Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661 |
Resumo: | This paper aimed to evaluate the productivity of corn crop for silage, beans and straw production in different crop rotation systems with spring/summer and fall/winter green manures cultivated under agroecological production management. The experiment was implemented in a rural property managed in an agroecological system since 2009, in the 2017/18 and 2018 crops. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with five repetitions. The treatments consisted of four different crop rotation systems: monocrop corn/monocrop corn/fallow/beans; corn + cowpea/monocrop corn/oats/beans; corn + crotalaria/monocrop corn/forage radish/beans and corn + jack bean/monocrop corn/vetch/beans. After the 2018 second crop of corn was removed, the winter/spring green manures were sown: forage radish, vetch, and oats. This was followed in September by the bean crop. The dry matter yields of corn for silage in each growing season and of the bean were evaluated, as well as the total productivity of the systems. The straw yield was also evaluated. The crop rotation systems that included green manures presented the highest total productivity. The intercropping with pork bean favored the corn productivity in the harvest and the crotalaria stover favored the productivity in the off-season. The corn + cowpea/jack bean/beans monocrop and corn + crotalaria/jack bean/forage radish/beans systems favored the productivity of beans. The mode corn monocrop/corn monocrop/fallow did not prioritize the accumulation of straw on the soil. |
id |
UNIFEI_963f54e96a76f132014b224f31382b8c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34661 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in successionProductividad del maíz para ensilaje en cultivo intercalado con abonos verdes y judías en sucesiónProdutividade de milho para ensilagem em consórcio com adubos verdes e de feijão em sucessãoConsortiumGreen manureEnsilageOrganic production.Cultivo intercaladoAbonos verdesEnsilajeProducción ecológica.ConsórcioAdubos verdesEnsilagemProdução orgânica.This paper aimed to evaluate the productivity of corn crop for silage, beans and straw production in different crop rotation systems with spring/summer and fall/winter green manures cultivated under agroecological production management. The experiment was implemented in a rural property managed in an agroecological system since 2009, in the 2017/18 and 2018 crops. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with five repetitions. The treatments consisted of four different crop rotation systems: monocrop corn/monocrop corn/fallow/beans; corn + cowpea/monocrop corn/oats/beans; corn + crotalaria/monocrop corn/forage radish/beans and corn + jack bean/monocrop corn/vetch/beans. After the 2018 second crop of corn was removed, the winter/spring green manures were sown: forage radish, vetch, and oats. This was followed in September by the bean crop. The dry matter yields of corn for silage in each growing season and of the bean were evaluated, as well as the total productivity of the systems. The straw yield was also evaluated. The crop rotation systems that included green manures presented the highest total productivity. The intercropping with pork bean favored the corn productivity in the harvest and the crotalaria stover favored the productivity in the off-season. The corn + cowpea/jack bean/beans monocrop and corn + crotalaria/jack bean/forage radish/beans systems favored the productivity of beans. The mode corn monocrop/corn monocrop/fallow did not prioritize the accumulation of straw on the soil.Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a produtividade da cultura de milho para ensilagem, feijão e a produção de palhada em diferentes sistemas de rotação de culturas com adubos verdes de primavera/verão e outono/inverno, cultivados sob manejo agroecológico de produção. O experimento foi implantado em uma propriedade rural manejada em sistema agroecológico desde 2009, nas safras de 2017/18 e 2018. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi em blocos casualizados, com 5 repetições. Os tratamentos foram constituídos por quatro diferentes sistemas de rotação de culturas: milho monocultivo/milho monocultivo/pousio/ feijão; milho + feijão-guandu/ milho monocultivo/ aveia/ feijão; milho + crotalária/ milho monocultivo/nabo forrageiro/feijão e milho + feijão-de-porco/milho monocultivo /ervilhaca/ feijão. Após a retirada do milho safrinha de 2018 foram semeados os adubos verdes de inverno/primavera: nabo forrageiro, ervilhaca e aveia. Em seguida no mês de setembro a cultura do feijoeiro. Foram avaliadas as produtividades de matéria seca de milho para ensilagem em cada estação de cultivo e do feijão; bem como, a produtividade total dos sistemas. Avaliou-se também a produtividade de palhada. Os sistemas de rotação de culturas que incluíram os adubos verdes apresentaram a maior produtividade total. O consórcio com feijão-de-porco favoreceu a produtividade de milho na safra e a palhada da crotalária a produtividade na safrinha. Os sistemas de milho + feijão-guandu/milho monocultivo/aveia/feijão e milho + crotalária/milho monocultivo/nabo forrageiro/feijão favoreceram a produtividade do feijão. A modalidade milho monocultivo/milho monocultivo/pousio não priorizou a acúmulo de palhada sobre o solo.Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar la productividad del cultivo de maíz para ensilaje, frijol y producción de paja en diferentes sistemas de rotación de cultivos con abonos verdes de primavera/verano y otoño/invierno, cultivados bajo un manejo de producción agroecológico. El experimento se implementó en un predio rural manejado en sistema agroecológico desde 2009, en las cosechas de 2017/18 y 2018. El diseño experimental utilizado fue en bloques aleatorios, con 5 repeticiones. Los tratamientos consistieron en cuatro sistemas diferentes de rotación de cultivos: maíz monocultivo/maíz monocultivo/fríjol; maíz + caupí/maíz monocultivo/avena/frijol; maíz + crotalaria/maíz monocultivo/nabo forrajero/frijol y maíz + frijol porcino/maíz monocultivo/ervillaca/frijol. Después de la retirada del maíz de retoño de 2018 se sembraron los abonos verdes de invierno/primavera: nabo forrajero, veza y avena. En septiembre le siguió la cosecha de judías. Se evaluaron los rendimientos de materia seca del maíz para ensilaje en cada temporada y de la judía; así como, la productividad total de los sistemas. También se evaluó la productividad de los rastrojos. Los sistemas de rotación de cultivos que incluían abonos verdes presentaron la mayor productividad total. El intercalado con caupí favoreció la productividad del maíz en la cosecha y la de los rastrojos de crotalaria en la contraestación. Los sistemas maíz + caupí/monocultivo de maíz/avena/frijoles y maíz + crotalaria/monocultivo de maíz/nabo forrajero/frijoles favorecieron la productividad de los frijoles. La modalidad monocultivo de maíz/monocultivo de maíz/pousseed no priorizó la acumulación de paja en el suelo.Research, Society and Development2022-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3466110.33448/rsd-v11i12.34661Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e439111234661Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e439111234661Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e4391112346612525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661/29248Copyright (c) 2022 Alexandra da Silva Martinez; Edleusa Pereira Seidel; Renan Pan; Tauane Santos Brito; Edmar Vasconcelos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartinez, Alexandra da Silva Seidel, Edleusa Pereira Pan, RenanBrito, Tauane Santos Vasconcelos , Edmar2022-09-26T11:56:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34661Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:49:52.444786Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession Productividad del maíz para ensilaje en cultivo intercalado con abonos verdes y judías en sucesión Produtividade de milho para ensilagem em consórcio com adubos verdes e de feijão em sucessão |
title |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession |
spellingShingle |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession Martinez, Alexandra da Silva Consortium Green manure Ensilage Organic production. Cultivo intercalado Abonos verdes Ensilaje Producción ecológica. Consórcio Adubos verdes Ensilagem Produção orgânica. |
title_short |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession |
title_full |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession |
title_fullStr |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession |
title_sort |
Corn yield for ensilage in consortium with green manure and bean in succession |
author |
Martinez, Alexandra da Silva |
author_facet |
Martinez, Alexandra da Silva Seidel, Edleusa Pereira Pan, Renan Brito, Tauane Santos Vasconcelos , Edmar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Seidel, Edleusa Pereira Pan, Renan Brito, Tauane Santos Vasconcelos , Edmar |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martinez, Alexandra da Silva Seidel, Edleusa Pereira Pan, Renan Brito, Tauane Santos Vasconcelos , Edmar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Consortium Green manure Ensilage Organic production. Cultivo intercalado Abonos verdes Ensilaje Producción ecológica. Consórcio Adubos verdes Ensilagem Produção orgânica. |
topic |
Consortium Green manure Ensilage Organic production. Cultivo intercalado Abonos verdes Ensilaje Producción ecológica. Consórcio Adubos verdes Ensilagem Produção orgânica. |
description |
This paper aimed to evaluate the productivity of corn crop for silage, beans and straw production in different crop rotation systems with spring/summer and fall/winter green manures cultivated under agroecological production management. The experiment was implemented in a rural property managed in an agroecological system since 2009, in the 2017/18 and 2018 crops. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with five repetitions. The treatments consisted of four different crop rotation systems: monocrop corn/monocrop corn/fallow/beans; corn + cowpea/monocrop corn/oats/beans; corn + crotalaria/monocrop corn/forage radish/beans and corn + jack bean/monocrop corn/vetch/beans. After the 2018 second crop of corn was removed, the winter/spring green manures were sown: forage radish, vetch, and oats. This was followed in September by the bean crop. The dry matter yields of corn for silage in each growing season and of the bean were evaluated, as well as the total productivity of the systems. The straw yield was also evaluated. The crop rotation systems that included green manures presented the highest total productivity. The intercropping with pork bean favored the corn productivity in the harvest and the crotalaria stover favored the productivity in the off-season. The corn + cowpea/jack bean/beans monocrop and corn + crotalaria/jack bean/forage radish/beans systems favored the productivity of beans. The mode corn monocrop/corn monocrop/fallow did not prioritize the accumulation of straw on the soil. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34661 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34661 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/34661/29248 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 12; e439111234661 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 12; e439111234661 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 12; e439111234661 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052723541049344 |