Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26936 |
Resumo: | Home care is an alternative to hospital admissions. Despite the multiple benefits, concerns about the risk of infections persist. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of supervised guidance on the care of patients hospitalized at home on the prevention of infections, using and comparing the conventional and systematic strategies. This is an experimental study with home care patients at Home Care service of a Medical Cooperative from Sergipe between May 2006 and April 2007. The patients included were divided into two groups, the control (group I) and the experimental (group II). Caregivers in group I received general guidelines, without standardization, while those in group II received guidelines systematized by the researcher. At the end, the occurrence of infections between the two groups was analyzed by an infectologist who was not aware of the allocation of patients in the groups. Forty-seven patients in group I, conventional, and 28 in group II, experimental, were evaluated. Infections were observed throughout the period of data collection in both groups and were diagnosed in 48.9% in group I and 17.9% in group II, with a significant difference between them and a relative risk of 2.7 for the occurrence of infection. Thus, this study showed a reduction in the occurrence of infections in the group that received systematic guidance in relation to the group that received general guidance, noting the effectiveness of this strategy. |
id |
UNIFEI_7765fef58131473c5f5853ee4cad4b72 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26936 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home careImpacto de la orientación del cuidador en la prevención de infecciones en la atención domiciliariaImpacto da orientação ao cuidador na prevenção de infecções na assistência domiciliarInfection controlCaregiversHome care services.Control de infeccionesCuidadoresServicios de atención de salud a domicílio.Controle de infecçõesCuidadoresServiços de assistência domiciliar.Home care is an alternative to hospital admissions. Despite the multiple benefits, concerns about the risk of infections persist. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of supervised guidance on the care of patients hospitalized at home on the prevention of infections, using and comparing the conventional and systematic strategies. This is an experimental study with home care patients at Home Care service of a Medical Cooperative from Sergipe between May 2006 and April 2007. The patients included were divided into two groups, the control (group I) and the experimental (group II). Caregivers in group I received general guidelines, without standardization, while those in group II received guidelines systematized by the researcher. At the end, the occurrence of infections between the two groups was analyzed by an infectologist who was not aware of the allocation of patients in the groups. Forty-seven patients in group I, conventional, and 28 in group II, experimental, were evaluated. Infections were observed throughout the period of data collection in both groups and were diagnosed in 48.9% in group I and 17.9% in group II, with a significant difference between them and a relative risk of 2.7 for the occurrence of infection. Thus, this study showed a reduction in the occurrence of infections in the group that received systematic guidance in relation to the group that received general guidance, noting the effectiveness of this strategy.La atención domiciliaria es una alternativa a los ingresos hospitalarios. A pesar de los múltiples beneficios, persisten las preocupaciones sobre el riesgo de infecciones. Así, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la orientación supervisada en la atención de los pacientes hospitalizados en el domicilio en la prevención de infecciones, utilizando y comparando las estrategias convencionales y sistemáticas. Se trata de un estudio experimental con pacientes domiciliarios del Servicio de Asistencia Domiciliaria de una Cooperativa Médica de Sergipe entre mayo de 2006 y abril de 2007. Los pacientes incluidos se dividieron en dos grupos, el control (grupo I) y el experimental (grupo II). Los cuidadores del grupo I recibieron pautas generales, sin estandarización, mientras que los del grupo II recibieron pautas sistematizadas por el investigador. Al final, la ocurrencia de infecciones entre los dos grupos fue analizada por un infectólogo que no conocía la asignación de pacientes en los grupos. Se evaluaron 47 pacientes del grupo I convencional y 28 del grupo II experimental. Las infecciones se observaron durante todo el período de recolección de datos en ambos grupos y se diagnosticaron en un 48,9% en el grupo I y en un 17,9% en el grupo II, con una diferencia significativa entre ellas y un riesgo relativo de 2,7 para la ocurrencia de infección. Así, este estudio mostró una reducción en la ocurrencia de infecciones en el grupo que recibió orientación sistemática en relación al grupo que recibió orientación general, destacando la efectividad de esta estrategia.A assistência domiciliar é uma alternativa às internações hospitalares. Apesar dos múltiplos benefícios, ainda persiste a preocupação com o risco de infecções. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o impacto da orientação supervisionada aos cuidados dos pacientes internados no domicílio na prevenção de infecções, utilizando e comparando a estratégia convencional e a sistemática. Trata-se de um estudo experimental com pacientes em assistência domiciliar do serviço de Home Care de Cooperativa Médica em Sergipe entre maio de 2006 e abril de 2007. Os pacientes incluídos foram divididos em dois grupos, o controle (grupo I) e o experimental (grupo II). Os cuidadores do grupo I recebiam as orientações gerais, sem normatização, enquanto os do grupo II receberiam orientações sistematizadas pela pesquisadora. Ao final, foi analisada a ocorrência de infecções entre os dois grupos por infectologista que não tinha conhecimento acerca da alocação dos pacientes nos grupos. Foram avaliados 47 pacientes no grupo I, convencional, e 28 no grupo II, experimental. Foram observadas infecções durante todo o período da coleta de dados nos dois grupos e foram diagnosticadas em 48,9% no grupo I e 17,9% no grupo II, com diferença significante entre eles e risco relativo de 2,7 para ocorrência de infecção. Dessa forma, esse estudo evidenciou a redução na ocorrência de infecções no grupo que recebeu orientações sistemáticas em relação ao grupo que recebeu orientações gerais, constatando a eficácia dessa estratégia.Research, Society and Development2022-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2693610.33448/rsd-v11i4.26936Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e14111426936Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e14111426936Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e141114269362525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26936/23761Copyright (c) 2022 Juliana Oliveira Coutinho Coelho; Hyder Aragão de Melo; João Eduardo Andrade Tavares de Aguiar; Alexia Ferreira Rodrigues; Ângela Maria da Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho, Juliana Oliveira CoutinhoMelo, Hyder Aragão deAguiar, João Eduardo Andrade Tavares deRodrigues, Alexia FerreiraSilva, Ângela Maria da2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26936Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:44:50.235070Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care Impacto de la orientación del cuidador en la prevención de infecciones en la atención domiciliaria Impacto da orientação ao cuidador na prevenção de infecções na assistência domiciliar |
title |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care |
spellingShingle |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care Coelho, Juliana Oliveira Coutinho Infection control Caregivers Home care services. Control de infecciones Cuidadores Servicios de atención de salud a domicílio. Controle de infecções Cuidadores Serviços de assistência domiciliar. |
title_short |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care |
title_full |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care |
title_fullStr |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care |
title_sort |
Impact of caregiver guidance on infection prevention in home care |
author |
Coelho, Juliana Oliveira Coutinho |
author_facet |
Coelho, Juliana Oliveira Coutinho Melo, Hyder Aragão de Aguiar, João Eduardo Andrade Tavares de Rodrigues, Alexia Ferreira Silva, Ângela Maria da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Melo, Hyder Aragão de Aguiar, João Eduardo Andrade Tavares de Rodrigues, Alexia Ferreira Silva, Ângela Maria da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coelho, Juliana Oliveira Coutinho Melo, Hyder Aragão de Aguiar, João Eduardo Andrade Tavares de Rodrigues, Alexia Ferreira Silva, Ângela Maria da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Infection control Caregivers Home care services. Control de infecciones Cuidadores Servicios de atención de salud a domicílio. Controle de infecções Cuidadores Serviços de assistência domiciliar. |
topic |
Infection control Caregivers Home care services. Control de infecciones Cuidadores Servicios de atención de salud a domicílio. Controle de infecções Cuidadores Serviços de assistência domiciliar. |
description |
Home care is an alternative to hospital admissions. Despite the multiple benefits, concerns about the risk of infections persist. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of supervised guidance on the care of patients hospitalized at home on the prevention of infections, using and comparing the conventional and systematic strategies. This is an experimental study with home care patients at Home Care service of a Medical Cooperative from Sergipe between May 2006 and April 2007. The patients included were divided into two groups, the control (group I) and the experimental (group II). Caregivers in group I received general guidelines, without standardization, while those in group II received guidelines systematized by the researcher. At the end, the occurrence of infections between the two groups was analyzed by an infectologist who was not aware of the allocation of patients in the groups. Forty-seven patients in group I, conventional, and 28 in group II, experimental, were evaluated. Infections were observed throughout the period of data collection in both groups and were diagnosed in 48.9% in group I and 17.9% in group II, with a significant difference between them and a relative risk of 2.7 for the occurrence of infection. Thus, this study showed a reduction in the occurrence of infections in the group that received systematic guidance in relation to the group that received general guidance, noting the effectiveness of this strategy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26936 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26936 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26936 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.26936 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26936/23761 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e14111426936 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e14111426936 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e14111426936 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052706279391232 |