Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Fernanda Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Romero, Adriano Lopes, Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski, Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da, Marques, Glessyan de Quadros, Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro, Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do, Ganhor, João Paulo, Garcia, Simone Domingues, Zabotti, Kamilla, Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de, Cunha, Marcia Borin da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780
Resumo: The scientific environment is characterized by demands of productivity, fact that leads to discussions and debates about the quality of the produced works. The ethical conditions for the elaboration of scientific articles, such as that involving the real participation of the authors in the productions, have demanded the establishment of precise and clear criteria. In this sense, this study sought to identify and analyze authorship criteria in Qualis Capes A1, A2, and B1 journals in the area of Education, which have in their scope Science Education or Science Teaching, in order to identify the existence of guidelines to the possible authors. From this study, the objective was to discuss authorship criteria to improve the quality and reliability of scientific productions. For this, 44 journals were selected to analyze information about the authorship criteria. It was observed that the ORCID registration requirement for researchers is present in four journals; whereas guidelines on plagiarism are present in 11 journals; whereas only three journals require specific titling of the authors; and 18 journals refer to the authors' contribution criteria in scientific work. These data indicate that most of the journals evaluated present insufficient information to the authors, showing little concern with this part of the article production process. With the above, it is clear that research with journals should continue to be developed, seeking the criteria established by journals to ensure the fairness of the indication of authorship, as these contribute to the quality, ethics and dissemination of research by journals.
id UNIFEI_a586a19018a8c0840149e6a2ee1db13c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1780
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1La autoría como criterio para la producción de artículos: un análisis de revistas en el área enseñanza de las ciencias Qualis A1, A2 y B1Autoria como critério para produção de artigos: uma análise dos periódicos da área de Ensino de Ciências Qualis A1, A2, e B1Ética de la investigaciónEducación en cienciasArtículos científicos.Ética em pesquisaEducação em CiênciasArtigos científicos.Research ethicsScience EducationScientific articles.The scientific environment is characterized by demands of productivity, fact that leads to discussions and debates about the quality of the produced works. The ethical conditions for the elaboration of scientific articles, such as that involving the real participation of the authors in the productions, have demanded the establishment of precise and clear criteria. In this sense, this study sought to identify and analyze authorship criteria in Qualis Capes A1, A2, and B1 journals in the area of Education, which have in their scope Science Education or Science Teaching, in order to identify the existence of guidelines to the possible authors. From this study, the objective was to discuss authorship criteria to improve the quality and reliability of scientific productions. For this, 44 journals were selected to analyze information about the authorship criteria. It was observed that the ORCID registration requirement for researchers is present in four journals; whereas guidelines on plagiarism are present in 11 journals; whereas only three journals require specific titling of the authors; and 18 journals refer to the authors' contribution criteria in scientific work. These data indicate that most of the journals evaluated present insufficient information to the authors, showing little concern with this part of the article production process. With the above, it is clear that research with journals should continue to be developed, seeking the criteria established by journals to ensure the fairness of the indication of authorship, as these contribute to the quality, ethics and dissemination of research by journals.El entorno científico se caracteriza por demandas de productividad, un hecho que lleva a discusiones y debates sobre la calidad del trabajo producido. Las condiciones éticas para la elaboración de artículos científicos, como la que implica la participación real de los autores en las producciones, han exigido el establecimiento de criterios precisos y claros. En este sentido, este estudio buscó identificar y analizar los criterios de autoría en las revistas Qualis Capes A1, A2 y B1 en el área de Educación, que tienen en su alcance la Educación en Ciencias o la Enseñanza de las Ciencias, para identificar la existencia de pautas a los posibles autores. De este estudio, el objetivo fue discutir los criterios de autoría para mejorar la calidad y la fiabilidad de las producciones científicas. Para esto, se seleccionaron 44 revistas para analizar información sobre los criterios de autoría. Se observó que el requisito de registro de ORCID para investigadores está presente en cuatro revistas; que las directrices sobre plagio están presentes en 11 revistas; que solo tres revistas requieren títulos específicos de los autores; y 18 revistas se refieren a los criterios de contribución de los autores en el trabajo científico. Estos datos indican que la mayoría de las revistas evaluadas presentan información insuficiente para los autores, mostrando poca preocupación con esta parte del proceso de producción del artículo. Con lo anterior, está claro que la investigación con revistas debe continuar desarrollándose, buscando los criterios establecidos por las revistas para garantizar la imparcialidad de la indicación de autoría, ya que contribuyen a la calidad, la ética y la difusión de la investigación por parte de las revistas.O meio científico é caracterizado por exigências de produtividade, fato que leva à discussões e debates acerca da qualidade dos trabalhos produzidos. As condições éticas de elaboração de artigos científicos, tal como a que envolve a real participação dos autores nas produções, têm demandado o estabelecimento de critérios precisos e claros. Nesse sentido, este estudo buscou identificar e analisar critérios de autoria em periódicos Qualis Capes A1, A2, e B1, da área de Ensino, que tenham em seu escopo a Educação em Ciências ou Ensino de Ciências, de forma a identificar a existência de orientações aos possíveis autores. A partir desse estudo, objetivou-se discutir critérios de autoria para melhoria da qualidade e da confiabilidade das produções científicas. Para isto, selecionou-se 44 periódicos para análise de informações acerca dos critérios de autoria. Observou-se que a exigência de cadastro no ORCID para os pesquisadores está presente em quatro periódicos; que as orientações acerca de plágio estão presentes em 11 periódicos; que apenas três periódicos exigem titulação específica dos autores; e que 18 periódicos fazem referência à critérios de contribuição dos autores nos trabalhos científicos. Esses dados indicam que a maior parte dos periódicos avaliados apresentam informações insuficientes aos autores, demonstrando pouca preocupação com essa parte do processo de produção de artigos. Com o exposto, percebe-se que pesquisas com periódicos devem continuar a serem desenvolvidas, buscando os critérios estabelecidos pelos periódicos para assegurar a lisura da indicação de autoria, já que esses contribuem com a qualidade, ética e divulgação das pesquisas pelos periódicos.Research, Society and Development2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/178010.33448/rsd-v9i1.1780Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 1; e125911780Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 1; e125911780Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 1; e1259117802525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780/1554Copyright (c) 2020 Fernanda Oliveira Lima, Luciana Borowski Pietricoski, Adriano Lopes Romero, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da Silva, Jéssica Engel do Nascimento, João Paulo Ganhor, Simone Domingues Garcia, Glessyan de Quadros Marques, Kamilla Zabotti, Greyze Palaoro, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de Deus, Marcia Borin da Cunhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Fernanda OliveiraRomero, Adriano LopesPietricoski, Luciana BorowskiSilva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues daMarques, Glessyan de QuadrosDeitos, Greyze Maria PalaoroNascimento, Jéssica Engel doGanhor, João PauloGarcia, Simone DominguesZabotti, KamillaDeus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo deCunha, Marcia Borin da2020-08-19T03:04:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1780Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:26:41.328639Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
La autoría como criterio para la producción de artículos: un análisis de revistas en el área enseñanza de las ciencias Qualis A1, A2 y B1
Autoria como critério para produção de artigos: uma análise dos periódicos da área de Ensino de Ciências Qualis A1, A2, e B1
title Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
spellingShingle Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
Lima, Fernanda Oliveira
Ética de la investigación
Educación en ciencias
Artículos científicos.
Ética em pesquisa
Educação em Ciências
Artigos científicos.
Research ethics
Science Education
Scientific articles.
title_short Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
title_full Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
title_fullStr Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
title_full_unstemmed Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
title_sort Authorship as a criterion for article production: an analysis of journals in the area of science education Qualis A1, A2, and B1
author Lima, Fernanda Oliveira
author_facet Lima, Fernanda Oliveira
Romero, Adriano Lopes
Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski
Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da
Marques, Glessyan de Quadros
Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro
Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do
Ganhor, João Paulo
Garcia, Simone Domingues
Zabotti, Kamilla
Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de
Cunha, Marcia Borin da
author_role author
author2 Romero, Adriano Lopes
Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski
Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da
Marques, Glessyan de Quadros
Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro
Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do
Ganhor, João Paulo
Garcia, Simone Domingues
Zabotti, Kamilla
Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de
Cunha, Marcia Borin da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Fernanda Oliveira
Romero, Adriano Lopes
Pietricoski, Luciana Borowski
Silva, Dorisvaldo Rodrigues da
Marques, Glessyan de Quadros
Deitos, Greyze Maria Palaoro
Nascimento, Jéssica Engel do
Ganhor, João Paulo
Garcia, Simone Domingues
Zabotti, Kamilla
Deus, Andréia Florêncio Eduardo de
Cunha, Marcia Borin da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ética de la investigación
Educación en ciencias
Artículos científicos.
Ética em pesquisa
Educação em Ciências
Artigos científicos.
Research ethics
Science Education
Scientific articles.
topic Ética de la investigación
Educación en ciencias
Artículos científicos.
Ética em pesquisa
Educação em Ciências
Artigos científicos.
Research ethics
Science Education
Scientific articles.
description The scientific environment is characterized by demands of productivity, fact that leads to discussions and debates about the quality of the produced works. The ethical conditions for the elaboration of scientific articles, such as that involving the real participation of the authors in the productions, have demanded the establishment of precise and clear criteria. In this sense, this study sought to identify and analyze authorship criteria in Qualis Capes A1, A2, and B1 journals in the area of Education, which have in their scope Science Education or Science Teaching, in order to identify the existence of guidelines to the possible authors. From this study, the objective was to discuss authorship criteria to improve the quality and reliability of scientific productions. For this, 44 journals were selected to analyze information about the authorship criteria. It was observed that the ORCID registration requirement for researchers is present in four journals; whereas guidelines on plagiarism are present in 11 journals; whereas only three journals require specific titling of the authors; and 18 journals refer to the authors' contribution criteria in scientific work. These data indicate that most of the journals evaluated present insufficient information to the authors, showing little concern with this part of the article production process. With the above, it is clear that research with journals should continue to be developed, seeking the criteria established by journals to ensure the fairness of the indication of authorship, as these contribute to the quality, ethics and dissemination of research by journals.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780
10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1780
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i1.1780
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1780/1554
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 1; e125911780
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 1; e125911780
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 1; e125911780
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052829313007616