Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to identify the barriers that are related to the maturity of project management in the public sector. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out based on works extracted from the CAPES Journal Portal and Google Scholar, using the protocol proposed by Felizardo et al. (2017) and from the keywords “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” and their variations. The final review sample consisted of six studies, two of which were developed in the Brazilian context, one in the United Kingdom, one in Slovenia, one in Serbia, and one in Iceland. The barriers presented in the studies were summarized in seven dimensions: technical competence, management methodology, computerization, human relations, organizational structure, alignment with the organization's business, and transversal categories. The notes of the studies brought as main notes the needs that organizations work with the intensification of benchmarking practices in the context of project management and the integration of this area with its strategic management. |
id |
UNIFEI_897284cd1d560328320653f916e81216 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19223 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature reviewBarreras a la madurez en la gestión de proyectos en el sector público: una revisión sistemática de la literaturaBarreiras à maturidade na gestão de projetos no setor público: uma revisão sistemática da literaturaMaturidade da gestão de projetosSetor públicoBarreirasRevisão sistemática da literatura.Madurez de la gestión de proyectosSector públicoBarrerasRevisión sistemática de la literatura.Project management maturityPublic sectorBarriersSystematic literature review.This paper aims to identify the barriers that are related to the maturity of project management in the public sector. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out based on works extracted from the CAPES Journal Portal and Google Scholar, using the protocol proposed by Felizardo et al. (2017) and from the keywords “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” and their variations. The final review sample consisted of six studies, two of which were developed in the Brazilian context, one in the United Kingdom, one in Slovenia, one in Serbia, and one in Iceland. The barriers presented in the studies were summarized in seven dimensions: technical competence, management methodology, computerization, human relations, organizational structure, alignment with the organization's business, and transversal categories. The notes of the studies brought as main notes the needs that organizations work with the intensification of benchmarking practices in the context of project management and the integration of this area with its strategic management.Esta investigación tiene como objetivo identificar las barreras que están relacionadas con la madurez de la gestión de proyectos en el sector público. Para ello, se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura a partir de estudios extraídos del Portal de Revistas de la CAPES y Google Scholar utilizando el protocolo propuesto por Felizardo et al. (2017) y de las palabras clave "project management maturity", "public-sector", "barriers" y sus variaciones. La muestra final de la revisión consistió en seis estudios, dos de los cuales se desarrollaron en el contexto brasileño, uno en el Reino Unido, uno en Eslovenia, uno en Serbia y uno en Islandia. Las barreras presentadas en los estudios se resumieron en siete dimensiones: competencia técnica, metodología de gestión, informatización, relaciones humanas, estructura organizacional, alineamiento con el negocio de la organización y categorías transversales. En las notas de los estudios se señalaba como puntos principales las necesidades de las organizaciones que se ocupara de la intensificación de las prácticas de evaluación comparativa en el contexto de la gestión de proyectos y la integración de esta esfera con su gestión estratégica.Este artigo tem como objetivo identificar as barreiras que estão relacionadas à maturidade da gestão de projetos no setor público. Para tanto, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura a partir de trabalhos extraídos do Portal de Periódicos da CAPES e do Google Scholar utilizando-se o protocolo proposto por Felizardo et al. (2017) e a partir das palavras-chave “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” e suas variações. A amostra final da revisão constituiu-se de seis estudos, dos quais dois foram desenvolvidos no contexto brasileiro, um no Reino Unido, um na Eslovênia, um na Sérvia e um na Islândia. As barreiras apresentadas nos estudos foram sintetizadas em sete dimensões: competência técnica, metodologia de gestão, informatização, relações humanas, estrutura organizacional, alinhamento com os negócios da organização e categorias transversais. Os apontamentos dos estudos trouxeram como principais necessidades que as organizações trabalhem a intensificação de práticas de benchmarking no contexto da gestão de projetos e a integração desta área com a sua gestão estratégica.Research, Society and Development2021-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1922310.33448/rsd-v10i10.19223Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e513101019223Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e513101019223Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e5131010192232525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223/17088Copyright (c) 2021 Edson Carlos da Silva Bezerra; Bartira Pereira Amorim; Fagner José Coutinho de Melohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva Amorim, Bartira Pereira Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19223Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:10.292483Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review Barreras a la madurez en la gestión de proyectos en el sector público: una revisión sistemática de la literatura Barreiras à maturidade na gestão de projetos no setor público: uma revisão sistemática da literatura |
title |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review |
spellingShingle |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva Maturidade da gestão de projetos Setor público Barreiras Revisão sistemática da literatura. Madurez de la gestión de proyectos Sector público Barreras Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Project management maturity Public sector Barriers Systematic literature review. |
title_short |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review |
title_full |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review |
title_sort |
Barriers to maturity in project management in the public sector: a systematic literature review |
author |
Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva |
author_facet |
Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva Amorim, Bartira Pereira Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amorim, Bartira Pereira Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bezerra, Edson Carlos da Silva Amorim, Bartira Pereira Melo, Fagner José Coutinho de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Maturidade da gestão de projetos Setor público Barreiras Revisão sistemática da literatura. Madurez de la gestión de proyectos Sector público Barreras Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Project management maturity Public sector Barriers Systematic literature review. |
topic |
Maturidade da gestão de projetos Setor público Barreiras Revisão sistemática da literatura. Madurez de la gestión de proyectos Sector público Barreras Revisión sistemática de la literatura. Project management maturity Public sector Barriers Systematic literature review. |
description |
This paper aims to identify the barriers that are related to the maturity of project management in the public sector. Therefore, a systematic literature review was carried out based on works extracted from the CAPES Journal Portal and Google Scholar, using the protocol proposed by Felizardo et al. (2017) and from the keywords “project management maturity”, “public-sector”, “barriers” and their variations. The final review sample consisted of six studies, two of which were developed in the Brazilian context, one in the United Kingdom, one in Slovenia, one in Serbia, and one in Iceland. The barriers presented in the studies were summarized in seven dimensions: technical competence, management methodology, computerization, human relations, organizational structure, alignment with the organization's business, and transversal categories. The notes of the studies brought as main notes the needs that organizations work with the intensification of benchmarking practices in the context of project management and the integration of this area with its strategic management. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19223 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19223/17088 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e513101019223 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e513101019223 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e513101019223 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052686935261184 |