Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18297 |
Resumo: | Objective: to ascertain the level of knowledge of the nursing team regarding the handling and control of cuff pressure in order to prevent complications. Methodology: This is a quantitative, empirical, analytical study. The study was developed in the ICUs of a public hospital of Urgency and Emergency, in the metropolitan area of Belém. Nursing professionals. Results and discussion: 30% of respondents answered the option that there is no ideal cuff pressure, but a minimum pressure that is sufficient to seal the trachea; 21.7% considered the ideal pressure to be less than 10 cmH2O; only 18.3% of professionals gave their opinion between 20 to 30 cmH2O and 15% declared they did not know. When addressing the maximum acceptable pressure to avoid causing injury, 20% of professionals defined the value of 10 cmH2O as the maximum limit; 20% said they did not know, and only 16.7% of professionals cited 30 cmH2O as the maximum limit. Conclusion: it was noticed that the respondents demonstrated insufficient knowledge in relation to the ideal pressures and the maximum acceptable pressure not to cause injury, as well as the repercussions. Becoming essential the implementation of permanent education related to the theme, as a way to train the professional for this procedure, collaborating actively in reducing the rates of recurrent complications and inadequate cuff pressure. |
id |
UNIFEI_a5c1479c87d2455ddde40a82c3c7759e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18297 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health careImportancia del control de la presión del manguito: Conocimiento del equipo de enfermería - prevención de infecciones relacionadas con el cuidado de la saludImportância do controle da pressão do Cuff: Conhecimento da equipe de enfermagem – prevenção a infecção relacionada à assistência à saúdeKnowledgeNursing teamCuff pressureIntensive care unit (ICU).Equipo de enfermeríaPresión del manguitoConocimientoUnidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI).ConhecimentoEquipe de EnfermagemPressão do CuffUnidade de terapia intensiva (UTI).Objective: to ascertain the level of knowledge of the nursing team regarding the handling and control of cuff pressure in order to prevent complications. Methodology: This is a quantitative, empirical, analytical study. The study was developed in the ICUs of a public hospital of Urgency and Emergency, in the metropolitan area of Belém. Nursing professionals. Results and discussion: 30% of respondents answered the option that there is no ideal cuff pressure, but a minimum pressure that is sufficient to seal the trachea; 21.7% considered the ideal pressure to be less than 10 cmH2O; only 18.3% of professionals gave their opinion between 20 to 30 cmH2O and 15% declared they did not know. When addressing the maximum acceptable pressure to avoid causing injury, 20% of professionals defined the value of 10 cmH2O as the maximum limit; 20% said they did not know, and only 16.7% of professionals cited 30 cmH2O as the maximum limit. Conclusion: it was noticed that the respondents demonstrated insufficient knowledge in relation to the ideal pressures and the maximum acceptable pressure not to cause injury, as well as the repercussions. Becoming essential the implementation of permanent education related to the theme, as a way to train the professional for this procedure, collaborating actively in reducing the rates of recurrent complications and inadequate cuff pressure.Objetivo: conocer el nivel de conocimiento del equipo de enfermería sobre el manejo y control de la presión del manguito para prevenir complicaciones. Metodología: Se trata de un estudio cuantitativo, empírico y analítico. El estudio se desarrolló en las UCI de un hospital público de Urgencias y Emergencias, en la región metropolitana de Belém. El universo de esta investigación abarcó a todos los profesionales del personal del equipo de enfermería de ese hospital, participaron en la investigación, un número de muestra de 60 profesionales de enfermería. Resultados y discusión: el 30% de los encuestados respondió la opción de que no hay una presión ideal del manguito, sino una presión mínima que es suficiente para sellar la tráquea; El 21,7% consideró que la presión ideal era inferior a 10 cmH2O; sólo el 18,3% de los profesionales opinó entre 20 y 30 cmH2O y el 15% declaró no saber. Al abordar la presión máxima aceptable para evitar causar lesiones, el 20% de los profesionales definió el valor de 10 cmH2O como límite máximo; El 20% dijo no saberlo, y sólo el 16,7% de los profesionales citó 30 cmH2O como límite máximo. Conclusión: se notó que los encuestados demostraron un conocimiento insuficiente en relación a las presiones ideales y la presión máxima aceptable para no causar lesiones, así como las repercusiones. Haciendo imprescindible la implementación de educación permanente relacionada con el tema, como una forma de capacitar al profesional para este procedimiento, colaborando activamente en la reducción de las tasas de complicaciones recurrentes y presión inadecuada del manguito.Objetivo: averiguar o nível de conhecimento da equipe de enfermagem quanto ao manejo e controle da pressão do cuff com vista à prevenção das complicações. Metodologia: Trata-se de um estudo de abordagem quantitativa, empírico analítico. O estudo foi desenvolvido nas UTI´s de um hospital público de Urgência e Emergência, na região metropolitana de Belém, O universo desta pesquisa abrangeu todos profissionais do quadro funcional da equipe de enfermagem do referido hospital, participaram da pesquisa, um número amostral de 60 profissionais de enfermagem. Resultados e discussão: 30% dos pesquisados responderam a opção que não existe pressão ideal do cuff e sim uma mínima pressão que seja suficiente para selar a traquéia; 21,7% consideraram como pressão ideal menor que 10 cmH2O; apenas 18,3% dos profissionais opinaram entre 20 a 30 cmH2O e 15% declararam não saber. Ao abordar sobre a pressão máxima aceitável para não se causar lesão, 20% dos profissionais definiram o valor de 10 cmH2O como limite máximo; 20% afirmaram não saber, e apenas 16,7% dos profissionais citaram 30 cmH2O como limite máximo. Conclusão: percebeu-se que os pesquisados demonstraram conhecimento insuficiente em relação às pressões ideais e a pressão máxima aceitável para não causar lesão, bem como, as repercussões. Tornando-se fundamental a implementação de educação permanente referente ao tema, como forma de capacitar o profissional para esse procedimento, colaborando de forma ativa com a redução dos índices de complicações recorrentes a inadequação da pressão do cuff.Research, Society and Development2021-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1829710.33448/rsd-v10i9.18297Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e47910918297Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e47910918297Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e479109182972525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18297/16376Copyright (c) 2021 Rosana Moreira da Silva; Bruna Renata Farias dos Santos; Kamille Giovanna Gomes Henriques; Natália de Araújo Costa Erdmann; Thaís Guimarães Albuquerque; Daniela Maria Nantes Boução; Elaine Regina Corrêa de Souzahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Rosana Moreira daSantos, Bruna Renata Farias dosErdmann, Natália de Araújo Costa Henriques, Kamille Giovanna Gomes Albuquerque, Thaís Guimarães Boução, Daniela Maria Nantes Souza, Elaine Regina Corrêa de 2021-09-12T14:28:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18297Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:28.144974Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care Importancia del control de la presión del manguito: Conocimiento del equipo de enfermería - prevención de infecciones relacionadas con el cuidado de la salud Importância do controle da pressão do Cuff: Conhecimento da equipe de enfermagem – prevenção a infecção relacionada à assistência à saúde |
title |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care |
spellingShingle |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care Silva, Rosana Moreira da Knowledge Nursing team Cuff pressure Intensive care unit (ICU). Equipo de enfermería Presión del manguito Conocimiento Unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Conhecimento Equipe de Enfermagem Pressão do Cuff Unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI). |
title_short |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care |
title_full |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care |
title_fullStr |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care |
title_sort |
Importance of Cuff pressure control: Knowledge of the nursing team - prevention of infection related to health care |
author |
Silva, Rosana Moreira da |
author_facet |
Silva, Rosana Moreira da Santos, Bruna Renata Farias dos Erdmann, Natália de Araújo Costa Henriques, Kamille Giovanna Gomes Albuquerque, Thaís Guimarães Boução, Daniela Maria Nantes Souza, Elaine Regina Corrêa de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Bruna Renata Farias dos Erdmann, Natália de Araújo Costa Henriques, Kamille Giovanna Gomes Albuquerque, Thaís Guimarães Boução, Daniela Maria Nantes Souza, Elaine Regina Corrêa de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Rosana Moreira da Santos, Bruna Renata Farias dos Erdmann, Natália de Araújo Costa Henriques, Kamille Giovanna Gomes Albuquerque, Thaís Guimarães Boução, Daniela Maria Nantes Souza, Elaine Regina Corrêa de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge Nursing team Cuff pressure Intensive care unit (ICU). Equipo de enfermería Presión del manguito Conocimiento Unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Conhecimento Equipe de Enfermagem Pressão do Cuff Unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI). |
topic |
Knowledge Nursing team Cuff pressure Intensive care unit (ICU). Equipo de enfermería Presión del manguito Conocimiento Unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Conhecimento Equipe de Enfermagem Pressão do Cuff Unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI). |
description |
Objective: to ascertain the level of knowledge of the nursing team regarding the handling and control of cuff pressure in order to prevent complications. Methodology: This is a quantitative, empirical, analytical study. The study was developed in the ICUs of a public hospital of Urgency and Emergency, in the metropolitan area of Belém. Nursing professionals. Results and discussion: 30% of respondents answered the option that there is no ideal cuff pressure, but a minimum pressure that is sufficient to seal the trachea; 21.7% considered the ideal pressure to be less than 10 cmH2O; only 18.3% of professionals gave their opinion between 20 to 30 cmH2O and 15% declared they did not know. When addressing the maximum acceptable pressure to avoid causing injury, 20% of professionals defined the value of 10 cmH2O as the maximum limit; 20% said they did not know, and only 16.7% of professionals cited 30 cmH2O as the maximum limit. Conclusion: it was noticed that the respondents demonstrated insufficient knowledge in relation to the ideal pressures and the maximum acceptable pressure not to cause injury, as well as the repercussions. Becoming essential the implementation of permanent education related to the theme, as a way to train the professional for this procedure, collaborating actively in reducing the rates of recurrent complications and inadequate cuff pressure. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18297 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18297 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18297 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18297 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18297/16376 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 9; e47910918297 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 9; e47910918297 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 9; e47910918297 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052641258242048 |