Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing different databases and discussing the advantages, disadvantages, and specific features of each one. A bibliographical search for oral and maxillofacial surgery literature was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Seven different search strategies were used on each database. VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel were used for tabulation and data visualization. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. A table comparing the number of articles obtained during seven different literature searches was created. A correlogram created in RStudio showed the correlation between the number of articles in the different databases evaluated. The functionalities of each database were compared. It is recommended to use more than one database when searching for literature related to surgery. Among the analyzed databases, PubMed stands out for its functionalities, precision, and quantity of available articles. |
id |
UNIFEI_79fb0a7b147fd5ec9b2c69b3d647f902 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34807 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literatureComparación de las características de las bases de datos bibliográficas sobre la literatura de cirugía oral y maxilofacialComparação das características das plataformas bibliográficas em relação à literatura de cirurgia oral e maxilofacialBibliometríaLesiones maxilofacialesCirugía, oralAmeloblastomaCirugía ortognática.BibliometriaTraumatismos maxilofaciaisCirurgia bucalAmeloblastomaCirurgia ortognática.BibliometricsMaxillofacial InjuriesSurgery, OralAmeloblastomaOrthognathic surgery.This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing different databases and discussing the advantages, disadvantages, and specific features of each one. A bibliographical search for oral and maxillofacial surgery literature was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Seven different search strategies were used on each database. VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel were used for tabulation and data visualization. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. A table comparing the number of articles obtained during seven different literature searches was created. A correlogram created in RStudio showed the correlation between the number of articles in the different databases evaluated. The functionalities of each database were compared. It is recommended to use more than one database when searching for literature related to surgery. Among the analyzed databases, PubMed stands out for its functionalities, precision, and quantity of available articles.El objetivo de este trabajo es realizar un análisis bibliométrico de la literatura sobre cirugía oral y maxilofacial, comparando diferentes bases de datos y discutiendo las ventajas, desventajas y características específicas de cada una. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de la literatura de cirugía oral y maxilofacial en Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS y Google Scholar. Se utilizaron siete estrategias de búsqueda diferentes en cada base de datos. Se utilizaron VOSViewer y Microsoft Excel para la tabulación y visualización de los datos. Se realizaron algunas pruebas estadísticas con un intervalo de confianza del 95%, que se consideró significativo. Se creó una tabla que compara el número de artículos obtenidos durante siete búsquedas bibliográficas diferentes. Un correlograma creado en RStudio mostró la correlación entre el número de artículos en las diferentes bases de datos evaluadas. Se compararon las funcionalidades de cada base de datos. Se recomienda utilizar más de una base de datos cuando se busque literatura relacionada con la cirugía. Entre las bases de datos analizadas, PubMed destaca por sus funcionalidades, precisión y cantidad de artículos disponibles.Este trabalho tem como objetivo fornecer uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre cirurgia oral e maxilofacial, comparando diferentes bancos de dados e discutindo as vantagens, desvantagens e características específicas de cada um deles. Uma pesquisa bibliográfica da literatura sobre cirurgia bucomaxilofacial foi realizada em Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, e Google Scholar. Sete diferentes estratégias de busca foram usadas em cada banco de dados. VOSViewer e Microsoft Excel foram usados para tabulação e visualização de dados. Alguns testes estatísticos foram realizados com um intervalo de confiança de 95%, o que foi considerado significativo. Foi criada uma tabela comparando o número de artigos obtidos durante sete diferentes pesquisas bibliográficas. Um correlograma criado no RStudio mostrou a correlação entre o número de artigos nas diferentes bases de dados avaliadas. As funcionalidades de cada base de dados foram comparadas. Recomenda-se a utilização de mais de uma base de dados na busca de literatura relacionada à cirurgia. Entre as bases de dados analisadas, o PubMed se destaca por suas funcionalidades, precisão e quantidade de artigos disponíveis.Research, Society and Development2022-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3480710.33448/rsd-v11i12.34807Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e331111234807Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e331111234807Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e3311112348072525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807/29126Copyright (c) 2022 Mariana Brozoski; Ricardo Grillo; Yuri Slusarenko da Silva; Agnelo Lucamba; Maria da Graça Naclério-Homemhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrozoski, MarianaGrillo, RicardoSilva, Yuri Slusarenko da Lucamba, AgneloNaclério-Homem, Maria da Graça2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34807Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:49:57.699412Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature Comparación de las características de las bases de datos bibliográficas sobre la literatura de cirugía oral y maxilofacial Comparação das características das plataformas bibliográficas em relação à literatura de cirurgia oral e maxilofacial |
title |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature Brozoski, Mariana Bibliometría Lesiones maxilofaciales Cirugía, oral Ameloblastoma Cirugía ortognática. Bibliometria Traumatismos maxilofaciais Cirurgia bucal Ameloblastoma Cirurgia ortognática. Bibliometrics Maxillofacial Injuries Surgery, Oral Ameloblastoma Orthognathic surgery. |
title_short |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature |
title_full |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature |
title_sort |
Comparison of bibliographic databases features regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery literature |
author |
Brozoski, Mariana |
author_facet |
Brozoski, Mariana Grillo, Ricardo Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da Lucamba, Agnelo Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grillo, Ricardo Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da Lucamba, Agnelo Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brozoski, Mariana Grillo, Ricardo Silva, Yuri Slusarenko da Lucamba, Agnelo Naclério-Homem, Maria da Graça |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bibliometría Lesiones maxilofaciales Cirugía, oral Ameloblastoma Cirugía ortognática. Bibliometria Traumatismos maxilofaciais Cirurgia bucal Ameloblastoma Cirurgia ortognática. Bibliometrics Maxillofacial Injuries Surgery, Oral Ameloblastoma Orthognathic surgery. |
topic |
Bibliometría Lesiones maxilofaciales Cirugía, oral Ameloblastoma Cirugía ortognática. Bibliometria Traumatismos maxilofaciais Cirurgia bucal Ameloblastoma Cirurgia ortognática. Bibliometrics Maxillofacial Injuries Surgery, Oral Ameloblastoma Orthognathic surgery. |
description |
This paper aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing different databases and discussing the advantages, disadvantages, and specific features of each one. A bibliographical search for oral and maxillofacial surgery literature was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar. Seven different search strategies were used on each database. VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel were used for tabulation and data visualization. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. A table comparing the number of articles obtained during seven different literature searches was created. A correlogram created in RStudio showed the correlation between the number of articles in the different databases evaluated. The functionalities of each database were compared. It is recommended to use more than one database when searching for literature related to surgery. Among the analyzed databases, PubMed stands out for its functionalities, precision, and quantity of available articles. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34807 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34807 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34807/29126 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e331111234807 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e331111234807 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e331111234807 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052723698335744 |