Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Victor de Melo
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Reis, Andréa Cândido dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722
Resumo: Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels.
id UNIFEI_933e5a3b1ec4188cb3c5b1326eaff83a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44722
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic reviewInfluencia de la forma del implante y la plataforma protésica en la reabsorción ósea cervical: Una revisión sistemáticaInfluência do formato do implante e da plataforma protética na reabsorção óssea cervical: Uma revisão sistemáticaCervical bone lossImplant shapeProsthetic platformDental implants.Pérdida ósea cervicalForma del implantePlataforma protésicaImplantes dentales.Perda óssea cervicalForma do implantePlataforma protéticaImplantes dentários.Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels.Propósito: El propósito de esta revisión sistemática fue evaluar críticamente la literatura existente y responder a la pregunta: "¿Qué formato de implante y plataforma protésica promueve la menor reabsorción cervical?". Material y método: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs y Google Scholar en septiembre de 2023. Resultados: La búsqueda en las bases de datos dio como resultado 2850 artículos. De los 12 artículos seleccionados para la lectura completa, 2 permanecieron en esta revisión sistemática. Se carece de información para formarse una opinión y realizar un análisis estadístico de los datos, por lo que se realizó un análisis descriptivo. Conclusiones: Según los estudios incluidos en esta revisión sistemática, la forma del implante influye en la estabilidad primaria y en la osteointegración, pero aún no es posible relacionarlo directamente con el POC. Sin embargo, el tipo de plataforma protésica tiene una influencia directa. Además del tipo de plataforma protésica utilizada, deben tenerse en cuenta las diversas características relacionadas con la forma del implante para mantener unos niveles óseos satisfactorios.Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi avaliar criticamente a literatura existente e responder à pergunta: "Qual formato de implante e plataforma protética promove a menor reabsorção cervical?". Material e método: Foram pesquisadas através das bases de dados SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs e Google Scholar em setembro de 2023. Resultados: A pesquisa nas bases de dados resultou em 2850 artigos. Dos 12 artigos selecionados para leitura integral, 2 permaneceram nesta revisão sistemática. Há falta de informação para formar uma opinião e para efetuar uma análise estatística dos dados, pelo que se procedeu a uma análise descritiva. Conclusões: Com base nos estudos incluídos nesta revisão sistemática, a forma do implante influencia a estabilidade primária e a osseointegração, mas ainda não é possível relacioná-la diretamente com o POC. No entanto, o tipo de plataforma protética tem uma influência direta. Para além do tipo de plataforma protética utilizada, as várias características relacionadas com a forma do implante devem ser consideradas para manter níveis ósseos satisfatórios.Research, Society and Development2024-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4472210.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 1; e1913144722Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 1; e1913144722Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 1; e19131447222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722/35724Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Victor de Melo Reis, Andréa Cândido dos 2024-02-01T09:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44722Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-02-01T09:48:39Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
Influencia de la forma del implante y la plataforma protésica en la reabsorción ósea cervical: Una revisión sistemática
Influência do formato do implante e da plataforma protética na reabsorção óssea cervical: Uma revisão sistemática
title Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
spellingShingle Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
Soares, Victor de Melo
Cervical bone loss
Implant shape
Prosthetic platform
Dental implants.
Pérdida ósea cervical
Forma del implante
Plataforma protésica
Implantes dentales.
Perda óssea cervical
Forma do implante
Plataforma protética
Implantes dentários.
title_short Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
title_full Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
title_fullStr Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
title_sort Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
author Soares, Victor de Melo
author_facet Soares, Victor de Melo
Reis, Andréa Cândido dos
author_role author
author2 Reis, Andréa Cândido dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Victor de Melo
Reis, Andréa Cândido dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cervical bone loss
Implant shape
Prosthetic platform
Dental implants.
Pérdida ósea cervical
Forma del implante
Plataforma protésica
Implantes dentales.
Perda óssea cervical
Forma do implante
Plataforma protética
Implantes dentários.
topic Cervical bone loss
Implant shape
Prosthetic platform
Dental implants.
Pérdida ósea cervical
Forma del implante
Plataforma protésica
Implantes dentales.
Perda óssea cervical
Forma do implante
Plataforma protética
Implantes dentários.
description Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722
10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722/35724
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 1; e1913144722
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 1; e1913144722
Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 1; e1913144722
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052636684353536

Registros relacionados