise bibliométrica |
title |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis |
spellingShingle |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis Moreira Santos, Daniele Moreira Bibliometría Beneficios y gastos indirectos Análisis de costos. Bibliometria Benefício e despesas indiretas Análise de custo. Bibliometrics Markup Cost analysis. |
title_short |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis |
title_full |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis |
title_fullStr |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis |
title_sort |
Overview of international research on indirect benefit and expense calculation methods: a bibliometric analysis |
author |
Moreira Santos, Daniele Moreira |
author_facet |
Moreira Santos, Daniele Moreira Piacente, Fabrício José Silva, Vanessa de Cillos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Piacente, Fabrício José Silva, Vanessa de Cillos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira Santos, Daniele Moreira Piacente, Fabrício José Silva, Vanessa de Cillos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bibliometría Beneficios y gastos indirectos Análisis de costos. Bibliometria Benefício e despesas indiretas Análise de custo. Bibliometrics Markup Cost analysis. |
topic |
Bibliometría Beneficios y gastos indirectos Análisis de costos. Bibliometria Benefício e despesas indiretas Análise de custo. Bibliometrics Markup Cost analysis. |
description |
Markup is a percentage composed of indirect costs, profit estimates, and tax charges, applied to all services that make up the direct cost of a budget. However, this concept is the subject of debate due to differences in the determination of its components and calculation formulas. This article aims to identify the positions that differ from the composition of the markup, as well as the proposed calculation methods and the frequency of occurrence of the theme in the world scientific content. Through a bibliometric analysis, 42 relevant articles were identified that after the interpolation of the selected metadata resulted in 10 articles in which the difficulty in determining the markup is perceived, as well as alternatives for improving the conventional calculation process. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2315 10.33448/rsd-v9i3.2315 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2315 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i3.2315 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2315/1876 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Daniele Moreira Moreira Santos, Fabrício José Piacente, Vanessa de Cillos Silva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Daniele Moreira Moreira Santos, Fabrício José Piacente, Vanessa de Cillos Silva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 3; e26932315 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 3; e26932315 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 3; e26932315 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052734220795904 |