Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martinez, Alexandra da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Seidel, Edleusa Pereira, Pan, Renan, Brito, Tauane Santos, Vasconcelos , Edmar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661
Resumo: This paper aimed to evaluate the productivity of corn crop for silage, beans and straw production in different crop rotation systems with spring/summer and fall/winter green manures cultivated under agroecological production management. The experiment was implemented in a rural property managed in an agroecological system since 2009, in the 2017/18 and 2018 crops. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with five repetitions. The treatments consisted of four different crop rotation systems: monocrop corn/monocrop corn/fallow/beans; corn + cowpea/monocrop corn/oats/beans; corn + crotalaria/monocrop corn/forage radish/beans and corn + jack bean/monocrop corn/vetch/beans. After the 2018 second crop of corn was removed, the winter/spring green manures were sown: forage radish, vetch, and oats. This was followed in September by the bean crop. The dry matter yields of corn for silage in each growing season and of the bean were evaluated, as well as the total productivity of the systems. The straw yield was also evaluated. The crop rotation systems that included green manures presented the highest total productivity. The intercropping with pork bean favored the corn productivity in the harvest and the crotalaria stover favored the productivity in the off-season. The corn + cowpea/jack bean/beans monocrop and corn + crotalaria/jack bean/forage radish/beans systems favored the productivity of beans. The mode corn monocrop/corn monocrop/fallow did not prioritize the accumulation of straw on the soil.
id UNIFEI_963f54e96a76f132014b224f31382b8c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34661
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in successionProductividad del maíz para ensilaje en cultivo intercalado con abonos verdes y judías en sucesiónProdutividade de milho para ensilagem em consórcio com adubos verdes e de feijão em sucessãoConsortiumGreen manureEnsilageOrganic production.Cultivo intercaladoAbonos verdesEnsilajeProducción ecológica.ConsórcioAdubos verdesEnsilagemProdução orgânica.This paper aimed to evaluate the productivity of corn crop for silage, beans and straw production in different crop rotation systems with spring/summer and fall/winter green manures cultivated under agroecological production management. The experiment was implemented in a rural property managed in an agroecological system since 2009, in the 2017/18 and 2018 crops. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with five repetitions. The treatments consisted of four different crop rotation systems: monocrop corn/monocrop corn/fallow/beans; corn + cowpea/monocrop corn/oats/beans; corn + crotalaria/monocrop corn/forage radish/beans and corn + jack bean/monocrop corn/vetch/beans. After the 2018 second crop of corn was removed, the winter/spring green manures were sown: forage radish, vetch, and oats. This was followed in September by the bean crop. The dry matter yields of corn for silage in each growing season and of the bean were evaluated, as well as the total productivity of the systems. The straw yield was also evaluated. The crop rotation systems that included green manures presented the highest total productivity. The intercropping with pork bean favored the corn productivity in the harvest and the crotalaria stover favored the productivity in the off-season. The corn + cowpea/jack bean/beans monocrop and corn + crotalaria/jack bean/forage radish/beans systems favored the productivity of beans. The mode corn monocrop/corn monocrop/fallow did not prioritize the accumulation of straw on the soil.Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a produtividade da cultura de milho para ensilagem, feijão e a produção de palhada em diferentes sistemas de rotação de culturas com adubos verdes de primavera/verão e outono/inverno, cultivados sob manejo agroecológico de produção. O experimento foi implantado em uma propriedade rural manejada em sistema agroecológico desde 2009, nas safras de 2017/18 e 2018. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi em blocos casualizados, com 5 repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos por quatro diferentes sistemas de rotação de culturas: milho monocultivo/milho monocultivo/pousio/ feijão; milho + feijão-guandu/ milho monocultivo/ aveia/ feijão; milho + crotalária/ milho monocultivo/nabo forrageiro/feijão e milho + feijão-de-porco/milho monocultivo /ervilhaca/ feijão. Após a retirada do milho safrinha de 2018 foram semeados os adubos verdes de inverno/primavera: nabo forrageiro, ervilhaca e aveia. Em seguida no mês de setembro a cultura do feijoeiro. Foram avaliadas as produtividades de matéria seca de milho para ensilagem em cada estação de cultivo e do feijão; bem como, a produtividade total dos sistemas. Avaliou-se também a produtividade de palhada. Os sistemas de rotação de culturas que incluíram os adubos verdes apresentaram a maior produtividade total. O consórcio com feijão-de-porco favoreceu a produtividade de milho na safra e a palhada da crotalária a produtividade na safrinha. Os sistemas de milho + feijão-guandu/milho monocultivo/aveia/feijão e milho + crotalária/milho monocultivo/nabo forrageiro/feijão favoreceram a produtividade do feijão. A modalidade milho monocultivo/milho monocultivo/pousio não priorizou a acúmulo de palhada sobre o solo.Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar la productividad del cultivo de maíz para ensilaje, frijol y producción de paja en diferentes sistemas de rotación de cultivos con abonos verdes de primavera/verano y otoño/invierno, cultivados bajo un manejo de producción agroecológico. El experimento se implementó en un predio rural manejado en sistema agroecológico desde 2009, en las cosechas de 2017/18 y 2018. El diseño experimental utilizado fue en bloques aleatorios, con 5 repeticiones. Los tratamientos consistieron en cuatro sistemas diferentes de rotación de cultivos: maíz monocultivo/maíz monocultivo/fríjol; maíz + caupí/maíz monocultivo/avena/frijol; maíz + crotalaria/maíz monocultivo/nabo forrajero/frijol y maíz + frijol porcino/maíz monocultivo/ervillaca/frijol. Después de la retirada del maíz de retoño de 2018 se sembraron los abonos verdes de invierno/primavera: nabo forrajero, veza y avena. En septiembre le siguió la cosecha de judías. Se evaluaron los rendimientos de materia seca del maíz para ensilaje en cada temporada y de la judía; así como, la productividad total de los sistemas. También se evaluó la productividad de los rastrojos. Los sistemas de rotación de cultivos que incluían abonos verdes presentaron la mayor productividad total. El intercalado con caupí favoreció la productividad del maíz en la cosecha y la de los rastrojos de crotalaria en la contraestación. Los sistemas maíz + caupí/monocultivo de maíz/avena/frijoles y maíz + crotalaria/monocultivo de maíz/nabo forrajero/frijoles favorecieron la productividad de los frijoles. La modalidad monocultivo de maíz/monocultivo de maíz/pousseed no priorizó la acumulación de paja en el suelo.Research, Society and Development2022-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3466110.33448/rsd-v11i12.34661Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e439111234661Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e439111234661Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e4391112346612525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661/29248Copyright (c) 2022 Alexandra da Silva Martinez; Edleusa Pereira Seidel; Renan Pan; Tauane Santos Brito; Edmar Vasconcelos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartinez, Alexandra da Silva Seidel, Edleusa Pereira Pan, RenanBrito, Tauane Santos Vasconcelos , Edmar2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34661Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:49:52.444786Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
Productividad del maíz para ensilaje en cultivo intercalado con abonos verdes y judías en sucesión
Produtividade de milho para ensilagem em consórcio com adubos verdes e de feijão em sucessão
title Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
spellingShingle Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
Martinez, Alexandra da Silva
Consortium
Green manure
Ensilage
Organic production.
Cultivo intercalado
Abonos verdes
Ensilaje
Producción ecológica.
Consórcio
Adubos verdes
Ensilagem
Produção orgânica.
title_short Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
title_full Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
title_fullStr Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
title_full_unstemmed Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
title_sort Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
author Martinez, Alexandra da Silva
author_facet Martinez, Alexandra da Silva
Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Pan, Renan
Brito, Tauane Santos
Vasconcelos , Edmar
author_role author
author2 Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Pan, Renan
Brito, Tauane Santos
Vasconcelos , Edmar
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martinez, Alexandra da Silva
Seidel, Edleusa Pereira
Pan, Renan
Brito, Tauane Santos
Vasconcelos , Edmar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Consortium
Green manure
Ensilage
Organic production.
Cultivo intercalado
Abonos verdes
Ensilaje
Producción ecológica.
Consórcio
Adubos verdes
Ensilagem
Produção orgânica.
topic Consortium
Green manure
Ensilage
Organic production.
Cultivo intercalado
Abonos verdes
Ensilaje
Producción ecológica.
Consórcio
Adubos verdes
Ensilagem
Produção orgânica.
description This paper aimed to evaluate the productivity of corn crop for silage, beans and straw production in different crop rotation systems with spring/summer and fall/winter green manures cultivated under agroecological production management. The experiment was implemented in a rural property managed in an agroecological system since 2009, in the 2017/18 and 2018 crops. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with five repetitions. The treatments consisted of four different crop rotation systems: monocrop corn/monocrop corn/fallow/beans; corn + cowpea/monocrop corn/oats/beans; corn + crotalaria/monocrop corn/forage radish/beans and corn + jack bean/monocrop corn/vetch/beans. After the 2018 second crop of corn was removed, the winter/spring green manures were sown: forage radish, vetch, and oats. This was followed in September by the bean crop. The dry matter yields of corn for silage in each growing season and of the bean were evaluated, as well as the total productivity of the systems. The straw yield was also evaluated. The crop rotation systems that included green manures presented the highest total productivity. The intercropping with pork bean favored the corn productivity in the harvest and the crotalaria stover favored the productivity in the off-season. The corn + cowpea/jack bean/beans monocrop and corn + crotalaria/jack bean/forage radish/beans systems favored the productivity of beans. The mode corn monocrop/corn monocrop/fallow did not prioritize the accumulation of straw on the soil.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34661
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34661
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661/29248
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e439111234661
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e439111234661
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e439111234661
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052723541049344