Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Amorim, Bartira Pereira, Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223
Resumo: This paper aims to identify the barriers that are related to the maturity of project management in the public sector. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out based on works extracted from the CAPES Journal Portal and Google Scholar, using the protocol proposed by Felizardo et al. (2017) and from the keywords “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” and their variations. The final review sample consisted of six studies, two of which were developed in the Brazilian context, one in the United Kingdom, one in Slovenia, one in Serbia, and one in Iceland. The barriers presented in the studies were summarized in seven dimensions: technical competence, management methodology, computerization, human relations, organizational structure, alignment with the organization's business, and transversal categories. The notes of the studies brought as main notes the needs that organizations work with the intensification of benchmarking practices in the context of project management and the integration of this area with its strategic management.
id UNIFEI_897284cd1d560328320653f916e81216
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19223
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature reviewBarreras a la madurez en la gestión de proyectos en el sector público: una revisión sistemática de la literaturaBarreiras à maturidade na gestão de projetos no setor público: uma revisão sistemática da literaturaMaturidade da gestão de projetosSetor públicoBarreirasRevisão sistemática da literatura.Madurez de la gestión de proyectosSector públicoBarrerasRevisión sistemática de la literatura.Project management maturityPublic sectorBarriersSystematic literature review.This paper aims to identify the barriers that are related to the maturity of project management in the public sector. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out based on works extracted from the CAPES Journal Portal and Google Scholar, using the protocol proposed by Felizardo et al. (2017) and from the keywords “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” and their variations. The final review sample consisted of six studies, two of which were developed in the Brazilian context, one in the United Kingdom, one in Slovenia, one in Serbia, and one in Iceland. The barriers presented in the studies were summarized in seven dimensions: technical competence, management methodology, computerization, human relations, organizational structure, alignment with the organization's business, and transversal categories. The notes of the studies brought as main notes the needs that organizations work with the intensification of benchmarking practices in the context of project management and the integration of this area with its strategic management.Esta investigación tiene como objetivo identificar las barreras que están relacionadas con la madurez de la gestión de proyectos en el sector público. Para ello, se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura a partir de estudios extraídos del Portal de Revistas de la CAPES y Google Scholar utilizando el protocolo propuesto por Felizardo et al. (2017) y de las palabras clave "project management maturity", "public-sector", "barriers" y sus variaciones. La muestra final de la revisión consistió en seis estudios, dos de los cuales se desarrollaron en el contexto brasileño, uno en el Reino Unido, uno en Eslovenia, uno en Serbia y uno en Islandia. Las barreras presentadas en los estudios se resumieron en siete dimensiones: competencia técnica, metodología de gestión, informatización, relaciones humanas, estructura organizacional, alineamiento con el negocio de la organización y categorías transversales. En las notas de los estudios se señalaba como puntos principales las necesidades de las organizaciones que se ocupara de la intensificación de las prácticas de evaluación comparativa en el contexto de la gestión de proyectos y la integración de esta esfera con su gestión estratégica.Este artigo tem como objetivo identificar as barreiras que estão relacionadas à maturidade da gestão de projetos no setor público. Para tanto, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura a partir de trabalhos extraídos do Portal de Periódicos da CAPES e do Google Scholar utilizando-se o protocolo proposto por Felizardo et al. (2017) e a partir das palavras-chave “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” e suas variações. A amostra final da revisão constituiu-se de seis estudos, dos quais dois foram desenvolvidos no contexto brasileiro, um no Reino Unido, um na Eslovênia, um na Sérvia e um na Islândia. As barreiras apresentadas nos estudos foram sintetizadas em sete dimensões: competência técnica, metodologia de gestão, informatização, relações humanas, estrutura organizacional, alinhamento com os negócios da organização e categorias transversais. Os apontamentos dos estudos trouxeram como principais necessidades que as organizações trabalhem a intensificação de práticas de benchmarking no contexto da gestão de projetos e a integração desta área com a sua gestão estratégica.Research, Society and Development2021-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1922310.33448/rsd-v10i10.19223Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e513101019223Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e513101019223Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e5131010192232525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223/17088Copyright (c) 2021 Edson Carlos da Silva Bezerra; Bartira Pereira Amorim; Fagner José Coutinho de Melohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva Amorim, Bartira Pereira Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19223Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:10.292483Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
Barreras a la madurez en la gestión de proyectos en el sector público: una revisión sistemática de la literatura
Barreiras à maturidade na gestão de projetos no setor público: uma revisão sistemática da literatura
title Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
spellingShingle Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva
Maturidade da gestão de projetos
Setor público
Barreiras
Revisão sistemática da literatura.
Madurez de la gestión de proyectos
Sector público
Barreras
Revisión sistemática de la literatura.
Project management maturity
Public sector
Barriers
Systematic literature review.
title_short Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
title_full Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
title_sort Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
author Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva
author_facet Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva
Amorim, Bartira Pereira
Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de
author_role author
author2 Amorim, Bartira Pereira
Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva
Amorim, Bartira Pereira
Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Maturidade da gestão de projetos
Setor público
Barreiras
Revisão sistemática da literatura.
Madurez de la gestión de proyectos
Sector público
Barreras
Revisión sistemática de la literatura.
Project management maturity
Public sector
Barriers
Systematic literature review.
topic Maturidade da gestão de projetos
Setor público
Barreiras
Revisão sistemática da literatura.
Madurez de la gestión de proyectos
Sector público
Barreras
Revisión sistemática de la literatura.
Project management maturity
Public sector
Barriers
Systematic literature review.
description This paper aims to identify the barriers that are related to the maturity of project management in the public sector. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out based on works extracted from the CAPES Journal Portal and Google Scholar, using the protocol proposed by Felizardo et al. (2017) and from the keywords “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” and their variations. The final review sample consisted of six studies, two of which were developed in the Brazilian context, one in the United Kingdom, one in Slovenia, one in Serbia, and one in Iceland. The barriers presented in the studies were summarized in seven dimensions: technical competence, management methodology, computerization, human relations, organizational structure, alignment with the organization's business, and transversal categories. The notes of the studies brought as main notes the needs that organizations work with the intensification of benchmarking practices in the context of project management and the integration of this area with its strategic management.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19223
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19223
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223/17088
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e513101019223
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e513101019223
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e513101019223
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052686935261184