Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780 |
Resumo: | The scientific environment is characterized by demands of productivity, fact that leads to discussions and debates about the quality of the produced works. The ethical conditions for the elaboration of scientific articles, such as that involving the real participation of the authors in the productions, have demanded the establishment of precise and clear criteria. In this sense, this study sought to identify and analyze authorship criteria in Qualis Capes A1, A2, and B1 journals in the area of Education, which have in their scope Science Education or Science Teaching, in order to identify the existence of guidelines to the possible authors. From this study, the objective was to discuss authorship criteria to improve the quality and reliability of scientific productions. For this, 44 journals were selected to analyze information about the authorship criteria. It was observed that the ORCID registration requirement for researchers is present in four journals; whereas guidelines on plagiarism are present in 11 journals; whereas only three journals require specific titling of the authors; and 18 journals refer to the authors' contribution criteria in scientific work. These data indicate that most of the journals evaluated present insufficient information to the authors, showing little concern with this part of the article production process. With the above, it is clear that research with journals should continue to be developed, seeking the criteria established by journals to ensure the fairness of the indication of authorship, as these contribute to the quality, ethics and dissemination of research by journals. |
id |
UNIFEI_a586a19018a8c0840149e6a2ee1db13c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1780 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1La autoría como criterio para la producción de artículos: un análisis de revistas en el área enseñanza de las ciencias Qualis A1, A2 y B1Autoria como critério para produção de artigos: uma análise dos periódicos da área de Ensino de Ciências Qualis A1, A2, e B1Ética de la investigaciónEducación en cienciasArtículos científicos.Ética em pesquisaEducação em CiênciasArtigos científicos.Research ethicsScience EducationScientific articles.The scientific environment is characterized by demands of productivity, fact that leads to discussions and debates about the quality of the produced works. The ethical conditions for the elaboration of scientific articles, such as that involving the real participation of the authors in the productions, have demanded the establishment of precise and clear criteria. In this sense, this study sought to identify and analyze authorship criteria in Qualis Capes A1, A2, and B1 journals in the area of Education, which have in their scope Science Education or Science Teaching, in order to identify the existence of guidelines to the possible authors. From this study, the objective was to discuss authorship criteria to improve the quality and reliability of scientific productions. For this, 44 journals were selected to analyze information about the authorship criteria. It was observed that the ORCID registration requirement for researchers is present in four journals; whereas guidelines on plagiarism are present in 11 journals; whereas only three journals require specific titling of the authors; and 18 journals refer to the authors' contribution criteria in scientific work. These data indicate that most of the journals evaluated present insufficient information to the authors, showing little concern with this part of the article production process. With the above, it is clear that research with journals should continue to be developed, seeking the criteria established by journals to ensure the fairness of the indication of authorship, as these contribute to the quality, ethics and dissemination of research by journals.El entorno científico se caracteriza por demandas de productividad, un hecho que lleva a discusiones y debates sobre la calidad del trabajo producido. Las condiciones éticas para la elaboración de artículos científicos, como la que implica la participación real de los autores en las producciones, han exigido el establecimiento de criterios precisos y claros. En este sentido, este estudio buscó identificar y analizar los criterios de autoría en las revistas Qualis Capes A1, A2 y B1 en el área de Educación, que tienen en su alcance la Educación en Ciencias o la Enseñanza de las Ciencias, para identificar la existencia de pautas a los posibles autores. De este estudio, el objetivo fue discutir los criterios de autoría para mejorar la calidad y la fiabilidad de las producciones científicas. Para esto, se seleccionaron 44 revistas para analizar información sobre los criterios de autoría. Se observó que el requisito de registro de ORCID para investigadores está presente en cuatro revistas; que las directrices sobre plagio están presentes en 11 revistas; que solo tres revistas requieren títulos específicos de los autores; y 18 revistas se refieren a los criterios de contribución de los autores en el trabajo científico. Estos datos indican que la mayoría de las revistas evaluadas presentan información insuficiente para los autores, mostrando poca preocupación con esta parte del proceso de producción del artículo. Con lo anterior, está claro que la investigación con revistas debe continuar desarrollándose, buscando los criterios establecidos por las revistas para garantizar la imparcialidad de la indicación de autoría, ya que contribuyen a la calidad, la ética y la difusión de la investigación por parte de las revistas.O meio científico é caracterizado por exigências de produtividade, fato que leva à discussões e debates acerca da qualidade dos trabalhos produzidos. As condições éticas de elaboração de artigos científicos, tal como a que envolve a real participação dos autores nas produções, têm demandado o estabelecimento de critérios precisos e claros. Nesse sentido, este estudo buscou identificar e analisar critérios de autoria em periódicos Qualis Capes A1, A2, e B1, da área de Ensino, que tenham em seu escopo a Educação em Ciências ou Ensino de Ciências, de forma a identificar a existência de orientações aos possíveis autores. A partir desse estudo, objetivou-se discutir critérios de autoria para melhoria da qualidade e da confiabilidade das produções científicas. Para isto, selecionou-se 44 periódicos para análise de informações acerca dos critérios de autoria. Observou-se que a exigência de cadastro no ORCID para os pesquisadores está presente em quatro periódicos; que as orientações acerca de plágio estão presentes em 11 periódicos; que apenas três periódicos exigem titulação específica dos autores; e que 18 periódicos fazem referência à critérios de contribuição dos autores nos trabalhos científicos. Esses dados indicam que a maior parte dos periódicos avaliados apresentam informações insuficientes aos autores, demonstrando pouca preocupação com essa parte do processo de produção de artigos. Com o exposto, percebe-se que pesquisas com periódicos devem continuar a serem desenvolvidas, buscando os critérios estabelecidos pelos periódicos para assegurar a lisura da indicação de autoria, já que esses contribuem com a qualidade, ética e divulgação das pesquisas pelos periódicos.Research, Society and Development2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/178010.33448/rsd-v9i1.1780Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 1; e125911780Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 1; e125911780Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 1; e1259117802525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780/1554Copyright (c) 2020 Fernanda Oliveira Lima, Luciana Borowski Pietricoski, Adriano Lopes Romero, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da Silva, Jéssica Engel do Nascimento, João Paulo Ganhor, Simone Domingues Garcia, Glessyan de Quadros Marques, Kamilla Zabotti, Greyze Palaoro, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de Deus, Marcia Borin da Cunhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Fernanda OliveiraRomero, Adriano LopesPietricoski, Luciana BorowskiSilva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues daMarques, Glessyan de QuadrosDeitos, Greyze Maria PalaoroNascimento, Jéssica Engel doGanhor, João PauloGarcia, Simone DominguesZabotti, KamillaDeus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo deCunha, Marcia Borin da2020-08-19T03:04:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1780Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:41.328639Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 La autoría como criterio para la producción de artículos: un análisis de revistas en el área enseñanza de las ciencias Qualis A1, A2 y B1 Autoria como critério para produção de artigos: uma análise dos periódicos da área de Ensino de Ciências Qualis A1, A2, e B1 |
title |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 |
spellingShingle |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 Lima, Fernanda Oliveira Ética de la investigación Educación en ciencias Artículos científicos. Ética em pesquisa Educação em Ciências Artigos científicos. Research ethics Science Education Scientific articles. |
title_short |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 |
title_full |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 |
title_fullStr |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 |
title_sort |
Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1 |
author |
Lima, Fernanda Oliveira |
author_facet |
Lima, Fernanda Oliveira Romero, Adriano Lopes Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da Marques, Glessyan de Quadros Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do Ganhor, João Paulo Garcia, Simone Domingues Zabotti, Kamilla Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de Cunha, Marcia Borin da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Romero, Adriano Lopes Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da Marques, Glessyan de Quadros Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do Ganhor, João Paulo Garcia, Simone Domingues Zabotti, Kamilla Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de Cunha, Marcia Borin da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Fernanda Oliveira Romero, Adriano Lopes Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da Marques, Glessyan de Quadros Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do Ganhor, João Paulo Garcia, Simone Domingues Zabotti, Kamilla Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de Cunha, Marcia Borin da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ética de la investigación Educación en ciencias Artículos científicos. Ética em pesquisa Educação em Ciências Artigos científicos. Research ethics Science Education Scientific articles. |
topic |
Ética de la investigación Educación en ciencias Artículos científicos. Ética em pesquisa Educação em Ciências Artigos científicos. Research ethics Science Education Scientific articles. |
description |
The scientific environment is characterized by demands of productivity, fact that leads to discussions and debates about the quality of the produced works. The ethical conditions for the elaboration of scientific articles, such as that involving the real participation of the authors in the productions, have demanded the establishment of precise and clear criteria. In this sense, this study sought to identify and analyze authorship criteria in Qualis Capes A1, A2, and B1 journals in the area of Education, which have in their scope Science Education or Science Teaching, in order to identify the existence of guidelines to the possible authors. From this study, the objective was to discuss authorship criteria to improve the quality and reliability of scientific productions. For this, 44 journals were selected to analyze information about the authorship criteria. It was observed that the ORCID registration requirement for researchers is present in four journals; whereas guidelines on plagiarism are present in 11 journals; whereas only three journals require specific titling of the authors; and 18 journals refer to the authors' contribution criteria in scientific work. These data indicate that most of the journals evaluated present insufficient information to the authors, showing little concern with this part of the article production process. With the above, it is clear that research with journals should continue to be developed, seeking the criteria established by journals to ensure the fairness of the indication of authorship, as these contribute to the quality, ethics and dissemination of research by journals. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780 10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1780 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1780 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780/1554 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 1; e125911780 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 1; e125911780 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 1; e125911780 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052829313007616 |