Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brozoski, Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Grillo, Ricardo, Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da, Lucamba, Agnelo, Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807
Resumo: This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing different databases and discussing the advantages, disadvantages, and specific features of each one. A bibliographical search for oral and maxillofacial surgery literature was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Seven different search strategies were used on each database. VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel were used for tabulation and data visualization. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. A table comparing the number of articles obtained during seven different literature searches was created. A correlogram created in RStudio showed the correlation between the number of articles in the different databases evaluated. The functionalities of each database were compared. It is recommended to use more than one database when searching for literature related to surgery. Among the analyzed databases, PubMed stands out for its functionalities, precision, and quantity of available articles.
id UNIFEI_79fb0a7b147fd5ec9b2c69b3d647f902
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34807
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literatureComparación de las características de las bases de datos bibliográficas sobre la literatura de cirugía oral y maxilofacialComparação das características das plataformas bibliográficas em relação à literatura de cirurgia oral e maxilofacialBibliometríaLesiones maxilofacialesCirugía, oralAmeloblastomaCirugía ortognática.BibliometriaTraumatismos maxilofaciaisCirurgia bucalAmeloblastomaCirurgia ortognática.BibliometricsMaxillofacial InjuriesSurgery, OralAmeloblastomaOrthognathic surgery.This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing different databases and discussing the advantages, disadvantages, and specific features of each one. A bibliographical search for oral and maxillofacial surgery literature was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Seven different search strategies were used on each database. VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel were used for tabulation and data visualization. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. A table comparing the number of articles obtained during seven different literature searches was created. A correlogram created in RStudio showed the correlation between the number of articles in the different databases evaluated. The functionalities of each database were compared. It is recommended to use more than one database when searching for literature related to surgery. Among the analyzed databases, PubMed stands out for its functionalities, precision, and quantity of available articles.El objetivo de este trabajo es realizar un análisis bibliométrico de la literatura sobre cirugía oral y maxilofacial, comparando diferentes bases de datos y discutiendo las ventajas, desventajas y características específicas de cada una. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de la literatura de cirugía oral y maxilofacial en Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS y Google Scholar. Se utilizaron siete estrategias de búsqueda diferentes en cada base de datos. Se utilizaron VOSViewer y Microsoft Excel para la tabulación y visualización de los datos. Se realizaron algunas pruebas estadísticas con un intervalo de confianza del 95%, que se consideró significativo. Se creó una tabla que compara el número de artículos obtenidos durante siete búsquedas bibliográficas diferentes. Un correlograma creado en RStudio mostró la correlación entre el número de artículos en las diferentes bases de datos evaluadas. Se compararon las funcionalidades de cada base de datos. Se recomienda utilizar más de una base de datos cuando se busque literatura relacionada con la cirugía. Entre las bases de datos analizadas, PubMed destaca por sus funcionalidades, precisión y cantidad de artículos disponibles.Este trabalho tem como objetivo fornecer uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre cirurgia oral e maxilofacial, comparando diferentes bancos de dados e discutindo as vantagens, desvantagens e características específicas de cada um deles. Uma pesquisa bibliográfica da literatura sobre cirurgia bucomaxilofacial foi realizada em Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, e Google Scholar. Sete diferentes estratégias de busca foram usadas em cada banco de dados. VOSViewer e Microsoft Excel foram usados para tabulação e visualização de dados. Alguns testes estatísticos foram realizados com um intervalo de confiança de 95%, o que foi considerado significativo. Foi criada uma tabela comparando o número de artigos obtidos durante sete diferentes pesquisas bibliográficas. Um correlograma criado no RStudio mostrou a correlação entre o número de artigos nas diferentes bases de dados avaliadas. As funcionalidades de cada base de dados foram comparadas. Recomenda-se a utilização de mais de uma base de dados na busca de literatura relacionada à cirurgia. Entre as bases de dados analisadas, o PubMed se destaca por suas funcionalidades, precisão e quantidade de artigos disponíveis.Research, Society and Development2022-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3480710.33448/rsd-v11i12.34807Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e331111234807Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e331111234807Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e3311112348072525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807/29126Copyright (c) 2022 Mariana Brozoski; Ricardo Grillo; Yuri Slusarenko da Silva; Agnelo Lucamba; Maria da Graça Naclério-Homemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrozoski, MarianaGrillo, RicardoSilva, Yuri Slusarenko da Lucamba, AgneloNaclério-Homem, Maria da Graça2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34807Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:49:57.699412Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
Comparación de las características de las bases de datos bibliográficas sobre la literatura de cirugía oral y maxilofacial
Comparação das características das plataformas bibliográficas em relação à literatura de cirurgia oral e maxilofacial
title Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
spellingShingle Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
Brozoski, Mariana
Bibliometría
Lesiones maxilofaciales
Cirugía, oral
Ameloblastoma
Cirugía ortognática.
Bibliometria
Traumatismos maxilofaciais
Cirurgia bucal
Ameloblastoma
Cirurgia ortognática.
Bibliometrics
Maxillofacial Injuries
Surgery, Oral
Ameloblastoma
Orthognathic surgery.
title_short Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
title_full Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
title_fullStr Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
title_sort Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
author Brozoski, Mariana
author_facet Brozoski, Mariana
Grillo, Ricardo
Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da
Lucamba, Agnelo
Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça
author_role author
author2 Grillo, Ricardo
Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da
Lucamba, Agnelo
Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brozoski, Mariana
Grillo, Ricardo
Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da
Lucamba, Agnelo
Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bibliometría
Lesiones maxilofaciales
Cirugía, oral
Ameloblastoma
Cirugía ortognática.
Bibliometria
Traumatismos maxilofaciais
Cirurgia bucal
Ameloblastoma
Cirurgia ortognática.
Bibliometrics
Maxillofacial Injuries
Surgery, Oral
Ameloblastoma
Orthognathic surgery.
topic Bibliometría
Lesiones maxilofaciales
Cirugía, oral
Ameloblastoma
Cirugía ortognática.
Bibliometria
Traumatismos maxilofaciais
Cirurgia bucal
Ameloblastoma
Cirurgia ortognática.
Bibliometrics
Maxillofacial Injuries
Surgery, Oral
Ameloblastoma
Orthognathic surgery.
description This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing different databases and discussing the advantages, disadvantages, and specific features of each one. A bibliographical search for oral and maxillofacial surgery literature was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Seven different search strategies were used on each database. VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel were used for tabulation and data visualization. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. A table comparing the number of articles obtained during seven different literature searches was created. A correlogram created in RStudio showed the correlation between the number of articles in the different databases evaluated. The functionalities of each database were compared. It is recommended to use more than one database when searching for literature related to surgery. Among the analyzed databases, PubMed stands out for its functionalities, precision, and quantity of available articles.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34807
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34807
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807/29126
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e331111234807
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e331111234807
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e331111234807
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052723698335744