Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722 |
Resumo: | Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels. |
id |
UNIFEI_933e5a3b1ec4188cb3c5b1326eaff83a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44722 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic reviewInfluencia de la forma del implante y la plataforma protésica en la reabsorción ósea cervical: Una revisión sistemáticaInfluência do formato do implante e da plataforma protética na reabsorção óssea cervical: Uma revisão sistemáticaCervical bone lossImplant shapeProsthetic platformDental implants.Pérdida ósea cervicalForma del implantePlataforma protésicaImplantes dentales.Perda óssea cervicalForma do implantePlataforma protéticaImplantes dentários.Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels.Propósito: El propósito de esta revisión sistemática fue evaluar críticamente la literatura existente y responder a la pregunta: "¿Qué formato de implante y plataforma protésica promueve la menor reabsorción cervical?". Material y método: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs y Google Scholar en septiembre de 2023. Resultados: La búsqueda en las bases de datos dio como resultado 2850 artículos. De los 12 artículos seleccionados para la lectura completa, 2 permanecieron en esta revisión sistemática. Se carece de información para formarse una opinión y realizar un análisis estadístico de los datos, por lo que se realizó un análisis descriptivo. Conclusiones: Según los estudios incluidos en esta revisión sistemática, la forma del implante influye en la estabilidad primaria y en la osteointegración, pero aún no es posible relacionarlo directamente con el POC. Sin embargo, el tipo de plataforma protésica tiene una influencia directa. Además del tipo de plataforma protésica utilizada, deben tenerse en cuenta las diversas características relacionadas con la forma del implante para mantener unos niveles óseos satisfactorios.Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi avaliar criticamente a literatura existente e responder à pergunta: "Qual formato de implante e plataforma protética promove a menor reabsorção cervical?". Material e método: Foram pesquisadas através das bases de dados SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs e Google Scholar em setembro de 2023. Resultados: A pesquisa nas bases de dados resultou em 2850 artigos. Dos 12 artigos selecionados para leitura integral, 2 permaneceram nesta revisão sistemática. Há falta de informação para formar uma opinião e para efetuar uma análise estatística dos dados, pelo que se procedeu a uma análise descritiva. Conclusões: Com base nos estudos incluídos nesta revisão sistemática, a forma do implante influencia a estabilidade primária e a osseointegração, mas ainda não é possível relacioná-la diretamente com o POC. No entanto, o tipo de plataforma protética tem uma influência direta. Para além do tipo de plataforma protética utilizada, as várias características relacionadas com a forma do implante devem ser consideradas para manter níveis ósseos satisfatórios.Research, Society and Development2024-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4472210.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 1; e1913144722Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 1; e1913144722Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 1; e19131447222525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722/35724Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Victor de Melo Reis, Andréa Cândido dos 2024-02-01T09:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44722Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-02-01T09:48:39Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review Influencia de la forma del implante y la plataforma protésica en la reabsorción ósea cervical: Una revisión sistemática Influência do formato do implante e da plataforma protética na reabsorção óssea cervical: Uma revisão sistemática |
title |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review Soares, Victor de Melo Cervical bone loss Implant shape Prosthetic platform Dental implants. Pérdida ósea cervical Forma del implante Plataforma protésica Implantes dentales. Perda óssea cervical Forma do implante Plataforma protética Implantes dentários. |
title_short |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review |
title_full |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review |
title_sort |
Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review |
author |
Soares, Victor de Melo |
author_facet |
Soares, Victor de Melo Reis, Andréa Cândido dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis, Andréa Cândido dos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Victor de Melo Reis, Andréa Cândido dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cervical bone loss Implant shape Prosthetic platform Dental implants. Pérdida ósea cervical Forma del implante Plataforma protésica Implantes dentales. Perda óssea cervical Forma do implante Plataforma protética Implantes dentários. |
topic |
Cervical bone loss Implant shape Prosthetic platform Dental implants. Pérdida ósea cervical Forma del implante Plataforma protésica Implantes dentales. Perda óssea cervical Forma do implante Plataforma protética Implantes dentários. |
description |
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722 10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v13i1.44722 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/44722/35724 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Victor de Melo Soares; Andréa Cândido dos Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 1; e1913144722 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 1; e1913144722 Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 1; e1913144722 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052636684353536 |