Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
DOI: | 10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015 |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015 |
Resumo: | This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing simulated test on wear and roughness of different low-viscosity resin composite, as well as the polymerization shrinkage stress. Thirty rectangular specimens (5 × 10 × 3 mm) were prepared and assigned into three different low-viscosity resin composites (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova), and SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). The specimens were brushed for 100.000 cycles using a toothbrushing testing machine with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water under a 300 g load. The surface roughness (Ra) (n=10) (before and after brushing) and wear (mm) (n=10) were measured by roughness tester. Also, the microhardness (KHN) (n=5) and shrinkage stress (MPa) (n=5) were evaluated. Data were analyzed by one-way for wear, microhardness and shrinkage stress data and two-way for roughness ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Nanova group presented higher final roughness (1.79±0.36) (p < 0.031), wear (13.87±3.26) (p <0.001) and microhardness (52.56±1.7) than the other groups (p < 0.006). For tensile test, all materials showed no difference in relation to shrinkage stress (p= 0.468). The Nanova group showed higher wear and roughness than the other groups. SDR and Z350 were statistically more resistant to wear. |
id |
UNIFEI_876f142a3c582cf9c5830c48b49bec32 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41015 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
spelling |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin compositePropiedades físico-mecánicas de un compuesto de resina fluida reforzado con nanofibrasPropriedades físico-mecânicas de uma resina composta fluida reforçada com nanofibrasComposite resinsToothbrushingNanofibers.Resinas compuestasCepillado dentalNanofibras.Resinas compostasEscovação dentáriaNanofibras.This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing simulated test on wear and roughness of different low-viscosity resin composite, as well as the polymerization shrinkage stress. Thirty rectangular specimens (5 × 10 × 3 mm) were prepared and assigned into three different low-viscosity resin composites (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova), and SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). The specimens were brushed for 100.000 cycles using a toothbrushing testing machine with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water under a 300 g load. The surface roughness (Ra) (n=10) (before and after brushing) and wear (mm) (n=10) were measured by roughness tester. Also, the microhardness (KHN) (n=5) and shrinkage stress (MPa) (n=5) were evaluated. Data were analyzed by one-way for wear, microhardness and shrinkage stress data and two-way for roughness ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Nanova group presented higher final roughness (1.79±0.36) (p < 0.031), wear (13.87±3.26) (p <0.001) and microhardness (52.56±1.7) than the other groups (p < 0.006). For tensile test, all materials showed no difference in relation to shrinkage stress (p= 0.468). The Nanova group showed higher wear and roughness than the other groups. SDR and Z350 were statistically more resistant to wear.Este estudio in vitro tuvo como objetivo evaluar el efecto de la prueba simulada de cepillado de dientes sobre el desgaste y la rugosidad de diferentes compuestos de resina de baja viscosidad, así como la tensión de contracción de polimerización. Se prepararon treinta muestras rectangulares (5 × 10 × 3 mm) y se asignaron a tres compuestos de resina de baja viscosidad diferentes (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); Relleno NanovaPro (Nanova) y SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). Los especímenes fueron cepillados durante 100.000 ciclos usando una máquina de prueba de cepillado de dientes con puntas de cerdas suaves (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brasil) y suspensión dentífrica (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) en agua desionizada bajo una carga de 300 g. La rugosidad de la superficie (Ra) (n=10) (antes y después del cepillado) y el desgaste (µm) (n=10) se midieron con un rugosímetro. Además, se evaluaron la microdureza (KHN) (n=5) y el estrés de contracción (MPa) (n=5). Los datos se analizaron mediante unidireccional para datos de desgaste, microdureza y tensión de contracción y bidireccional para rugosidad ANOVA y prueba de Tukey (α = 0,05). El grupo Nanova presentó mayor rugosidad final (1,79±0,36) (p < 0,031), desgaste (13,87±3,26) (p<0,001) y microdureza (52,561,7) que los demás grupos (p < 0,006). Para el ensayo de tracción, todos los materiales no mostraron diferencia en relación al esfuerzo de contracción (p= 0,468). El grupo Nanova mostró mayor desgaste y rugosidad que los otros grupos. SDR y Z350 fueron estadísticamente más resistentes al desgaste.Este estudo in vitro teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito do teste de escovação simulada no desgaste e rugosidade de diferentes resinas compostas de baixa viscosidade, bem como a tensão de contração de polimerização. Trinta espécimes retangulares (5 × 10 × 3 mm) foram preparados e divididos em três diferentes resinas compostas de baixa viscosidade (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova) e SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). Os espécimes foram escovados por 100.000 ciclos usando uma máquina de teste de escovação com pontas de cerdas macias (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, São Paulo, Brasil) e suspensão de dentifrício (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) em água deionizada sob uma carga de 300 g. A rugosidade superficial (Ra) (n=10) (antes e após a escovação) e o desgaste (µm) (n=10) foram medidos por rugosímetro. Também foram avaliadas a microdureza (KHN) (n=5) e a tensão de contração (MPa) (n=5). Os dados foram analisados por one-way para dados de desgaste, microdureza e tensão de retração e two-way para rugosidade ANOVA e teste de Tukey (α = 0,05). O grupo Nanova apresentou maior rugosidade final (1,790,36) (p < 0,031), desgaste (13,87±3,26) (p <0,001) e microdureza (52,56±1,7) que os outros grupos (p < 0,006). Para o ensaio de tração, todos os materiais não apresentaram diferença em relação à tensão de retração (p= 0,468). O grupo Nanova apresentou maior desgaste e rugosidade do que os outros grupos. SDR e Z350 foram estatisticamente mais resistentes ao desgaste.Research, Society and Development2023-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4101510.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 4; e11712441015Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 4; e11712441015Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 4; e117124410152525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015/33439Copyright (c) 2023 Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Velo; Natália Almeida Bastos Bitencourt; Daniella Cristo Santin; Alyssa Teixeira Obeid; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonattihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVelo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos Santin, Daniella Cristo Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares 2023-04-21T18:13:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41015Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2023-04-21T18:13:32Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite Propiedades físico-mecánicas de un compuesto de resina fluida reforzado con nanofibras Propriedades físico-mecânicas de uma resina composta fluida reforçada com nanofibras |
title |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite |
spellingShingle |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Composite resins Toothbrushing Nanofibers. Resinas compuestas Cepillado dental Nanofibras. Resinas compostas Escovação dentária Nanofibras. Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Composite resins Toothbrushing Nanofibers. Resinas compuestas Cepillado dental Nanofibras. Resinas compostas Escovação dentária Nanofibras. |
title_short |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite |
title_full |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite |
title_fullStr |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite |
title_sort |
Physical-mechanical properties of a flowable nanofiber-reinforced resin composite |
author |
Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos |
author_facet |
Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos Santin, Daniella Cristo Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos Santin, Daniella Cristo Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos Santin, Daniella Cristo Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Velo, Marilia Mattar de Amoêdo Campos Bitencourt, Natália Almeida Bastos Santin, Daniella Cristo Obeid, Alyssa Teixeira Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia Bombonatti, Juliana Fraga Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Composite resins Toothbrushing Nanofibers. Resinas compuestas Cepillado dental Nanofibras. Resinas compostas Escovação dentária Nanofibras. |
topic |
Composite resins Toothbrushing Nanofibers. Resinas compuestas Cepillado dental Nanofibras. Resinas compostas Escovação dentária Nanofibras. |
description |
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of toothbrushing simulated test on wear and roughness of different low-viscosity resin composite, as well as the polymerization shrinkage stress. Thirty rectangular specimens (5 × 10 × 3 mm) were prepared and assigned into three different low-viscosity resin composites (n=10): Filtek flow Z350 (Z350); NanovaPro fill (Nanova), and SureFil SDR Flow (SDR). The specimens were brushed for 100.000 cycles using a toothbrushing testing machine with soft bristle tips (Colgate Classic, Colgate-Palmolive Co., Osasco, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and dentifrice suspension (Colgate MFP, Colgate-Palmolive Co.) in deionized water under a 300 g load. The surface roughness (Ra) (n=10) (before and after brushing) and wear (mm) (n=10) were measured by roughness tester. Also, the microhardness (KHN) (n=5) and shrinkage stress (MPa) (n=5) were evaluated. Data were analyzed by one-way for wear, microhardness and shrinkage stress data and two-way for roughness ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). The Nanova group presented higher final roughness (1.79±0.36) (p < 0.031), wear (13.87±3.26) (p <0.001) and microhardness (52.56±1.7) than the other groups (p < 0.006). For tensile test, all materials showed no difference in relation to shrinkage stress (p= 0.468). The Nanova group showed higher wear and roughness than the other groups. SDR and Z350 were statistically more resistant to wear. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015 10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41015/33439 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 4; e11712441015 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 4; e11712441015 Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 4; e11712441015 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822182207613042688 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v12i4.41015 |