Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18750 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to carry out a qualitative analysis of the environmental impact report (RIMA) of a port terminal located in the municipality of Itacoatiara/AM. The report was analyzed according to the minimum parameters established by Article 9 of CONAMA Resolution No. 01/1986, which provides for minimum criteria for preparing the RIMA. A general synthesis of the analyzed requirements was carried out. It was possible to observe that the report has several technical words that make understanding and clarity difficult. RIMA presents coherent objectives and justifications, with excellent quality. In this way, the alternatives and the environmental diagnosis of the project are mostly in accordance with the CONAMA Resolution. On the other hand, there is a deficiency in environmental impacts, which are not characterized in the installation and operation phases. The different situations and their alternatives were not considered, as well as the non-execution of the project. The mitigating measures are presented in a clear and objective way, but not enough programs were presented. Finally, the conclusion is not consistent with the reality of the project, as well as the multidisciplinary team, where there is not a variety of professionals. Overall, 60% of the requirements highlighted by the CONAMA Resolution were not in agreement, while 40% were relatively within the recommendations. Thus, this study presents data that show the quality of RIMA that, in the absence of this information, damage to the environment is possible, as well as a lack of understanding for the lay public. |
id |
UNIFEI_a04045272672379718c8cab60d3aad59 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18750 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AMAnálisis de calidad del informe de impacto ambiental de una terminal portuaria del Municipio de Itacoatiara/AMAnálise da qualidade do relatório de impacto sobre o meio ambiente de um terminal portuário do Município de Itacoatiara/AMEnvironmental studiesEnvironmental impactsLay public.Estudios ambientalesImpactos ambientalesPúblico laico.Estudos ambientaisImpactos ambientaisPúblico leigo. This study aimed to carry out a qualitative analysis of the environmental impact report (RIMA) of a port terminal located in the municipality of Itacoatiara/AM. The report was analyzed according to the minimum parameters established by Article 9 of CONAMA Resolution No. 01/1986, which provides for minimum criteria for preparing the RIMA. A general synthesis of the analyzed requirements was carried out. It was possible to observe that the report has several technical words that make understanding and clarity difficult. RIMA presents coherent objectives and justifications, with excellent quality. In this way, the alternatives and the environmental diagnosis of the project are mostly in accordance with the CONAMA Resolution. On the other hand, there is a deficiency in environmental impacts, which are not characterized in the installation and operation phases. The different situations and their alternatives were not considered, as well as the non-execution of the project. The mitigating measures are presented in a clear and objective way, but not enough programs were presented. Finally, the conclusion is not consistent with the reality of the project, as well as the multidisciplinary team, where there is not a variety of professionals. Overall, 60% of the requirements highlighted by the CONAMA Resolution were not in agreement, while 40% were relatively within the recommendations. Thus, this study presents data that show the quality of RIMA that, in the absence of this information, damage to the environment is possible, as well as a lack of understanding for the lay public.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo realizar un análisis cualitativo del informe de impacto ambiental (RIMA) de una terminal portuaria ubicada en el municipio de Itacoatiara / AM. El informe fue analizado de acuerdo con los parámetros mínimos establecidos por el artículo 9 de la Resolución CONAMA No. 01/1986, que establece los criterios mínimos para la elaboración del RIMA. Se realizó una síntesis general de los requerimientos analizados. Se pudo observar que el informe tiene varias palabras técnicas que dificultan la comprensión y la claridad. RIMA presenta objetivos y justificaciones coherentes, con excelente calidad. De esta manera, las alternativas y el diagnóstico ambiental del proyecto están mayoritariamente de acuerdo con la Resolución de CONAMA. Por otro lado, existe una deficiencia en los impactos ambientales, los cuales no se caracterizan en las fases de instalación y operación. No se consideraron las diferentes situaciones y sus alternativas, así como la no ejecución del proyecto. Las medidas de mitigación se presentan de manera clara y objetiva, pero no se presentaron suficientes programas. Finalmente, la conclusión no es acorde con la realidad del proyecto, así como la del equipo multidisciplinar, donde no hay variedad de profesionales. En general, el 60% de los requisitos destacados por la Resolución de CONAMA no estaban de acuerdo, mientras que el 40% estaban relativamente dentro de las recomendaciones. Así, este estudio presenta datos que demuestran la calidad de RIMA que, en ausencia de esta información, es posible el daño al medio ambiente, así como una falta de comprensión por parte del público lego.O presente estudo teve como objetivo realizar uma análise qualitativa do relatório de impacto sobre o meio ambiente (RIMA) de um terminal portuário localizado no município de Itacoatiara/AM. O relatório foi analisado de acordo com os parâmetros mínimos estabelecido pelo Art. 9 da Resolução CONAMA nº 01/1986 que dispõe critérios mínimos para elaboração do RIMA. Foi realizada uma síntese geral dos requisitos analisados. Foi possível observar que o relatório possui diversas palavras de cunho técnico que dificultam o entendimento e a clareza. O RIMA apresenta objetivos e justificativas coerentes e com ótima qualidade. Dessa mesma maneira, as alternativas e o diagnóstico ambiental do empreendimento estão de acordo em sua maioria com a Resolução CONAMA. Por outro lado, há deficiência nos impactos ambientais, onde não são caracterizados nas fases da instalação e da operação. Não foram consideradas as diferentes situações e suas alternativas, bem como à não execução do empreendimento. As medidas mitigadoras são apresentadas de forma clara e objetivas, porém não foram apresentados programas suficientes. Por fim, a conclusão não está coerente com a realidade do empreendimento, bem como a equipe multidisciplinar, onde não há uma variedade de profissionais. De forma geral, 60% dos requisitos salientados pela Resolução CONAMA não estavam de acordo, enquanto que 40% estavam relativamente dentro das recomendações. Sendo assim, o presente estudo apresenta dados que mostram a qualidade do RIMA que, com a ausência dessas informações é possível ocorrer danos sobre o meio ambiente, bem como falta do entendimento ao público leigo.Research, Society and Development2021-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1875010.33448/rsd-v10i10.18750Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e205101018750Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e205101018750Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e2051010187502525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18750/16747Copyright (c) 2021 Gabriel dos Anjos Guimarães; Rodrigo Couto Alveshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães, Gabriel dos AnjosAlves, Rodrigo Couto2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18750Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:48.692480Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM Análisis de calidad del informe de impacto ambiental de una terminal portuaria del Municipio de Itacoatiara/AM Análise da qualidade do relatório de impacto sobre o meio ambiente de um terminal portuário do Município de Itacoatiara/AM |
title |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM |
spellingShingle |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM Guimarães, Gabriel dos Anjos Environmental studies Environmental impacts Lay public. Estudios ambientales Impactos ambientales Público laico. Estudos ambientais Impactos ambientais Público leigo. |
title_short |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM |
title_full |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM |
title_fullStr |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM |
title_sort |
Quality analysis of the environmental impact report of a port terminal in the Municipality of Itacoatiara/AM |
author |
Guimarães, Gabriel dos Anjos |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Gabriel dos Anjos Alves, Rodrigo Couto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves, Rodrigo Couto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Gabriel dos Anjos Alves, Rodrigo Couto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Environmental studies Environmental impacts Lay public. Estudios ambientales Impactos ambientales Público laico. Estudos ambientais Impactos ambientais Público leigo. |
topic |
Environmental studies Environmental impacts Lay public. Estudios ambientales Impactos ambientales Público laico. Estudos ambientais Impactos ambientais Público leigo. |
description |
This study aimed to carry out a qualitative analysis of the environmental impact report (RIMA) of a port terminal located in the municipality of Itacoatiara/AM. The report was analyzed according to the minimum parameters established by Article 9 of CONAMA Resolution No. 01/1986, which provides for minimum criteria for preparing the RIMA. A general synthesis of the analyzed requirements was carried out. It was possible to observe that the report has several technical words that make understanding and clarity difficult. RIMA presents coherent objectives and justifications, with excellent quality. In this way, the alternatives and the environmental diagnosis of the project are mostly in accordance with the CONAMA Resolution. On the other hand, there is a deficiency in environmental impacts, which are not characterized in the installation and operation phases. The different situations and their alternatives were not considered, as well as the non-execution of the project. The mitigating measures are presented in a clear and objective way, but not enough programs were presented. Finally, the conclusion is not consistent with the reality of the project, as well as the multidisciplinary team, where there is not a variety of professionals. Overall, 60% of the requirements highlighted by the CONAMA Resolution were not in agreement, while 40% were relatively within the recommendations. Thus, this study presents data that show the quality of RIMA that, in the absence of this information, damage to the environment is possible, as well as a lack of understanding for the lay public. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18750 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18750 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18750 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18750 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18750/16747 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Gabriel dos Anjos Guimarães; Rodrigo Couto Alves https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Gabriel dos Anjos Guimarães; Rodrigo Couto Alves https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e205101018750 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e205101018750 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e205101018750 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052685878296576 |