Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dambros, Marlei
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Pasqualli, Roberta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i5.3318
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3318
Resumo: This article aims to provoke reflections on scientific activity and the non-neutrality of science, based on Hugh Lacey's theoretical perspective as an epistemological foundation. Contemplating their perceptions about values and scientific activity, the perspectives that perpetuate in contemporary science practices stand out, as well as the modern values of controls that predominate in the scientific field. Methodologically, this research is classified as bibliographic, descriptive and qualitative. The results obtained emphasize the methodological pluralism defended by the author as a necessary principle for the neutrality of science since his theory is based on the assumption that there is a dialectical relationship between science, scientific activity and human well-being. It also highlights the need for science teaching to be practiced from a critical reflexive perspective, without being relativistic since science is a socio-historical practice inserted in the world of values and human experience, undertaken by agents human beings, whose actions are explainable in terms of their beliefs, perceptions, deliberations, desires, values and other intentional opportunities.
id UNIFEI_96b0402a46a3a8af1005a9a23631c96a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3318
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
spelling Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspectiveActividad científica y la cuestión de la no neutralidad de la ciencia: la perspectiva epistemológica de Hugh LaceyAtividade científica e a questão da não neutralidade da ciência: perspectiva epistemológica de Hugh LaceyHugh LaceyCiênciaAtividade CientíficaEducação Científica e Tecnológica.Hugh LaceyCienciaActividad científicaEducación científica y tecnológica.Hugh LaceyScienceScientific activityScientific and Technological Education.This article aims to provoke reflections on scientific activity and the non-neutrality of science, based on Hugh Lacey's theoretical perspective as an epistemological foundation. Contemplating their perceptions about values and scientific activity, the perspectives that perpetuate in contemporary science practices stand out, as well as the modern values of controls that predominate in the scientific field. Methodologically, this research is classified as bibliographic, descriptive and qualitative. The results obtained emphasize the methodological pluralism defended by the author as a necessary principle for the neutrality of science since his theory is based on the assumption that there is a dialectical relationship between science, scientific activity and human well-being. It also highlights the need for science teaching to be practiced from a critical reflexive perspective, without being relativistic since science is a socio-historical practice inserted in the world of values and human experience, undertaken by agents human beings, whose actions are explainable in terms of their beliefs, perceptions, deliberations, desires, values and other intentional opportunities.Este artículo tiene como objetivo provocar reflexiones sobre la actividad científica y la no neutralidad de la ciencia, basándose en la perspectiva teórica de Hugh Lacey como base epistemológica. Al contemplar sus percepciones sobre los valores y la actividad científica, se destacan las perspectivas que perpetúan en las prácticas científicas contemporáneas, así como los valores modernos de los controles que predominan en el campo científico. Metodológicamente, esta investigación se clasifica en bibliográfica, descriptiva y cualitativa. Los resultados obtenidos enfatizan el pluralismo metodológico defendido por el autor como un principio necesario para la neutralidad de la ciencia, ya que su teoría se basa en el supuesto de que existe una relación dialéctica entre la ciencia, la actividad científica y el bienestar humano. También destaca la necesidad de que la enseñanza de las ciencias se practique desde una perspectiva reflexiva crítica, sin ser relativista, ya que la ciencia es una práctica sociohistórica insertada en el mundo de los valores y la experiencia humana, realizada por agentes seres humanos, cuyas acciones son explicables en términos de sus creencias, percepciones, deliberaciones, deseos, valores y otras oportunidades intencionales.Esse artigo tem a pretensão de provocar reflexões sobre atividade científica e a não neutralidade da ciência, tendo como fundamento epistemológico a perspectiva teórica de Hugh Lacey. Contemplando suas percepções sobre os valores e a atividade científica, destacam-se as perspectivas que perpetuam nas práticas da ciência contemporânea, bem como os valores modernos de controles que predominam no campo científico. Metodologicamente, classifica-se esta pesquisa como de natureza bibliográfica, de caráter descritivo e qualitativo. Os resultados obtidos enfatizam o pluralismo metodológico defendido pelo autor como princípio necessário para a neutralidade da ciência uma vez que a sua teoria parte do pressuposto de que existe uma relação dialética entre ciência, atividade científica e bem-estar humano. Destaca-se, também, a necessidade de que o ensino das ciências seja praticado a partir de perspectiva crítica reflexiva, sem ser relativista uma vez que a ciência é uma prática sócio-histórica inserida no mundo dos valores e da experiência humana, empreendida por agentes humanos, cujas ações são explicáveis em termos de suas crenças, percepções, deliberações, desejos, valores e outros ensejos intencionais.Research, Society and Development2020-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/331810.33448/rsd-v9i5.3318Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 5; e139953318Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 5; e139953318Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 5; e1399533182525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3318/4776Copyright (c) 2020 Marlei Dambros, Roberta Pasqualliinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDambros, MarleiPasqualli, Roberta2020-08-20T18:06:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3318Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:27:33.449794Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
Actividad científica y la cuestión de la no neutralidad de la ciencia: la perspectiva epistemológica de Hugh Lacey
Atividade científica e a questão da não neutralidade da ciência: perspectiva epistemológica de Hugh Lacey
title Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
spellingShingle Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
Dambros, Marlei
Hugh Lacey
Ciência
Atividade Científica
Educação Científica e Tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Ciencia
Actividad científica
Educación científica y tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Science
Scientific activity
Scientific and Technological Education.
Dambros, Marlei
Hugh Lacey
Ciência
Atividade Científica
Educação Científica e Tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Ciencia
Actividad científica
Educación científica y tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Science
Scientific activity
Scientific and Technological Education.
title_short Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
title_full Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
title_fullStr Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
title_full_unstemmed Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
title_sort Scientific activity and the question of the non-neutrality of science: Hugh Lacey's epistemological perspective
author Dambros, Marlei
author_facet Dambros, Marlei
Dambros, Marlei
Pasqualli, Roberta
Pasqualli, Roberta
author_role author
author2 Pasqualli, Roberta
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dambros, Marlei
Pasqualli, Roberta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hugh Lacey
Ciência
Atividade Científica
Educação Científica e Tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Ciencia
Actividad científica
Educación científica y tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Science
Scientific activity
Scientific and Technological Education.
topic Hugh Lacey
Ciência
Atividade Científica
Educação Científica e Tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Ciencia
Actividad científica
Educación científica y tecnológica.
Hugh Lacey
Science
Scientific activity
Scientific and Technological Education.
description This article aims to provoke reflections on scientific activity and the non-neutrality of science, based on Hugh Lacey's theoretical perspective as an epistemological foundation. Contemplating their perceptions about values and scientific activity, the perspectives that perpetuate in contemporary science practices stand out, as well as the modern values of controls that predominate in the scientific field. Methodologically, this research is classified as bibliographic, descriptive and qualitative. The results obtained emphasize the methodological pluralism defended by the author as a necessary principle for the neutrality of science since his theory is based on the assumption that there is a dialectical relationship between science, scientific activity and human well-being. It also highlights the need for science teaching to be practiced from a critical reflexive perspective, without being relativistic since science is a socio-historical practice inserted in the world of values and human experience, undertaken by agents human beings, whose actions are explainable in terms of their beliefs, perceptions, deliberations, desires, values and other intentional opportunities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3318
10.33448/rsd-v9i5.3318
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3318
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i5.3318
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3318/4776
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Marlei Dambros, Roberta Pasqualli
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Marlei Dambros, Roberta Pasqualli
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 5; e139953318
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 5; e139953318
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 5; e139953318
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1822178734824751104
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i5.3318

Registros relacionados