Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1905 |
Resumo: | The objective of the research was to identify the profile of childbirth care in a usual risk maternity hospital in the centre of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. This is a cross-sectional study that investigated the labour’s duration, the use of technologies, the type of delivery and interventions. Data are from a patient record book in the approximate period of 7 months of the year 2017, composing a total of 485 birth deliveries analyzed from IBM SPSS version 23 software. A cross-table was made, applying the Qui-square test and identifying the statistically significant differences, with results with value p<0,05. The results indicate that there is an association between the type of delivery and the use of medical interventions during labour (p<0,001). In the delivery types cesarean section (PC) and vaginal birth with episiotomy (PNE), the percentages come close to 90% with the use of medical interventions. As for normal delivery (PN) and normal delivery with laceration (PNL), these percentages reduce to less than 50%. It is concluded that the deliveries type PNL and PN are accompanied, most of the times, by obstetric nurses, and that minimizes the use of interventions. The deliveries type PNE and PC are attended by physicians, who maintain more interventive approaches. These data are important for the professionals’ reflection and allow to outline strategies to qualify the assistance. |
id |
UNIFEI_80c4c449f685d83cbd41e97535ae7b7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1905 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventionsPerfil de atenção ao parto em maternidade de risco habitual: tipo de parto e intervençõesEnfermagem ObstétricaBoas práticasParturiente.Obstetric NursingGood PracticesParturient.The objective of the research was to identify the profile of childbirth care in a usual risk maternity hospital in the centre of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. This is a cross-sectional study that investigated the labour’s duration, the use of technologies, the type of delivery and interventions. Data are from a patient record book in the approximate period of 7 months of the year 2017, composing a total of 485 birth deliveries analyzed from IBM SPSS version 23 software. A cross-table was made, applying the Qui-square test and identifying the statistically significant differences, with results with value p<0,05. The results indicate that there is an association between the type of delivery and the use of medical interventions during labour (p<0,001). In the delivery types cesarean section (PC) and vaginal birth with episiotomy (PNE), the percentages come close to 90% with the use of medical interventions. As for normal delivery (PN) and normal delivery with laceration (PNL), these percentages reduce to less than 50%. It is concluded that the deliveries type PNL and PN are accompanied, most of the times, by obstetric nurses, and that minimizes the use of interventions. The deliveries type PNE and PC are attended by physicians, who maintain more interventive approaches. These data are important for the professionals’ reflection and allow to outline strategies to qualify the assistance.Este estudo objetivou identificar o perfil de atenção ao parto em uma maternidade de risco habitual de um hospital no centro do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, com ênfase no tipo de parto e intervenções realizadas. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de delineamento transversal, foram investigados tempo de trabalho de parto, uso de tecnologias, tipo de parto, intervenções realizadas. Os dados são de um livro de registros das pacientes internadas no período aproximado de 7 meses do ano de 2017, perfazendo 485 partos analisados a partir do software IBM SPSS versão 23. Foi construída uma tabela de valores cruzados, aplicado teste do Qui-quadrado e identificado as diferenças significativas, com resultados com valor p< 0,05. Os resultados apontam que existe associação entre os tipos de parto e o uso das intervenções médicas no trabalho de parto (p < 0,001). Nos partos do tipo parto cesáreo (PC) e parto normal com episiotomia (PNE) os percentuais chegam próximos a 90% com o uso de intervenções médicas. Já nos tipos parto normal (PN) e parto normal com laceração (PNL) estes percentuais reduzem para menos de 50%. Conclui-se que os partos do tipo PNL e PN são acompanhados, na maioria das vezes, por enfermeiras obstetras, o que minimiza o uso de intervenções. Já os partos do tipo e os PNE e PC são atendidos por profissionais médicos, que mantém condutas mais interventivas. Esses dados são importantes para a reflexão dos profissionais e permitem delinear estratégias para qualificar a assistência.Research, Society and Development2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/190510.33448/rsd-v9i2.1905Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 2; e176921905Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 2; e176921905Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 2; e1769219052525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1905/1818Copyright (c) 2020 Claudia Maria G Diaz, Andressa Avila Melo, CRISTINA SALING KRUEL, Claudia Zamberlan, Bibiana Antunes, Clandio Timm Marques, Gabriel Bloedow da Silveira, Bruno Figueiró Pinheiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Andressa AvilaDiaz, Claudia Maria GabertZamberlan, ClaudiaAntunes, BibianaMarques, Clandio TimmSilveira, Gabriel Bloedow daPinheiro, Bruno FigueiróKruel, Cristina Saling2020-08-20T18:08:48Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1905Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:46.246066Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions Perfil de atenção ao parto em maternidade de risco habitual: tipo de parto e intervenções |
title |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions |
spellingShingle |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions Melo, Andressa Avila Enfermagem Obstétrica Boas práticas Parturiente. Obstetric Nursing Good Practices Parturient. |
title_short |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions |
title_full |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions |
title_fullStr |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions |
title_sort |
Childbirth care profile in a usual risk maternity hospital: type of delivery and interventions |
author |
Melo, Andressa Avila |
author_facet |
Melo, Andressa Avila Diaz, Claudia Maria Gabert Zamberlan, Claudia Antunes, Bibiana Marques, Clandio Timm Silveira, Gabriel Bloedow da Pinheiro, Bruno Figueiró Kruel, Cristina Saling |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Diaz, Claudia Maria Gabert Zamberlan, Claudia Antunes, Bibiana Marques, Clandio Timm Silveira, Gabriel Bloedow da Pinheiro, Bruno Figueiró Kruel, Cristina Saling |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Andressa Avila Diaz, Claudia Maria Gabert Zamberlan, Claudia Antunes, Bibiana Marques, Clandio Timm Silveira, Gabriel Bloedow da Pinheiro, Bruno Figueiró Kruel, Cristina Saling |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Enfermagem Obstétrica Boas práticas Parturiente. Obstetric Nursing Good Practices Parturient. |
topic |
Enfermagem Obstétrica Boas práticas Parturiente. Obstetric Nursing Good Practices Parturient. |
description |
The objective of the research was to identify the profile of childbirth care in a usual risk maternity hospital in the centre of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. This is a cross-sectional study that investigated the labour’s duration, the use of technologies, the type of delivery and interventions. Data are from a patient record book in the approximate period of 7 months of the year 2017, composing a total of 485 birth deliveries analyzed from IBM SPSS version 23 software. A cross-table was made, applying the Qui-square test and identifying the statistically significant differences, with results with value p<0,05. The results indicate that there is an association between the type of delivery and the use of medical interventions during labour (p<0,001). In the delivery types cesarean section (PC) and vaginal birth with episiotomy (PNE), the percentages come close to 90% with the use of medical interventions. As for normal delivery (PN) and normal delivery with laceration (PNL), these percentages reduce to less than 50%. It is concluded that the deliveries type PNL and PN are accompanied, most of the times, by obstetric nurses, and that minimizes the use of interventions. The deliveries type PNE and PC are attended by physicians, who maintain more interventive approaches. These data are important for the professionals’ reflection and allow to outline strategies to qualify the assistance. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1905 10.33448/rsd-v9i2.1905 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1905 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i2.1905 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1905/1818 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 2; e176921905 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 2; e176921905 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 2; e176921905 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052644847517696 |