Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Setúbal, Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Lopes, Letícia Mendes da Rocha, Lopes, Matheus Araújo Brito Santos, Verde, Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima, Reis, Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41618
Resumo: Introduction: Individuals born with cleft palate may face a number of challenges, including anatomical deformities, dental malocclusion, hearing impairment and speech disorder. Those who develop maxillary hypoplasia may receive osteogenic distraction or later orthognathic surgery, which can reposition the maxilla to a functional and esthetic position. This surgical advancement of the maxilla has been reported for over 30 years. According to the ideal protocol, the lip should be operated from 3 months of age, in a procedure known as cheiloplasty, while 12 months is the time determined for palatoplasty. Objective: To review in the literature what would be the advantages and disadvantages of an early approach to an osteogenic distraction to the detriment of a subsequent orthognathic surgery in cleft patients. Methodology: It was carried out in the period between 2006 and 2019 through the databases: Science direct and Pubmed. Results: A total of 95 articles were found, 26 duplicates were excluded and 69 were selected for the survey. Conclusion: We can see that both surgeries have their benefits performed at the right times during the patient's life, requiring multidisciplinary treatment with psychologists, doctors, speech therapists, among others. However, there is a bias of osteogenic surgery, as we do not always obtain an expected and objective result.
id UNIFEI_97cae93426993e7c0d75c0a39474a179
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41618
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literaturaOrthognathic surgery vs. osteogenic distraction in cleft patients: literature reviewCirugía ortognática vs. distracción osteogénica en pacientes con fisura: revisión de la literaturaCirugía ortognáticaOsteogénesis por distracciónFisura del paladar.Cirurgia ortognáticaOsteogenese por distraçãoFissura palatina.Orthognathic surgeryOsteogenesis, distractionCleft palate.Introduction: Individuals born with cleft palate may face a number of challenges, including anatomical deformities, dental malocclusion, hearing impairment and speech disorder. Those who develop maxillary hypoplasia may receive osteogenic distraction or later orthognathic surgery, which can reposition the maxilla to a functional and esthetic position. This surgical advancement of the maxilla has been reported for over 30 years. According to the ideal protocol, the lip should be operated from 3 months of age, in a procedure known as cheiloplasty, while 12 months is the time determined for palatoplasty. Objective: To review in the literature what would be the advantages and disadvantages of an early approach to an osteogenic distraction to the detriment of a subsequent orthognathic surgery in cleft patients. Methodology: It was carried out in the period between 2006 and 2019 through the databases: Science direct and Pubmed. Results: A total of 95 articles were found, 26 duplicates were excluded and 69 were selected for the survey. Conclusion: We can see that both surgeries have their benefits performed at the right times during the patient's life, requiring multidisciplinary treatment with psychologists, doctors, speech therapists, among others. However, there is a bias of osteogenic surgery, as we do not always obtain an expected and objective result.Introducción: las personas que nacen con paladar hendido pueden enfrentar una serie de desafíos, que incluyen deformidades anatómicas, maloclusión dental, discapacidad auditiva y trastornos del habla. Aquellos que desarrollan hipoplasia maxilar pueden recibir distracción osteogénica o cirugía ortognática posterior, que puede reposicionar el maxilar a una posición funcional y estética. Este avance quirúrgico del maxilar ha sido reportado por más de 30 años. Según el protocolo ideal, el labio debe operarse a partir de los 3 meses de edad, en un procedimiento conocido como queiloplastia, mientras que 12 meses es el tiempo determinado para la palatoplastia. Objetivo: Revisar en la literatura cuáles serían las ventajas y desventajas de un abordaje temprano de una distracción osteogénica en detrimento de una cirugía ortognática posterior en pacientes fisurados. Metodología: Se realizó en el periodo comprendido entre 2006 y 2019 a través de las bases de datos: Science direct y Pubmed. Resultados: Se encontraron un total de 95 artículos, se excluyeron 26 duplicados y se seleccionaron 69 para la encuesta. Conclusión: Podemos ver que ambas cirugías tienen sus beneficios realizadas en los momentos adecuados durante la vida del paciente, requiriendo un tratamiento multidisciplinario con psicólogos, médicos, logopedas, entre otros. Sin embargo, existe un sesgo de la cirugía osteogénica, ya que no siempre obtenemos un resultado esperado y objetivo.Introdução: Indivíduos nascidos com fenda palatina podem enfrentar uma série de desafios, incluindo deformidades anatômicas, má oclusão dentária, deficiência auditiva e distúrbio da fala. Aqueles que desenvolvem hipoplasia maxilar podem receber distração osteogênica ou posteriormente cirurgia ortognática, que pode reposicionar a maxila para uma posição funcional e estética. Esse avanço cirúrgico da maxila tem sido relatado há mais de 30 anos. Pelo protocolo ideal, o lábio deve ser operado a partir dos 3 meses de idade, em procedimento conhecido como queiloplastia, enquanto 12 meses é o tempo determinado para a palatoplastia. Objetivo: Revisar na literatura quais seriam as vantagens e desvantagens de uma abordagem precoce de uma distração osteogênica em detrimento a uma posterior cirurgia ortognática em pacientes fissurados. Metodologia: Foi realizada no período compreendido entre 2006 a 2019 através das bases de dados: Science direct e Pubmed. Resultados: Foram achados ao todo 95 artigos, excluídos 26 duplicados e selecionados 69 para o levantamento. Conclusão: Podemos perceber que ambas a cirurgia tem seus benefícios feitos em momentos corretos durante a vida do paciente, necessitam de tratamento multidisciplinar com psicólogos, médicos, fonoaudiólogos, entre outros. Entretanto, há um viés da cirurgia osteogênica, pois nem sempre obtemos um resultado esperado e objetivo, por esse motivo, novos estudos necessitam ser feitos para avaliar a relação cirurgia ortognática e distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados.Research, Society and Development2023-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4161810.33448/rsd-v12i5.41618Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 5; e16712541618Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 5; e16712541618Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 5; e167125416182525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41618/33815Copyright (c) 2023 Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga Setúbal; Letícia Mendes da Rocha Lopes; Matheus Araújo Brito Santos Lopes; Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima Verde; Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSetúbal, Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga Lopes, Letícia Mendes da Rocha Lopes, Matheus Araújo Brito Santos Verde, Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima Reis, Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho 2023-05-30T13:24:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/41618Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2023-05-30T13:24:21Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
Orthognathic surgery vs. osteogenic distraction in cleft patients: literature review
Cirugía ortognática vs. distracción osteogénica en pacientes con fisura: revisión de la literatura
title Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
spellingShingle Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
Setúbal, Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga
Cirugía ortognática
Osteogénesis por distracción
Fisura del paladar.
Cirurgia ortognática
Osteogenese por distração
Fissura palatina.
Orthognathic surgery
Osteogenesis, distraction
Cleft palate.
title_short Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
title_full Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
title_fullStr Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
title_full_unstemmed Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
title_sort Cirurgia ortognática vs distração osteogênica em pacientes fissurados: revisão da literatura
author Setúbal, Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga
author_facet Setúbal, Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga
Lopes, Letícia Mendes da Rocha
Lopes, Matheus Araújo Brito Santos
Verde, Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima
Reis, Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Letícia Mendes da Rocha
Lopes, Matheus Araújo Brito Santos
Verde, Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima
Reis, Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Setúbal, Brunnah Rafaella Mapurunga
Lopes, Letícia Mendes da Rocha
Lopes, Matheus Araújo Brito Santos
Verde, Giselle Maria Ferreira Lima
Reis, Erik Neiva Ribeiro de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cirugía ortognática
Osteogénesis por distracción
Fisura del paladar.
Cirurgia ortognática
Osteogenese por distração
Fissura palatina.
Orthognathic surgery
Osteogenesis, distraction
Cleft palate.
topic Cirugía ortognática
Osteogénesis por distracción
Fisura del paladar.
Cirurgia ortognática
Osteogenese por distração
Fissura palatina.
Orthognathic surgery
Osteogenesis, distraction
Cleft palate.
description Introduction: Individuals born with cleft palate may face a number of challenges, including anatomical deformities, dental malocclusion, hearing impairment and speech disorder. Those who develop maxillary hypoplasia may receive osteogenic distraction or later orthognathic surgery, which can reposition the maxilla to a functional and esthetic position. This surgical advancement of the maxilla has been reported for over 30 years. According to the ideal protocol, the lip should be operated from 3 months of age, in a procedure known as cheiloplasty, while 12 months is the time determined for palatoplasty. Objective: To review in the literature what would be the advantages and disadvantages of an early approach to an osteogenic distraction to the detriment of a subsequent orthognathic surgery in cleft patients. Methodology: It was carried out in the period between 2006 and 2019 through the databases: Science direct and Pubmed. Results: A total of 95 articles were found, 26 duplicates were excluded and 69 were selected for the survey. Conclusion: We can see that both surgeries have their benefits performed at the right times during the patient's life, requiring multidisciplinary treatment with psychologists, doctors, speech therapists, among others. However, there is a bias of osteogenic surgery, as we do not always obtain an expected and objective result.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41618
10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41618
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41618
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v12i5.41618
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/41618/33815
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 5; e16712541618
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 5; e16712541618
Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 5; e16712541618
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052624154918912