One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409 |
Resumo: | During the passage of time, it is necessary for a legal system to introduce structural reforms, given the maximum effectiveness of Law. And, among the main reforms proposed to the Brazilian order, there is the tax reform, represented, above all, by the PEC 45/2019. Several points are innovative, such as the adoption of the Value Added Tax (VAT) - renamed Tax on Goods and Services (IBS) - on consumer goods, in the three federal spheres, the basis of which comes from five other taxes: Tax on Industrialized Products ( IPI), Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS), Tax on Services (ISS), Contribution to the Financing of Social Security (Cofins) and Social Integration Program (PIS); having specific rates for each federative entity and abolition of taxes such as the Tax on Financial Operations (IOF). However, would the creation or abolition of these taxes be positive or negative for the fiscal decentralization proposed in the 1988 Charter? An unsolvable dichotomy. Despite the selective rates for the three federative entities (Union, States and Municipalities), the Reform intends to create a central body, whose character would be to inspect such rates according to the total. There is, therefore, a paradox: between one and triune. Based on such affirmative assumptions, this article will have an exploratory character, with deduction as a method and data collection extracted from documents, bibliography and data taken from administrative bodies. |
id |
UNIFEI_80a6bb11f043297bfb3b507ca40ec5fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16409 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralizationUno o Trino: Los (posibles) impactos del PEC 45/2019 en la descentralización fiscal brasileñaUno ou Trino: Os (possíveis) impactos da PEC 45/2019 na descentralização fiscal brasileiraDescentralizaciónRemodelaciónImpuestos.DescentralizaçãoReformaTributos.DecentralizationRemodelingTaxes.During the passage of time, it is necessary for a legal system to introduce structural reforms, given the maximum effectiveness of Law. And, among the main reforms proposed to the Brazilian order, there is the tax reform, represented, above all, by the PEC 45/2019. Several points are innovative, such as the adoption of the Value Added Tax (VAT) - renamed Tax on Goods and Services (IBS) - on consumer goods, in the three federal spheres, the basis of which comes from five other taxes: Tax on Industrialized Products ( IPI), Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS), Tax on Services (ISS), Contribution to the Financing of Social Security (Cofins) and Social Integration Program (PIS); having specific rates for each federative entity and abolition of taxes such as the Tax on Financial Operations (IOF). However, would the creation or abolition of these taxes be positive or negative for the fiscal decentralization proposed in the 1988 Charter? An unsolvable dichotomy. Despite the selective rates for the three federative entities (Union, States and Municipalities), the Reform intends to create a central body, whose character would be to inspect such rates according to the total. There is, therefore, a paradox: between one and triune. Based on such affirmative assumptions, this article will have an exploratory character, with deduction as a method and data collection extracted from documents, bibliography and data taken from administrative bodies.Con el paso del tiempo, es necesario que un sistema legal introduzca reformas estructurales, en vista de la máxima efectividad de la Ley. Y, entre las principales reformas propuestas al orden brasileño, está la reforma tributaria, representada, sobre todo, por el PEC 45/2019. Varios puntos son innovadores, como la adopción del Impuesto al Valor Agregado (IVA) - rebautizado como Impuesto sobre Bienes y Servicios (IBS) - sobre bienes de consumo, en los tres ámbitos federales, cuya base proviene de otros cinco impuestos: Productos Industrializados (IPI), Impuesto a la Circulación de Bienes y Servicios (ICMS), Impuesto a los Servicios (ISS), Contribución al Financiamiento de la Seguridad Social (Cofins) y Programa de Integración Social (PIS); teniendo tasas específicas para cada entidad federativa y abolición de impuestos como el Impuesto a las Operaciones Financieras (IOF). Sin embargo, ¿la creación o abolición de estos impuestos sería positiva o negativa para la descentralización fiscal propuesta en la Carta de 1988? Una dicotomía irresoluble. A pesar de las tarifas selectivas para las tres entidades federativas (Unión, Estados y Municipios), la Reforma pretende crear un organismo central, cuyo carácter sería inspeccionar dichas tarifas según el total. Existe, por tanto, una paradoja: entre uno y trino. En base a tales supuestos afirmativos, este artículo tendrá un carácter exploratorio, con deducción como método y recolección de datos extraídos de documentos, bibliografía y datos extraídos de órganos administrativos.Durante o transcorrer do tempo, faz-se mister a um sistema jurídico instaurar reformas estruturantes, vista a máxima efetividade do Direito. E, dentre as principais reformas propostas ao ordenamento brasileiro, encontra-se a reforma tributária, representada, sobretudo, pela PEC 45/2019. Diversos pontos são inovadores, como a adoção do Imposto de Valor Agregado (IVA) — renomeado Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços (IBS) — sobre bens de consumo, nos três âmbitos federais, cuja base provém de outros cinco impostos: Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados (IPI), Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços (ICMS), Imposto sobre Serviços (ISS), Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social (Cofins) e Programa de Integração Social (PIS); tendo alíquotas específicas para cada ente federativo e abolição de tributos como o Imposto sobre Operação Financeira (IOF). Entretanto, a criação ou abolição desses tributos seria positiva ou negativa para descentralização fiscal proposta na Carta de 1988? Uma dicotomia insolucionável. Apesar das alíquotas seletivas para os três entes federativos (União, Estados e Municípios), a Reforma pretende criar um órgão central, cujo caráter seria fiscalizar tais alíquotas conforme a total. Encontra-se, sendo assim, um paradoxo: entre uno e trino. Baseando-se em tais pressupostos afirmativos, o presente artigo terá um caráter exploratório, tendo a dedução como método e a coleta de dados extraída de documentos, bibliografia e dados retirados de órgãos administrativos.Research, Society and Development2021-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1640910.33448/rsd-v10i7.16409Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e53010716409Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e53010716409Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e530107164092525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409/15093Copyright (c) 2021 Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Lima; Francisco das Chagas Bezerra Neto; José Cândido da Silva Nóbrega; Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Monteiro; Hyago Pires Nogueira; Lorena Araújo Rolim Moreirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Bezerra Neto, Francisco das ChagasNóbrega, José Cândido da SilvaMonteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Nogueira, Hyago Pires Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim 2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16409Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:57.876391Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization Uno o Trino: Los (posibles) impactos del PEC 45/2019 en la descentralización fiscal brasileña Uno ou Trino: Os (possíveis) impactos da PEC 45/2019 na descentralização fiscal brasileira |
title |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization |
spellingShingle |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Descentralización Remodelación Impuestos. Descentralização Reforma Tributos. Decentralization Remodeling Taxes. |
title_short |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization |
title_full |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization |
title_fullStr |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization |
title_full_unstemmed |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization |
title_sort |
One or Trine: The (possible) impacts of the PEC 45/2019 on Brazilian fiscal decentralization |
author |
Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida |
author_facet |
Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Nogueira, Hyago Pires Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Nogueira, Hyago Pires Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Mateus Ferreira de Almeida Bezerra Neto, Francisco das Chagas Nóbrega, José Cândido da Silva Monteiro, Auzenir de Oliveira Abrantes Nogueira, Hyago Pires Moreira, Lorena Araújo Rolim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Descentralización Remodelación Impuestos. Descentralização Reforma Tributos. Decentralization Remodeling Taxes. |
topic |
Descentralización Remodelación Impuestos. Descentralização Reforma Tributos. Decentralization Remodeling Taxes. |
description |
During the passage of time, it is necessary for a legal system to introduce structural reforms, given the maximum effectiveness of Law. And, among the main reforms proposed to the Brazilian order, there is the tax reform, represented, above all, by the PEC 45/2019. Several points are innovative, such as the adoption of the Value Added Tax (VAT) - renamed Tax on Goods and Services (IBS) - on consumer goods, in the three federal spheres, the basis of which comes from five other taxes: Tax on Industrialized Products ( IPI), Tax on Circulation of Goods and Services (ICMS), Tax on Services (ISS), Contribution to the Financing of Social Security (Cofins) and Social Integration Program (PIS); having specific rates for each federative entity and abolition of taxes such as the Tax on Financial Operations (IOF). However, would the creation or abolition of these taxes be positive or negative for the fiscal decentralization proposed in the 1988 Charter? An unsolvable dichotomy. Despite the selective rates for the three federative entities (Union, States and Municipalities), the Reform intends to create a central body, whose character would be to inspect such rates according to the total. There is, therefore, a paradox: between one and triune. Based on such affirmative assumptions, this article will have an exploratory character, with deduction as a method and data collection extracted from documents, bibliography and data taken from administrative bodies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16409 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16409 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16409/15093 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e53010716409 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e53010716409 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e53010716409 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052679750418432 |