Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos, Santin, Daniella Cristo, Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira, Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia, Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015
Resumo: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing simulated test on wear and roughness of different low-viscosity resin composite, as well as the polymerization shrinkage stress. Thirty rectangular specimens (5 × 10 × 3 mm) were prepared and assigned into three different low-viscosity resin composites (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova), and SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). The specimens were brushed for 100.000 cycles using a toothbrushing testing machine with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water under a 300 g load. The surface roughness (Ra) (n=10) (before and after brushing) and wear (mm) (n=10) were measured by roughness tester. Also, the microhardness (KHN) (n=5) and shrinkage stress (MPa) (n=5) were evaluated. Data were analyzed by one-way for wear, microhardness and shrinkage stress data and two-way for roughness ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Nanova group presented higher final roughness (1.79±0.36) (p < 0.031), wear (13.87±3.26) (p <0.001) and microhardness (52.56±1.7) than the other groups (p < 0.006). For tensile test, all materials showed no difference in relation to shrinkage stress (p= 0.468). The Nanova group showed higher wear and roughness than the other groups. SDR and Z350 were statistically more resistant to wear.
id UNIFEI_876f142a3c582cf9c5830c48b49bec32
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41015
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
spelling Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin compositePropiedades físico-mecánicas de un compuesto de resina fluida reforzado con nanofibrasPropriedades físico-mecânicas de uma resina composta fluida reforçada com nanofibrasComposite resinsToothbrushingNanofibers.Resinas compuestasCepillado dentalNanofibras.Resinas compostasEscovação dentáriaNanofibras.This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing simulated test on wear and roughness of different low-viscosity resin composite, as well as the polymerization shrinkage stress. Thirty rectangular specimens (5 × 10 × 3 mm) were prepared and assigned into three different low-viscosity resin composites (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova), and SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). The specimens were brushed for 100.000 cycles using a toothbrushing testing machine with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water under a 300 g load. The surface roughness (Ra) (n=10) (before and after brushing) and wear (mm) (n=10) were measured by roughness tester. Also, the microhardness (KHN) (n=5) and shrinkage stress (MPa) (n=5) were evaluated. Data were analyzed by one-way for wear, microhardness and shrinkage stress data and two-way for roughness ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Nanova group presented higher final roughness (1.79±0.36) (p < 0.031), wear (13.87±3.26) (p <0.001) and microhardness (52.56±1.7) than the other groups (p < 0.006). For tensile test, all materials showed no difference in relation to shrinkage stress (p= 0.468). The Nanova group showed higher wear and roughness than the other groups. SDR and Z350 were statistically more resistant to wear.Este estudio in vitro tuvo como objetivo evaluar el efecto de la prueba simulada de cepillado de dientes sobre el desgaste y la rugosidad de diferentes compuestos de resina de baja viscosidad, así como la tensión de contracción de polimerización. Se prepararon treinta muestras rectangulares (5 × 10 × 3 mm) y se asignaron a tres compuestos de resina de baja viscosidad diferentes (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); Relleno NanovaPro (Nanova) y SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). Los especímenes fueron cepillados durante 100.000 ciclos usando una máquina de prueba de cepillado de dientes con puntas de cerdas suaves (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brasil) y suspensión dentífrica (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) en agua desionizada bajo una carga de 300 g. La rugosidad de la superficie (Ra) (n=10) (antes y después del cepillado) y el desgaste (µm) (n=10) se midieron con un rugosímetro. Además, se evaluaron la microdureza (KHN) (n=5) y el estrés de contracción (MPa) (n=5). Los datos se analizaron mediante unidireccional para datos de desgaste, microdureza y tensión de contracción y bidireccional para rugosidad ANOVA y prueba de Tukey (α = 0,05). El grupo Nanova presentó mayor rugosidad final (1,79±0,36) (p < 0,031), desgaste (13,87±3,26) (p<0,001) y microdureza (52,561,7) que los demás grupos (p < 0,006). Para el ensayo de tracción, todos los materiales no mostraron diferencia en relación al esfuerzo de contracción (p= 0,468). El grupo Nanova mostró mayor desgaste y rugosidad que los otros grupos. SDR y Z350 fueron estadísticamente más resistentes al desgaste.Este estudo in vitro teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito do teste de escovação simulada no desgaste e rugosidade de diferentes resinas compostas de baixa viscosidade, bem como a tensão de contração de polimerização. Trinta espécimes retangulares (5 × 10 × 3 mm) foram preparados e divididos em três diferentes resinas compostas de baixa viscosidade (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova) e SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). Os espécimes foram escovados por 100.000 ciclos usando uma máquina de teste de escovação com pontas de cerdas macias (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, São Paulo, Brasil) e suspensão de dentifrício (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) em água deionizada sob uma carga de 300 g. A rugosidade superficial (Ra) (n=10) (antes e após a escovação) e o desgaste (µm) (n=10) foram medidos por rugosímetro. Também foram avaliadas a microdureza (KHN) (n=5) e a tensão de contração (MPa) (n=5). Os dados foram analisados por one-way para dados de desgaste, microdureza e tensão de retração e two-way para rugosidade ANOVA e teste de Tukey (α = 0,05). O grupo Nanova apresentou maior rugosidade final (1,790,36) (p < 0,031), desgaste (13,87±3,26) (p <0,001) e microdureza (52,56±1,7) que os outros grupos (p < 0,006). Para o ensaio de tração, todos os materiais não apresentaram diferença em relação à tensão de retração (p= 0,468). O grupo Nanova apresentou maior desgaste e rugosidade do que os outros grupos. SDR e Z350 foram estatisticamente mais resistentes ao desgaste.Research, Society and Development2023-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4101510.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 4; e11712441015Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 4; e11712441015Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 4; e117124410152525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015/33439Copyright (c) 2023 Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Velo; Natália Almeida Bastos Bitencourt; Daniella Cristo Santin; Alyssa Teixeira Obeid; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVelo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos Santin, Daniella Cristo Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares 2023-04-21T18:13:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41015Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2023-04-21T18:13:32Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
Propiedades físico-mecánicas de un compuesto de resina fluida reforzado con nanofibras
Propriedades físico-mecânicas de uma resina composta fluida reforçada com nanofibras
title Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
spellingShingle Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
Composite resins
Toothbrushing
Nanofibers.
Resinas compuestas
Cepillado dental
Nanofibras.
Resinas compostas
Escovação dentária
Nanofibras.
Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
Composite resins
Toothbrushing
Nanofibers.
Resinas compuestas
Cepillado dental
Nanofibras.
Resinas compostas
Escovação dentária
Nanofibras.
title_short Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
title_full Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
title_fullStr Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
title_full_unstemmed Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
title_sort Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
author Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
author_facet Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos
Santin, Daniella Cristo
Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares
Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos
Santin, Daniella Cristo
Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares
author_role author
author2 Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos
Santin, Daniella Cristo
Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos
Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos
Santin, Daniella Cristo
Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite resins
Toothbrushing
Nanofibers.
Resinas compuestas
Cepillado dental
Nanofibras.
Resinas compostas
Escovação dentária
Nanofibras.
topic Composite resins
Toothbrushing
Nanofibers.
Resinas compuestas
Cepillado dental
Nanofibras.
Resinas compostas
Escovação dentária
Nanofibras.
description This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing simulated test on wear and roughness of different low-viscosity resin composite, as well as the polymerization shrinkage stress. Thirty rectangular specimens (5 × 10 × 3 mm) were prepared and assigned into three different low-viscosity resin composites (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova), and SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). The specimens were brushed for 100.000 cycles using a toothbrushing testing machine with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water under a 300 g load. The surface roughness (Ra) (n=10) (before and after brushing) and wear (mm) (n=10) were measured by roughness tester. Also, the microhardness (KHN) (n=5) and shrinkage stress (MPa) (n=5) were evaluated. Data were analyzed by one-way for wear, microhardness and shrinkage stress data and two-way for roughness ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Nanova group presented higher final roughness (1.79±0.36) (p < 0.031), wear (13.87±3.26) (p <0.001) and microhardness (52.56±1.7) than the other groups (p < 0.006). For tensile test, all materials showed no difference in relation to shrinkage stress (p= 0.468). The Nanova group showed higher wear and roughness than the other groups. SDR and Z350 were statistically more resistant to wear.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015
10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015/33439
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 4; e11712441015
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 4; e11712441015
Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 4; e11712441015
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1822182207613042688
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015