One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas, Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva, Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes, Nogueira, Hyago Pires, Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409
Resumo: During the passage of time, it is necessary for a legal system to introduce structural reforms, given the maximum   effectiveness of Law. And, among the main reforms proposed to the Brazilian order, there is the tax reform, represented, above all, by the PEC 45/2019. Several points are innovative, such as the adoption of the Value Added Tax (VAT) - renamed Tax on Goods and Services (IBS) - on consumer goods, in the three federal spheres, the basis of which comes from five other taxes: Tax on Industrialized Products ( IPI), Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS), Tax on Services (ISS), Contribution to the Financing of Social Security (Cofins) and Social Integration Program (PIS); having specific rates for each federative entity and abolition of taxes such as the Tax on Financial Operations (IOF). However, would the creation or abolition of these taxes be positive or negative for the fiscal decentralization proposed in the 1988 Charter? An unsolvable dichotomy. Despite the selective rates for the three federative entities (Union, States and Municipalities), the Reform intends to create a central body, whose character would be to inspect such rates according to the total. There is, therefore, a paradox: between one and triune. Based on such affirmative assumptions, this article will have an exploratory character, with deduction as a method and data collection extracted from documents, bibliography and data taken from administrative bodies.
id UNIFEI_80a6bb11f043297bfb3b507ca40ec5fd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16409
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralizationUno o Trino: Los (posibles) impactos del PEC 45/2019 en la descentralización fiscal brasileñaUno ou Trino: Os (possíveis) impactos da PEC 45/2019 na descentralização fiscal brasileiraDescentralizaciónRemodelaciónImpuestos.DescentralizaçãoReformaTributos.DecentralizationRemodelingTaxes.During the passage of time, it is necessary for a legal system to introduce structural reforms, given the maximum   effectiveness of Law. And, among the main reforms proposed to the Brazilian order, there is the tax reform, represented, above all, by the PEC 45/2019. Several points are innovative, such as the adoption of the Value Added Tax (VAT) - renamed Tax on Goods and Services (IBS) - on consumer goods, in the three federal spheres, the basis of which comes from five other taxes: Tax on Industrialized Products ( IPI), Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS), Tax on Services (ISS), Contribution to the Financing of Social Security (Cofins) and Social Integration Program (PIS); having specific rates for each federative entity and abolition of taxes such as the Tax on Financial Operations (IOF). However, would the creation or abolition of these taxes be positive or negative for the fiscal decentralization proposed in the 1988 Charter? An unsolvable dichotomy. Despite the selective rates for the three federative entities (Union, States and Municipalities), the Reform intends to create a central body, whose character would be to inspect such rates according to the total. There is, therefore, a paradox: between one and triune. Based on such affirmative assumptions, this article will have an exploratory character, with deduction as a method and data collection extracted from documents, bibliography and data taken from administrative bodies.Con el paso del tiempo, es necesario que un sistema legal introduzca reformas estructurales, en vista de la máxima efectividad de la Ley. Y, entre las principales reformas propuestas al orden brasileño, está la reforma tributaria, representada, sobre todo, por el PEC 45/2019. Varios puntos son innovadores, como la adopción del Impuesto al Valor Agregado (IVA) - rebautizado como Impuesto sobre Bienes y Servicios (IBS) - sobre bienes de consumo, en los tres ámbitos federales, cuya base proviene de otros cinco impuestos: Productos Industrializados (IPI), Impuesto a la Circulación de Bienes y Servicios (ICMS), Impuesto a los Servicios (ISS), Contribución al Financiamiento de la Seguridad Social (Cofins) y Programa de Integración Social (PIS); teniendo tasas específicas para cada entidad federativa y abolición de impuestos como el Impuesto a las Operaciones Financieras (IOF). Sin embargo, ¿la creación o abolición de estos impuestos sería positiva o negativa para la descentralización fiscal propuesta en la Carta de 1988? Una dicotomía irresoluble. A pesar de las tarifas selectivas para las tres entidades federativas (Unión, Estados y Municipios), la Reforma pretende crear un organismo central, cuyo carácter sería inspeccionar dichas tarifas según el total. Existe, por tanto, una paradoja: entre uno y trino. En base a tales supuestos afirmativos, este artículo tendrá un carácter exploratorio, con deducción como método y recolección de datos extraídos de documentos, bibliografía y datos extraídos de órganos administrativos.Durante o transcorrer do tempo, faz-se mister a um sistema jurídico instaurar reformas estruturantes, vista a máxima efetividade do Direito. E, dentre as principais reformas propostas ao ordenamento brasileiro, encontra-se a reforma tributária, representada, sobretudo, pela PEC 45/2019. Diversos pontos são inovadores, como a adoção do Imposto de Valor Agregado (IVA) — renomeado Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços (IBS) — sobre bens de consumo, nos três âmbitos federais, cuja base provém de outros cinco impostos: Imposto sobre  Produtos Industrializados (IPI), Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (ICMS), Imposto sobre Serviços (ISS), Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social (Cofins) e Programa de Integração Social (PIS); tendo alíquotas específicas para cada ente federativo e abolição de tributos como o Imposto sobre Operação Financeira (IOF). Entretanto, a criação ou abolição desses tributos seria positiva ou negativa para descentralização fiscal proposta na Carta de 1988? Uma dicotomia insolucionável. Apesar das alíquotas seletivas para os três entes federativos (União, Estados e Municípios), a Reforma pretende criar um órgão central, cujo caráter seria fiscalizar tais alíquotas conforme a total. Encontra-se, sendo assim, um paradoxo: entre uno e trino. Baseando-se em tais pressupostos afirmativos, o presente artigo terá um caráter exploratório, tendo a dedução como método e a coleta de dados extraída de documentos, bibliografia e dados retirados de órgãos administrativos.Research, Society and Development2021-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1640910.33448/rsd-v10i7.16409Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e53010716409Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e53010716409Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e530107164092525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409/15093Copyright (c) 2021 Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Lima; Francisco das Chagas Bezerra Neto; José Cândido da Silva Nóbrega; Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Monteiro; Hyago Pires Nogueira; Lorena Araújo Rolim Moreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Bezerra Neto, Francisco das ChagasNóbrega, José Cândido da SilvaMonteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Nogueira, Hyago Pires Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim 2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16409Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:57.876391Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
Uno o Trino: Los (posibles) impactos del PEC 45/2019 en la descentralización fiscal brasileña
Uno ou Trino: Os (possíveis) impactos da PEC 45/2019 na descentralização fiscal brasileira
title One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
spellingShingle One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida
Descentralización
Remodelación
Impuestos.
Descentralização
Reforma
Tributos.
Decentralization
Remodeling
Taxes.
title_short One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
title_full One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
title_fullStr One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
title_full_unstemmed One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
title_sort One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
author Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida
author_facet Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida
Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas
Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva
Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes
Nogueira, Hyago Pires
Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim
author_role author
author2 Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas
Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva
Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes
Nogueira, Hyago Pires
Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida
Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas
Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva
Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes
Nogueira, Hyago Pires
Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Descentralización
Remodelación
Impuestos.
Descentralização
Reforma
Tributos.
Decentralization
Remodeling
Taxes.
topic Descentralización
Remodelación
Impuestos.
Descentralização
Reforma
Tributos.
Decentralization
Remodeling
Taxes.
description During the passage of time, it is necessary for a legal system to introduce structural reforms, given the maximum   effectiveness of Law. And, among the main reforms proposed to the Brazilian order, there is the tax reform, represented, above all, by the PEC 45/2019. Several points are innovative, such as the adoption of the Value Added Tax (VAT) - renamed Tax on Goods and Services (IBS) - on consumer goods, in the three federal spheres, the basis of which comes from five other taxes: Tax on Industrialized Products ( IPI), Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS), Tax on Services (ISS), Contribution to the Financing of Social Security (Cofins) and Social Integration Program (PIS); having specific rates for each federative entity and abolition of taxes such as the Tax on Financial Operations (IOF). However, would the creation or abolition of these taxes be positive or negative for the fiscal decentralization proposed in the 1988 Charter? An unsolvable dichotomy. Despite the selective rates for the three federative entities (Union, States and Municipalities), the Reform intends to create a central body, whose character would be to inspect such rates according to the total. There is, therefore, a paradox: between one and triune. Based on such affirmative assumptions, this article will have an exploratory character, with deduction as a method and data collection extracted from documents, bibliography and data taken from administrative bodies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16409
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16409
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409/15093
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e53010716409
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e53010716409
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e53010716409
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052679750418432